If you agree and find it useful, you can share merit for me.
Look, I found a merit beggar! Share merit with me instead.
Topic: Merit system improvement - page 2. (Read 307 times)
Look, I found a merit beggar! Share merit with me instead.
If you agree and find it useful, you can share merit for me.
Look, I found a merit beggar! Share merit with me instead.
I put him on ignore for that.
Hello everybody.
I know bitcointalk for a long time, however, i became it`s member not so long ago.
I know about the previous rank system and the only thing i can say about it, that it was extremely easy to use. And i definetely support the new "merit system", that`s gonna exclude the easy ranking and multiaccounting in perspective. However, there are some moments, that i find not very fair, and some offers for improving this system.
About unfair moments. As i understand, merit system is called up to decrease the multiaccounting and increase the quality of the posts. So people now should somehow confirm their originality and competence. But why do you think, that the old forum member are all able to do this? I know, that it was possible to buy even hero member. Full and senior are not a big deal at all. And i see a lot of such highrank members that write posts just to fulfill the requirements for the signature, all messages are empty and doesnt have any meaning. So, i think, that at least the old fullmembers should not got the merits according to their activity, so that they start from the begining and earn merits for their quality posts. But that`s in the past, and now it would be unfair in relation to them.
About imrovement. I think, that sMerits should be distributed to member rank, and maybe jr members, but in a lower quantity, 20 and 10, or 16 and 8 in a month accordingly. I`ll explain why.
I saw a bunch of topics that were very informative, especially for those who are new on the forum or in the cryptotrading. And what do we get? We get the following: old and experienced members dont find these topics informative or interesting, because they already know the most things that were told in them. But for newbies (not rank) these topics are the real treasure.
Without this, i see the sad painting, where new forum members reaps their buts making the really good topics and dont get anything for it. And on the other side: high ranked members just live in their own world of the members with the same high rank and dont give a thing about any other people. Thats not a bad phenomenon, because these two groups just have different levels of interests and knowledge. But for the new members there it`s quite impossible to get what they really deserve at the moment.
Thank you for attention.
If you agree and find it useful, you can share merit for me.
I know bitcointalk for a long time, however, i became it`s member not so long ago.
I know about the previous rank system and the only thing i can say about it, that it was extremely easy to use. And i definetely support the new "merit system", that`s gonna exclude the easy ranking and multiaccounting in perspective. However, there are some moments, that i find not very fair, and some offers for improving this system.
About unfair moments. As i understand, merit system is called up to decrease the multiaccounting and increase the quality of the posts. So people now should somehow confirm their originality and competence. But why do you think, that the old forum member are all able to do this? I know, that it was possible to buy even hero member. Full and senior are not a big deal at all. And i see a lot of such highrank members that write posts just to fulfill the requirements for the signature, all messages are empty and doesnt have any meaning. So, i think, that at least the old fullmembers should not got the merits according to their activity, so that they start from the begining and earn merits for their quality posts. But that`s in the past, and now it would be unfair in relation to them.
About imrovement. I think, that sMerits should be distributed to member rank, and maybe jr members, but in a lower quantity, 20 and 10, or 16 and 8 in a month accordingly. I`ll explain why.
I saw a bunch of topics that were very informative, especially for those who are new on the forum or in the cryptotrading. And what do we get? We get the following: old and experienced members dont find these topics informative or interesting, because they already know the most things that were told in them. But for newbies (not rank) these topics are the real treasure.
Without this, i see the sad painting, where new forum members reaps their buts making the really good topics and dont get anything for it. And on the other side: high ranked members just live in their own world of the members with the same high rank and dont give a thing about any other people. Thats not a bad phenomenon, because these two groups just have different levels of interests and knowledge. But for the new members there it`s quite impossible to get what they really deserve at the moment.
Thank you for attention.
If you agree and find it useful, you can share merit for me.
I would share Merit if I had but sorry, I entered forum 2 months later than it was needed.
Hello everybody.
Thank you for attention.
If you agree and find it useful, you can share merit for me.
Thank you for attention.
If you agree and find it useful, you can share merit for me.
In the end beg for a merit? Why aren't you confident in your skills, or alternatively instead of writing a paragraph for a merit look for merit giveaways and post your links there. I know one you can post is Bill Gator but do not pm him lol. Guys long posts and asking for merits is cliche, believe in yourself and post for good, helpful or related not for merit!
bla bla bla
Here is the trick, if you want to give out merits then you need to improve your English, then in turn you will be recognized for your own quality posts and as part of being recognized you will have your own sMerits to hand out. Its pretty simple if you think about it, step up your game then you can encourage others by handing out merits..
