I was also surprised by such a generous distribution of merit. And, of course, I was wondering who got them. In my observation, someone who had alternative accounts was able to take advantage of this. I don't really believe in coincidence, but two alternative accounts took advantage of this.
Another point is interesting. Looking at the history of the distribution of merits to the OP, I realized that for some reason he kept them and did not give them out earlier. And then the day came, which was called the “action of generosity.”
I can't believe the Merit Holder hasn't found a single worthy post before. Therefore, I would like to wish everyone who keeps their merits, that in the future there will be no such incidents, and the merits were distributed really for their intended purpose to those who are trying to create useful content for the forum.
I will answer shortly to this, they do that because they see that giveaway topics get merited, simple as that. Not saying that this was only factor that lead to this, but it is one of the factors for sure and it is becoming a trend it seems.There are not many people that start a giveaway while they are only member rank. I certainly was not one of them and will never be, unless I become a merit source one day or if someone dumps 250 merits on me suddenly so I don't have a way to spend them naturally as I go, which is not likely.
As long as it's for an actual post (and not e.g. "you get a merit if your username starts with an 'm'") and the post isn't blatantly useless (not like e.g. "good project") then I think it's a waste of time to police it. I mean you can point it out to the person doing it, and in this case it worked, but generally speaking merits are not moderated and I've seen too many cases where this kind of thing resulted in red trust when it shouldn't. A certain number of merits will always be sent to users who seemingly don't deserve it. It just doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things. Sometimes plagiarizers get one. Or scammers. Or people who spell "idea" with an "r". Shit happens.
That's not to say we should knowingly send merits to people who are perhaps attempting to farm accounts etc. But I also don't think we have to come to some sort of universal consensus as what's acceptable as a criteria for "good post" or what kind of rules giveaways should have etc. Sounds like an unenforceable drama-inducing setup.
I agree with you, there are already rules for merits and there is no need to start making more additional rules especially if ti will be hard to enforce it and if people would have to police it even more. It would create more problems then few giveaways over few merits.
I don't say I consider those giveaways as something productive, especially if the person that is giving the merits away, gives them almost randomly for low effort posts, to alts or something similar, but sometimes there are some giveaways that turn out just fine.
Also if people stop giving merits to that kind of low effort giveaway treads, I'm pretty sure we would see much less of those popping up.
I saw your thread and I agree with you, your giveaway is a good example of a good merit giveaway. Makes people learn something that is useful and could push them to learn on from there.
What I wanted to add too is that some threads that reward good posts with merits are very useful like one @LoyceV has made and some others. Some posts do get neglected or overlooked, some boards have few merit sources with low merit allocations and can't give enough merits to certain posts or can't give merit at all sometimes as they simply don't have enough. In those type of situations merit threads like the one I mention can be used to help other members. I regularly use those threads to direct merit to posts that were overlooked or merit sources were out of merit on those boards.