Topic: MERIT POINT-> Good Bye Spammer! (Semua Penjelasannya Ada Disini)! - page 17. (Read 5625 times)

Makasih bang sangat membantu, tadi nya saya kaga paham maksud nya, setelah baca jadi paham, tapi saya mau nanya nih bang, misalkan aktiviti nya 120 tapi merit nya dah 250 apakah bisa ke sr member langsung?

kalo punya merit ya sayang buat dibagiin ke orang lain. manfaatnya apa buat yg ngasih? malah ngurangin merit   cmiiw

Gan sebelumnya mau nanya, akun kita baru bisa naik ke rank selanjutnya jika merit point sudah memenuhi syarat bukan ? Terus seandainya kita ingin memberikan merit point saya karena postingan seseorang cukup bermanfaat apakah merit point saya akan berkurang atau tidak ?

ane mau nanya gan.. jadi ini naik rank bergantung ke merit nya juga ?
misalkan akun ane udah 120 activity tapi merit masih 10 apakah bisa naik jadi Full Member ?
sudah paham masalah apa itu merit sama tujuannya cuma untuk masalah naik rank dg merit blum tau keterkaitannya

Kalo menurut info yang saya baca, setiap 30 hari kita akan dikasih sMerit, jadi kalo sMerit kita untuk bulan ini sudah habis jangan khawatir kita akan dikasih lagi bulan depan tapi kalo sMerit kita bulan ini ga dipakai, sMerit akan hangus dan diganti dengan sMerit yang baru dan kita akan mendapat sMerit sesuai dengan rank kita setiap 30 hari

penerapan sistem merit dari theymos memang efektif guna menghindari para spammer bounty yang asal post demi mengejarkan postingan tanpa memerhatikan kualitas post, ini juga menjadi acuan untuk meningkatkan kualitas post yang berkualitas jadi kita tidak bergantung pada jumlah tiap 2 minggu sekali untuk mendapatkan aktivity.

terimakasih gan infonya saya juga sempat bertanya2 ada tambahan merit dibawah activity,,
cara memberi point merit ke orang lain  bagaimana gan ?

wah bakal susah kayanya buat naik level nih   , jadi kita di tuntut buat content posting kita dengan kualitas yang baik yah, tentu ini jadi tantangan yang berat sih buat para member yang tidak pandai membuat content. apa dari reply juga bisa menabah Merit Point ya ??

Jr Members can no longer have signature links.

A couple of ideas that have been floating around in my head:

1. To attain ranks above Member, you'd have to earn some number of merit points. Merit points would be awarded in a monthly vote on best posts of the previous month, with various measures (TBD) to prevent gaming of the vote. Winning merit points might also come with a BTC prize.

In addition to activity, everyone now has a merit score, and you need both a certain activity level and a certain merit score in order to reach higher member ranks. The required scores are:

Rank	Required activity	Required merit
Brand new	0	0
Newbie	1	0
Jr Member	30	0
Member	60	10
Full Member	120	100
Sr. Member	240	250
Hero Member	480	500
Legendary	Random in the range 775-1030	1000

You get merit points when someone sends you some for one of your posts. Additionally, when someone sends you merit points, half of those points can be sent by you to other people.

Certain users are designated as "merit sources". They can create new merit out of nothing, up to a limited number per month (which differs per source). I will not be posting a definitive list of merit sources (so that people don't bug them too much), though you'll soon figure out who they are if you pay attention.

There is currently no such thing as a "demerit". I'm hoping that the positive merits alone will be fine. I could add demerits pretty easily later on if necessary, though.

I'm hoping that this system will increase post quality by:
 - Forcing people to post high-quality stuff in order to rank up. If you just post garbage, you will never get even 1 merit point, and you will therefore never be able to put links in your signature, etc.
 - Highlighting good posts with the "Merited by" line.

While we will not be directly moderating this, I encourage people to give merit to posts that are objectively high-quality, not just posts that you agree with.

The forum ranking system is a bit complicated now... It'd be nice if someone made an infographic explaining activity and merit.

If you want to be a merit source:

Collect TEN posts that have not received nearly enough merit for how good they are, and post quotes for them all in a new Meta thread.

Trivia:

For current members, your initial merit score is equal to the minimum required to your rank. Of that, a certain amount (less than the usual half) is spendable. The spendable amount was calculated based on your current rank and the number of activity points you earned in the last year. A Legendary member who hasn't posted in the last year would still be Legendary, but would not have any spendable merit.

If someone sends you 1 merit, the 0.5 sMerit is not wasted; it is just not shown until you get another merit point.

Jr Members can no longer have signature links.

A couple of ideas that have been floating around in my head:

1. To attain ranks above Member, you'd have to earn some number of merit points. Merit points would be awarded in a monthly vote on best posts of the previous month, with various measures (TBD) to prevent gaming of the vote. Winning merit points might also come with a BTC prize.

In addition to activity, everyone now has a merit score, and you need both a certain activity level and a certain merit score in order to reach higher member ranks. The required scores are:

Rank	Required activity	Required merit
Brand new	0	0
Newbie	1	0
Jr Member	30	0
Member	60	10
Full Member	120	100
Sr. Member	240	250
Hero Member	480	500
Legendary	Random in the range 775-1030	1000

You get merit points when someone sends you some for one of your posts. Additionally, when someone sends you merit points, half of those points can be sent by you to other people.

Certain users are designated as "merit sources". They can create new merit out of nothing, up to a limited number per month (which differs per source). I will not be posting a definitive list of merit sources (so that people don't bug them too much), though you'll soon figure out who they are if you pay attention.

There is currently no such thing as a "demerit". I'm hoping that the positive merits alone will be fine. I could add demerits pretty easily later on if necessary, though.

I'm hoping that this system will increase post quality by:
 - Forcing people to post high-quality stuff in order to rank up. If you just post garbage, you will never get even 1 merit point, and you will therefore never be able to put links in your signature, etc.
 - Highlighting good posts with the "Merited by" line.

While we will not be directly moderating this, I encourage people to give merit to posts that are objectively high-quality, not just posts that you agree with.

The forum ranking system is a bit complicated now... It'd be nice if someone made an infographic explaining activity and merit.

If you want to be a merit source:

Collect TEN posts that have not received nearly enough merit for how good they are, and post quotes for them all in a new Meta thread.

Trivia:

For current members, your initial merit score is equal to the minimum required to your rank. Of that, a certain amount (less than the usual half) is spendable. The spendable amount was calculated based on your current rank and the number of activity points you earned in the last year. A Legendary member who hasn't posted in the last year would still be Legendary, but would not have any spendable merit.

If someone sends you 1 merit, the 0.5 sMerit is not wasted; it is just not shown until you get another merit point.