[...]You only see metawin doing this.
I gave both thread a read, may I suggest you to consider that you're a bit biased, and perhaps fueled by previous case with other user? I am not sure how biased I am myself, given I am "from" the community, but it seems to me that the conversation there are about the members trying to protect each other, warn about possible risk, as well as giving inputs to improve themselves. To be blunt, there are other people wearing other signature commented on the thread with similar tone; skepticism.
That degree of scepticism is not exclusive to metawin participants, other user also approached the project with similar manner, and it's not unexpected.
Not that the forum is trying to be hard and unwelcome to new platforms, we just have been through a lot of scam attempts, many has fallen victim to fake platforms and rug-pull projects, not strictly gambling platform, many other kinds of platform. I'd like to think that we are fair, if a platform is questionable, we'll ask them and pursue clarifications, and if a platform is good, we'll praise them. Not only that, we also give suggestions, way for platform to improve themselves.
If I may... I'll quote some of the posts from anonbet's thread, deliberately removing the details and place them in non-chronological order. No timestamp, no author's name, no clue of who wear whose campaign, only what's written. Don't cheat by peeking into the thread and see who said what's quoted, just to be sure there will be no bias involved from your side, let's see if you can perhaps gain a new perspective and reconsider your opinion:
anonbet.net, I hope you will give detailed and satisfactory answers to the questions in the thread, as the suspicions raised are legitimate. Just as we have seen in this section many very important sites we have also seen quite a few scams. If you want to promote your project in a legitimate way take some time to think about it and present it well, as well as give answers to the legitimate questions raised.
There are no free spins terms but there are general T&C terms that state:
[a snippet of T&C]
Some people say it's to scam people but how would you prevent yourself from possible abuses if you offer free spins on a non-kyc site?
The whole thing looks unprofessional to me. I do not have enough data to say it is a scam and therefore I will not support the flag or leave negative feedback but it does not inspire me confidence to bet there due to the way things have been done in a hurry.
This is why before launch a casino, the owner need to consult with the experts or create review campaign, now the @OP need to being responsible with the amateur mistake he did.
[a snippet from anonbet talking about VPN and TOR]
Where are the rules that stated you shouldn't use VPN or TOR? in your TOS (archived version) didn't state it.
You could argue that you haven't update it or use any other excuse, then there's a possibility you could update your rules that will make gamblers can't withdraw their funds.
@anonbet.net I have a few comments regarding your free spins.
Since you are a no KYC platform, how do you intend to fight off free spin or bonus abuse?
Secondly, I don't see any free spins terms and this can cause problems when users try to withdraw their winnings like it is happening right now. Please address this as soon as possible.
Be careful how you proceed with this site because I’m sure that you won’t get the money you win from the free spin even after making a deposit.
I’m thinking of making a $2 deposit to test out this theory and if after the deposit I’m unable to make withdrawal from the site then an Official scam accusation thread can be created against them so that others won’t continue to try it.
I’ll give my report after completing it.
I think he rushed a bit too, after all, this is a new site and they seem to have an inexperienced team. This is certainly not an excuse, but we have seen many casinos make a similar mistake with no deposit bonuses... too many spammers, many of them win something and want to withdraw money, and when there are no ToS and clear rules chaos is inevitable. They will probably need some time to clear the air and do something about this mess.
I can't say I like this simple look, it's like the team decided to throw something out in a hurry without much work. I don't know how much people like this generally compared to modern casinos. I will wait until this mess is over and maybe try these 20 free spins...
[a snippet of anonbet's statement]
No one else confirms it after this? I know [username] confirmed it before this message but with all the hype I was expecting more people. Although people usually make more noise to protest than when everything is going well.
In any case, it seems to me that anonbet.net has had a shaky start but that they are making an effort to do things right.
Keep trying to improve, OP, there are many very fruitful casinos in this section and it is to be welcomed that there is a new non-kyc initiative, there are less and less of them left.
They keep talking about the negative flags since they don't expect that a new casino will easily perform like this that's why don't get surprise for some negative discussion since those people try to experience the worst is free to share their experience that's why we have this discussion ongoing.
It maybe good that you solve some of the issue but don't expect that it can eliminate the negative thoughts of people since for sure they still have doubts to gamble again on your casino since for sure those people don't like to experience again what they experience earlier. Now for sure you will get a hard time to get the trust back of people and if you want to continue your business here then I guess you should perform more better and pay the other pending request of other people.
