Code:
Address: 18Xw4rG8CMnzsQENCxuufCPpy13R33z9nL
Message: I am centralcurrency. It is 12/19/2020 and i can sign a message.
Signature: IJmiIDkSYojeKV6t1jFvxGfsyaufcausnX9u2pJQUZhWfEVT7oN2WASm6P6JyFaE15/sBWfJVyXJ+2dcjvmyY1s=
Topic: [Merit] Hey Newbies! Can You Sign A Message? - page 18. (Read 8498 times)
Code:
I am GbitG from Bitcointalk.org is posting this message today 19th December 2020
bc1qxqqzch3yfm8h6hvfk9v203h0efyg20enqkatqd
IJuf6ri35jlIlX7mA5aXgsEEw3HzZGzVtic20pJAfVUJNHnwZhR4IVH02DSEn2P9fwHUEAOdLoMfhFk23MZ8WDM=
Quote
If anyone wanted to help point out posted signatures like this that can't be verified, I would be appreciative.
I can do this for you from today will give reply in case wrong sign otherwise good to go. 
I checked I think it's done
Code:
Address: 19wQEQ3rA2mFsqQXLH9JAA7VTpJu84n8s5
Message: I am BDBitcoinExpart. It is 12/19/2020 and I can sign a message.
Signature: IJkIt2Jo3od0kLXZKSQ/W6exgoXSXPVaefVhP0ZHuFpPDypwN57ExwMP96sqUn4+oOXnI6RkPO6qdMzOi+Tcs2M=
I appreciate your participation, but you have already proved you could sign a message on my last thread.
My First attempt and I think it’s my first success.
Address: 178KWG43d8XJMV2ibsN2EfN4jbLJEmcHNY
Message: I am BDBitcoinExpart, I created a new sign message.
Signature: H6K45P5JPSoTl880XCiBbvLBU54RUFz8eHKzTIJh4DgOSUVADcnxAmrQfds3UUNjeANgUuy1e1fS1iy th8Lj5Fs=
Address: 178KWG43d8XJMV2ibsN2EfN4jbLJEmcHNY
Message: I am BDBitcoinExpart, I created a new sign message.
Signature: H6K45P5JPSoTl880XCiBbvLBU54RUFz8eHKzTIJh4DgOSUVADcnxAmrQfds3UUNjeANgUuy1e1fS1iy th8Lj5Fs=
I checked I think it's done
Code:
Address: 19wQEQ3rA2mFsqQXLH9JAA7VTpJu84n8s5
Message: I am BDBitcoinExpart. It is 12/19/2020 and I can sign a message.
Signature: IJkIt2Jo3od0kLXZKSQ/W6exgoXSXPVaefVhP0ZHuFpPDypwN57ExwMP96sqUn4+oOXnI6RkPO6qdMzOi+Tcs2M=
Code:
Address: 1B1aoEYwJecEA6tMp94QuZj13ozqSeTqbB
Message: This is cryptomint9 from bitcointalk.org. Today is 3-12-2020. Always be happy..
Signature: HKBfzjgXHr/hledbBvgUhJg6WJw3pY5ShpeCN+yKPThXZwZwD0TKWX/VCedLoNqUR0+H/diQGOGVesPZgIHOaBg=
This signature couldn't be verified so I could not give you any merit. You also have the ability to "verify" these signatures on your end using the same software you used to sign it. Please check to make sure your signature can be verified before posting it here to avoid having to wait to hear from someone that it can't be verified to try again.
If anyone wanted to help point out posted signatures like this that can't be verified, I would be appreciative.
Code:
Address: 1B1aoEYwJecEA6tMp94QuZj13ozqSeTqbB
Message: This is cryptomint9 from bitcointalk.org. Today is 3-12-2020. Always be happy..
Signature: HKBfzjgXHr/hledbBvgUhJg6WJw3pY5ShpeCN+yKPThXZwZwD0TKWX/VCedLoNqUR0+H/diQGOGVesPZgIHOaBg=
If I can make a small suggestion to improve the *cough* quality of those applying for merits from you?
My suggestion is that you limit the applicants to newbies who registered on the Forum PRE 2020-09-11, 17:04:23 (11th of September, 2020) registration, (the creation date of your first such thread) that way you aren't gifting users of questionable values who have gone out and created a string of new accounts just to make multiple claims of merits.
My suggestion is that you limit the applicants to newbies who registered on the Forum PRE 2020-09-11, 17:04:23 (11th of September, 2020) registration, (the creation date of your first such thread) that way you aren't gifting users of questionable values who have gone out and created a string of new accounts just to make multiple claims of merits.
Hey Newbies (& Jr Members)! I want to give you the opportunity to earn some merit by using your Bitcoin client (or whatever you use). There is a great guide linked below showing you how to sign a message. If you can sign a message from your Bitcoin address with your bitcointalk username, post it here and I will send you merit. Enjoy!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/how-to-sign-a-message-990345
Example:
Indeed. That is what this community does and isn't limited to merit. If what you say is happening in this thread is true, then it is a very good example of how this forum is allowing scammers to make multiple accounts to abuse the system for their own benefit at the cost of generous members offering their time and resources to help others. If you think people are willing to go far to earn a merit, imagine the kind of nonsense occurring to get multiple accounts into the DT network to inflate their trust ratings and punish those who stand up against them.
I didn't make this thread to cast assumptions about users or try to catch them making alt accounts. I'm not foolish enough to think that's possible with the tools I have access to. Certainly the alt account issue is something this forum's administration should be taking care of, especially given the way the trust network is setup and it's perceived importance among it's lower tier members. I hope that if this is the turn this thread is taking, maybe it can show just how bad of a problem alt account abuse is, and why this decentralized forum policing system was doomed before it was launched as the alt account abuse problem wasn't taken care of and instead the abusers were empowered with the new system. I also wonder why the infamous forum police around here are not tagging these members if they are abusing alt accounts to earn merit, as they certainly tag many users for less. There are many here that claim their ability to tag abusers with negative trust is their contribution to the Bitcoin community, yet when I look at the accounts I supposedly shouldn't be giving merit to because they're abusers, I see no negative trust.
Original Thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/merit-hey-newbies-can-you-sign-a-message-5275043
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/how-to-sign-a-message-990345
Example:
I believe your good nature in this undertaking has been abused right from the start:
Indeed. That is what this community does and isn't limited to merit. If what you say is happening in this thread is true, then it is a very good example of how this forum is allowing scammers to make multiple accounts to abuse the system for their own benefit at the cost of generous members offering their time and resources to help others. If you think people are willing to go far to earn a merit, imagine the kind of nonsense occurring to get multiple accounts into the DT network to inflate their trust ratings and punish those who stand up against them.
I didn't make this thread to cast assumptions about users or try to catch them making alt accounts. I'm not foolish enough to think that's possible with the tools I have access to. Certainly the alt account issue is something this forum's administration should be taking care of, especially given the way the trust network is setup and it's perceived importance among it's lower tier members. I hope that if this is the turn this thread is taking, maybe it can show just how bad of a problem alt account abuse is, and why this decentralized forum policing system was doomed before it was launched as the alt account abuse problem wasn't taken care of and instead the abusers were empowered with the new system. I also wonder why the infamous forum police around here are not tagging these members if they are abusing alt accounts to earn merit, as they certainly tag many users for less. There are many here that claim their ability to tag abusers with negative trust is their contribution to the Bitcoin community, yet when I look at the accounts I supposedly shouldn't be giving merit to because they're abusers, I see no negative trust.
Original Thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/merit-hey-newbies-can-you-sign-a-message-5275043
Jump to: