Topic: MH17 - Where is shrapnel? (Read 5237 times)
Experts need time for the true
60 KG of shrapnel is something other, than that.
Still no info about...
in your Mum
heh heh, betcha didn't see that one coming
heh heh, betcha didn't see that one coming
Malaysia delegation rep and Dutch rep now signing to receive #MH17 black boxes from rebels in #Donetsk.
you wonder if Malaysia treating the rebels with diplomatic protocol will have repercussions. But still a big step
Both sides are using some sort of stamp on the #MH17 black box protocols. Old habits die hard in the DNR
#MH17 black boxes now in hands Malaysia delegation.
Rebel leader Borodai: "Today is a very important day for the Donetsk People's Republic."
Malaysian "would like to convey our sincere appreciation to His Excellency Mr. Borodai for obeying our request."
Malaysia delegation says he isn't interests in blame game, but just wants black boxes because they "are property of Malaysia."
Malaysia: "We show to the people of Malaysia that we are so serious to make these things be recovered from Malaysia."
Malaysia National Security Council member/delegation head says he is pleased that #MH17 black boxes appear intact.
Super. That is not Buk (ground-air missie).
This damages are from air-air missile R-27 Topor, or R-73.
This damages are from air-air missile R-27 Topor, or R-73.
Remember it can be all set-up for a media coverage, so US will have a good enough reason to invade.
What are you trying to prove exactly? Those holes are sharpnel, expected to be inside the warhead of the missile.
Doesn't look a bit like machine gun holes, which draw lines of holes.
Doesn't look a bit like machine gun holes, which draw lines of holes.
I don't think is it possible to take down a boeing like airplane using an machine gun?
especially if it is flying higher than 5kmEven if it was possible, that method would give time for the pilot to cast a mayday over the radio. Whatever was the pilot had no time to do anything.
What are you trying to prove exactly? Those holes are sharpnel, expected to be inside the warhead of the missile.
Doesn't look a bit like machine gun holes, which draw lines of holes.
Doesn't look a bit like machine gun holes, which draw lines of holes.
I don't think is it possible to take down a boeing like airplane using an machine gun?
especially if it is flying higher than 5km
What are you trying to prove exactly? Those holes are sharpnel, expected to be inside the warhead of the missile.
Doesn't look a bit like machine gun holes, which draw lines of holes.
Doesn't look a bit like machine gun holes, which draw lines of holes.
Jump to: