Countries pay now for military companies like lockhead maartin and baes.
Imagine for example NATO countries pay for equipment now and later when those countries struggle financially they need to borrow money and they get money from the same companies who they pay now.
So why pay that money lol ....If they have to borrow the same money back later.
So it's like i steal your money and then i offering to you Im generous i give you with low rate loan lol 😁 your own money.
World is in money crisis only ones who got fat wallets of money will be military companies but they will not help.
Imagine for example NATO countries pay for equipment now and later when those countries struggle financially they need to borrow money and they get money from the same companies who they pay now.
So why pay that money lol ....If they have to borrow the same money back later.
So it's like i steal your money and then i offering to you Im generous i give you with low rate loan lol 😁 your own money.
World is in money crisis only ones who got fat wallets of money will be military companies but they will not help.
Actually, You raise valid points concerning funding with regard to military expenses and how the chances are that different countries They end up owing for the money they contributed to the private companies. This has then brought forward defense budget constraints and economic dependency on military actions. It is somehow paradoxical when countries Spend more funds on defense but end up in financial crisis later on. This obliges them to borrow from the agency. This type of analysis tends to focus attention on public questions and the long-range impact such spending might have.
