Mexxer-2 gave trust even though I explained ( updated with more details )

Deluxee

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Quote from: Casdinyard on December 06, 2015, 03:47:50 AM

Quote from: Deluxee on December 05, 2015, 11:43:39 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on December 05, 2015, 11:29:44 AM

Quickseller
Hero Member
*****
Activity: 518

View Profile WWW Personal Message (Offline)
Trust: -15: -5 / +17
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!

Am I the only one to find humor in a disgraced account merchant with red trust moralizing about scamming & trust ratings?
Cheesy

You are not the only one. I also have the same feeling. Maybe the negative were given not for scamming but for other reasons.

Sure. For scamming. Here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=358020
Not that it makes much difference. Quickseller is just an alt account, owner has many more, many with positive trust. This is perfectly legit, because reasons.

Casdinyard

hero member

Activity: 2184

Merit: 891

Leading Crypto Sports Betting and Casino Platform

Quote from: Deluxee on December 05, 2015, 11:43:39 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on December 05, 2015, 11:29:44 AM

Quickseller
Hero Member
*****
Activity: 518

View Profile WWW Personal Message (Offline)
Trust: -15: -5 / +17
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!

Am I the only one to find humor in a disgraced account merchant with red trust moralizing about scamming & trust ratings?
Cheesy

You are not the only one. I also have the same feeling. Maybe the negative were given not for scamming but for other reasons.

jackg

copper member

Activity: 2856

Merit: 3071

https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory

Quote from: Deluxee on December 05, 2015, 11:43:39 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on December 05, 2015, 11:29:44 AM

Quickseller
Hero Member
*****
Activity: 518

View Profile WWW Personal Message (Offline)
Trust: -15: -5 / +17
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!

Am I the only one to find humor in a disgraced account merchant with red trust moralizing about scamming & trust ratings?
Cheesy

Good One! I just realised that, that Quickseller was a disgraced scammer too! They both have something in common! (They are both speculated about as being scammers!)
Quickseller was suspected of being an escrow for himself
The OP was suspected in being involved with a ponzi!
(both suspected of scamming)

Quote from: Quickseller on December 05, 2015, 11:29:44 AM

Quote from: jackg on December 05, 2015, 11:05:32 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on December 05, 2015, 09:46:36 AM

You are promoting what is pretty clearly a ponzi that is being deceptive about how they make their money. Not only that but you still have the signature up that caused you to receive negative trust.

If you are really concerned about your reputation, then I would suggest that you stop promoting what is clearly a scam

He does have a disclaimer at the start! I see no problem with this signature. If he removed it, he would seem weak on the forum and he is remaining with his own opinion! Do you have a problem with people having their own opinion and remaining with it Quick Seller?

Furthermore, he could possibly add a brackets after the use at your own risk which says "Suspected Ponzi" so that people know that it may be a ponzi!

LOL what? There is nothing in his signature that is an opinion. He is/was selling an advertisement and what he was advertising was clearly a scam. The disclaimer said nothing about that site being a scam.

If it is so obvious, then what do you have a problem with?
Keeping the same signature even through negative trust because of this suggests he has a strong opinion about it! Doesn't It?
I was suggesting he could add a better disclaimer suggesting that it may not be a supported platform.

Deluxee

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Quote from: Quickseller on December 05, 2015, 11:29:44 AM

Quickseller
Hero Member
*****
Activity: 518

View Profile WWW Personal Message (Offline)
Trust: -15: -5 / +17
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!

Am I the only one to find humor in a disgraced account merchant with red trust moralizing about scamming & trust ratings?
Cheesy

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: jackg on December 05, 2015, 11:05:32 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on December 05, 2015, 09:46:36 AM

You are promoting what is pretty clearly a ponzi that is being deceptive about how they make their money. Not only that but you still have the signature up that caused you to receive negative trust.

If you are really concerned about your reputation, then I would suggest that you stop promoting what is clearly a scam

He does have a disclaimer at the start! I see no problem with this signature. If he removed it, he would seem weak on the forum and he is remaining with his own opinion! Do you have a problem with people having their own opinion and remaining with it Quick Seller?

Furthermore, he could possibly add a brackets after the use at your own risk which says "Suspected Ponzi" so that people know that it may be a ponzi!

LOL what? There is nothing in his signature that is an opinion. He is/was selling an advertisement and what he was advertising was clearly a scam. The disclaimer said nothing about that site being a scam.

Gildarts

sr. member

Activity: 390

Merit: 250

well you know that they will scam one day and everyone knows.Money is not that easy to earn.and its not that easy to double it quickly.
And again Every ponzi will start scam one day.and when you helping them to advertise it means you're helping them to scam people.
People knows they can lose but still they gamble but i think some how someway its not a good choice to help advertise ponzi sites.
mexxer should remove his neg feedback if op agree that he/she will not advertise any ponzi site.

Deluxee

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Quote from: shorena on December 05, 2015, 10:51:59 AM

Quote from: Deluxee on December 05, 2015, 10:43:00 AM

-snip-
No.

http://s18.postimg.org/vp2dbguex/Capture.png

Open any thread.

Quote from: Deluxee on December 05, 2015, 10:43:00 AM

Quote

I do however have a problem if ponzis are advertised outside of their section. Many people still new to bitcoin come here, leaving a warning for them is far from a nanny state IMHO. I dont infantilize, I just issue a warning. You and anyone else is free to ignore it and "invest".

I'm not SNavy, though I may share its sentiment, so I'll field this one too.
I'm a little hazy on why you haven't chosen to leave a negative rating to every user advertising his wares on Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Marketplace > Securities.
Do you not feel that these users "are scammers or likely to scam in the future," in light of 99% of offerings in this sub being scams? Noobs may not know this, you know

Classic argument, but I cant do everything and without this thread I would probably have missed to mark those discussed here. I dont go around paroling for these things, but I will also not look away when I see them.

>I dont go around paroling for these things
No?

But now that you're aware of 'these things,' I'm sure you'll go & do your stuff

Deluxee

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Quote from: mexxer-2 on December 05, 2015, 10:57:29 AM

Quote from: Deluxee on December 05, 2015, 10:43:00 AM

No.

http://s18.postimg.org/vp2dbguex/Capture.png

Nah I believe you're on the wrong page
http://s14.postimg.org/6dbw48kxd/Capture.png

Quote from: Deluxee on December 05, 2015, 10:43:00 AM

I'm a little hazy on why you haven't chosen to leave a negative rating to every user advertising his wares on Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Marketplace > Securities.
Do you not feel that these users "are scammers or likely to scam in the future," in light of 99% of offerings in this sub being scams? Noobs may not know this, you know

I try giving the neg. rating to as much ponzis as possible.

Thanks, but no

jackg

copper member

Activity: 2856

Merit: 3071

https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory

Quote from: Quickseller on December 05, 2015, 09:46:36 AM

You are promoting what is pretty clearly a ponzi that is being deceptive about how they make their money. Not only that but you still have the signature up that caused you to receive negative trust.

If you are really concerned about your reputation, then I would suggest that you stop promoting what is clearly a scam

He does have a disclaimer at the start! I see no problem with this signature. If he removed it, he would seem weak on the forum and he is remaining with his own opinion! Do you have a problem with people having their own opinion and remaining with it Quick Seller?

Furthermore, he could possibly add a brackets after the use at your own risk which says "Suspected Ponzi" so that people know that it may be a ponzi!

mexxer-2

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 1005

4 Mana 7/7

Quote from: Deluxee on December 05, 2015, 10:43:00 AM

No.

Nah I believe you're on the wrong page

Quote from: Deluxee on December 05, 2015, 10:43:00 AM

I'm a little hazy on why you haven't chosen to leave a negative rating to every user advertising his wares on Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Marketplace > Securities.
Do you not feel that these users "are scammers or likely to scam in the future," in light of 99% of offerings in this sub being scams? Noobs may not know this, you know

I try giving the neg. rating to as much ponzis as possible.

shorena

copper member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1528

No I dont escrow anymore.

Quote from: Deluxee on December 05, 2015, 10:43:00 AM

-snip-
No.

Open any thread.

Quote from: Deluxee on December 05, 2015, 10:43:00 AM

Quote

I do however have a problem if ponzis are advertised outside of their section. Many people still new to bitcoin come here, leaving a warning for them is far from a nanny state IMHO. I dont infantilize, I just issue a warning. You and anyone else is free to ignore it and "invest".

I'm not SNavy, though I may share its sentiment, so I'll field this one too.
I'm a little hazy on why you haven't chosen to leave a negative rating to every user advertising his wares on Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Marketplace > Securities.
Do you not feel that these users "are scammers or likely to scam in the future," in light of 99% of offerings in this sub being scams? Noobs may not know this, you know

Classic argument, but I cant do everything and without this thread I would probably have missed to mark those discussed here. I dont go around paroling for these things, but I will also not look away when I see them.

Deluxee

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Quote from: shorena on December 05, 2015, 10:36:01 AM

Quote from: Deluxee on December 05, 2015, 10:32:35 AM

Quote from: shorena on December 05, 2015, 10:25:44 AM

Quote from: Deluxee on December 05, 2015, 10:22:02 AM

Quote from: shorena on December 05, 2015, 10:14:58 AM

Explain: ✔ 100% Payouts Guaranteed.

Presumably, "✔ 100% Payouts Guaranteed as long as the business is operational."
No different from any other guarantee on bitcointalk

Quote

The difference I see is that txbtc advertises the ponzi to everyone.

And that's wrong? You're gonna leave him negative trust because he advertises his perfectly legit operation? Nana State much?

I have no problem with people knowingly giving away money to the likes of our "legit operator" SNavy.

In that case, we agree. Txbtc actually took an extra step to inform his investors of the perils associated with his reputable firm, by thoughtfully adding "Please invest at your own risk" to his sig.
An extra step, I might add, which Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Marketplace > Gambling > Investor-based games chose not to take Undecided

No?

Quote

Warning: You are in the Gambling section. You are likely to eventually lose any money that you gamble/"invest". Additionally, moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Do not gamble more than you can afford to lose.

No.

http://s18.postimg.org/vp2dbguex/Capture.png

Quote

I do however have a problem if ponzis are advertised outside of their section. Many people still new to bitcoin come here, leaving a warning for them is far from a nanny state IMHO. I dont infantilize, I just issue a warning. You and anyone else is free to ignore it and "invest".

I'm not SNavy, though I may share its sentiment, so I'll field this one too.
I'm a little hazy on why you haven't chosen to leave a negative rating to every user advertising his wares on Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Marketplace > Securities.
Do you not feel that these users "are scammers or likely to scam in the future," in light of 99% of offerings in this sub being scams? Noobs may not know this, you know

shorena

copper member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1528

No I dont escrow anymore.

Quote from: winspiral on December 05, 2015, 10:36:12 AM

Quote

I do however have a problem if ponzis are advertised outside of their section. Many people still new to bitcoin come here, leaving a warning for them is far from a nanny state IMHO. I dont infantilize, I just issue a warning. You and anyone else is free to ignore it and "invest".

a warning...a warning...
but if you warn being wrong...your warning remain...
-not your thread-

I will remove the rating if the signature is removed and no payment claimed.
I will change the wording if the signature is no longer worn, but payment was claimed before that.

Im pretty sure mexxer-2 is willing to do something similar. (see post above)

mexxer-2

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 1005

4 Mana 7/7

Quote from: txbtc on December 05, 2015, 09:35:17 AM

but I clearly added in red ( in my signature u can see ) that invest at your own risk , so whats the problem now ?

Its like saying, hey this site is going to scam, but still join it and get "100% guaranteed".

Quote from: txbtc on December 05, 2015, 09:35:17 AM

People aren't kid, if they see the signature they will see there is risk, if they want to risk, u can stop them from gamble, they can always do that at primedice !

As I said in PM:

Quote from: txbtc on December 05, 2015, 09:35:17 AM

stopped replying to my PM's then I told him that how he felt when VOD did same with him ( VOD was not abe to reply nd mexxer opened thread )

so he replied saying .. he will not remove and cannot explain why

I said:

Quote from: Joel_Jantsen on December 05, 2015, 10:35:36 AM

@mexzer Don't be harsh on him man guy seems like he was unaware about it .This red mark will have him fucked forever on this forum .Please do the needful if he's ready to apolozise and take the sign off .You know ,you can always give them chances to improve .

He is fully aware of it and I have already told him about it:

Quote from: mexxer-2 on December 05, 2015, 02:02:09 PM

Although if you remove/replace your signature immediately I can remove my negative trust.

winspiral

legendary

Activity: 1778

Merit: 1026

Free WSPU2 Token or real dollars

Quote

I do however have a problem if ponzis are advertised outside of their section. Many people still new to bitcoin come here, leaving a warning for them is far from a nanny state IMHO. I dont infantilize, I just issue a warning. You and anyone else is free to ignore it and "invest".

a warning...a warning...
but if you warn being wrong...your warning remain...
Yoy have stolen at my member $1 per month or so...
because you have put me a negative trust...so i have lost $1 per month...
And each time i say a word...the answer is:
you are a scammer with negative trust...
shorena...you have killed me (lol)

shorena

copper member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1528

No I dont escrow anymore.

Quote from: Deluxee on December 05, 2015, 10:32:35 AM

Quote from: shorena on December 05, 2015, 10:25:44 AM

Quote from: Deluxee on December 05, 2015, 10:22:02 AM

Quote from: shorena on December 05, 2015, 10:14:58 AM

Explain: ✔ 100% Payouts Guaranteed.

Presumably, "✔ 100% Payouts Guaranteed as long as the business is operational."
No different from any other guarantee on bitcointalk

Quote

The difference I see is that txbtc advertises the ponzi to everyone.

And that's wrong? You're gonna leave him negative trust because he advertises his perfectly legit operation? Nana State much?

I have no problem with people knowingly giving away money to the likes of our "legit operator" SNavy.

In that case, we agree. Txbtc actually took an extra step to inform his investors of the perils associated with his reputable firm, by thoughtfully adding "Please invest at your own risk" to his sig.
An extra step, I might add, which Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Marketplace > Gambling > Investor-based games chose not to take Undecided

No?

Quote

Warning: You are in the Gambling section. You are likely to eventually lose any money that you gamble/"invest". Additionally, moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Do not gamble more than you can afford to lose.

Quote

Games where the main factor is whether or not new "investors" join the game. Also any Bitcoin-denominated investment product with an APY far above the reasonable market rate.

Joel_Jantsen

legendary

Activity: 1988

Merit: 1317

Get your game girl

There is a reason why a special thread is created with a warning .Don't you think so ?They have mentioned how bad it could be or they would allow the ponzis to be advertised in the services section right? You may not be aware but since you're now you can always realize the mistake and request mexxer to remove his feedback .

@mexzer Don't be harsh on him man guy seems like he was unaware about it .This red mark will have him fucked forever on this forum .Please do the needful if he's ready to apolozise and take the sign off .You know ,you can always give them chances to improve .

Deluxee

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Quote from: shorena on December 05, 2015, 10:25:44 AM

Quote from: Deluxee on December 05, 2015, 10:22:02 AM

Quote from: shorena on December 05, 2015, 10:14:58 AM

Explain: ✔ 100% Payouts Guaranteed.

Presumably, "✔ 100% Payouts Guaranteed as long as the business is operational."
No different from any other guarantee on bitcointalk

Quote

The difference I see is that txbtc advertises the ponzi to everyone.

And that's wrong? You're gonna leave him negative trust because he advertises his perfectly legit operation? Nana State much?

I have no problem with people knowingly giving away money to the likes of our "legit operator" SNavy.

In that case, we agree. Txbtc actually took an extra step to inform his investors of the perils associated with his reputable firm, by thoughtfully adding "Please invest at your own risk" to his sig.
An extra step, I might add, which Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Marketplace > Gambling > Investor-based games chose not to take Undecided

Quote

I do however have a problem if ponzis are advertised outside of their section. Many people still new to bitcoin come here, leaving a warning for them is far from a nanny state IMHO. I dont infantilize, I just issue a warning. You and anyone else is free to ignore it and "invest".

I'm not SNavy, though I may share the its sentiment, so I'll field this one too.
I'm a little hazy on why you haven't chosen to leave a negative rating to every user advertising his wares on Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Marketplace > Securities.
Do you not feel that these users "are scammers or likely to scam in the future," in light of 99% of offerings in this sub being scams?

shorena

copper member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1528

No I dont escrow anymore.

Quote from: Deluxee on December 05, 2015, 10:22:02 AM

Quote from: shorena on December 05, 2015, 10:14:58 AM

Explain: ✔ 100% Payouts Guaranteed.

Presumably, "✔ 100% Payouts Guaranteed as long as the business is operational."
No different from any other guarantee on bitcointalk

Quote

The difference I see is that txbtc advertises the ponzi to everyone.

And that's wrong? You're gonna leave him negative trust because he advertises his perfectly legit operation? Nana State much?

I have no problem with people knowingly giving away money to the likes of our "legit operator" SNavy.

Quote from: SNavy on December 04, 2015, 10:45:57 PM

Quote from: rammy2k2 on December 04, 2015, 01:51:58 PM

This is a scam for kids, no grown up person would send them any money ... dont waste your BTC here

Spit out a dick from your mouth, loser.

I do however have a problem if ponzis are advertised outside of their section. Many people still new to bitcoin come here, leaving a warning for them is far from a nanny state IMHO. I dont infantilize, I just issue a warning. You and anyone else is free to ignore it and "invest".

Deluxee

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Quote from: shorena on December 05, 2015, 10:14:58 AM

Explain: ✔ 100% Payouts Guaranteed.

Presumably, "✔ 100% Payouts Guaranteed as long as the business is operational."
No different from any other guarantee on bitcointalk

Quote

The difference I see is that txbtc advertises the ponzi to everyone.

And that's wrong? You're gonna leave him negative trust because he advertises his perfectly legit operation? What happened to free trade, caveat emptor & freedom of speech? Nanny State much?

Topic: Mexxer-2 gave trust even though I explained ( updated with more details ) (Read 1429 times)