Pages:
Author

Topic: Merit source application by Daniel91 - page 2. (Read 1267 times)

member
Activity: 322
Merit: 36
November 04, 2018, 01:51:45 PM
#32
Daniel91 definitely deserves to become a Merit source. In the past few months he has proven that he cares about the local community. Yes, he had some issues with iluvbitcoins in the past, but if we start digging in everyone's past, it would be very hard to find anyone without issues.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
November 04, 2018, 06:38:12 AM
#31
I just removed negative trust from iluvbitcoins and gave him positive trust.
I don't have desire any more to continue conflict with iluvbitcoins.
I wish him all the best in his life and business.
I'm sorry that our common business project in the past failed but it's time to leave past behind and move on with life.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
November 03, 2018, 01:18:41 PM
#30
With his topic "Merits for quality posts" in the Croatian subforum Daniel has already been an unofficial merit source to the local community for months. He deserves a chance to be an official merit source as well.
His topic has and is still helping members who post quality posts to get some merits that otherwise they wouldn't get. Especially the lower ranks get the needed incentives when they see members like Daniel around because they know they have an unselfish person who is close and ready to award those that deserve to be awarded and doesn't expect anything in return.

Regarding the issue with iluvbitcoins. I am sorry things went down the way they did. I certainly dont have the right to meddle since it is a personal issue with the two of you. I do hope though that you can get together and find a gentleman's agreement and resolve the conflict in a peaceful way with a few beers and tequila shots. Good luck to the both of you and I hope Daniel becomes an Official Merit Source.

Thank you very much for your kind words.
I just felt that this new members need help and support and I did it, in the best way I could.
If I become merit source, I will continue to help and support them by rewarding quality posts on this forum.
Regarding issue with iluvbitcoins I don't hate him or want to harm him.
He helped me a lot in the past and I'm grateful for everything.
I had to explain my position here and I'm sorry that he feel dissatisfied.
It was tragic business story for all of us. We all lost a lot money and time in our former business.
It's nothing we can do it about it now or change it.
It's nature of any business.
Some businesses prosper and some don't.
I already said in this topic that I forgive iluvbitcoins, that I don't ask any refund from him and I believe that soon or later we will meet somewhere and laugh about this story one day. 

legendary
Activity: 2730
Merit: 7065
November 03, 2018, 01:05:11 PM
#29
With his topic "Merits for quality posts" in the Croatian subforum Daniel has already been an unofficial merit source to the local community for months. He deserves a chance to be an official merit source as well.
His topic has and is still helping members who post quality posts to get some merits that otherwise they wouldn't get. Especially the lower ranks get the needed incentives when they see members like Daniel around because they know they have an unselfish person who is close and ready to award those that deserve to be awarded and doesn't expect anything in return.

Regarding the issue with iluvbitcoins. I am sorry things went down the way they did. I certainly dont have the right to meddle since it is a personal issue with the two of you. I do hope though that you can get together and find a gentleman's agreement and resolve the conflict in a peaceful way with a few beers and tequila shots. Good luck to the both of you and I hope Daniel becomes an Official Merit Source.
member
Activity: 392
Merit: 54
November 03, 2018, 11:51:56 AM
#28
Daniel91 has been a shining example of a quality member of this forum. I have a good knowledge of English, but prefer my local forum as many posts are of high quality and valuable advice. I think that Daniel91 is one of the reasons why the quality of the local board is increasing and with his help he has made it an undoubtedly better place. If anyone should be a merit source, it is him.
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1150
Freedom&Honor
November 03, 2018, 11:08:54 AM
#27
According to the law, all property belongs to the company, not individuals.

How come you used company #1 script in company #2 then?

I suggest you to control your emotions and to ask legal advice from the lawyers and company house office.
We did everything (all legal decisions) according to the legal advice received in the UK.
I send you info that we started company dissolution process.
You had 3 months to file an official complaint to the Company house and stop company dissolution but you didn't send any complain.
It's all I can say here.
I don't think that others are interesting in discussion about laws in UK for ltd companies, so I suggest you not to waste their and our time any more.


I'm not interested in UK ltd laws.

You took money from 3 people you kicked out without reimbursement.
You used their money to purchase something.
You never intended to give them dividends if the product makes money.
2 new people PAID to get in, and you still didn't reimburse the old investors.

That's a scam no matter how the law defines it.

And the new guys got out because they realized DD was unstable Cheesy  Cheesy
The money though, where did it go o.o

It would be best for you to stop wasting my time because this is an argument you can't win.
All you can achieve is get on my nerves so hard that I actually dig up the group screenshots and make a scam accusation against you.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
November 03, 2018, 10:58:14 AM
#26
According to the law, all property belongs to the company, not individuals.

How come you used company #1 script in company #2 then?

I suggest you to control your emotions and to ask legal advice from the lawyers and company house office.
We did everything (all legal decisions) according to the legal advice received in the UK.
I send you info that we started company dissolution process.
You had 3 months to file an official complaint to the Company house and stop company dissolution but you didn't send any complain.
It's all I can say here.
I don't think that others are interesting in discussion about laws in UK for ltd companies, so I suggest you not to waste their and our time any more.
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1150
Freedom&Honor
November 03, 2018, 10:49:50 AM
#25
According to the law, all property belongs to the company, not individuals.

How come you used company #1 script in company #2 then?

Quote
Still, I don't have anything against you and will not ask you to refund money spend for the trip to UK.
I forgive you everything.

Are you high?
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
November 03, 2018, 10:45:51 AM
#24
Only one more post and I will stop this useless discussion here.
According to the law, all property belongs to the company, not individuals.
All money invested also belong to the company and majority of the owners decide how to use it or spend it.
All decisions was made after we got legal advice from the authorities.
All decisions was confirmed by the authorities.
At this point, I just wanted to explain whole situation to the public.
All other matters I don't care, really.
I'm here because I want to help others and it's all.
You started this subject and I felt that public had to hear what really happened.
Still, I don't have anything against you and will not ask you to refund money spend for the trip to UK.
I forgive you everything.


p.s. also your negative trust is visible now but you gave it a few years ago, as I remember.
I don't care about trust or anything else but care about real facts and truth.
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1150
Freedom&Honor
November 03, 2018, 10:38:44 AM
#23
Glad you chimed in on this and explained your side of the story.  It doesn't sound like Daniel91 is some sort of serial scammer, though the question is whether Theymos would consider the stain on his bitcointalk reputation as grounds for denying his merit source application.  In this case, I tend to think it would be worth giving him a shot at being a merit source especially since he can merit some local board posts.  The great thing about the merit system is that it's all public, so if any shenanigans take place, it's caught pretty quickly.

I don't think Daniel is a serial scammer.

But he wanted to kick out the 'rebels' and voted to form a new company and use the script the previous shareholders paid for.

I think it's time to stop this useless discussion.
Majority of the owners of the company have right to make any legal decision connected with the company and trade, according to UK trade law.
Majority of the owners of the company have right to decide also what to do with the company property.
Before all decisions was made, we asked legal advice from the UK accounting company and they confirmed everything.
Also, Company house confirmed that all decisions was legal and accepted our request to dissolve the company.
All co owners, not content with the decision from the majority could file an official complaint to the Company house and in such case, they will check and decide if our legal decisions was made according to the law.
Also, if anything illegal, they will not dissolve company.
iluvbitcoins never filed an official complaint to the Company house about any decision made by the majority of the company owners.
With this, I think that legally everything is clear here.

All you care about is that you don't get in trouble? Smiley

Step 1 - Take money from investors to buy something online
Step 2 - Dissolve the company
Step 3 - Start a new company
Step 4 - Use the item you bought with their money
Step 5 - Huh
Step 6 - Profit

I did contact a lawyer about it, but I deemed it to be a waste of my time since the project was a ticking time bomb already.
And it did self-destruct as I warned you.

------------------------------

On a side note, I was considering removing the feedback in 3 months or so, to teach you a lesson but you have showed 0 remorse for what you have done! 0.
You have written false statements that don't even have any relation at all with what actually happened (in the other thread), and because of that condemned yourself to that feedback forever.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
November 03, 2018, 10:33:03 AM
#22
Glad you chimed in on this and explained your side of the story.  It doesn't sound like Daniel91 is some sort of serial scammer, though the question is whether Theymos would consider the stain on his bitcointalk reputation as grounds for denying his merit source application.  In this case, I tend to think it would be worth giving him a shot at being a merit source especially since he can merit some local board posts.  The great thing about the merit system is that it's all public, so if any shenanigans take place, it's caught pretty quickly.

I don't think Daniel is a serial scammer.

But he wanted to kick out the 'rebels' and voted to form a new company and use the script the previous shareholders paid for.

I think it's time to stop this useless discussion.
Majority of the owners of the company have right to make any legal decision connected with the company and trade, according to UK trade law.
Majority of the owners of the company have right to decide also what to do with the company property.
Before all decisions was made, we asked legal advice from the UK accounting company and they confirmed everything.
Also, Company house confirmed that all decisions was legal and accepted our request to dissolve the company.
All co owners, not content with the decision from the majority could file an official complaint to the Company house and in such case, they will check and decide if our legal decisions was made according to the law.
Also, if anything illegal, they will not dissolve company.
iluvbitcoins never filed an official complaint to the Company house about any decision made by the majority of the company owners.
With this, I think that legally everything is clear here.



legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1150
Freedom&Honor
November 03, 2018, 10:06:50 AM
#21
Glad you chimed in on this and explained your side of the story.  It doesn't sound like Daniel91 is some sort of serial scammer, though the question is whether Theymos would consider the stain on his bitcointalk reputation as grounds for denying his merit source application.  In this case, I tend to think it would be worth giving him a shot at being a merit source especially since he can merit some local board posts.  The great thing about the merit system is that it's all public, so if any shenanigans take place, it's caught pretty quickly.

I don't think Daniel is a serial scammer.

But he wanted to kick out the 'rebels' and voted to form a new company and use the script the previous shareholders paid for.
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 280
November 03, 2018, 10:05:09 AM
#20
There's a thread in Meta (I just searched for it and couldn't find it, as I forgot the title) where many merit sources were identified
I think you are looking for [TOP-200] The most generous users giving merits
From this list, TMAN is the only merit source with negative trust from DT. Some others negative tagged members are also there but OP didn't confirm those user as merit source.
legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 7005
Top Crypto Casino
November 03, 2018, 09:40:49 AM
#19
I don't think there is any red trusted merit source, I am not sure because we don't know all the merit source. Correct me if I am wrong.
No, I don't think all the merit sources are known, but many have been "outed" based on the math of their merit-giving history.  There's a thread in Meta (I just searched for it and couldn't find it, as I forgot the title) where many merit sources were identified--and I know who some of them are and the ones I'm aware of don't have red trust from DT members. 

Then again, I have a custom trust list so it's kind of hard for me to say that with certainty since I don't even know who's on DT anymore.  I only became aware of iluvbitcoins getting on DT because someone made me aware of my own trust getting a color change due to the neg he left on me--which has since been amicably resolved, I might add.


Glad you chimed in on this and explained your side of the story.  It doesn't sound like Daniel91 is some sort of serial scammer, though the question is whether Theymos would consider the stain on his bitcointalk reputation as grounds for denying his merit source application.  In this case, I tend to think it would be worth giving him a shot at being a merit source especially since he can merit some local board posts.  The great thing about the merit system is that it's all public, so if any shenanigans take place, it's caught pretty quickly.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
November 03, 2018, 09:19:06 AM
#18
Everything I wanted to say about this subject is here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/negative-trust-2833560
So, nothing more to say really.
I don't think anybody is interesting in this any more, it's old, ancient history now, without any connection with activity on this forum or crypto.
Any way, I'm still grateful to you that you introduced me to the bitcoin and this forum.
We had great fun together and shared a lot things.
At that time we had dreams how to change the world and our lives.
Because of your hot temper you had a lot problems with other co owners in our business project, specially the creator Smiley
I tried to protect you as much as I could.
I'm sorry that our business didn't succeed but it's life.
I wish you well in your life and still hope that once we will enjoy pizza at bosso Smiley
I forgive you everything. 


legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1150
Freedom&Honor
November 03, 2018, 09:14:12 AM
#17
Regarding negative trust from iluvbitcoins, I can say following:
It's a pure act of revenge and nothing else.
1. We participated together in one common business project which failed. It's long story but basically all investors lost money there, including me.
2. It happened 3-4 years ago.
3. Company also dissolved 2 years ago.
3. No connection with bitcoin.
4. We never finished project so we never used any script in public.
4. No trading of any kind.
5. No connection with any activity on this forum or crypto.


