lol you guy(s) are funny, the "Minexpool miner" is "nheqminer":
https://github.com/nicehash/nheqminerThe solver used is tromp's solver:
https://github.com/tromp/equihashAdapted to the equihash parameters of MNX. BTW read the licenses of the software
I have an open source miner, which improves speed by at least a factor of 3, in the works which will be released to the public soon, free of charge and with no dev fee at all, and yes, it will also work on Minexpool.. Unethical ? Releasing an old, obsolete, slow open source miner as a compiled binary-only version with 2% pool fee plus 2% miner-dev-fee? Yes.
So, Raq's miner was such garbage that you had to lift it, tweak it, then put it in place at another website to let a swarm of hash power pour into the network and take income from the rest of us miners.
You did all of this, instead of just waiting to finish this magical mining software you're already working on.
Yeah. Pretty fucking unethical.
However, I applaud your attempt at obfuscation by deflecting about Racq's "release of an old, obsolete, slow open source miner". It was almost clever.
There was nothing lifted, put back together, I simply replaced The URL in the miner with an hexeditor within 5 mins.
He did a great job in implementing the new equihash params into the miner, no doubt, he also had his fee on the miner and pool for the first 40.000 blocks or so of the network which should have been already a pretty big reward .. nicehash or tromp, which are the creators of the miner and the solver sure get a part of that as well, right?
Oh you are free to mine where you want, no one forces you. If you want to pay more fee, just stay on the other pool, that's cool for me. IMHO people should have a choice.. they had none.
@nosekefik the source will be made publicly available in full and I'll Post it here and on the pool.
@racquemis great job on the coin stuff, maybe the devs should pay you a bounty for that as well?
