Good Day to everyone.
Good evening. I would like to know if it is a must to add merit count requirements when participating into a campaign
No.I mean is it better to hire applicants with merits or by basing on their quality post?
No. IMHO It should be based on their post quality not merits. I have seen yahoo62278 start to come up with the idea of accepting applicants with merits for high payments but also accepted applicants without merits since the merit feature is fresh.
He can do whatever he wants to do, he is signature campaign manager. He can kick you without any reason and he doesn't have to explain anything and he doesn't need to explain rules of his campaign to anyone.For clarification, do managers have to hire applicants with merits in a must or not?
No. But if they do - their campaign their rules.But with so many members competing, we can see merit as requirement as well for participating in signature campaigns.
Competing? You guys really don't get it, do you?The merit will help judging the best with those who actually make irrelevant or off topic posts.
No it won't. You can write hundred shitposts and create one nice and constructive topic and receive merits for it. 