Obviously, it's nothing I can do it about it.
Some people on the forum suggested me to start a thread about it but I feel it will be useless and just waste of my time and energy.
I will rather focus my time to help and support others, as much as I can.
I was just naive in the beginning and shared with this person that I will open account on this forum (and my nickname) so because of this he know my real name.
I could simple close this btc account and start new one but felt that in such way I will confess some kind of guilt and allow the injustice to win what I did not want.
It's all I can say about this subject.

We paid for a script (1000$), after 4 of us weren't happy with where the company was going and wanted changes, Daniel91 together with 5 other investors dissolved the company (50%+1 votes [6/10]).

After the dissolvment they formed a new company and wanted to use the script we paid for.

Although this was pushed by another person, Daniel91 was a very intense advocate of his actions and supported them throughoutly.

Although the website never came to fruition, the intention was to use the same script that was purchased with the money of other investors.

And also, you weren't 'naive' to tell me your account name because I told you about bitcointalk and then you signed up  Cheesy

I could write a lot more about this, but since it's off-topic, I'll just leave it at this.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
November 03, 2018, 08:06:41 AM
#16
Thank you very much guys!
I'm overwhelmed with your support here, inspiration and encouragement.
I promise you that I will continue to support you on this forum, in any possible way.
I will always use my merits to support good quality posts in non English languages, because such forum members are often invisible for English speaking members here and have difficulties to get deserved award for their contribution on the forum.
Since I almost spend all my merits as legendary member, only way to continue my mission is to become merit source.

Regarding negative trust from iluvbitcoins, I can say following:
It's a pure act of revenge and nothing else.
1. We participated together in one common business project which failed. It's long story but basically all investors lost money there, including me.
2. It happened 3-4 years ago.
3. Company also dissolved 2 years ago.
3. No connection with bitcoin.
4. We never finished project so we never used any script in public.
4. No trading of any kind.
5. No connection with any activity on this forum or crypto.


Obviously, it's nothing I can do it about it.
Some people on the forum suggested me to start a thread about it but I feel it will be useless and just waste of my time and energy.
I will rather focus my time to help and support others, as much as I can.
I was just naive in the beginning and shared with this person that I will open account on this forum (and my nickname) so because of this he know my real name.
I could simple close this btc account and start new one but felt that in such way I will confess some kind of guilt and allow the injustice to win what I did not want.
It's all I can say about this subject.





full member
Activity: 490
Merit: 134
November 03, 2018, 03:41:03 AM
#15
Believe that we need him with high words. I also believe that local community need one good and quality merit sourcer that can be good for community. He made very good contributions to must say Balkan community cuz there are not just Croatian native language speakers but as well as all former republic. Whit this all together please consider this cuz it can be very good for not just local community section but as well all all othes where merit is most given.

Hopefully his apply will pass and he will become merit sources and maybe we will have after that another user who will aply to be merit sourcer.
sr. member
Activity: 1491
Merit: 320
🐪
November 03, 2018, 02:41:50 AM
#14
,but I'm assuming negative trust from a DT member doesn't factor into it?  I can't think of all the known merit sources I'm aware of and whether they're generally trusted.

I don't think there is any red trusted merit source, I am not sure because we don't know all the merit source.
~

I don't think there is any public list of merit sources, and maybe it is better so to avoid unnecessary pressure to them.

As far as Daniel91 application goes I support him because in 1 year now of me being member of this forum, Daniel91 was nothing but helpful specially to new users.

He also had very popular topic on local section "Merit for quality posts" where he merited high quality articles until he spent all his merit.

That being said I fully support his application to be merit source.


legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 2226
Signature space for rent
November 03, 2018, 12:39:30 AM
#13
,but I'm assuming negative trust from a DT member doesn't factor into it?  I can't think of all the known merit sources I'm aware of and whether they're generally trusted.

I don't think there is any red trusted merit source, I am not sure because we don't know all the merit source. Correct me if I am wrong. As far as I know previous applicant wasn't with red tag those application approved. After be a merit source if someone get red tag that's different case. But form begain of application if someone have red tag, I believe it will prevent him from become merit source. OP should convince iluvbitcoins to remove red tag. I don't think theymos going to consider it if applicant's is untrusted by default trust. It's just my opinion, who know about admin mind.


However I always welcome new merit source  application, so same for OP also. Best of luck with your application.
Pages:
Jump to: