And your coin was a Luckycoin clone, With "God's numbers" and the letter "V" added. Oh and it didn't work.
FYPFY
If it's a clone genius if super and lucky blocks tell me why much better programmers than you like markM and twoBits haven't been able to get it to run.
You do know clone means cut and paste and click on run, right?
So obviously my coin has something original, something new and that's is the definition if innovation. So much so the best here can't figure it out yet.
Is that complicated or do you think Mark can't cut and paste as good as your fraudulent waste of 10,000 posts?
Your coin had cut and pasted the supposedly broken code from luckycoin.
So most coins using lucky blocks are probably all using the same broken code.
Since there is no lack of clone coins with lucky blocks there is no hurry to launch any more of them, it seems more useful to wait until a good way of doing them has been decided upon, then maybe have them all set a block number at which to change to fixed code. If there is still any need to launch yet another clone by then, which i guess some idiot is going to claim there is, then the same better code could be used for that too.
Its not as if there is any hurry since there is no need. If some kind of consensus is reached as to what approach to use then doubtless someone will end up using it. It is not something I am in any hurry to do, why would I, yet another scamcoin is not something I actually want to see happen.
I ran some nodes just for the learning experience of figuring out what was going on in the blockchains, like which version people were running and why none were reporting any conflicts.
From the sound of it the spots people have not even noticed anything wrong yet, that is kind of amusing too. Why bother creating a fix for them, lets wait and see if they even notice the problem...
-MarkM-