bumping for relevancy
Lauda has said it all, and I don't think there is any relevance for you pump the thread Buddy. 
Topic: minerjones backing out of multiple auctions [endorsed/condoned by blazed] (Read 13259 times)
May 26, 2019, 01:15:48 PM
May 25, 2019, 07:13:10 PM
bumping for relevancy
Go get a life, it's not relevant and neither are you.
May 25, 2019, 06:17:40 PM
bumping for relevancy
August 26, 2017, 06:21:43 AM
These are not mistakes. This is a habit of MJ backing out of his obligations.
No, that is absolute bullshit. He has never backed out of any obligation from what I've seen, other than you presenting this case which again, as many have said, it not entirely his fault. If he does proxy auctions, then things can go wrong and if the seller is at fault then MJ can't really do much about it. He can, however, and should, stop doing proxy auctions.It is interesting to see you turn a blind eye about people in power ignoring their obligations while you leave negative trust against anyone not in power who does something that most people don't even consider anything close to being a scam and trolling them when they try to defend themselves. I think this says a lot about you.
1) Bullshit, again.2) Nobody from the section is really complaining, besides you desperately trying to smear his name.
3) There is a huge difference between: 1) Someone who has done absolutely nothing for the forum, community nor has proven themselves to be trustworthy. 2) A person, like MJ, who is the exact opposite. You can't treat both equally / doing so wouldn't make sense at all.
4) I don't turn a blind eye to pretty much anything, which is trivially proven by my constant bothering of DT1 members who don't actively maintain their lists or do not do what they're supposed to.
5) I tend to occasionally troll scammers like yourself as well as innocent people like MJ. It's all fun; don't worry about it snowflake.
Remember when you tried to blackmail DT members with that request that you've had? Cat 'members. Seems similar.
August 25, 2017, 11:20:26 PM
It looks like users are taking note of this kind of behavior and refusing to bid on his auctions.
Which is absolute nonsense. Nobody from the Collectibles section really, aside from you and OgNasty, could care less about these mistakes. They happen, and he has proven himself to the point where a plethora of them are forgivable as long as he learns from it.It is interesting to see you turn a blind eye about people in power ignoring their obligations while you leave negative trust against anyone not in power who does something that most people don't even consider anything close to being a scam and trolling them when they try to defend themselves. I think this says a lot about you.
Interestingly, minerjones had left me a negative rating not long after I opened this thread, and removed it around the time you posted this message.
So? You keep removing my negative ratings, then sending me a PM telling me you have done so. Hoping I would look the other way on your unethical behaviour and remove my legitimate negative ratings on you. This is just more of your repeated hypocritical behaviour.
I finally had to block your PMs.
August 25, 2017, 11:12:02 AM
Seems like minerjones got scared because of daddy ognasty..Because mineraljones removed his negative feedback from og.
Thus this situation clearly signifies that og is mightier than minerjones.
Og nasty is a big man with power while minerjones is a cunt endorsed by tman
Thus this situation clearly signifies that og is mightier than minerjones.
Og nasty is a big man with power while minerjones is a cunt endorsed by tman
yes I wholeheartedly endorse MJ he is a great man and should run for presidency of the US.
OG on the other hand is an overweight, balding, pubebeard fuck who's Mrs left him because of how much of a prick he is...
August 25, 2017, 04:53:44 AM
Seems like minerjones got scared because of daddy ognasty..Because mineraljones removed his negative feedback from og.
Thus this situation clearly signifies that og is mightier than minerjones.
Og nasty is a big man with power while minerjones is a cunt endorsed by tman
Thus this situation clearly signifies that og is mightier than minerjones.
Og nasty is a big man with power while minerjones is a cunt endorsed by tman
August 25, 2017, 03:46:56 AM
It looks like users are taking note of this kind of behavior and refusing to bid on his auctions.
Which is absolute nonsense. Nobody from the Collectibles section really, aside from you and OgNasty, could care less about these mistakes. They happen, and he has proven himself to the point where a plethora of them are forgivable as long as he learns from it.Interestingly, minerjones had left me a negative rating not long after I opened this thread, and removed it around the time you posted this message.
He should have left it long ago / shouldn't have removed it. Unfortunately he does not tend to tag scammers like yourself often. 
August 25, 2017, 02:13:01 AM
Interestingly, minerjones had left me a negative rating not long after I opened this thread, and removed it around the time you posted this message.
So? You keep removing my negative ratings, then sending me a PM telling me you have done so. Hoping I would look the other way on your unethical behaviour and remove my legitimate negative ratings on you. This is just more of your repeated hypocritical behaviour.
I finally had to block your PMs.
August 25, 2017, 01:18:12 AM
2 more auctions backed out of by minerjones. In typical fashion he locked the threads so his posts wouldn't be quoted and criticized (another disturbing ongoing trend).
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21103971
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21104171
It looks like users are taking note of this kind of behavior and refusing to bid on his auctions. Unfortunately, and sadly, it seems that users are still afraid of leaving a negative rating against MJ as they know they will be retaliated against by his group of friends. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21103971
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21104171
Interestingly, minerjones had left me a negative rating not long after I opened this thread, and removed it around the time you posted this message.
August 22, 2017, 06:21:09 PM
2 more auctions backed out of by minerjones. In typical fashion he locked the threads so his posts wouldn't be quoted and criticized (another disturbing ongoing trend).
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21103971
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21104171
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21103971
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21104171
you're resembling QS more than usual today...
August 22, 2017, 03:18:45 PM
2 more auctions backed out of by minerjones. In typical fashion he locked the threads so his posts wouldn't be quoted and criticized (another disturbing ongoing trend).
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21103971
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21104171
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21103971
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21104171
August 21, 2017, 02:38:18 PM
One other thing I would point out is that minerjones has thusfar failed to address the issue of him lying about no longer handling third party auctions without transparency. I want to know when minerjones is going to address this lie.
You seem to be using the wrong account, Quickseller. The situation has been addresses and resolved.I have no meat on this table but this made me laugh, real hard, I kept pounding my fist.
August 21, 2017, 09:41:34 AM
One other thing I would point out is that minerjones has thusfar failed to address the issue of him lying about no longer handling third party auctions without transparency. I want to know when minerjones is going to address this lie.
You seem to be using the wrong account, Quickseller. The situation has been addresses and resolved. August 21, 2017, 03:36:02 AM
One other thing I would point out is that minerjones has thusfar failed to address the issue of him lying about no longer handling third party auctions without transparency. I want to know when minerjones is going to address this lie.
You seem to be using the wrong account, Quickseller. The situation has been addresses and resolved. 
August 20, 2017, 10:43:39 PM
Panthers52, keep pounding
It is funny you say that because your wife said that exact same thing to me last weekend.Kind Regards
Panthers52
One other thing I would point out is that minerjones has thusfar failed to address the issue of him lying about no longer handling third party auctions without transparency. I want to know when minerjones is going to address this lie.
August 17, 2017, 03:54:16 AM
Too bad that I get information from my doxes from 100% public sources, and watching for small little details that give me hints as to the RL identities of users. None of my doxes use any information learned as a result of shipping a package from someone else.
Highly doubtful at best.I don't actively retain shipping information of those that I ship to unless I have shipped to the person many times, and expect to continue doing so -- I may also remember some details about some that I trade with such as their first name and general area of residence in order to have a more personable relationship with those I have traded with.
Minerjones on the other hand allegedly maintains a list of identities that he has traded with in the past by keeping information provided to him in confidence. This is non-public, confidential information that he is collecting.
Which is pretty much the same thing. Minerjones on the other hand apparently is willing to release private information to his "buddies" who have not been harmed financially in any way, nor have the person in question done anything wrong except gotten on the wrong side of one of Minerjones's friends.
No. This is a bullshit claim made by Canary, who is as trustworthy as your local robber waiting at the next corner. August 17, 2017, 02:04:25 AM
I thought minerjones started acting shady after doxxing CanaryInTheMine back in March, but it looks like the behavior may have started earlier than that...
While this isn't on topic here, do you have any sort of proof of this happening? From what I understand, CanaryInTheMine was saying in his trust rating that it is possible for MJ to dox people. However this is the case for anyone that sends or receives packages, and it is unfair to call out MJ specifically on it.
Canary spoke to me about it at the time and I believe he would have been more vocal about the situation to others, but minerjones excluded him from the slack group limiting his options to leaving negative trust.
Just ordered your DOX QS. Chat to you next week when I have them through from my man.. amazing what $200 gets you if you know who to ask
Well OG's cost me $200 and took 3 days for everything. Can't imagine QS will cost any more, but I have a suspicion that they are one and the same. I'll let you know when I have them vod
I discussed dox, I haven't publicly aired them.
Your behavior is disgusting and minerjones should be embarrassed to be affiliated with you.
no your behavior is disgusting - you did not pay loans back in full, you are running a loss making asset and you are transmitting money without a license, plus I dont like you personally I think you are a dickhead so I bought your Dox.. no big deal and if you stop winding me up they will stay with me, QS on the other hand is a different matter - with his previous posts on kiddy porn.. well I wont say what will happen with his Dox
August 17, 2017, 12:28:10 AM
I went to one of minerjones's recent auction and was pointed to this thread by the op. Seems to have gotten a lot of "looks". Has anyone been scammed by minerjones? I will recon to say no. I personally have had quite a bit of bitcoin handled through him and have never had one single issue. This topic doesnt seem to belong in the "scam accusations" portion of this forum as one of his admitted third parties backed out of an auction with not one person moving any money/btc around. People have gotten taken for "actual funds" and no one seems to give a shit about it but a member here hosted a 3rd party auction who the seller needed to back out and everyone "cares".
Personally if i was one of the other genuine thread op's who have gotten scammed id be bent right now. But thats just me. This seems almost a non issue compared to some of their stories. I try to stay out of here as much as possible but was directed here through a recent auction in the goods section. Oh well this post has been long enough either way
I have never been scammed by miner jones nor have i ever felt like i was getting scammed. Such is life in the world of crypto.....
Personally if i was one of the other genuine thread op's who have gotten scammed id be bent right now. But thats just me. This seems almost a non issue compared to some of their stories. I try to stay out of here as much as possible but was directed here through a recent auction in the goods section. Oh well this post has been long enough either way
I have never been scammed by miner jones nor have i ever felt like i was getting scammed. Such is life in the world of crypto.....
August 16, 2017, 10:29:23 PM
I was auctioning items for other people.... I do not control them or their items.
I have stopped doing this, that is why the last auction was cancelled..
It looks like you are being a little dishonest. I have stopped doing this, that is why the last auction was cancelled..
When you backed out of your auction to sell the 1000 BTC cas coins, you said you would be more transparent in ownership of coins you are selling for third parties: (July 11)
Quote from: http://archive.is/LSEoY#selection-9073.0-9073.97
I would like to apologize to coblee and the community for not doing my due diligence
Future transactions will be transparent and items ownership confirmed before selling or auctions.
Future transactions will be transparent and items ownership confirmed before selling or auctions.
Yet, over a month later, you backed out of an auction to sell a cas brass halve (August 12) - http://archive.is/okLEh#selection-409.0-409.10
These three statements can't all be true. You have had several auctions since you stated on July 11 that you would be transparent about ownership of coins you are selling, did you personally own all of these coins, or were you selling them on behalf of other people?
This is one more reason not to trust MJ.
Jump to: