Topic: Miner cartel, Bankster cartel, or an altcoin? Your choice? - page 4. (Read 33243 times)

From the gist of what @traincarswreck has said, bitcoin is not ideal money. It is merely an asymptotically monetary tool to stabilise the fiat monetary system.

While a long-standing hypothesis, I don't think it fits.  Nash was too smart to be Satoshi.  There are too many silly ideas at the foundations of bitcoin for it to be invented by a guy like Nash ; unless Nash meant it to be a testbench of ideas, and that the thing got out of hand.

Bitcoin is designed to be some kind of digital gold.  Nash was against the principles of gold bugs like the Austrians.  Nash, of all people, wanted ideal money to keep its value ; not to decrease it, but also, *not to increase it*.  Of all people, he should know that a collectible cannot be ideal money.  In fact, money with constant inflation was close to his view of ideal money.  In other words, Nash would not:
1) have introduced a finite amount of bitcoins, but would have kept the inflation RATE constant, meaning, increasing block rewards over time.
2) would have perfectly realized the centralization of PoW ; he didn't even trust the United Nations to control money, how would he trust an oligarchy of miners
3) not have committed stupid design errors, such as a way too small nonce in the block header, having to resort to tricks like having to modify transactions (coinbase comments) in order to modify the Merkle root, while in the white paper, he explains that the work should only be done at the header level.  This is a *particularly stupid* error, because a 128 bit header instead of a 80 bit header would have been perfect with a long enough nonce ; now this non-existing nonce is replaced by stupid padding for the SHA-256 second block hash.

In other words, for Nash to be Satoshi, Nash would have to be less smart than we think he was, or would have been much less honest and open in his real intentions than Satoshi claimed to be.  In other words, if it was Nash, he created a monster by being stupid, or he did it on purpose and was a bastard.

Yeah he was real..
It's a known fact that they kept parading around a new savior that kept getting killed.
Then they would drag out a new baby Jesus all over again.. saying ohhhh this is THE one.
And that concept was ripped off from the Egyptians as well as the arc of the covenant and many other key aspects to the religion.
Christianty was a rebel move to break away from being captive slaves.
It was more of a political thing of the times than a religion.
Agenda's.. perverted in time.

Read the bible guys it says exactly what happened.
It's right there in front of your nose.
What i just said is documented in history in written works etc.

In other words it was not about teaching "truths" it was about an agenda.
A pile of slaves breaking free and going off wandering etc.
Would you want to be a slave ?
They were probably miserable and desperate and were looking for a savior.
Of course they found one  

Anyway

How the hell do you know the seat belts did not work in the taxi ?
And why are you not so good at editing your posts ?
People this guy seems like a fucking idiot  

Almost as bad as rich people thinking their money is important.
Rich = Retarded (brain damaged people)
Few actually deserve it.. like Bill Gates maybe.
Many simply have it fall in their lap then run around with a smug attitude with their superiority.
Guess what assholes.. the internet is here (the great equalizer)
Your dumb fuck rich douche ass's are no better than mine on the web.
And i exercise integrity when you can't even buy it.. so blow me shitheads.
Roll up wads of cash and ram it up your ass douche bags.
Monero douche bags can blow me  

@traincarswreck I still think you pushing to reveal Satoshi got him killed. They didn't need to kill him as long as we didn't know who he was:

if nash is in fact satoshi then his death wouldnt be surprise to myself at least as perhaps his life's purpose been achieved and "his" creation better have him gone than still around to keep stability of the bitcoin economy. the idea of premined bitcoins is like a time bomb - if satoshi's wallet moves, then it would be the end..

This thread is where its at.  Nash didn't disprove einstein.  He showed how einstein was right, but how he (nash) was righter.

It was a most likely a Sanctioned OP.
Seatbelts had been damaged prior in preparation for the accident.

Taxi Cab Driver only started driving Taxi Two weeks earlier.
Before that he drove an ice cream truck for years.
A lot of covert surveillance occurs using food trucks / vans.

Limo Service that was supposed to pick them up, declined calls. 

Told a colleague in the days before his death that he had a replacement equation for Albert Einstein's theory of relativity.
Nash believed his replacement theory would further explain quantum gravity and expand on Einstein's theory of relativity,
which was published in the early 20th century and explains how what is perceived as gravity comes from the curvature of space and time.

Most likely some organization felt this information too valuable to be made public.

Understanding quantum gravity is the precursor to controlling motion at the atomic level.
Technologies developed from this are as wondrous as they are dangerous.

* In simple Terms,
Einstein Theory gave us Nuclear Power & Nuclear Bombs,
Nash's expanded Theory : would give it's holder even more power


 

money still happens.  Its just on a higher order.

An old problem of coordination, which is dying. We have the Internet now.

let's stabilize the uni and time travel.  Is nash shinichi? unlimited money?  money is natural, solves a problem.  It's intrinsically NOT useless.

Unlimited money will become less and less useful.

I wouldn't want unlimited money because it would make me insane. The only goals remaining be either power or knowledge. I seek the latter, which one doesn't need unlimited money to pursue.

Unlimited money is for those who will perish in their insatiable lust for power. They will all be huddled together on the top of the hill with the hoardes of depraved masses (who whoreshipped them) below them dying. And they will all perish together.

yup now we are getting somewhere.  Krishnamurti teaches objective truth.  I suspect jesus was real.  He said "hey lets live differently" and we nailed him to a cross.

Jesus is a thief.

Don't believe you, or in other words I think he "expected", nonetheless, cite....

Nash also wrote and I quote verbatim he wrote "hopefully" (I found it in his website) that he hoped the moneylenders would lose and that the barons of real property would gain instead.

I should have quoted that when I found it. I don't feel like digging for it right now.

Jesus smashed the money changer tables and nash notes this.

Met the guy yesterday. He had unlimited money. In fact we work together for quite some time now. Let the Earl of Cebu understand.