Mexxer-2 gave trust even though I explained ( updated with more details ) - page 2.

shorena

copper member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1528

No I dont escrow anymore.

Explain: ✔ 100% Payouts Guaranteed.

Quote from: Deluxee on December 05, 2015, 10:11:10 AM

@txbtc, I don't see any difference between what you are promoting, and every thread in Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Marketplace > Gambling > Investor-based games.

As far as QS's alts, who cares? QS itself is an alt, created to deal in forum accounts. It has been at it for quite a while, has a show-stable of quality aged, pre-owned, and antique accounts. Which it trots out whenever the need/fancy takes it.
Nothing wrong with that, that's what this forum is all about

The difference I see is that txbtc advertises the ponzi to everyone.

Deluxee

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

@txbtc, I don't see any difference between what you are promoting, and every thread in Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Marketplace > Gambling > Investor-based games.

As far as QS's alts, who cares? QS itself is an alt, created to deal in forum accounts. It has been at it for quite a while, has a show-stable of quality aged, pre-owned, and antique accounts. Which it trots out whenever the need/fancy takes it.
Nothing wrong with that, that's what this forum is all about

txbtc

hero member

Activity: 499

Merit: 500

Quote from: Quickseller on December 05, 2015, 09:46:36 AM

You are promoting what is pretty clearly a ponzi that is being deceptive about how they make their money. Not only that but you still have the signature up that caused you to receive negative trust.

If you are really concerned about your reputation, then I would suggest that you stop promoting what is clearly a scam

What I can see from mexxer's negative trust is you are his alt, so anyone unbiased please share views ?

Since the day you got negative trusted ( almost banned ), mexxer-2 got hell active ..so please anyone unbiased and non-alt can share his views ?

winspiral

legendary

Activity: 1778

Merit: 1026

Free WSPU2 Token or real dollars

Quote from: txbtc on December 05, 2015, 09:35:17 AM

So I was given a negative trust from mexxer-2 , for placing a ponzi in my signature but I clearly added in red ( in my signature u can see ) that invest at your own risk , so whats the problem now ?

People aren't kid, if they see the signature they will see there is risk, if they want to risk, u can stop them from gamble, they can always do that at primedice !

He said to me that he is on DT-3 and default trust of many uers, so he asked me to remove signature, please guys give your views on this, I will be happy to remove my sig but after a proper reason.

When asked more this happened ....

stopped replying to my PM's then I told him that how he felt when VOD did same with him ( VOD was not abe to reply nd mexxer opened thread )

so he replied saying .. he will not remove and cannot explain why

Then shown me a thread and said what majority will say he will go with them ( https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/should-people-who-promote-ponzis-in-their-signature-be-given-a-negative-trust-1183602 )

then I told him that majority is saying no ( because u see 2,3,4 as NO if you have common sense ) .. now he says that whatever bye I wont remove

You can be lucky...
I got negative trust points for putting a real investment site taken for a supposed ponzi.

You must know that on this forum you are guilty so long you have not prooved your innocence.

Have a nice day...

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

You are promoting what is pretty clearly a ponzi that is being deceptive about how they make their money. Not only that but you still have the signature up that caused you to receive negative trust.

If you are really concerned about your reputation, then I would suggest that you stop promoting what is clearly a scam

txbtc

hero member

Activity: 499

Merit: 500

So I was given a negative trust from mexxer-2 , for placing a ponzi in my signature but I clearly added in red ( in my signature u can see ) that invest at your own risk , so whats the problem now ?

People aren't kid, if they see the signature they will see there is risk, if they want to risk, u can stop them from gamble, they can always do that at primedice !

He said to me that he is on DT-3 and default trust of many uers, so he asked me to remove signature, please guys give your views on this, I will be happy to remove my sig but after a proper reason.

When asked more this happened ....

stopped replying to my PM's then I told him that how he felt when VOD did same with him ( VOD was not abe to reply nd mexxer opened thread )

so he replied saying .. he will not remove and cannot explain why

Then shown me a thread and said what majority will say he will go with them ( https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/should-people-who-promote-ponzis-in-their-signature-be-given-a-negative-trust-1183602 )

then I told him that majority is saying no ( because u see 2,3,4 as NO if you have common sense ) .. now he says that whatever bye I wont remove

Topic: Mexxer-2 gave trust even though I explained ( updated with more details ) - page 2. (Read 1429 times)