If you are posting to get merits (I'm talking about other people joining Joe's challenge) would you post if there is no merit reward? if you would post no matter if there is any reward or not, then join the club as everybody else and people shall merit your posts.
I don't post to get merits and I don't need merits so the rest of your rant is irrelevant.
You are just avoiding to respond, don't just say your rant is irrelevant.
Not posting if there is no merit reward? then don't post. are you here to conclude that I have attempted to sell merits as a source and tag me? I would never betray theymos. I would never sell merits with this account or my brother's account (dormant for 6 months, I tried to register an alt account recently, when I opened Bitcointalk.org with another browser, his account was logged in, I only looked at his personal messages and then logged out to register an account for April fools day). even if I had 20 accounts with 1000 merits, I would never sell merits, period.
Not sure why you're talking about your alts but now that you brought it up you should make those usernames public.
Literally_farming_merits not that it's any of your business other than theymos's. other account is not mine to disclose, however they have used the same IPs as mine. you are not sure why? read the part in bold.
I have merited 300+ users, does that make all of them my friends?
You have merited your friends more than others.
As this is a public discussion, and as I have participated in many Joe's rounds, I will express my opinion.
@digaran, I think that as a Merit Source you are somehow a staff member of this forum. You have the right to disagree to Joe's campaign, and that's ok.
You should report that thread to moderators. The moderators are the ones who have the authority to decide what to do about his campaign, not the merit sources.
But you are exposing yourself and the forum (as a staff member) when you engage in discussions like this. Too many offenses from so many people. Nothing good will come from this discussion.
Just my 2cc.
Is this the reason for Joe not applying as a source? so he can talk however he'd liked? if you could find my name anywhere as a staff or representative of this forum, we should then start discussing people's behaviour towards me. do not mistaken me as the forum's *representative. I'm representing the public, unheard, poor, lowlifes with nobody to defend them. I'm a public servant. reckless and fearless. I don't like it when somebody rubs what they are doing to our faces, like we are benefiting the most. suchmoon says what BTCforJoe is doing is great, why wouldn't he do that on behalf of the forum as a source? if he doesn't want to take the responsibility of a source, he shouldn't expect to have me removed and my post deleted because he is offended by my post.
He should have
reported me to moderators and they should've deleted my post, I would have be offended then, if they deleted my post and not every body else's posts somehow offensive for other users. doing that would be like doing a favour for Joe
(if they are not reacting to my case, is because they don't want to pick a side, they are staying neutral and waiting for either of us to make a mistake to step in) he didn't get what he wanted, now he has posted this to demand action resulting to his satisfaction. not against the rules, right? everybody else could and should do the same because Joe did the same, right?
Now he has me quoted, no chance for me to edit my post, if I'd made a mistake, right? this person knows nothing about helping others, doing charity? I'd like to advise those homeless families to drop some of that soup inside alia to see if she gets pregnant or not, yes that's what we do with people like alia, we would use them in our experiments. we'll know the result after a few weeks. lol now.
If I see they would keep putting my actions on theymos, to blame him like everything else, I will resign. seriously. under one condition though. nobody else should replace me. because I'm starting to feel like they are pushing theymos with every chance they'd get to further push somebody else's merit source application to be as the next best thing.
What Joe wants, is something that would only benefit himself and his friends. he is not demanding something for the benefit of the community, he'd rather use forum's resources for personal gains
(instead of reporting to moderators, he'd rather to post this topic, there is 0.0007BTC per post for him and all of his buddies trying to smear my small near to nothing contribution. insinuating that I'm bad for the image of the forum, but when it comes to my opinion, they don't care what I'm saying and they don't recognize me as any authority but they would demand me to act as I have any authoritative obligation towards them) have you noticed how he added quotes of mine to say that I'm a racist? isn't that the same nails and cactus to spice this up? who said something about spicing things up I wonder? I'd say this is the same tactic mentioned by somebody else. suchmoon talking about adding nails to spice me fucking myself, BTCforJoe adding a few quotes to his report with the same intent and expecting the same result which would be me fucked. not really. if I'm not a source, it would make me sad, because I wouldn't be able to help. but I know that I should be myself, if I had been given some guidelines about what is expected from me and if I had ignored them, I'd deserved to be removed as a source.
Enjoy reading my wall of text.
*= don't throw up please.
EDIT: Above statement in red and the following:
I would like to invite you the vigilant community members to decide and conclude for yourselves, how many posts do they have regarding their merit distribution threads? who has received the majority of the merits as a result directly from their threads? how many 0.0007
BTC per post they have earned? if I had never posted there to talk about farming merits with alt accounts. they were trying to allow alt accounts taking part in their thread. you all know that I'm a nobody, and everything I say about respect and selling merits etc is a joke of a clown trying to mirror whatever that happens every day in this community. for example: somebody is doing something, not for our benefit but mostly for their own. they would act like we should respect them and trust them just because they were trusted once a long time ago with a large amount of money and by somebody who had no other choice, because they were the next best thing. or when you see some people had some trades with the right people and at the right time to have them trusted by green + digits. they are using that for their own benefits not even secretly but openly. if I have offended you the community in any way, I'm a human like you, I can make mistakes too. I have always tried to stay neutral and fair. I'm sorry for inconveniences from my part. now make me an admin, this ladder was the hardest one to climb. lol before putting me on ignore.