Topic: MasterCoin: New Protocol Layer Starting From “The Exodus Address” - page 115. (Read 448489 times)

Why would you even think that would happen?

why don't you answer me , will current "Mastercoins" aka MST get wiped out or are you planning a buyout of sorts?   thank you looks like you are keeping busy here

Looks great!
Only thing I would change is increase contrast between the background and the dark font – for readability's sake.

Nice design and taste, please just don't change that block background to some typical white neutral in future
Lovely, thank you!

That looks beautiful

A full  MasterCoin wallet will eventually have to support display of dozens and dozens of currencies (and smart properties). Most users may not care about Test MasterCoins right now, but handling both coins is a good way to start thinking about the UI needed for all those kinds of coins.

That looks pretty awesome

Nice! I'd like to see it with a white background and black font - reversed basically.

As I mentioned a few posts back I'm transitioning priority from web wallet to desktop wallet - could I solicit a little feedback on UI design?  What do you guys think?  I'm thinking of dropping test mastercoins from the overview as my feeling is most 'regular' users wouldn't be interested - thoughts?



Thanks

Just a quick suggestion btw - perception of good security for all these concepts and services will only help the Mastercoin project.

I would suggest that future contests also include bounties for things like PT & VA (penetration testing & vulnerability assessment), those so inclined can then review code looking for exploits etc and claim bounties for highlighting attack vectors (eg similar to D'aniel & Bytemaster).  

Working now   Sorry for troubling you.


1. Please consider integrating the exchange with these charting & trading front-ends: Multicharts, Ninjatrader and maybe Metatrader.

2. These two free charting services have reasonable chart quality for an average trader - you should hook your data to them: https://www.tradingview.com/e/?symbol=MTGOX:BTCUSD# http://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/mtgox/btcusd

3. Please consider selling / distributing the data feed to data distribution companies, e.g.: http://www.iqfeed.net/

4. Please consider availing the trading gateway (placing orders) through broker aggregating companies, e.g.: https://www.tradingtechnologies.com/

The video is working for me at that link. Is anybody else seeing errors at that URL?

No charts yet. That will undoubtedly come with implementations of the distributed exchange

The video is not working / no longer available / internal error - something like this. Can you repost this video on YT please?


Is there a chart service showing the value of this investment over time?

what about the other Mastercoin/MST camp?~did youes filed the name with copywrite office?=) tia!

I want to be very clear on this - the web wallet I'm building is proof of concept code to be open sourced for others to use should they wish in production implementations.  The idea is for testers to use a small amount of coin to evaluate things like security & functionality via Masterchest but no-one should be using it for any serious coin storage - that should be left for a production service.

I did mention further back that I wanted to limit each account to <100 MSC. <10 MSC would be even better however unfortunately once the web wallet gives out an address there is no real way to limit the coins sent to said address so any limit would have to be treated as more of a guideline than a restriction.

As such rather than try and discourage people from using the web wallet for any substantial coin storage I'm going to change tac slightly and build a simple desktop GUI wallet using the Masterchest transaction engine first. Choice is king and hopefully by having other easy options for coin storage (ie simple desktop client), users won't do something silly like deposit a large amount of coins in an untested unverified web wallet.

As to web wallet security there are a huge number of factors influencing design decisions and I'm not finished - there are some obvious security measures (back-end limits number and size of tranactions front-end is allowed to send etc) and some not so obvious ones.  

are you thinking of buying out our MST shares to smooth the transition moving up on eXchanges~good idea imo!;) easyyyyyy

David's reimbursement: http://blockchain.info/tx/3b837ee468d89a26e251023f6e844aa7778aa65fcc3a622773eb28ad501c3bc7

0.169 BTC change went to: 19qSCYuwAQEa34NasQjRyNPPMY4DrXfXNc

At some point I may consolidate our change addresses back to 1Exodus so all the money is easy to see in one place.

+1

Decentralized is better.  Our big central entities of money handling -- pools and web wallets -- all have a history of poor security.

Yeah it should work but it's very fragile at the moment. You can paste the error here but I rather do it over pm or irc (#mastercoin) so we don't pollute the topic. I'm already working on turning this into a 'real' wallet that should be less fragile.

I wanted to say one thing about web-wallets. Please don't host other peoples money; if you really want to build a web-wallet please make it at least client-side encoded so that no important data can be leaked. It would be very easy to build-in a web-wallet to mastercoin-explorer but I'm not doing this for a reason, it will get hacked. If not sooner, then later.

This is HUGE! I tried to create a new transaction, but got an error. Should "New Transaction" be working right now?

Hopefully the rest of you are working on parsing these transactions too! All our new features beyond simple send will use this method (until we find a better way such as if we decide to switch to OP_RETURN once it is fully supported by the network).

I expect the number of confirmations should be the same as bitcoin - no more, no less. This is because we are relying on bitcoin to solve the double-spending problem for us, and the purpose of waiting for confirmations is to avoid double-spending.


I am VERY pleased to see this. Note that Tachikoma hasn't decided to release the source code to MasterCoin explorer yet (just the library that runs behind it), and the contest only pays for projects that have source code released. Obviously Tachikoma will have a big payday for releasing that library, but an open-source MasterCoin explorer would win some money too. If he does release source code, you'll have to share.

I'm really excited that you are working on making this into a web wallet. That will be a huge boon to our project (and obviously will be worth some money too).


Everybody working on MasterCoin projects should either be looking closely at Tachikoma's source code for his library, or just using it


Nice! This will help a lot of other projects move forward faster.


I'll be soliciting feedback from the contest participants about how they would distribute the funds to the other participants if they weren't in the contest. I'll combine that feedback with my own, and take those numbers to the board, who may have their own feedback. Once the board is happy, we'll pay out.

We'll probably start another contest of some sort immediately after the current one. Possibly instead of having an end date for the next contest, we'll have an end-feature. Once the feature is fully implemented (web wallet, PC wallet, and library), we'd pay out to everyone who helped us get there. What do you guys think of that idea?