Hello everybody.
Thank you for attention.
If you agree and find it useful, you can share merit for me.
Thank you for attention.
If you agree and find it useful, you can share merit for me.
In the end beg for a merit? Why aren't you confident in your skills, or alternatively instead of writing a paragraph for a merit look for merit giveaways and post your links there. I know one you can post is Bill Gator but do not pm him lol. Guys long posts and asking for merits is cliche, believe in yourself and post for good, helpful or related not for merit!
If you agree and find it useful, you can share merit for me.
Look, I found a merit beggar! Share merit with me instead.
bla bla bla
Here is the trick, if you want to give out merits then you need to improve your English, then in turn you will be recognized for your own quality posts and as part of being recognized you will have your own sMerits to hand out. Its pretty simple if you think about it, step up your game then you can encourage others by handing out merits..
Hello everybody.
I know bitcointalk for a long time, however, i became it`s member not so long ago.
I know about the previous rank system and the only thing i can say about it, that it was extremely easy to use. And i definetely support the new "merit system", that`s gonna exclude the easy ranking and multiaccounting in perspective. However, there are some moments, that i find not very fair, and some offers for improving this system.
About unfair moments. As i understand, merit system is called up to decrease the multiaccounting and increase the quality of the posts. So people now should somehow confirm their originality and competence. But why do you think, that the old forum member are all able to do this? I know, that it was possible to buy even hero member. Full and senior are not a big deal at all. And i see a lot of such highrank members that write posts just to fulfill the requirements for the signature, all messages are empty and doesnt have any meaning. So, i think, that at least the old fullmembers should not got the merits according to their activity, so that they start from the begining and earn merits for their quality posts. But that`s in the past, and now it would be unfair in relation to them.
About imrovement. I think, that sMerits should be distributed to member rank, and maybe jr members, but in a lower quantity, 20 and 10, or 16 and 8 in a month accordingly. I`ll explain why.
I saw a bunch of topics that were very informative, especially for those who are new on the forum or in the cryptotrading. And what do we get? We get the following: old and experienced members dont find these topics informative or interesting, because they already know the most things that were told in them. But for newbies (not rank) these topics are the real treasure.
Without this, i see the sad painting, where new forum members reaps their buts making the really good topics and dont get anything for it. And on the other side: high ranked members just live in their own world of the members with the same high rank and dont give a thing about any other people. Thats not a bad phenomenon, because these two groups just have different levels of interests and knowledge. But for the new members there it`s quite impossible to get what they really deserve at the moment.
Thank you for attention.
I know bitcointalk for a long time, however, i became it`s member not so long ago.
I know about the previous rank system and the only thing i can say about it, that it was extremely easy to use. And i definetely support the new "merit system", that`s gonna exclude the easy ranking and multiaccounting in perspective. However, there are some moments, that i find not very fair, and some offers for improving this system.
About unfair moments. As i understand, merit system is called up to decrease the multiaccounting and increase the quality of the posts. So people now should somehow confirm their originality and competence. But why do you think, that the old forum member are all able to do this? I know, that it was possible to buy even hero member. Full and senior are not a big deal at all. And i see a lot of such highrank members that write posts just to fulfill the requirements for the signature, all messages are empty and doesnt have any meaning. So, i think, that at least the old fullmembers should not got the merits according to their activity, so that they start from the begining and earn merits for their quality posts. But that`s in the past, and now it would be unfair in relation to them.
About imrovement. I think, that sMerits should be distributed to member rank, and maybe jr members, but in a lower quantity, 20 and 10, or 16 and 8 in a month accordingly. I`ll explain why.
I saw a bunch of topics that were very informative, especially for those who are new on the forum or in the cryptotrading. And what do we get? We get the following: old and experienced members dont find these topics informative or interesting, because they already know the most things that were told in them. But for newbies (not rank) these topics are the real treasure.
Without this, i see the sad painting, where new forum members reaps their buts making the really good topics and dont get anything for it. And on the other side: high ranked members just live in their own world of the members with the same high rank and dont give a thing about any other people. Thats not a bad phenomenon, because these two groups just have different levels of interests and knowledge. But for the new members there it`s quite impossible to get what they really deserve at the moment.
Thank you for attention.
Jump to: