maybe pirate is just a front for banks/governments/people who would destroy btc? - page 3.

hashman

legendary

Activity: 1264

Merit: 1008

Quote from: paulie_w on August 24, 2012, 02:17:09 PM

also it isn't that complicated.

it's clear to me that if you wanted to destroy bitcoin, all you'd need to do is get ahold of a certain % of the coin which you could then write some smart trading algorithms against, with the assumption that your competition basically doesn't exist.

it's hardly implausible.

Ok so you can manipulate the price on an exchange.

Sorry I'm a bit slow today. Can you connect the dots for me, how do we get to the "destroy" bit?

sunnankar

legendary

Activity: 1031

Merit: 1000

Quote from: SysRun on August 24, 2012, 12:44:44 PM

An elephant with laser cannons may have caused the latest earthquake, but the evidence points toward plate tectonics.

Actually, according to Fmr. Gov. Ventura more evidence points at HAARP than either laser equipped elephants or plate tectonics, particularly when there are geo-political ramifications.

paulie_w

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

also it isn't that complicated.

it's clear to me that if you wanted to destroy bitcoin, all you'd need to do is get ahold of a certain % of the coin which you could then write some smart trading algorithms against, with the assumption that your competition basically doesn't exist.

it's hardly implausible.

Piper67

legendary

Activity: 1106

Merit: 1001

Quote from: SysRun on August 24, 2012, 12:44:44 PM

The more complicated a conspiracy theory, the less likely it is true.

An elephant with laser cannons may have caused the latest earthquake, but the evidence points toward plate tectonics.

Yeah, 'cause plate tectonics isn't complicated at all Grin

Generally speaking, Occam's razor applies, but only where there is no preponderance of evidence.

SysRun

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

Portland Bitcoin Group Organizer

The more complicated a conspiracy theory, the less likely it is true.

An elephant with laser cannons may have caused the latest earthquake, but the evidence points toward plate tectonics.

dust

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Herodes on August 24, 2012, 09:36:12 AM

Do we know 100% that Pirate did/do control 500K BTC ?

He claimed over 500k btc. Various estimates based on from the community put him at 350-500k. Both of these numbers are going on the assumption that he was not running a ponzi, in which case he would have significantly less real btc than the total value of his accounts on paper.

paulie_w

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Quote from: DeathAndTaxes on August 24, 2012, 09:32:20 AM

Quote from: paulie_w on August 24, 2012, 08:25:38 AM

is your question _really_ suggesting that this would not be possible?

the answer is by automating pump & dump where that entity retains control of the majority of the btc.

clearly, based on last week's activities, this would not be a difficult thing to achieve.

Sure you can do it at a cost. Take 500K BTC sell them all, then buy them back. Guess what you have less than 500K BTC. Keep doing that and eventually you have 0 BTC. Idiots lose money in scams all the time. It is simply a form of economic darwinism. Money moves to the strong. Those who do due diligence, require enforceable contracts, and build strong business relationships will accumulate the capital at the expense of those who don't.

Now what is different about Bitcoin is you have a some people who became incredibly wealthy in a short period of time. A lot of them will lose their coins and they will be transferred to stronger hands.

i really don't believe that this is the only way that manipulations can play out. sophisticated investors have been gaming the traditional currency markets for ages in order to get more of it into their hands, not always to the benefit of everyone else (usually to the contrary).

Gabi

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1008

If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat

Quote from: Etlase2 on August 24, 2012, 08:20:51 AM

Quote from: paulie_w on August 24, 2012, 08:12:12 AM

if someone controls, say, 2 million BTC, then the issue is that they can constantly mess with the exchange rate, create panics, etc.

and why would they be able to constantly mess with the exchange rate and create panics?

To destroy Bitcoin?

Banks can lose billions if bitcoin become widespread.

Herodes

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 1000

Do we know 100% that Pirate did/do control 500K BTC ?

DeathAndTaxes

donator

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1079

Gerald Davis

Quote from: paulie_w on August 24, 2012, 08:25:38 AM

is your question _really_ suggesting that this would not be possible?

the answer is by automating pump & dump where that entity retains control of the majority of the btc.

clearly, based on last week's activities, this would not be a difficult thing to achieve.

Sure you can do it at a cost. Take 500K BTC sell them all, then buy them back. Guess what you have less than 500K BTC. Keep doing that and eventually you have 0 BTC. Idiots lose money in scams all the time. It is simply a form of economic darwinism. Money moves to the strong. Those who do due diligence, require enforceable contracts, and build strong business relationships will accumulate the capital at the expense of those who don't.

Now what is different about Bitcoin is you have a some people who became incredibly wealthy in a short period of time. A lot of them will lose their coins and they will be transferred to stronger hands.

Etlase2

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

I was trying to oh-so-gently lead you back to "because there is a strictly limited supply", a flaw I consider fatal.

paulie_w

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

is your question _really_ suggesting that this would not be possible?

the answer is by automating pump & dump where that entity retains control of the majority of the btc.

clearly, based on last week's activities, this would not be a difficult thing to achieve.

Etlase2

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

Quote from: paulie_w on August 24, 2012, 08:12:12 AM

if someone controls, say, 2 million BTC, then the issue is that they can constantly mess with the exchange rate, create panics, etc.

and why would they be able to constantly mess with the exchange rate and create panics?

markm

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1090

Quote: "do not question the limited supply"

Oh yeah good point. Once "the man" owns all the bitcoins, except maybe for some trivial token number of them all the billions of peons will have to make do with, maybe the virtues of altcoins will start to occur to people. Hey "the man", wanna buy up all those too? Bargain prices! Wink

-MarkM-

paulie_w

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

no, this is not the same question, and I am not talking about deflation.

if someone controls, say, 2 million BTC, then the issue is that they can constantly mess with the exchange rate, create panics, etc.

they can even more or less _AUTOMATE_ this (ie, write a program to poison the market with fluctuations). this would _remove_ value from the economy because people would simply stop using it for anything.

Etlase2

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

the first rule of bitcoin: do not question the limited supply

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/deflation-and-bitcoin-the-last-word-on-this-forum-11627

paulie_w

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

i wrote this in another thread but i think it maybe deserves its own. sorry to anyone who disagrees.

lets consider for a moment. if people are so stupid as to give 500,000 btc to someone with absolutely no credibility, identification, etc then we may have no chance whatsoever of hanging onto this currency and building any kind of real value with it.

that's because: the exact same method could be used by governments, banks and other interests that do not want btc to be anything more than a funny hobby currency (if that), locking up huge amounts of capital and constantly fucking with the markets to make it basically unusable for commerce.

this seems pretty serious to me. in fact, we have no proof either way that "pirate" isn't actually that very thing.

this is one thing that makes me seriously question whether bitcoin can work. certainly i believe in cryptocurrency... but bitcoin designed in this way, coupled with the apparent stupidity of speculators who would give coin away so easily? they'll ruin it for all of us.

if anyone can tell me why i am technically wrong, i'd like to hear it.

Topic: maybe pirate is just a front for banks/governments/people who would destroy btc? - page 3. (Read 4884 times)