- fastestFee: 4 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 4 sat/vB
- hourFee: 3 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
Topic: Mempool Observer Topic - page 12. (Read 21622 times)
- fastestFee: 3 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 3 sat/vB
- hourFee: 3 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 9 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 8 sat/vB
- hourFee: 6 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 11 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 9 sat/vB
- hourFee: 7 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 4 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 4 sat/vB
- hourFee: 4 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 8 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 7 sat/vB
- hourFee: 6 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 10 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 8 sat/vB
- hourFee: 7 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 20 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 18 sat/vB
- hourFee: 15 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 8 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 7 sat/vB
- hourFee: 6 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 133 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 111 sat/vB
- hourFee: 76 sat/vB
- economyFee: 4 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 2 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 10 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 10 sat/vB
- hourFee: 10 sat/vB
- economyFee: 4 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 2 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 126 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 111 sat/vB
- hourFee: 89 sat/vB
- economyFee: 6 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 3 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 39 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 37 sat/vB
- hourFee: 33 sat/vB
- economyFee: 6 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 3 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 4 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 4 sat/vB
- hourFee: 4 sat/vB
- economyFee: 4 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 2 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 11 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 10 sat/vB
- hourFee: 9 sat/vB
- economyFee: 4 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 2 sat/vB
Observing mempool.space, I also don't really saw that many big consolidation transactions taking place.
Thus, I'm concluding that the activity rise this time is genuine Bitcoin transaction activity. It's not unlikely that it is related to the price increase in the last days. Retailers are returning slowly to get their share of Uptober, perhaps
?
Thus, I'm concluding that the activity rise this time is genuine Bitcoin transaction activity. It's not unlikely that it is related to the price increase in the last days. Retailers are returning slowly to get their share of Uptober, perhaps
?Well, I also asked myself the same question, the reason for this increase in fees. I didn't find a logical reason, so maybe it's just that, the simple increase in BTC transactions.
It's a good sign when fees rise for this reason. It is a sign that the market is really moving.
very healthy sign. It is looking better these days my friend
- fastestFee: 11 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 10 sat/vB
- hourFee: 8 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
Observing mempool.space, I also don't really saw that many big consolidation transactions taking place.
Thus, I'm concluding that the activity rise this time is genuine Bitcoin transaction activity. It's not unlikely that it is related to the price increase in the last days. Retailers are returning slowly to get their share of Uptober, perhaps ?
Thus, I'm concluding that the activity rise this time is genuine Bitcoin transaction activity. It's not unlikely that it is related to the price increase in the last days. Retailers are returning slowly to get their share of Uptober, perhaps
?Well, I also asked myself the same question, the reason for this increase in fees. I didn't find a logical reason, so maybe it's just that, the simple increase in BTC transactions.
It's a good sign when fees rise for this reason. It is a sign that the market is really moving.
- fastestFee: 7 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 6 sat/vB
- hourFee: 5 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
I wondered if the last transaction spike -- with the fee reaching >20 amd even >30 sat/vbyte during some times of the day -- was caused again by Ordinals, Runes or similar stuff. I recently also saw, by chance, a very big accelerated inscription (of several hundred kB).
But it seems not really. While the Runes activity has grown a bit in October compared to September, on the CryptoKoryo statistics site you can see that the combined share of fees paid by Runes is still lower than 10%, which hints that the space occupied by them is on a similar level. Share of transactions is around 15%.
Observing mempool.space, I also don't really saw that many big consolidation transactions taking place.
Thus, I'm concluding that the activity rise this time is genuine Bitcoin transaction activity. It's not unlikely that it is related to the price increase in the last days. Retailers are returning slowly to get their share of Uptober, perhaps ?
But it seems not really. While the Runes activity has grown a bit in October compared to September, on the CryptoKoryo statistics site you can see that the combined share of fees paid by Runes is still lower than 10%, which hints that the space occupied by them is on a similar level. Share of transactions is around 15%.
Observing mempool.space, I also don't really saw that many big consolidation transactions taking place.
Thus, I'm concluding that the activity rise this time is genuine Bitcoin transaction activity. It's not unlikely that it is related to the price increase in the last days. Retailers are returning slowly to get their share of Uptober, perhaps
? Jump to: