[ mining os ] nvoc - page 86. | Bitcointalksearch.org

l4ncel0t

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Just saw the new KTccminer version 8.18.
KT ccminer i way faster than SPccminer on neoscrypt at least

You can compile it, it's realy easy
In /home/m1

Code:

mkdir KTccminer-818
cd KTccminer-818
wget https://github.com/KlausT/ccminer/archive/windows.zip
unzip windows.zip
cd ccminer-windows
./build.sh
mv ccminer ../

Then change the path to your new
/home/m1/KTccminer-818/ccminer for neoscrypt coin in 0miner

l4ncel0t

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Quote from: CryptAtomeTrader44 on January 07, 2018, 11:19:09 AM

OK adding a coin, but how is profitable to mine DSR Huh

?

And i want to tell all that unimining.net had some saturation on neoscrypt pools. I tried to mine GBX at this pool and they can't provide me any blocks to mine.

in additions :

1/ I'm not sure that all of us have a folder named KTccminer-817 in /home/m1
2/ I think there is a "typing error" in the command line

Code:

-o stratum+tcp://$DSR_POOL:$DRS_PORT

must be

Code:

-o stratum+tcp://$DSR_POOL:$DSR_PORT

You have to be more precise an readable in your post. You can post a modification understandable and easy to do without being a computer scientist or a computer technician. This system is named "easy to use" for reminder.

Thanks for adding.

You 're right sorry for the typo,
A patch is the easiest way to do the modification, you don't even need to know where to put the lines in the patched file.
just do
patch -p0 < file_with_the_patch
fastest than anything

KTccminer 817 was posted few days ago here by Papampi
I don't know if this coin is profitable, I just want to mine some so made the modification and shared.

Rumo

newbie

Activity: 41

Merit: 0

Quote from: Rumo on January 07, 2018, 07:40:16 AM

Quote from: papampi on January 07, 2018, 03:06:08 AM

Quote from: Rumo on January 06, 2018, 03:52:00 PM

Quote from: CryptAtomeTrader44 on January 06, 2018, 11:10:51 AM

Quote from: papampi on January 06, 2018, 07:14:36 AM

I was having some issues this week with some pools and decide to rewrite the code for pool check in watchdog, it was supposed to be in v19-2.0 but we let it slide for that time.

It works almost same as network check but instead of checking for network it checks for pool and wait if its unreachable to prevent miner restart and eventually rig restarts.
Then After I wrote it I thought why wait and waste time when we can switch to an alternate pool
So I rewrite it again to add an alternate pool in 1bash whether its supported by the miner or not.
What left to do is to check the first pool and switch back as soon as it becomes available.

So here is my question:
How important it is for you guys to have an alternate pool?
And how important it is to switch back to main pool?

I'm asking this because I wrote the code for myself and to make it work with rest of miners and coins it needs more changes so I don't want to work on something not so useful Wink

It's clear that luckpool has had a lot of hits this week. They probably have lower fee than elsewhere but their servers seem unstable, so I decided to go elsewhere, even if it costs me a little more fee.
When I look at MPH and the number of pools they have and I have never had a single break with them, all I can switch home, I rock it.

I also had troubles with Nicehash who all of a sudden Wednesday night began to refuse my connections to their servers ... So I created a ticket home and removed nicehash from my list of WTM switch ...

Your proposal to send to another alternative pool is a good idea, but I have another one: Why not try the second corner directly in the WTM list.

Obviously this only works for those who use WTM_Switch, but it must be possible to combine both a second pool and a second coin with or without the SWITCH WTM.

I would love to have it now because ZPOOL is down and my riggs shouting at me.

I'm sorry Rumo, but you should wait a bit longer, as its better to wait and have a bug free code than get it sooner with some bugs that could cause problems.
The code is almost done, I'm working on an update script so users dont need to redo their 1bash and the update script do it for them, and thats writing a script to edit so many coins so its a long long update script Wink

But I will send you a pre-release so you can test it when its done.

Cool Stuff. Thanks.

Hi Papampi. I think ( from my point of view ) you should add a test for checking the Pool2 and Port2 variable. In your script if the variable is empty an error comes up. If you place
"if [ -z $variable to test ]
then"

in front of your script you can prevent that.

regards

msato

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

Quote from: papampi on January 06, 2018, 07:14:36 AM

I was having some issues this week with some pools and decide to rewrite the code for pool check in watchdog, it was supposed to be in v19-2.0 but we let it slide for that time.

It works almost same as network check but instead of checking for network it checks for pool and wait if its unreachable to prevent miner restart and eventually rig restarts.
Then After I wrote it I thought why wait and waste time when we can switch to an alternate pool
So I rewrite it again to add an alternate pool in 1bash whether its supported by the miner or not.
What left to do is to check the first pool and switch back as soon as it becomes available.

So here is my question:
How important it is for you guys to have an alternate pool?
And how important it is to switch back to main pool?

I'm asking this because I wrote the code for myself and to make it work with rest of miners and coins it needs more changes so I don't want to work on something not so useful Wink

This would be very useful, it's one of the things I always worry about in monitoring the rig. And being able to go back to the main pool would be great as I always use the pool closer to my rigs.

CryptAtomeTrader44

full member

Activity: 340

Merit: 103

It is easier to break an atom than partialities AE

Quote from: l4ncel0t on January 07, 2018, 10:55:55 AM

DSR patch, not on WTM so no autoswitch

Code:

--- backups/1bash       2018-01-07 16:52:36.927391240 +0100
+++ 1bash       2018-01-07 16:42:10.831384399 +0100
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@
 ######### ONION
 
 #ALGO - Neoscrypt
-######### PXC  FTC  ORB  TZC VIVO
+######### PXC  FTC  ORB  TZC VIVO DSR (No autoswitch for DSR))
 
 #ALGO - Myriad-Groestl
 ######### XMY
@@ -600,6 +600,14 @@
 TZC_POOL="pool.unimining.net"
 TZC_PORT="4237"
 TZC_INTENSITY="17"
+
+# DSR ## No Need to add stratum+tcp:// to server address
+DSR_WORKER="$WORKERNAME"
+DSR_ADDRESS="replace_with_your_address"
+DSR_POOL="pool.unimining.net"
+DSR_PORT="4234"
+DSR_INTENSITY="17"
+
 # NICE_ETHASH autoconverts to BTC: ensure you update BTC_ADDRESS if you use NICE_ETHASH
 NICE_ETHASH_WORKER="$WORKERNAME"
 NICE_ETHASH_POOL="stratum+tcp://daggerhashimoto.usa.nicehash.com:3353"

--- backups/0miner      2018-01-07 16:51:33.845080736 +0100
+++ 0miner      2018-01-07 16:50:03.737208788 +0100
@@ -409,6 +409,13 @@
   screen -dmSL miner $HCD -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://$TZC_POOL:$TZC_PORT -u $ADDR -p $MINER_PWD -i $TZC_INTENSITY
 fi
 
+if [ $COIN == "DSR" ]
+then
+  HCD='/home/m1/KTccminer-817/ccminer'
+  ADDR="$DSR_ADDRESS.$DSR_WORKER"
+  screen -dmSL miner $HCD -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://$DSR_POOL:$DRS_PORT -u $ADDR -p $MINER_PWD -i $DSR_INTENSITY
+fi
+
 if [ $COIN == "VIVO" ]
 then
   HCD='/home/m1/KTccminer-817/ccminer'

OK adding a coin, but how is profitable to mine DSR Huh

?

And i want to tell all that unimining.net had some saturation on neoscrypt pools. I tried to mine GBX at this pool and they can't provide me any blocks to mine.

in additions :

1/ I'm not sure that all of us have a folder named KTccminer-817 in /home/m1
2/ I think there is a "typing error" in the command line

Code:

-o stratum+tcp://$DSR_POOL:$DRS_PORT

must be

Code:

-o stratum+tcp://$DSR_POOL:$DSR_PORT

You have to be more precise an readable in your post. You can post a modification understandable and easy to do without being a computer scientist or a computer technician. This system is named "easy to use" for reminder.

Thanks for adding.

