Hey Mem.
bitZino.com recently added a new crap: craps. It has the same slick HTML5 interface as their roulette game, and better than usual odds.
Topic: ★★★ MEMs LIST of GAMBLING SITES ★★★ - page 45. (Read 135041 times)
Hi Mem, would you mind updating our listing.
I have gone ahead and done the hard work for you
I have gone ahead and done the hard work for you
| CASINO: | |||||||
| Site - | Key - | Min Cash In - | Min Cash Out - | Games - | Min Bet - | Max Bet - | Comments - |
| SatoshiRoulette |   | ฿0.005 | ฿0.00000001 | Roulette Dice SicBo CoinFlip LoveTester Scratch n Win Charities | ฿0.010 ฿0.010 ฿0.050 ฿0.050 ฿0.050 ฿0.005 ฿0.050 | ฿2.000 ฿1.000 ฿1.000 ฿1.000 ฿1.000 ฿1.000 ฿0.500 | Admin is a forum member. Instant payouts. Litecoin Support. Many games. Progressive jackpots. . . . . |
http://bittleships.in/ is redirecting elsewhere, hasn't shown the bittleships game for at least a few weeks now.
Striking out, thanks for letting me know.
Thanks for the list, mem.
No problems
Hi mem, we have added another game: Clone Dice.
It is a game inspired by fireducks satoshidice but with several adjustments.
Progressive Jackpots
Numbers are 1-100 not 0-65535 (easier for the user to calculate).
A cool retro 1995 styled web page
It is a game inspired by fireducks satoshidice but with several adjustments.
Progressive Jackpots
Numbers are 1-100 not 0-65535 (easier for the user to calculate).
A cool retro 1995 styled web page
I have noticed, Maybe you have done work since I last checked but your clone dice website is much nicer on the eyes than the other 2, though SD will be launching a new page soon as well I understand. Good to see you responded to criticism well.
edit: formatted list some more, it was getting to big to just have 1 table.
http://bittleships.in/ is redirecting elsewhere, hasn't shown the bittleships game for at least a few weeks now.
Thanks for the list, mem.
Hi mem, we have added another game: Clone Dice.
It is a game inspired by fireducks satoshidice but with several adjustments.
Progressive Jackpots
Numbers are 1-100 not 0-65535 (easier for the user to calculate).
A cool retro 1995 styled web page
It is a game inspired by fireducks satoshidice but with several adjustments.
Progressive Jackpots
Numbers are 1-100 not 0-65535 (easier for the user to calculate).
A cool retro 1995 styled web page
Not relevant to BTCDice. I explain this to you quite clear. You are slandering me and my site for no reason.
the reasons have been explained to you repeatedly and quite clearly by myself and several other forum members.
I wont waste further energy on this, but please consider the following.
You achieve only 2 things advertising your payout multiplier in the fashion you do.
- Decieving new players who have not read the 'fine print' on your site.
- Poor first impression with all clients when they wonder why their 50% payout was not actually 50%.
Good luck and I hope you find enlightenment elsewhere as I cannot give it to you.
Great news. It's the market at work
Happy to announce that btc dice multipliers are now displayed in a fashion that gamblers are used to.
BTCDice issue resolved, I have noted this in its current listing and will bump it back into the main listing shortly (late night for me )
Id also like to welcome another site to the list: https://dvc-lotto.com/ , site admin is a forum member https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kumala-41776
I shall create a pending listing for this new game shortly, will fire off a few bets/entries tonight for a test.
BTCDice issue resolved, I have noted this in its current listing and will bump it back into the main listing shortly (late night for me
)Id also like to welcome another site to the list: https://dvc-lotto.com/ , site admin is a forum member
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kumala-41776I shall create a pending listing for this new game shortly, will fire off a few bets/entries tonight for a test.
Not relevant to BTCDice. I explain this to you quite clear. You are slandering me and my site for no reason.
the reasons have been explained to you repeatedly and quite clearly by myself and several other forum members.
I wont waste further energy on this, but please consider the following.
You achieve only 2 things advertising your payout multiplier in the fashion you do.
- Decieving new players who have not read the 'fine print' on your site.
- Poor first impression with all clients when they wonder why their 50% payout was not actually 50%.
Good luck and I hope you find enlightenment elsewhere as I cannot give it to you.
Not relevant to BTCDice. I explain this to you quite clear. You are slandering me and my site for no reason.
BTCDice now marked as a scam.
If you're going to define SCAM as "No payouts and the admins do not respond to contact attempts" then the label of scam is inaccurate in this case. They do pay, they just don't pay what most reasonable users would expect them to pay after reading their front page.
Dont read to much into it, a scam is a scam is a scam.
Description updated for clarity though.
BTCDice now marked as a scam.
If you're going to define SCAM as "No payouts and the admins do not respond to contact attempts" then the label of scam is inaccurate in this case. They do pay, they just don't pay what most reasonable users would expect them to pay after reading their front page.
BTCDice now marked as a scam.
Id appreciate some feedback on either listing as scam or permanently shelving the game in unattended until the matter is resolved..
Well, it's certainly not unattended. They're deliberately quoting the payouts like that, and actively defending the decision. I think it's better not to remove any service from the list, since that may lead new players to think you just didn't review the service yet. I'd say leave it on the list and mark it according to what you think of their service.
Yeah, I agree. Definitely don't remove them from the list. I would mark them as a scam with a note as to why. It would be even better if there was a way to mark a game as "intentionally deceptive", but scam is close enough for me. If they don't like it, they can change their payout claims.
Id appreciate some feedback on either listing as scam or permanently shelving the game in unattended until the matter is resolved..
Well, it's certainly not unattended. They're deliberately quoting the payouts like that, and actively defending the decision. I think it's better not to remove any service from the list, since that may lead new players to think you just didn't review the service yet. I'd say leave it on the list and mark it according to what you think of their service.
Yeah, I've also noticed the BTCDice payouts being lower than described.
I notice you list btcdice as "exact clone of satshidice". That's not really true. btcdice seems to be deliberately deceptive in the payouts they quote. For example they say they payout "2x" for the "lessthan 32768" (50/50) bet. Obviously nobody can afford to pay 2x on a 50/50 bet, or they'd never win any money. It turns out they take off the house edge *after* working out the 2x. This is in contrast to pretty much every other site out there. It's standard practice to quote the actual multiplier the player gets.
Various people have tried to point this out to btcdice, but they refuse to quote their real payouts.
Read from this post to the end of the page for details.
I guess you should at least mark their listing as "misleading payout multipliers" if not some stronger words.
Various people have tried to point this out to btcdice, but they refuse to quote their real payouts.
Read from this post to the end of the page for details.
I guess you should at least mark their listing as "misleading payout multipliers" if not some stronger words.
I saw that and hoped that it would rectify itself..... I guess not.
Frankly Id prefer to list it as a scam rather than give it a note or simply remove it from the list entirely since it does mislead players.
Misleading players removes you from my list, striking out now.
Id appreciate some feedback on either listing as scam or permanently shelving the game in unattended until the matter is resolved..
I notice you list btcdice as "exact clone of satshidice". That's not really true. btcdice seems to be deliberately deceptive in the payouts they quote. For example they say they payout "2x" for the "lessthan 32768" (50/50) bet. Obviously nobody can afford to pay 2x on a 50/50 bet, or they'd never win any money. It turns out they take off the house edge *after* working out the 2x. This is in contrast to pretty much every other site out there. It's standard practice to quote the actual multiplier the player gets.
Various people have tried to point this out to btcdice, but they refuse to quote their real payouts.
Read from this post to the end of the page for details.
I guess you should at least mark their listing as "misleading payout multipliers" if not some stronger words.
Various people have tried to point this out to btcdice, but they refuse to quote their real payouts.
Read from this post to the end of the page for details.
I guess you should at least mark their listing as "misleading payout multipliers" if not some stronger words.
tied up list, shifted known scams / offlines/ etc to their correct place.
Formatted some entries, corrected max bet for satoshiroulette and listed the new games.
Formatted some entries, corrected max bet for satoshiroulette and listed the new games.
Jump to: