Pages:
Author

Topic: MicroCash - New CryptoCurrency - page 5. (Read 13719 times)

legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008
If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat
April 25, 2012, 08:54:28 AM
#51

Hang on here - MicroCash isn't peer2peer and has absolute central control.

This thing isn't a cryptocurrency in any meaningful sense, it's a central database with a pretty client attached.

CoinHunter knows that most users understand little about how these things work. He intends to fool them with a pretty GUI and steal their coins with taxes they probably won't understand either. Apart from that the network is grossly insecure both to outside attacks and acts of CoinHunter.

/thread
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
April 25, 2012, 05:51:11 AM
#50

Hang on here - MicroCash isn't peer2peer and has absolute central control.

This thing isn't a cryptocurrency in any meaningful sense, it's a central database with a pretty client attached.

CoinHunter knows that most users understand little about how these things work. He intends to fool them with a pretty GUI and steal their coins with taxes they probably won't understand either. Apart from that the network is grossly insecure both to outside attacks and acts of CoinHunter.


welcome to solidcoin 1 and 2
legendary
Activity: 4551
Merit: 3445
Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023
April 25, 2012, 04:49:53 AM
#49
Whats the difference between SC3 (aka Microcrash) and Paypal?
PayPal isn't a pyramid scheme.

Is mining still needed?
Yes.

If so - why?
To get more people involved in the scheme in order to steal their money.

Isnt mining just some nice cosmetical way to satisfy people and make them think that they can actually earn something off of RealSolids share?
Yes.

How would banning be implemented?
Arbitrarily.

One DB Server (or cluster) or will banning be propagated through the network and 51% of the miners have to accept a node to no longer be supported?
Doesn't really matter.

If someone was banned: Would his coins be "tainted"?  ...
If by "tainted" you mean "put in the developers' pockets", then yes, most likely.

Any other questions?
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 507
April 25, 2012, 04:25:55 AM
#48
Wow, the ability to ban certain nodes is a heavy strike. I mean, ok, its not like in SC2 it wasnt possible but admitting that is just bad..

But now, just for once, i want to know something simple:
Whats the difference between SC3 (aka Microcrash) and Paypal? Is mining still needed? If so - why? Isnt mining just some nice cosmetical way to satisfy people and make them think that they can actually earn something off of RealSolids share? How would banning be implemented? One DB Server (or cluster) or will banning be propagated through the network and 51% of the miners have to accept a node to no longer be supported? If someone was banned: Would his coins be "tainted"?  ...

sd
hero member
Activity: 730
Merit: 500
April 25, 2012, 04:10:14 AM
#47

Hang on here - MicroCash isn't peer2peer and has absolute central control.

This thing isn't a cryptocurrency in any meaningful sense, it's a central database with a pretty client attached.

CoinHunter knows that most users understand little about how these things work. He intends to fool them with a pretty GUI and steal their coins with taxes they probably won't understand either. Apart from that the network is grossly insecure both to outside attacks and acts of CoinHunter.
member
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
COIN SUPPORTER
April 25, 2012, 01:17:32 AM
#46
ScamCoin is open-source? Well, that put's a whole new spin on things. Let's see what we've got here...
Code: (mining.cpp)
if(g_bTrustedMiningOnly && (pBlock->nBlockNum%2)==1 )
{
Sleep(100);
continue;
}
Huh. I've always wondered how trusted mining works. Now I know! Cheesy Does MicroCash work the same way? Grin

That's so trust nodes will only bother attempting to create trust blocks which are even, the odd blocks are normal blocks. Both trust nodes/blocks and trust accounts have been removed from MicroCash due to criticism.

@Coinhunter (or whoever is playing the part)

Over on your SolidcoinTalk info I saw you posted the below as one of the "New Features" in MicroCash.

"Denial of Service code added, can now ban nodes that flood the network"

Which means you have the ability to ban specific nodes, period. The reason doesn't matter, you have that ability and your unstable history more than proves that one of the fastest ways to get banned is simply to disagree with you.

It also means this built in DDOS protection can be exploited to create all sorts of havoc. I wonder how bloated the "Ban DB" will be with maybe 100,000 banned nodes?? It only makes sense you have a central control server somewhere maintaining a database.

Peer <---> Central Control <----> Peer

Same structure as Solidcoin 2.0 except this time you're admitting it up front. Grin Grin Grin

~BCX~

I think it auto bans so if it gets like a hundred thousand or so requests in 10 seconds, then it automagically bans.

More like...
Peer Control <---> Peer Control <---> Peer Control


So close...
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1006
April 24, 2012, 11:57:59 PM
#45
ScamCoin is open-source? Well, that put's a whole new spin on things. Let's see what we've got here...
Code: (mining.cpp)
if(g_bTrustedMiningOnly && (pBlock->nBlockNum%2)==1 )
{
Sleep(100);
continue;
}
Huh. I've always wondered how trusted mining works. Now I know! Cheesy Does MicroCash work the same way? Grin

That's so trust nodes will only bother attempting to create trust blocks which are even, the odd blocks are normal blocks. Both trust nodes/blocks and trust accounts have been removed from MicroCash due to criticism.

@Coinhunter (or whoever is playing the part)

Over on your SolidcoinTalk info I saw you posted the below as one of the "New Features" in MicroCash.

"Denial of Service code added, can now ban nodes that flood the network"

Which means you have the ability to ban specific nodes, period. The reason doesn't matter, you have that ability and your unstable history more than proves that one of the fastest ways to get banned is simply to disagree with you.

It also means this built in DDOS protection can be exploited to create all sorts of havoc. I wonder how bloated the "Ban DB" will be with maybe 100,000 banned nodes?? It only makes sense you have a central control server somewhere maintaining a database.

Peer <---> Central Control <----> Peer

Same structure as Solidcoin 2.0 except this time you're admitting it up front. Grin Grin Grin

~BCX~

I think it auto bans so if it gets like a hundred thousand or so requests in 10 seconds, then it automagically bans.

More like...
Peer Control <---> Peer Control <---> Peer Control
member
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
COIN SUPPORTER
April 24, 2012, 10:52:22 PM
#44
ScamCoin is open-source? Well, that put's a whole new spin on things. Let's see what we've got here...
Code: (mining.cpp)
if(g_bTrustedMiningOnly && (pBlock->nBlockNum%2)==1 )
{
Sleep(100);
continue;
}
Huh. I've always wondered how trusted mining works. Now I know! Cheesy Does MicroCash work the same way? Grin

That's so trust nodes will only bother attempting to create trust blocks which are even, the odd blocks are normal blocks. Both trust nodes/blocks and trust accounts have been removed from MicroCash due to criticism.

@Coinhunter (or whoever is playing the part)

Over on your SolidcoinTalk info I saw you posted the below as one of the "New Features" in MicroCash.

"Denial of Service code added, can now ban nodes that flood the network"

Which means you have the ability to ban specific nodes, period. The reason doesn't matter, you have that ability and your unstable history more than proves that one of the fastest ways to get banned is simply to disagree with you.

It also means this built in DDOS protection can be exploited to create all sorts of havoc. I wonder how bloated the "Ban DB" will be with maybe 100,000 banned nodes?? It only makes sense you have a central control server somewhere maintaining a database.

Peer <---> Central Control <----> Peer

Same structure as Solidcoin 2.0 except this time you're admitting it up front. Grin Grin Grin

~BCX~

I think it auto bans so if it gets like a hundred thousand or so requests in 10 seconds, then it automagically bans.

More like...
Peer Control <---> Peer Control <---> Peer Control
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1080
Gerald Davis
April 24, 2012, 02:29:39 PM
#43
Source code =/= open source.

SolidCoin isn't open source.  It is restricted under a restrictive license.  Source code of Microsoft Windows is available under license but even Microsoft isn't blatant enough to call it open source.
legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
April 24, 2012, 01:59:54 PM
#42
Why is there no mention of the source code being open source?

