I'd say give us Members the chance to rank up easier by lowering the merits required because there's no way I'm getting to 100 unless I come up with something like "Theory of Relativity Vol. 2"
LOL, if you'll think that way then, most probably, you'll end up crazy striving to gain merit
I gained several merits just for this post:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.29334664It's too easy for quality posters. 25 will be a challenge.
This would mean you'd drop down your rank to jr member again. Do you really want that?
It doesn't bother me at all, TBH. I am aware of that my proposal could affect me. But ranks are just ranks it's not big deal for me
It's curious how all the hero members want the requirements for sr. members and below to be increased, all the sr. members want the merit requirements for Full Member and below to be increased, etc. If the merit requirements are increased from 10 to 25, it will not stop merit farming, nor will it really even slow it down as 25 merits is really not a hard number to obtain. The major issue isn't the fact that so many people are ranking up to member, it's that people are filling up bounty and signature campaigns with alternate accounts.
I would recommend a more reasonable solution, remove the merit requirements altogether, and only upgrade members who are within a certain percentile of merit received per month. E.g. Only the top 5% of high quality users are eligible to rank up. There should be a leaderboard so that we can check who is currently in the lead, and that way if people are boosting their way to the top they will also be under increased scrutiny. I genuinely think this system will stop the abuse issues, and will result in more high quality members in the upper member levels. You will never stop the Jr. and Newbie members from potentially being low quality, but you can at least stop them benefiting from their spam posting.
I look forward to seeing any responses to my proposal.
Your proposal is good but you're just making the system complex. The proposal is unfair to those people who post with quality but are often AWOL. If the ranking up depends on how much merit you gained within a specific span of time then your effort helping others before and after that frame will be disregarded. As I've said, it is unfair.
Bro you don't feel our pain!!! how hard is to get even 1merit look at mine, and your saying increase it to 15 more
If ranking up is a big deal to you and you are having a hard time doing so then you can always leave. The forum is not in need of spammers so, please, give this forum a favor.
I think 10 Merit is a difficult for newbie and Jr. Member because they are new to crypto. So, they don't have enough knowledge and experience to generate a quality post to be given merits by another people.
In my opinion, 10 merits is enough to become Member. If you increase it to 25 Merits, you would change the requirement for all ranks and I think I will never ranked up to Full Members
)))
Remember that merit system is used to respect. However, high requirement will stimulate buy/sell merit and I think theymos don't like this
If 10 Merit is difficult then the problem is in you. If you don't have enough knowledge then go out there and read, gain more knowledge and see Merits flowing in.
Based from your post history, you might never
Merit is not a sign of respect, it is just a mere pointing system based from the readers point of view.