EDIT :

@L4ncel0t
I know it's nasty but it's my opinion:
their web page gives an impression of sidereal emptiness

And then the proposed exchanges seem to me rather second area even unknown, except coinmarkets and still I'm skeptical about this exchange (less than Yobit anyway)

l4ncel0t

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

DSR patch, not on WTM so no autoswitch

Code:

--- backups/1bash       2018-01-07 16:52:36.927391240 +0100
+++ 1bash       2018-01-07 16:42:10.831384399 +0100
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@
 ######### ONION
 
 #ALGO - Neoscrypt
-######### PXC  FTC  ORB  TZC VIVO
+######### PXC  FTC  ORB  TZC VIVO DSR (No autoswitch for DSR))
 
 #ALGO - Myriad-Groestl
 ######### XMY
@@ -600,6 +600,14 @@
 TZC_POOL="pool.unimining.net"
 TZC_PORT="4237"
 TZC_INTENSITY="17"
+
+# DSR ## No Need to add stratum+tcp:// to server address
+DSR_WORKER="$WORKERNAME"
+DSR_ADDRESS="replace_with_your_address"
+DSR_POOL="pool.unimining.net"
+DSR_PORT="4234"
+DSR_INTENSITY="17"
+
 # NICE_ETHASH autoconverts to BTC: ensure you update BTC_ADDRESS if you use NICE_ETHASH
 NICE_ETHASH_WORKER="$WORKERNAME"
 NICE_ETHASH_POOL="stratum+tcp://daggerhashimoto.usa.nicehash.com:3353"

--- backups/0miner      2018-01-07 16:51:33.845080736 +0100
+++ 0miner      2018-01-07 16:50:03.737208788 +0100
@@ -409,6 +409,13 @@
   screen -dmSL miner $HCD -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://$TZC_POOL:$TZC_PORT -u $ADDR -p $MINER_PWD -i $TZC_INTENSITY
 fi
 
+if [ $COIN == "DSR" ]
+then
+  HCD='/home/m1/KTccminer-817/ccminer'
+  ADDR="$DSR_ADDRESS.$DSR_WORKER"
+  screen -dmSL miner $HCD -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://$DSR_POOL:$DRS_PORT -u $ADDR -p $MINER_PWD -i $DSR_INTENSITY
+fi
+
 if [ $COIN == "VIVO" ]
 then
   HCD='/home/m1/KTccminer-817/ccminer'

papampi

full member

Activity: 686

Merit: 140

Linux FOREVER! Resistance is futile!!!

Quote from: CryptAtomeTrader44 on January 07, 2018, 07:39:45 AM

Since apparently the Mega link of papampi poses problems of availability and complications due to the rules of this service to download version 19-2.0 of nvOC, I uploaded on an online file-saving service the file that contains the IMG

Here is the link:
http://dl.free.fr/hAWltP5uD

I did not test or check the download after uploading it.

Tell me if he is good or not.

NB: I live in France and this service is a very famous French provider (FREE), so it's written in French, but you only have to click on
Valider et Telecharger

Thanks mate,
Will add the link to GitHub after first confirmation.

damNmad

full member

Activity: 378

Merit: 104

nvOC forever

Quote from: CryptAtomeTrader44 on January 07, 2018, 07:39:45 AM

Since apparently the Mega link of papampi poses problems of availability and complications due to the rules of this service to download version 19-2.0 of nvOC, I uploaded on an online file-saving service the file that contains the IMG

Here is the link:
http://dl.free.fr/hAWltP5uD

I did not test or check the download after uploading it.

Tell me if he is good or not.

NB: I live in France and this service is a very famous French provider (FREE), so it's written in French, but you only have to click on
Valider et Telecharger

Thanks mate.

Downloading it now, seems it is working, Once downloading finishes, i will upload it to Gdrive and create a torrent as well if possible.

Rumo

newbie

Activity: 41

Merit: 0

Quote from: papampi on January 07, 2018, 03:06:08 AM

Quote from: Rumo on January 06, 2018, 03:52:00 PM

Quote from: CryptAtomeTrader44 on January 06, 2018, 11:10:51 AM

Quote from: papampi on January 06, 2018, 07:14:36 AM

I was having some issues this week with some pools and decide to rewrite the code for pool check in watchdog, it was supposed to be in v19-2.0 but we let it slide for that time.

It works almost same as network check but instead of checking for network it checks for pool and wait if its unreachable to prevent miner restart and eventually rig restarts.
Then After I wrote it I thought why wait and waste time when we can switch to an alternate pool
So I rewrite it again to add an alternate pool in 1bash whether its supported by the miner or not.
What left to do is to check the first pool and switch back as soon as it becomes available.

So here is my question:
How important it is for you guys to have an alternate pool?
And how important it is to switch back to main pool?

I'm asking this because I wrote the code for myself and to make it work with rest of miners and coins it needs more changes so I don't want to work on something not so useful Wink

It's clear that luckpool has had a lot of hits this week. They probably have lower fee than elsewhere but their servers seem unstable, so I decided to go elsewhere, even if it costs me a little more fee.
When I look at MPH and the number of pools they have and I have never had a single break with them, all I can switch home, I rock it.

I also had troubles with Nicehash who all of a sudden Wednesday night began to refuse my connections to their servers ... So I created a ticket home and removed nicehash from my list of WTM switch ...

Your proposal to send to another alternative pool is a good idea, but I have another one: Why not try the second corner directly in the WTM list.

Obviously this only works for those who use WTM_Switch, but it must be possible to combine both a second pool and a second coin with or without the SWITCH WTM.

I would love to have it now because ZPOOL is down and my riggs shouting at me.

I'm sorry Rumo, but you should wait a bit longer, as its better to wait and have a bug free code than get it sooner with some bugs that could cause problems.
The code is almost done, I'm working on an update script so users dont need to redo their 1bash and the update script do it for them, and thats writing a script to edit so many coins so its a long long update script Wink

But I will send you a pre-release so you can test it when its done.

Cool Stuff. Thanks.

CryptAtomeTrader44

full member

Activity: 340

Merit: 103

It is easier to break an atom than partialities AE

Since apparently the Mega link of papampi poses problems of availability and complications due to the rules of this service to download version 19-2.0 of nvOC, I uploaded on an online file-saving service the file that contains the IMG

Here is the link:
http://dl.free.fr/hAWltP5uD

I did not test or check the download after uploading it.

Tell me if it is good or not.

NB: I live in France and this service is a very famous French provider (FREE), so it's written in French, but you only have to click on
Valider et Telecharger

bumbu100

newbie

Activity: 44

Merit: 0

Quote from: papampi on January 07, 2018, 05:34:01 AM

Quote from: bumbu100 on January 07, 2018, 05:14:23 AM

Quote from: WaveFront on January 07, 2018, 04:26:25 AM

Quote from: papampi on January 07, 2018, 04:01:08 AM

Quote from: bumbu100 on January 07, 2018, 03:44:42 AM

What is remote bash?

I believe "remote Bash" was a feature introduced in the PoisonXA fork. From one of his release notes:

Quote

remote bash feature Will allow your to host your 1bash files remotely to edit your miners without direct connection

yes
and that's a very good option to control many rigs through a single bash file

Nice
But thats nothing new, its been in nvOC since long ago with _Parallax_MODE

Code:

_Parallax_MODE="NO"         # YES or NO # To deploy 1bash remotely from pastebin.com.

With a small difference in Parallax_MODE you own your config in pastebin but I dont know where the configs saves in pxa and who owns the web server

I am using my own 1bash, my own webserver for hosting it (inside a LAN). I have a good connection between rigs and remote bash, and remote bash is really working, but not perfectly....

papampi

full member

Activity: 686

Merit: 140

Linux FOREVER! Resistance is futile!!!

Quote from: bumbu100 on January 07, 2018, 05:14:23 AM

Quote from: WaveFront on January 07, 2018, 04:26:25 AM

Quote from: papampi on January 07, 2018, 04:01:08 AM

Quote from: bumbu100 on January 07, 2018, 03:44:42 AM

What is remote bash?

I believe "remote Bash" was a feature introduced in the PoisonXA fork. From one of his release notes:

Quote

remote bash feature Will allow your to host your 1bash files remotely to edit your miners without direct connection

yes
and that's a very good option to control many rigs through a single bash file

Nice
But thats nothing new, its been in nvOC since long ago with _Parallax_MODE

Code:

_Parallax_MODE="NO"         # YES or NO # To deploy 1bash remotely from pastebin.com.

With a small difference in Parallax_MODE you own your config in pastebin but I dont know where the configs saves in pxa and who owns the web server

bumbu100

newbie

Activity: 44

Merit: 0

Quote from: WaveFront on January 07, 2018, 04:26:25 AM

Quote from: papampi on January 07, 2018, 04:01:08 AM

Quote from: bumbu100 on January 07, 2018, 03:44:42 AM

What is remote bash?

I believe "remote Bash" was a feature introduced in the PoisonXA fork. From one of his release notes:

Quote

remote bash feature Will allow your to host your 1bash files remotely to edit your miners without direct connection

yes
and that's a very good option to control many rigs through a single bash file

WaveFront

member

Activity: 126

Merit: 10

Quote from: papampi on January 07, 2018, 04:01:08 AM

Quote from: bumbu100 on January 07, 2018, 03:44:42 AM

What is remote bash?

I believe "remote Bash" was a feature introduced in the PoisonXA fork. From one of his release notes:

Quote

remote bash feature Will allow your to host your 1bash files remotely to edit your miners without direct connection

papampi

full member

Activity: 686

Merit: 140

Linux FOREVER! Resistance is futile!!!

Quote from: bumbu100 on January 07, 2018, 03:44:42 AM

What is remote bash?

bumbu100

newbie

Activity: 44

Merit: 0

JK-47

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

Complete noob here using nvoc 17 to mine ZCL & ZEN. Everytime I connect to a pool (minepro,suprnova,luckpool) it shows my hash rate but not payment stats. Sometimes payment stats will show up for a little then show $0. Do these pools lag on info like that or am I mining for free when I don't see payment info? Upwards of 12 hours with no data shown.

However, I can mine NICE and get direct payment info on NiceHash. Any help will be greatly appreciated.

papampi

full member

Activity: 686

Merit: 140

Linux FOREVER! Resistance is futile!!!

Quote from: Rumo on January 06, 2018, 03:52:00 PM

Quote from: CryptAtomeTrader44 on January 06, 2018, 11:10:51 AM

Quote from: papampi on January 06, 2018, 07:14:36 AM

I was having some issues this week with some pools and decide to rewrite the code for pool check in watchdog, it was supposed to be in v19-2.0 but we let it slide for that time.

It works almost same as network check but instead of checking for network it checks for pool and wait if its unreachable to prevent miner restart and eventually rig restarts.
Then After I wrote it I thought why wait and waste time when we can switch to an alternate pool
So I rewrite it again to add an alternate pool in 1bash whether its supported by the miner or not.
What left to do is to check the first pool and switch back as soon as it becomes available.

So here is my question:
How important it is for you guys to have an alternate pool?
And how important it is to switch back to main pool?

I'm asking this because I wrote the code for myself and to make it work with rest of miners and coins it needs more changes so I don't want to work on something not so useful Wink

It's clear that luckpool has had a lot of hits this week. They probably have lower fee than elsewhere but their servers seem unstable, so I decided to go elsewhere, even if it costs me a little more fee.
When I look at MPH and the number of pools they have and I have never had a single break with them, all I can switch home, I rock it.

I also had troubles with Nicehash who all of a sudden Wednesday night began to refuse my connections to their servers ... So I created a ticket home and removed nicehash from my list of WTM switch ...

Your proposal to send to another alternative pool is a good idea, but I have another one: Why not try the second corner directly in the WTM list.

Obviously this only works for those who use WTM_Switch, but it must be possible to combine both a second pool and a second coin with or without the SWITCH WTM.

I would love to have it now because ZPOOL is down and my riggs shouting at me.

I'm sorry Rumo, but you should wait a bit longer, as its better to wait and have a bug free code than get it sooner with some bugs that could cause problems.
The code is almost done, I'm working on an update script so users dont need to redo their 1bash and the update script do it for them, and thats writing a script to edit so many coins so its a long long update script Wink

But I will send you a pre-release so you can test it when its done.

papampi

full member

Activity: 686

Merit: 140

Linux FOREVER! Resistance is futile!!!

Quote from: CryptAtomeTrader44 on January 06, 2018, 11:10:51 AM

Quote from: papampi on January 06, 2018, 07:14:36 AM

I was having some issues this week with some pools and decide to rewrite the code for pool check in watchdog, it was supposed to be in v19-2.0 but we let it slide for that time.

It works almost same as network check but instead of checking for network it checks for pool and wait if its unreachable to prevent miner restart and eventually rig restarts.
Then After I wrote it I thought why wait and waste time when we can switch to an alternate pool
So I rewrite it again to add an alternate pool in 1bash whether its supported by the miner or not.
What left to do is to check the first pool and switch back as soon as it becomes available.

So here is my question:
How important it is for you guys to have an alternate pool?
And how important it is to switch back to main pool?

I'm asking this because I wrote the code for myself and to make it work with rest of miners and coins it needs more changes so I don't want to work on something not so useful Wink

It's clear that luckpool has had a lot of hits this week. They probably have lower fee than elsewhere but their servers seem unstable, so I decided to go elsewhere, even if it costs me a little more fee.
When I look at MPH and the number of pools they have and I have never had a single break with them, all I can switch home, I rock it.

I also had troubles with Nicehash who all of a sudden Wednesday night began to refuse my connections to their servers ... So I created a ticket home and removed nicehash from my list of WTM switch ...

Your proposal to send to another alternative pool is a good idea, but I have another one: Why not try the second corner directly in the WTM list.

Obviously this only works for those who use WTM_Switch, but it must be possible to combine both a second pool and a second coin with or without the SWITCH WTM.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on the alternate pool
As you mentioned your solution gonna work only for those who use wtm switcher and not all,
and more important problem is most of us usually mine on one pool for all of our coins so for example if you mine ZCL on suprnova for sure your ZEC pool is suprnova too, so if its ZCL pool is down there is a big chance that its ZEC pool is down too.
So its better to switch pool instead of switching coins.

Rumo

newbie

Activity: 41

Merit: 0

Quote from: CryptAtomeTrader44 on January 06, 2018, 11:10:51 AM

Quote from: papampi on January 06, 2018, 07:14:36 AM

I was having some issues this week with some pools and decide to rewrite the code for pool check in watchdog, it was supposed to be in v19-2.0 but we let it slide for that time.

It works almost same as network check but instead of checking for network it checks for pool and wait if its unreachable to prevent miner restart and eventually rig restarts.
Then After I wrote it I thought why wait and waste time when we can switch to an alternate pool
So I rewrite it again to add an alternate pool in 1bash whether its supported by the miner or not.
What left to do is to check the first pool and switch back as soon as it becomes available.

So here is my question:
How important it is for you guys to have an alternate pool?
And how important it is to switch back to main pool?

I'm asking this because I wrote the code for myself and to make it work with rest of miners and coins it needs more changes so I don't want to work on something not so useful Wink

It's clear that luckpool has had a lot of hits this week. They probably have lower fee than elsewhere but their servers seem unstable, so I decided to go elsewhere, even if it costs me a little more fee.
When I look at MPH and the number of pools they have and I have never had a single break with them, all I can switch home, I rock it.

I also had troubles with Nicehash who all of a sudden Wednesday night began to refuse my connections to their servers ... So I created a ticket home and removed nicehash from my list of WTM switch ...

Your proposal to send to another alternative pool is a good idea, but I have another one: Why not try the second corner directly in the WTM list.

Obviously this only works for those who use WTM_Switch, but it must be possible to combine both a second pool and a second coin with or without the SWITCH WTM.

I would love to have it now because ZPOOL is down and my riggs shouting at me.

Topic: [ mining os ] nvoc - page 86. (Read 418542 times)