re the race been having a bit of a think, we could do it say every 10 blocks (not ones we solve just blocks in general)
for example from block 136220 to 136230.
Hmmm... It's roughly one hour, right?
here is my idea for the rules:
the top 10 people who submitted shares in the previous 10 blocks would be in the running
the person who submitted the most valid shares (from the previous group) would be the winner and and so on for 2nd and 3rd place
members bet on who ever they like to win
all bets are added to a pool
that pool is split 60,30,10 ? for 1st 2nd 3rd
and is then split between the people who chose the 1st 2nd 3rd ?
i guess that splitting only works if everyone bets the same amount, unless u have a better idea ?
to maintain transparency we would show all bets as they stand
any ideas, suggestions send em over
this is by no means final in any way, just a bit of an idea i had.
the main drawback with this system is that it would have to be a fixed bet, and there could be cheating by simply making more accounts. That could be overcome by only allowing members with X shares bet ?
Totalizator works alittle bit differently. It works on the principle of who provides the best information about the future events is the winner.
For example, now we have: linkme, somebadger, dtmcnamara as the leaders. The majority will bet on those, individual stakes and number of losers does not matter, the sum matters, for example, 1BTC. And two bets with 0.2BTC that linkme, dtmcnamara, somebadger will be the leaders. (there could be many outcomes. You can bet on whoever). If the outcome "linkme, dtmcnamara, somebadger" gets realized, the sum 1.2BTC minus admin fee (say, 10%) will be distributed among those two who guessed correctly.
It means, each winner of the bet will get 1.2 * 0.8 / 2 = 0.48 BTC.
However, as I said before, the results can be easily manipulated. And my point is that probably betting on hashrates and such is not
quite ok. All of us have limited has generating capabilities, which can't be changed quickly.
I think, the important thing is to set the objective of the competition.
If the goal is to increase total hashrate, then the competition should be strictly for the top N players. And they have all the fun.
If the goal is to have something special and more fun for larger crowd, then totalizator idea (as described above) is very good. Bets could be done on anything, even on the number of total pool shares generated during last 10 blocks modulo 10 (which is pure lottery) or top leaders (which is less lottery, more brains required, but can be manipulated), etc, etc.
And have I understood right, that the bets are done in the shares submitted during the round and they can be reshuffled then?
Or will the game require bitcoins from outside?
Say, linkme bets 187000 shares and looses ;-) Weird...
Probably, more thinking is needed.