Because it's implied it's open source? They may even be going back to a MIT license.

SC started out as open source, but then progressed to a more restricted proprietary license. It's quite logical to assume that no mention of the source code in the announcement means there will be no source code released. I know, silly of me for thinking anything about SC follows logic.
member
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
COIN SUPPORTER
April 24, 2012, 10:32:58 AM
#41
I think it will be much easier for MicroCash to get new users than those who have already experienced a cryptocurrency.

When I started cryptocurrencies, I first went with SolidCoin.

The reason for that is because it worked in the Windows XP VM that I had to use (it didn't take forever to download the blocks).

And it looked kind of interesting.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
April 24, 2012, 10:04:04 AM
#40
 Cheesy rapecash  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
April 24, 2012, 10:00:41 AM
#39
ScamCoin is open-source? Well, that put's a whole new spin on things. Let's see what we've got here...
Code: (mining.cpp)
if(g_bTrustedMiningOnly && (pBlock->nBlockNum%2)==1 )
{
Sleep(100);
continue;
}
Huh. I've always wondered how trusted mining works. Now I know! Cheesy Does MicroCash work the same way? Grin

That's so we could steal people's money, but there was never enough money in Solidcoin to make it worth while. Both trust nodes/blocks and trust accounts have been removed from MicroCash due to everyone on the planet realizing it was a Dictatocurrency.

Glad you can finally admit the truth. Good luck rebranding Soiledcoin into Rapecash.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1006
April 24, 2012, 09:59:23 AM
#38
and how about the coins generated from it?

straight to your wallet, like always?  Grin
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 251
April 24, 2012, 08:55:58 AM
#37
ScamCoin is open-source? Well, that put's a whole new spin on things. Let's see what we've got here...
Code: (mining.cpp)
if(g_bTrustedMiningOnly && (pBlock->nBlockNum%2)==1 )
{
Sleep(100);
continue;
}
Huh. I've always wondered how trusted mining works. Now I know! Cheesy Does MicroCash work the same way? Grin

That's so trust nodes will only bother attempting to create trust blocks which are even, the odd blocks are normal blocks. Both trust nodes/blocks and trust accounts have been removed from MicroCash due to criticism.
legendary
Activity: 4551
Merit: 3445
Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023
April 24, 2012, 06:55:47 AM
#36
MicroCash isn't released yet so the source isn't available. SolidCoin source has been available not far from when it was released, that is what I meant it's implied open source. The project it's spawning from is, why wouldn't we assume this is also?

http://solidcoin.info/downloads.html

ScamCoin is open-source? Well, that put's a whole new spin on things. Let's see what we've got here...
Code: (mining.cpp)
if(g_bTrustedMiningOnly && (pBlock->nBlockNum%2)==1 )
{
Sleep(100);
continue;
}
Huh. I've always wondered how trusted mining works. Now I know! Cheesy Does MicroCash work the same way? Grin
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 251
April 24, 2012, 06:21:46 AM
#35
You can't "imply" something's open source. Either the source is available for all to see or it isn't. So which is it?

MicroCash isn't released yet so the source isn't available. SolidCoin source has been available not far from when it was released, that is what I meant it's implied open source. The project it's spawning from is, why wouldn't we assume this is also?

http://solidcoin.info/downloads.html
legendary
Activity: 4551
Merit: 3445
Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023
April 24, 2012, 06:18:11 AM
#34
Why is there no mention of the source code being open source?

Because it's implied it's open source? They may even be going back to a MIT license.

You can't "imply" something's open source. Either the source is available for all to see or it isn't. So which is it?
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 251
April 24, 2012, 05:40:23 AM
#33
Why is there no mention of the source code being open source?

Because it's implied it's open source? They may even be going back to a MIT license.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 251
April 24, 2012, 05:29:39 AM
#32
Hang on - no I don't, I hope he dies in a fire.

Another reasonable poster I see.
Pages:
Jump to: