Bitcoin Forum>Alternate cryptocurrencies>Mining (Altcoins)
Pages:
Author

Topic: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX - page 28. (Read 60004 times)

Kringel
jr. member
Activity: 151
Merit: 7
Re: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
June 17, 2020, 06:16:25 PM
#988
Quote from: miniZ on June 17, 2020, 05:53:46 PM
Quote from: Kringel on June 17, 2020, 03:15:16 PM
I've checked this, the Nicehash client fork indeed specifies --par=150,5 in the command line. All I could do for now is adding --par=150,5,3 in addition to --par=150,5 (before it, actually); that didn't help. I'll contact the author of the program.
Hi Kringel,
Thank you for letting us know.

Writing --par=150,5,3 after --par=150,5 would work... The last one overrides the previous one.

Can you try this? : Add -p just before --par=150,5.  The command line would then end with -p --par=150,5.
This will set the whole string --par=150,5 to the password.

Maybe you can manage with this workaround?

Cheers
Thanks for the quick responses and insight on the source of the problem.

Unfortunately all custom parameters in the Nicehash fork always appear at the start of the final parameter string, and --par is somewhere in the middle of the default command line, so with additional -p miniZ just stops working. Have to wait for a fix, usually they arrive relatively fast.

UPD: actually, I already see the fix on the Github, will try it tomorrow.
miniZ
member
Activity: 690
Merit: 17
Re: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
June 17, 2020, 05:57:22 PM
#987
Quote from: impynick on June 17, 2020, 04:26:06 PM
[TRACE  ] GPU[0]: switch mode 8 -> mode 9, speed=20.41+0.03% max:20.413[08]
[FATAL  ] GPU[0]: CUDA error 77 'an illegal memory access was encountered' in line 1021

Only happens with miniz. Same settings work with Gminer. I even dropped mem OC from 500 to 400 and still getting this error. Miner shuts down.

I am using ocX setting. How can i get it to assign "mode 8" to this gpu? Seems to crash when switching to "mode 9"

I want to use MiniZ but its not stable atm.  On 150,5 (grimm/Defis)

Hi impynick,

Maybe mode 8 is stable with your OCs. You can run mode 8 on a specific GPU by adding to your command line --modeN=8, where N=PCI_ID (number appearing after # on log start, GPU#N). To apply it to all GPUs is just --mode=8.

However, you can make sure that it is not OC-related by running a mode in stock settings.

Could you let us know which GPU(s) are you using?

Let us know if problem persists.
Thanks!
Cheers
miniZ
member
Activity: 690
Merit: 17
Re: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
June 17, 2020, 05:53:46 PM
#986
Quote from: Kringel on June 17, 2020, 03:15:16 PM
Quote from: miniZ on June 17, 2020, 02:03:11 PM
Hi Kringel,
we think we understand the problem.

Are you specifying the algo in the command line?  --par=150,5 ?
It is entering the wrong algo in the new version.

In t3 version it was working because we used to ignore the par argument while mining Beam (because of the last fork, a verification that was never removed). We have been preparing for the next algo change and we took it out.

You need to write --par=150,5,3 or do not use par at all, miniZ will enter the right algo if it is not specified. Smiley

Hope this helps.
Cheers
I've checked this, the Nicehash client fork indeed specifies --par=150,5 in the command line. All I could do for now is adding --par=150,5,3 in addition to --par=150,5 (before it, actually); that didn't help. I'll contact the author of the program.
Hi Kringel,
Thank you for letting us know.

Writing --par=150,5,3 after --par=150,5 would work... The last one overrides the previous one.

Can you try this? : Add -p just before --par=150,5.  The command line would then end with -p --par=150,5.
This will set the whole string --par=150,5 to the password.

Maybe you can manage with this workaround?

Cheers
impynick
jr. member
Activity: 77
Merit: 6
Re: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
June 17, 2020, 04:26:06 PM
#985
[TRACE  ] GPU[0]: switch mode 8 -> mode 9, speed=20.41+0.03% max:20.413[08]
[FATAL  ] GPU[0]: CUDA error 77 'an illegal memory access was encountered' in line 1021

Only happens with miniz. Same settings work with Gminer. I even dropped mem OC from 500 to 400 and still getting this error. Miner shuts down.

I am using ocX setting. How can i get it to assign "mode 8" to this gpu? Seems to crash when switching to "mode 9"

I want to use MiniZ but its not stable atm.  On 150,5 (grimm/Defis)
Kringel
jr. member
Activity: 151
Merit: 7
Re: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
June 17, 2020, 03:15:16 PM
#984
Quote from: miniZ on June 17, 2020, 02:03:11 PM
Hi Kringel,
we think we understand the problem.

Are you specifying the algo in the command line?  --par=150,5 ?
It is entering the wrong algo in the new version.

In t3 version it was working because we used to ignore the par argument while mining Beam (because of the last fork, a verification that was never removed). We have been preparing for the next algo change and we took it out.

You need to write --par=150,5,3 or do not use par at all, miniZ will enter the right algo if it is not specified. Smiley

Hope this helps.
Cheers
I've checked this, the Nicehash client fork indeed specifies --par=150,5 in the command line. All I could do for now is adding --par=150,5,3 in addition to --par=150,5 (before it, actually); that didn't help. I'll contact the author of the program.
miniZ
member
Activity: 690
Merit: 17
Re: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
June 17, 2020, 02:03:11 PM
#983
Quote from: Kringel on June 17, 2020, 12:51:22 PM

Yes, the command line is the same, I upgraded-downgraded miniZ one more time and can confirm the problem with the new version(s).
The u2 didn't change much, it just stopped saying that OC2 kernel is not available for 1070 (the switch is there just in case you implement it sometime; I tried to remove it, nothing changes).

Start of the output (the test rig is a miniPC with two 1070s, one of them is limited to 70% TDP):
Code:
************ miniZ v1.5u2 ************
Algo:           EQ[150,5]
Pool#0:         user[...] server[beamv2.eu.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[auto]

Hi Kringel,
we think we understand the problem.

Are you specifying the algo in the command line?  --par=150,5 ?
It is entering the wrong algo in the new version.

In t3 version it was working because we used to ignore the par argument while mining Beam (because of the last fork, a verification that was never removed). We have been preparing for the next algo change and we took it out.

You need to write --par=150,5,3 or do not use par at all, miniZ will enter the right algo if it is not specified. Smiley

Hope this helps.
Cheers
Kringel
jr. member
Activity: 151
Merit: 7
Re: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
June 17, 2020, 12:51:22 PM
#982
Quote from: miniZ on June 16, 2020, 12:01:33 PM
Quote from: rgsnedds on June 16, 2020, 11:18:54 AM
Quote from: Kringel on June 16, 2020, 05:25:46 AM
With 1070s, the new version is painfully slow on beamv2 (~1.7 times slower than the previous one) and all found shares are rejected by the Nicehash pool.

must be the pool you choose to mine on giving you the problems, i'm mining Beam directly and the new version is pretty much no different to the previous.
Hi Kringel, rgsnedds,

Thank you for your messages.

We haven't change anything significantly, on Beam.

Kringel, you say that with t3 it works fine and with the new version you have rejected shares and performance drops, with the same command line?
Could you maybe paste here the start of your log?

We are investigating this.

Cheers
Yes, the command line is the same, I upgraded-downgraded miniZ one more time and can confirm the problem with the new version(s).
The u2 didn't change much, it just stopped saying that OC2 kernel is not available for 1070 (the switch is there just in case you implement it sometime; I tried to remove it, nothing changes).

Start of the output (the test rig is a miniPC with two 1070s, one of them is limited to 70% TDP):
Code:
************ miniZ v1.5u2 ************
Algo:           EQ[150,5]
Pool#0:         user[...] server[beamv2.eu.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[auto]
Pool#1:         user[...] server[beamv2.usa.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[auto]
Pool#2:         user[...] server[beamv2.hk.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[auto]
Pool#3:         user[...] server[beamv2.jp.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[auto]
Pool#4:         user[...] server[beamv2.in.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[auto]
Pool#5:         user[...] server[beamv2.br.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[auto]
Pool#6:         user[...] server[beamv2.eu.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[auto]
Telemetry:      [http://localhost:4002]
Optimisation:   oc1[0] oc2[1]
Temp. limit:    [90°C]
miniZ<150,5>[8:0:00:6787]: Selecting GPU#0[0] GeForce GTX 1070
miniZ<150,5>[1:0:00:6787]: Selecting GPU#1[1] GeForce GTX 1070
[ 0d 0h 0m10s] 38(37.8)Sol/s 253(253.2)W
 0>GTX 1070     ` 100% [60°C/38%]  9.66 I/s 17.8(17.8)Sol/s 106(105.8)W clk=1316MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.17
 1>GTX 1070     ` 100% [60°C/38%] 10.74 I/s 20.0(20.0)Sol/s 147(147.4)W clk=1670MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.14
[ 0d 0h 0m20s] 41(40.8)Sol/s 255(254.6)W
 0>GTX 1070     `0.00% [61°C/42%]*10.05 I/s 19.4(19.4)Sol/s 106(105.9)W clk=1215MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.18
 1>GTX 1070     ` 100% [61°C/42%] 11.24 I/s 20.7(20.7)Sol/s 149(148.6)W clk=1670MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.14
[ 0d 0h 0m30s] 42(42.3)Sol/s 248(247.7)W
 0>GTX 1070     `0.00% [62°C/42%] 10.12 I/s 20.4(20.4)Sol/s 103(102.9)W clk=1290MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.20
 1>GTX 1070     ` 100% [61°C/42%] 11.35 I/s 21.7(21.7)Sol/s 145(144.9)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.15
[ 0d 0h 0m40s] 41(41.4)Sol/s 251(250.6)W
 0>GTX 1070     `0.00% [62°C/44%] 10.14 I/s 19.9(19.9)Sol/s 105(104.6)W clk=1303MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.19
 1>GTX 1070     `0.00% [62°C/44%]*11.39 I/s 21.4(21.4)Sol/s 146(146.1)W clk=1670MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.15
[ 0d 0h 0m50s] 42(41.9)Sol/s 250(250.0)W
 0>GTX 1070     `0.00% [63°C/46%] 10.12 I/s 20.0(20.0)Sol/s 105(104.9)W clk=1177MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.19
 1>GTX 1070     `0.00% [63°C/46%] 11.38 I/s 22.0(22.0)Sol/s 145(145.1)W clk=1670MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.15
[ 0d 0h 1m00s] 41(41.2)Sol/s 250(249.7)W
 0>GTX 1070     `0.00% [63°C/46%] 10.15 I/s 19.5(19.5)Sol/s 103(103.6)W clk=1303MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.19
 1>GTX 1070     `0.00% [64°C/46%] 11.38 I/s 21.8(21.8)Sol/s 147(146.1)W clk=1670MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.15

A healthy output with t3 and the same settings:
Code:
************ miniZ v1.5t3 ************
Algo:           EQ[150,5]
Pool#0:         user[...] server[beamv2.eu.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[Beam-PoW]
Pool#1:         user[...] server[beamv2.usa.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[Beam-PoW]
Pool#2:         user[...] server[beamv2.hk.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[Beam-PoW]
Pool#3:         user[...] server[beamv2.jp.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[Beam-PoW]
Pool#4:         user[...] server[beamv2.in.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[Beam-PoW]
miniZ<150,5,3>[09:0:00:6788]: Selecting GPU#0[0] GeForce GTX 1070
Pool#5:         user[...] server[beamv2.br.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[Beam-PoW]
Pool#6:         user[...] server[beamv2.eu.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[Beam-PoW]
Telemetry:      [http://localhost:4003]
Optimisation:   oc1[0] oc2[1]
Temp. limit:    [90°C]
[WARNING] GPU[1]: GeForce GTX 1070 does not have oc2 for this algo.
miniZ<150,5,3>[04:0:00:6788]: Selecting GPU#1[1] GeForce GTX 1070
[ 0d 0h 0m10s] 64(63.7)Sol/s 257(257.3)W
 0>GTX 1070     ` 100% [61°C/41%] 15.67 I/s 27.4(27.4)Sol/s 105(104.8)W clk=1493MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.26
 1>GTX 1070     ` 100% [60°C/39%] 17.75 I/s 33.7(33.7)Sol/s 153(152.5)W clk=1733MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.22
[ 0d 0h 0m20s] 66(65.9)Sol/s 254(254.1)W
 0>GTX 1070     ` 100% [61°C/42%]*16.32 I/s 30.4(30.4)Sol/s 105(105.1)W clk=1480MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.29
 1>GTX 1070     ` 100% [61°C/41%]*18.50 I/s 34.5(34.5)Sol/s 149(149.0)W clk=1746MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 0m30s] 70(69.8)Sol/s 257(256.6)W
 0>GTX 1070     ` 100% [62°C/44%] 16.44 I/s 33.1(33.1)Sol/s 106(106.4)W clk=1518MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.31
 1>GTX 1070     ` 100% [62°C/42%] 18.64 I/s 36.2(36.2)Sol/s 150(150.2)W clk=1721MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.24
[ 0d 0h 0m40s] 70(70.5)Sol/s 253(253.2)W
 0>GTX 1070     ` 100% [63°C/46%] 16.48 I/s 33.8(33.8)Sol/s 106(106.0)W clk=1493MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.32
 1>GTX 1070     ` 100% [63°C/44%] 18.69 I/s 36.1(36.1)Sol/s 147(147.2)W clk=1721MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 0m50s] 70(69.9)Sol/s 251(251.9)W
 0>GTX 1070     ` 100% [63°C/46%] 16.51 I/s 33.7(33.7)Sol/s 107(106.4)W clk=1493MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.32
 1>GTX 1070     ` 100% [63°C/46%] 18.70 I/s 36.4(36.4)Sol/s 145(145.5)W clk=1721MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 1m00s] 70(69.9)Sol/s 251(251.9)W
 0>GTX 1070     ` 100% [64°C/48%] 16.51 I/s 33.0(33.0)Sol/s 107(106.5)W clk=1493MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.31
 1>GTX 1070     ` 100% [64°C/48%] 18.69 I/s 36.6(36.6)Sol/s 145(145.4)W clk=1708MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.25

The driver version is 442.92.
miniZ
member
Activity: 690
Merit: 17
Re: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
June 16, 2020, 07:50:03 PM
#981
Hi everyone,

A new version miniZ v1.5u2 is out with a fix for an issue that on ZEL mining was not submitting shares on some pools.

We also had the opportunity to adjust kernels for the 1070. It should start with the best kernel now, on stock settings.

We will keep working to make miniZ better.

Download miniZ v1.5u2 here.

Changelog:

* Fixed bug that on ZEL mining was not submitting shares on some pools ex: 2miners.
* Adjusted default kernels for GTX1070, on stock settings, for all algorithms.

Let us know how it goes!

Thank you all for your feedback!
miniZ
member
Activity: 690
Merit: 17
Re: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
June 16, 2020, 07:46:57 PM
#980
Quote from: somaton on June 16, 2020, 12:22:43 PM
Question: does it mean that Miniz is mining devfee when --show-pers not showing what coin is mined?

Hi somaton,
yes, it should be like that. You can use --extra option for more information on when the miner mines to you/fee.
Cheers
somaton
jr. member
Activity: 212
Merit: 6
Re: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
June 16, 2020, 12:22:43 PM
#979
Question: does it mean that Miniz is mining devfee when --show-pers not showing what coin is mined?

miniZ
member
Activity: 690
Merit: 17
Re: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
June 16, 2020, 12:01:33 PM
#978
Quote from: rgsnedds on June 16, 2020, 11:18:54 AM
Quote from: Kringel on June 16, 2020, 05:25:46 AM
With 1070s, the new version is painfully slow on beamv2 (~1.7 times slower than the previous one) and all found shares are rejected by the Nicehash pool.

must be the pool you choose to mine on giving you the problems, i'm mining Beam directly and the new version is pretty much no different to the previous.
Hi Kringel, rgsnedds,

Thank you for your messages.

We haven't change anything significantly, on Beam.

Kringel, you say that with t3 it works fine and with the new version you have rejected shares and performance drops, with the same command line?
Could you maybe paste here the start of your log?

We are investigating this.

Cheers
miniZ
member
Activity: 690
Merit: 17
Re: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
June 16, 2020, 11:57:39 AM
#977
Quote from: Ziv1 on June 16, 2020, 02:36:19 AM
W7 vd 430.86

In an hour and 20 minutes, non-transferred shares to the pool
When you contact the GPUZ immediately crash.
 
Hi Ziv1,
Thanks a lot for letting us know. Sorry about this.

Possibly, this is only happening with 2miners. We spotted the issue (we had a control verification that was messing up with high difficulty pools).
We are currently testing it. A fix should be out very soon.

It is good to see that miniZ works again on your GPU on Windows Smiley (apart from this new thing...).

Maybe next time you do not need to run ocX again, since you have confirmed that mode 0 is the best for yout GPU.

Cheers
miniZ
member
Activity: 690
Merit: 17
Re: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
June 16, 2020, 11:54:21 AM
#976
Quote from: cryptoyes on June 15, 2020, 06:19:46 PM
1070. no 1070ti.

Re: stock - if you read my message (in full) you'll notice I said I already tried stock. It's not o/c related.
Hi cryptoyes,
Thank you for your message and for pointing out that on stock it is also not working well.
We will try to improve the kernel calls like you suggested. Smiley
Cheers
rgsnedds
member
Activity: 952
Merit: 17
raskul
Re: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
June 16, 2020, 11:18:54 AM
#975
Quote from: Kringel on June 16, 2020, 05:25:46 AM
With 1070s, the new version is painfully slow on beamv2 (~1.7 times slower than the previous one) and all found shares are rejected by the Nicehash pool.

must be the pool you choose to mine on giving you the problems, i'm mining Beam directly and the new version is pretty much no different to the previous.
Kringel
jr. member
Activity: 151
Merit: 7
Re: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
June 16, 2020, 05:25:46 AM
#974
With 1070s, the new version is painfully slow on beamv2 (~1.7 times slower than the previous one) and all found shares are rejected by the Nicehash pool.
Ziv1
newbie
Activity: 25
Merit: 1
Re: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
June 16, 2020, 02:36:19 AM
#973
W7 vd 430.86

************ miniZ v1.5u ************
Number of CUDA[10.0] devices found: 2
Algo:      EQ[125,4]
Pool#0:    user[t1QVyHMCUztsdHWSyrpwNs4KLSJ8o8HroHg.rigr]
      server[zel.2miners.com] port[9090] ssl[no] pers[ZelProof]
Logging::    file[miniZ.log] period[10] delay[0]
Optimisation:   ocX[0 1]
Temp. limit:   [75шC]
miniZ<125,4>[00:0:00:2906]: Selecting GPU#1[1] GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
miniZ<125,4>[00:0:00:2906]: Selecting GPU#0[0] GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
[ 0d 0h 0m10s|08:44:37 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 39(39.0)Sol/s 156(155.7)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [53шC/37%]  9.69 I/s 22.3(22.3)Sol/s  80( 80.2)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.28
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/46%]  9.20 I/s 17.4(17.4)Sol/s  76( 75.5)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 0m20s|08:44:46 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 40(40.0)Sol/s 155(155.2)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [54шC/41%] 10.38 I/s 21.5(21.5)Sol/s  80( 80.2)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [58шC/48%]  9.75 I/s 18.4(18.4)Sol/s  75( 75.0)W clk=1531MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[TRACE  ] GPU[1]: Optimisation started mode[00]
[TRACE  ] GPU[0]: Optimisation started mode[00]
[ 0d 0h 0m30s|08:44:56 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 42(41.7)Sol/s 155(154.5)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [54шC/41%] 10.54 I/s 21.3(21.3)Sol/s  78( 78.1)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [58шC/49%]  9.88 I/s 20.5(20.5)Sol/s  76( 76.4)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.27
[ 0d 0h 0m40s|08:45:06 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 42(42.1)Sol/s 157(156.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [55шC/42%] 10.60 I/s 21.7(21.7)Sol/s  79( 79.1)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [58шC/49%]  9.92 I/s 20.3(20.3)Sol/s  78( 77.9)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 0m50s|08:45:16 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 41(41.3)Sol/s 157(157.4)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [55шC/43%] 10.64 I/s 21.6(21.6)Sol/s  79( 79.4)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [59шC/49%]  9.96 I/s 19.7(19.7)Sol/s  78( 78.1)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 1m00s|08:45:26 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 42(42.1)Sol/s 157(157.3)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/44%] 10.65 I/s 22.3(22.3)Sol/s  81( 80.0)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.28
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [59шC/52%]  9.97 I/s 19.9(19.9)Sol/s  77( 77.3)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 1m10s|08:45:36 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 42(42.4)Sol/s 157(157.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/45%] 10.65 I/s 22.8(22.8)Sol/s  81( 80.6)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.28
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [59шC/52%]  9.97 I/s 19.8(19.8)Sol/s  76( 76.6)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 1m20s|08:45:46 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 43(42.5)Sol/s 157(157.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/45%] 10.65 I/s 22.6(22.6)Sol/s  81( 80.7)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.28
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [59шC/52%]  9.97 I/s 19.9(19.9)Sol/s  76( 76.3)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 1m30s|08:45:56 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 42(42.0)Sol/s 155(156.4)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/45%] 10.65 I/s 22.5(22.5)Sol/s  78( 79.7)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.28
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [59шC/52%]  9.97 I/s 19.5(19.5)Sol/s  77( 76.7)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 1m40s|08:46:06 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 41(41.3)Sol/s 154(155.8)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/45%] 10.65 I/s 21.8(21.8)Sol/s  77( 79.1)W clk=1632MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.28
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [59шC/52%]  9.98 I/s 19.4(19.4)Sol/s  77( 76.7)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 1m50s|08:46:16 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 41(40.8)Sol/s 157(156.4)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/45%] 10.65 I/s 21.7(21.7)Sol/s  79( 79.3)W clk=1632MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [59шC/52%]  9.98 I/s 19.2(19.2)Sol/s  78( 77.1)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 2m00s|08:46:26 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 40(40.5)Sol/s 157(156.7)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/45%] 10.65 I/s 21.5(21.5)Sol/s  79( 79.5)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [59шC/52%]  9.98 I/s 19.1(19.1)Sol/s  78( 77.2)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 2m10s|08:46:36 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 40(40.5)Sol/s 159(157.3)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/46%] 10.65 I/s 21.7(21.7)Sol/s  81( 79.9)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/52%]  9.98 I/s 18.9(18.9)Sol/s  78( 77.4)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.24
[ 0d 0h 2m20s|08:46:46 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 41(40.7)Sol/s 159(157.5)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/46%] 10.65 I/s 21.6(21.6)Sol/s  82( 80.3)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [59шC/52%]  9.98 I/s 19.2(19.2)Sol/s  77( 77.2)W clk=1506MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 2m30s|08:46:56 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 41(40.6)Sol/s 158(157.2)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/45%] 10.64 I/s 21.5(21.5)Sol/s  81( 80.2)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/52%]  9.98 I/s 19.1(19.1)Sol/s  77( 77.1)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 2m40s|08:47:06 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 41(40.7)Sol/s 157(157.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/46%] 10.64 I/s 21.6(21.6)Sol/s  79( 80.0)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [59шC/53%]  9.98 I/s 19.1(19.1)Sol/s  78( 77.2)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 2m50s|08:47:16 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 41(40.9)Sol/s 160(157.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/45%] 10.64 I/s 21.5(21.5)Sol/s  83( 80.8)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.98 I/s 19.5(19.5)Sol/s  77( 77.0)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 3m00s|08:47:26 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 41(41.2)Sol/s 160(157.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/45%] 10.64 I/s 21.4(21.4)Sol/s  82( 80.8)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.97 I/s 19.8(19.8)Sol/s  77( 77.1)W clk=1506MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 3m10s|08:47:36 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 41(41.3)Sol/s 158(157.6)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/47%] 10.64 I/s 21.6(21.6)Sol/s  81( 80.7)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.97 I/s 19.8(19.8)Sol/s  77( 77.0)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 3m20s|08:47:46 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 41(41.2)Sol/s 157(157.6)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/46%] 10.64 I/s 21.3(21.3)Sol/s  79( 80.3)W clk=1632MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.97 I/s 19.8(19.8)Sol/s  78( 77.2)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 3m30s|08:47:56 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 41(41.0)Sol/s 156(157.3)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/45%] 10.64 I/s 21.4(21.4)Sol/s  78( 80.0)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.97 I/s 19.7(19.7)Sol/s  79( 77.4)W clk=1569MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 3m40s|08:48:06 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 41(41.1)Sol/s 157(157.5)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/47%] 10.64 I/s 21.4(21.4)Sol/s  79( 80.1)W clk=1632MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.97 I/s 19.7(19.7)Sol/s  78( 77.4)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 3m50s|08:48:16 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 41(41.1)Sol/s 157(157.3)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/47%] 10.64 I/s 21.2(21.3)Sol/s  79( 80.0)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.97 I/s 19.8(19.8)Sol/s  77( 77.3)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 4m00s|08:48:26 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 41(41.0)Sol/s 156(157.2)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/45%] 10.64 I/s 21.3(21.3)Sol/s  80( 80.1)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.97 I/s 19.7(19.7)Sol/s  76( 77.1)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 4m10s|08:48:36 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 41(40.9)Sol/s 158(157.3)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/45%] 10.64 I/s 21.3(21.3)Sol/s  81( 80.2)W clk=1683MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.97 I/s 19.6(19.6)Sol/s  77( 77.1)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 4m20s|08:48:46 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 41(41.0)Sol/s 155(156.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/45%] 10.64 I/s 21.3(21.3)Sol/s  79( 80.0)W clk=1683MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.97 I/s 19.6(19.6)Sol/s  76( 76.9)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[TRACE  ] GPU[1]: switch mode 0 -> mode 10, speed=9.97-0.05% max:9.972[00]
[ 0d 0h 4m30s|08:48:56 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 41(40.9)Sol/s 151(156.4)W [fee.server] (100.0%) (0.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/45%] 10.64 I/s 21.1(21.2)Sol/s  80( 80.1)W clk=1632MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.97 I/s 19.6(19.6)Sol/s  71( 76.3)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 4m40s|08:49:06 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 41(40.8)Sol/s 151(156.0)W [fee.server] (96.4%) (3.6%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/46%] 10.64 I/s 21.3(21.3)Sol/s  76( 79.6)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.96 I/s 19.4(19.5)Sol/s  75( 76.4)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 4m50s|08:49:16 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 40(40.5)Sol/s 155(156.2)W [fee.server] (93.1%) (6.9%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/47%] 10.64 I/s 21.2(21.2)Sol/s  78( 79.6)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.93 I/s 19.0(19.2)Sol/s  77( 76.6)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 5m00s|08:49:26 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 40(40.3)Sol/s 157(156.4)W [fee.server] (90.0%) (10.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/45%] 10.63 I/s 21.2(21.3)Sol/s  79( 79.7)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.92 I/s 18.8(19.1)Sol/s  78( 76.7)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 5m10s|08:49:36 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 40(40.3)Sol/s 156(156.3)W [fee.server] (87.1%) (12.9%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/45%] 10.63 I/s 21.2(21.2)Sol/s  79( 79.6)W clk=1632MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/52%]  9.91 I/s 18.7(19.0)Sol/s  77( 76.7)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 5m20s|08:49:46 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 40(40.1)Sol/s 155(156.1)W [fee.server] (84.3%) (15.7%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/47%] 10.63 I/s 21.2(21.2)Sol/s  80( 79.7)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/52%]  9.90 I/s 18.5(18.9)Sol/s  75( 76.4)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 5m30s|08:49:56 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 39(39.8)Sol/s 153(155.8)W [fee.server] (81.8%) (18.2%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/46%] 10.63 I/s 21.3(21.3)Sol/s  79( 79.6)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.89 I/s 18.0(18.6)Sol/s  73( 76.2)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.24
[ 0d 0h 5m40s|08:50:06 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 39(39.9)Sol/s 154(155.8)W [fee.server] (79.4%) (20.6%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/46%] 10.63 I/s 21.4(21.3)Sol/s  80( 79.6)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.87 I/s 17.9(18.5)Sol/s  75( 76.1)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.24
[ 0d 0h 5m50s|08:50:16 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 39(39.7)Sol/s 153(155.5)W [fee.server] (77.1%) (22.9%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/47%] 10.63 I/s 21.6(21.4)Sol/s  79( 79.6)W clk=1632MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [59шC/53%]  9.86 I/s 17.7(18.4)Sol/s  74( 75.9)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.24
[ 0d 0h 6m00s|08:50:26 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 39(39.7)Sol/s 154(155.6)W [fee.server] (74.9%) (25.1%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/46%] 10.63 I/s 21.8(21.6)Sol/s  78( 79.4)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [59шC/53%]  9.85 I/s 17.7(18.3)Sol/s  76( 76.1)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.24
[ 0d 0h 6m10s|08:50:36 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 40(39.9)Sol/s 156(155.7)W [fee.server] (72.9%) (27.1%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/45%] 10.63 I/s 22.0(21.7)Sol/s  80( 79.5)W clk=1632MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [59шC/53%]  9.85 I/s 17.6(18.2)Sol/s  76( 76.1)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.24
[ 0d 0h 6m20s|08:50:46 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 39(39.7)Sol/s 155(155.6)W [fee.server] (71.0%) (29.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/45%] 10.63 I/s 21.8(21.6)Sol/s  80( 79.6)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.84 I/s 17.6(18.2)Sol/s  75( 76.0)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.24
[TRACE  ] GPU[0]: switch mode 0 -> mode 10, speed=10.63-0.03% max:10.633[00]
[ 0d 0h 6m30s|08:50:56 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 39(39.6)Sol/s 159(155.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (69.2%) (30.8%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/47%] 10.63 I/s 21.9(21.7)Sol/s  83( 80.0)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [59шC/53%]  9.83 I/s 17.1(17.9)Sol/s  76( 76.0)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.24
[ 0d 0h 6m40s|08:51:06 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 39(39.4)Sol/s 161(156.2)W [zel.2miners.com] (69.9%) (30.1%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/47%] 10.62 I/s 21.4(21.4)Sol/s  83( 80.1)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [59шC/52%]  9.83 I/s 17.1(17.9)Sol/s  78( 76.2)W clk=1582MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 6m50s|08:51:16 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 38(39.2)Sol/s 161(156.5)W [zel.2miners.com] (70.7%) (29.3%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/45%] 10.62 I/s 21.2(21.3)Sol/s  83( 80.2)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.82 I/s 17.0(17.8)Sol/s  78( 76.3)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 7m00s|08:51:26 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 38(38.9)Sol/s 157(156.4)W [zel.2miners.com] (71.4%) (28.6%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/45%] 10.61 I/s 20.9(21.2)Sol/s  80( 80.1)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.82 I/s 17.0(17.8)Sol/s  77( 76.3)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 7m10s|08:51:36 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 38(38.8)Sol/s 156(156.3)W [zel.2miners.com] (72.0%) (28.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/45%] 10.60 I/s 20.4(20.9)Sol/s  80( 80.1)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.81 I/s 17.2(17.8)Sol/s  76( 76.2)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 7m20s|08:51:46 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 37(38.6)Sol/s 156(156.3)W [zel.2miners.com] (72.7%) (27.3%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/46%] 10.59 I/s 20.1(20.8)Sol/s  79( 80.0)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [59шC/53%]  9.81 I/s 17.1(17.7)Sol/s  76( 76.3)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 7m30s|08:51:56 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 37(38.6)Sol/s 154(156.0)W [zel.2miners.com] (73.3%) (26.7%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/45%] 10.59 I/s 20.2(20.8)Sol/s  78( 79.9)W clk=1683MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [59шC/53%]  9.81 I/s 17.2(17.8)Sol/s  75( 76.2)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 7m40s|08:52:06 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 37(38.5)Sol/s 156(156.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (73.9%) (26.1%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/46%] 10.58 I/s 20.3(20.9)Sol/s  78( 79.8)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/52%]  9.81 I/s 17.2(17.7)Sol/s  78( 76.3)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 7m50s|08:52:16 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 37(38.3)Sol/s 156(156.0)W [zel.2miners.com] (74.4%) (25.6%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/46%] 10.58 I/s 19.9(20.6)Sol/s  77( 79.6)W clk=1670MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [59шC/52%]  9.80 I/s 17.1(17.7)Sol/s  79( 76.5)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 8m00s|08:52:26 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 37(38.1)Sol/s 155(156.0)W [zel.2miners.com] (74.9%) (25.1%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/46%] 10.57 I/s 19.5(20.5)Sol/s  77( 79.5)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/52%]  9.80 I/s 17.1(17.6)Sol/s  78( 76.5)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 8m10s|08:52:36 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 36(38.0)Sol/s 155(155.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (75.4%) (24.6%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/46%] 10.57 I/s 19.4(20.4)Sol/s  77( 79.4)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.80 I/s 17.0(17.6)Sol/s  77( 76.5)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 8m20s|08:52:46 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 36(37.8)Sol/s 157(156.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (75.9%) (24.1%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/45%] 10.57 I/s 19.2(20.3)Sol/s  79( 79.5)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.79 I/s 17.0(17.6)Sol/s  78( 76.6)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 8m30s|08:52:56 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 36(37.6)Sol/s 155(155.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (76.4%) (23.6%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/45%] 10.56 I/s 18.9(20.2)Sol/s  78( 79.4)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.25
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.79 I/s 17.2(17.6)Sol/s  77( 76.5)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 8m40s|08:53:06 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 36(37.6)Sol/s 156(156.0)W [zel.2miners.com] (76.8%) (23.2%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/45%] 10.56 I/s 18.7(20.0)Sol/s  78( 79.4)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.25
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [59шC/53%]  9.79 I/s 17.0(17.5)Sol/s  78( 76.6)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 8m50s|08:53:16 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 36(37.5)Sol/s 160(156.3)W [zel.2miners.com] (77.3%) (22.7%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/47%] 10.56 I/s 18.7(20.0)Sol/s  82( 79.6)W clk=1708MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.25
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/52%]  9.79 I/s 17.1(17.5)Sol/s  77( 76.7)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 9m00s|08:53:26 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 36(37.5)Sol/s 157(156.2)W [zel.2miners.com] (77.7%) (22.3%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/45%] 10.56 I/s 18.6(19.9)Sol/s  82( 79.7)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.25
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.79 I/s 17.1(17.5)Sol/s  75( 76.6)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 9m10s|08:53:36 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 35(37.2)Sol/s 159(156.4)W [zel.2miners.com] (78.1%) (21.9%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/45%] 10.56 I/s 18.3(19.7)Sol/s  82( 79.7)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.25
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.79 I/s 17.1(17.5)Sol/s  77( 76.6)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 9m20s|08:53:46 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 35(37.1)Sol/s 152(156.0)W [zel.2miners.com] (78.5%) (21.5%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/46%] 10.55 I/s 18.0(19.6)Sol/s  78( 79.5)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.25
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.79 I/s 17.0(17.5)Sol/s  74( 76.5)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 9m30s|08:53:56 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 35(36.9)Sol/s 155(156.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (78.9%) (21.1%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/45%] 10.55 I/s 17.7(19.4)Sol/s  79( 79.5)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.78 I/s 16.8(17.4)Sol/s  77( 76.6)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 9m40s|08:54:06 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 35(36.8)Sol/s 154(156.0)W [zel.2miners.com] (79.2%) (20.8%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/45%] 10.55 I/s 18.0(19.5)Sol/s  78( 79.5)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.25
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.78 I/s 16.7(17.4)Sol/s  76( 76.5)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 9m50s|08:54:16 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 35(36.7)Sol/s 154(155.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (79.6%) (20.4%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/45%] 10.55 I/s 17.9(19.4)Sol/s  78( 79.4)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.78 I/s 16.7(17.3)Sol/s  75( 76.5)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h10m00s|08:54:26 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 34(36.6)Sol/s 155(155.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (79.9%) (20.1%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/45%] 10.55 I/s 17.8(19.3)Sol/s  80( 79.5)W clk=1683MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.78 I/s 16.7(17.3)Sol/s  75( 76.4)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h10m10s|08:54:36 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 35(36.6)Sol/s 158(156.0)W [zel.2miners.com] (80.3%) (19.7%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/47%] 10.54 I/s 17.9(19.3)Sol/s  80( 79.5)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.78 I/s 16.6(17.3)Sol/s  77( 76.5)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h10m20s|08:54:46 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 35(36.5)Sol/s 155(155.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (80.6%) (19.4%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/45%] 10.54 I/s 18.2(19.3)Sol/s  79( 79.5)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.78 I/s 16.8(17.3)Sol/s  76( 76.4)W clk=1569MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h10m30s|08:54:57 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 35(36.5)Sol/s 156(155.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (80.9%) (19.1%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/45%] 10.54 I/s 18.0(19.2)Sol/s  80( 79.6)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.78 I/s 16.9(17.3)Sol/s  75( 76.3)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h10m40s|08:55:06 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 35(36.4)Sol/s 157(156.0)W [zel.2miners.com] (81.2%) (18.8%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/45%] 10.54 I/s 18.0(19.2)Sol/s  79( 79.5)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.78 I/s 16.8(17.3)Sol/s  78( 76.4)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[TRACE  ] GPU[1]: switch mode 10 -> mode 14, speed=9.78-0.04% max:9.972[00]
[ 0d 0h10m50s|08:55:16 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 35(36.4)Sol/s 156(155.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (81.5%) (18.5%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/46%] 10.54 I/s 17.9(19.1)Sol/s  79( 79.5)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/52%]  9.76 I/s 16.9(17.3)Sol/s  77( 76.4)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h11m00s|08:55:26 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 35(36.5)Sol/s 158(156.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (81.8%) (18.2%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/47%] 10.54 I/s 17.9(19.1)Sol/s  81( 79.6)W clk=1670MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.75 I/s 17.1(17.3)Sol/s  77( 76.5)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h11m10s|08:55:36 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 35(36.3)Sol/s 155(155.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (82.0%) (18.0%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/45%] 10.54 I/s 17.7(19.0)Sol/s  79( 79.5)W clk=1632MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/52%]  9.73 I/s 17.3(17.4)Sol/s  76( 76.4)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h11m20s|08:55:46 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 35(36.3)Sol/s 159(156.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (82.3%) (17.7%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/45%] 10.54 I/s 17.5(18.9)Sol/s  80( 79.5)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.72 I/s 17.3(17.4)Sol/s  79( 76.6)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h11m30s|08:55:56 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 35(36.3)Sol/s 162(156.3)W [zel.2miners.com] (82.6%) (17.4%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/47%] 10.54 I/s 17.2(18.8)Sol/s  83( 79.7)W clk=1708MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.71 I/s 17.7(17.5)Sol/s  79( 76.6)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[TRACE  ] GPU[1]: Tune finished: mode=0 speed=9.97
[TRACE  ] GPU[0]: switch mode 10 -> mode 14, speed=10.54-0.05% max:10.633[00]
[ 0d 0h11m40s|08:56:06 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 35(36.2)Sol/s 160(156.4)W [zel.2miners.com] (82.8%) (17.2%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/45%] 10.53 I/s 17.1(18.7)Sol/s  82( 79.7)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.23
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/52%]  9.70 I/s 17.5(17.4)Sol/s  78( 76.6)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h11m50s|08:56:17 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 35(36.2)Sol/s 156(156.2)W [zel.2miners.com] (83.1%) (16.9%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [56шC/45%] 10.53 I/s 17.4(18.8)Sol/s  78( 79.5)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
.................................................
[ 0d 1h18m30s|10:02:57 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 42(40.8)Sol/s 159(159.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (97.4%) (2.6%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/47%] 10.62 I/s 21.7(21.1)Sol/s  81( 81.6)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.95 I/s 19.8(19.7)Sol/s  78( 77.1)W clk=1569MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 1h18m40s|10:03:07 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 41(40.7)Sol/s 157(159.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (97.5%) (2.5%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/49%] 10.62 I/s 21.4(21.1)Sol/s  80( 81.6)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.95 I/s 19.6(19.7)Sol/s  77( 77.1)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 1h18m50s|10:03:17 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 41(40.7)Sol/s 157(159.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (97.5%) (2.5%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/47%] 10.62 I/s 21.3(21.0)Sol/s  80( 81.6)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.95 I/s 19.8(19.7)Sol/s  77( 77.1)W clk=1531MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 1h19m00s|10:03:27 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 41(40.7)Sol/s 161(159.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (97.5%) (2.5%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/49%] 10.62 I/s 21.2(21.0)Sol/s  82( 81.6)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [60шC/53%]  9.95 I/s 20.0(19.7)Sol/s  79( 77.1)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 1h19m10s|10:03:37 16/06/2020] S:  0/0 40(40.7)Sol/s 137(158.3)W [zel.2miners.com] (97.5%) (2.5%)
 0>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [57шC/48%] 10.61 I/s 21.2(21.0)Sol/s  78( 81.5)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
 1>GTX 1060 3GB  100% [59шC/52%]  9.95 I/s 19.5(19.7)Sol/s  59( 76.9)W clk=1898MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
In an hour and 20 minutes, non-transferred shares to the pool
When you contact the GPUZ immediately crash.

[FATAL  ] GPU[1]: CUDA error 6 'the launch timed out and was terminated' in line 1356
[FATAL  ] GPU[0]: CUDA error 6 'the launch timed out and was terminated' in line 1356
[INFO   ] Disconnecting from zel.2miners.com
[INFO   ] Miner monitor exited.
[INFO   ] Exited main loop


 
cryptoyes
member
Activity: 297
Merit: 10
Re: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
June 15, 2020, 06:19:46 PM
#972
Quote from: miniZ on June 15, 2020, 12:41:05 PM
Quote from: cryptoyes on June 14, 2020, 07:08:11 PM
Only the 1080ti work better as I could increase the PL. The 1070s are still hanging everything and they are at max PL -- I already tried stock settings. Gminer is definitely doing something better than miniZ given the problem doesn't exist and it also hashes faster. I met this problem on quite a few miners (even Gminer at first, he fixed it in the meantime) ... it's always because of inefficient use of CUDA calls which end up hogging the driver unnecessarily, being amplified by the number of GPUs.

At 5 GPUs you're mostly going to be ok. 7+ and you need to be increasingly careful.

I only used miniZ on 150,5 because Gminer's devfee pools choked and killed mining (so in that regard you've already beaten Gminer Tongue)

Hi cryptoyes,

thank you for the feedback. This information might be usefull (you mean 1070 and perhaps 1070 Ti? both models?).

We will keep looking at/for this Smiley

Btw, have you tried in stock settings? With no increase/decrease in PL, core, and memory clocks?

Cheers

1070. no 1070ti.

Re: stock - if you read my message (in full) you'll notice I said I already tried stock. It's not o/c related.
miniZ
member
Activity: 690
Merit: 17
Re: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
June 15, 2020, 01:06:16 PM
#971
Hi everyone,

A new version miniZ v1.5u is out with major improvements for 144,5 - ZHash - and minor for 125,4 - ZelHash. Smiley

We have updated 144,5 and 125,4 performance tables (stock, eco, eco70, and max power oc) @ 144,5 and 125,4 algorithm performance pages, respectively.

Download miniZ v1.5u here.

Changelog:

 * 144,5 (BTG, XSG, BTCZ, BTH, BZE,...): major improvements for various GPUs. Up to 6.5% depending on GPU.
 * 125,4 (ZEL): minor improvements. Up to 1% depending on GPU.
 * Fixed connection latency issues.
 * Added --ocX option for automatic tunning of the best kernel for your GPU and OC settings, for all algos.
 * Added --show-mode option to show the miniZ kernel each GPU is using.
 * Reduced memory utilization on 144,5 for all GPUs.
 * Reduced memory usage on 3GB GPUs for 125,4, on Windows 10 (work still in progress).

Few notes:

 * When adjusting your GPUs settings do not forget to check if your GPU supports oc1/oc2. If so it may boost your performance a little. --oc1/oc2 changed for some GPUs and algos in the new version.
    You can also use an option for automatic tunning of the best kernel for your GPU and OC settings --ocX - available in all algorithms. For updated information read the specific topic on FAQ page.
 * In this version we have stopped Cuda 8 support. On Download page you can find Cuda 10 version (Linux and Windows).
  
We wish you a fast and friendly mining experience!
miniZ
member
Activity: 690
Merit: 17
Re: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
June 15, 2020, 12:41:05 PM
#970
Quote from: cryptoyes on June 14, 2020, 07:08:11 PM
Only the 1080ti work better as I could increase the PL. The 1070s are still hanging everything and they are at max PL -- I already tried stock settings. Gminer is definitely doing something better than miniZ given the problem doesn't exist and it also hashes faster. I met this problem on quite a few miners (even Gminer at first, he fixed it in the meantime) ... it's always because of inefficient use of CUDA calls which end up hogging the driver unnecessarily, being amplified by the number of GPUs.

At 5 GPUs you're mostly going to be ok. 7+ and you need to be increasingly careful.

I only used miniZ on 150,5 because Gminer's devfee pools choked and killed mining (so in that regard you've already beaten Gminer Tongue)

Hi cryptoyes,

thank you for the feedback. This information might be usefull (you mean 1070 and perhaps 1070 Ti? both models?).

We will keep looking at/for this Smiley

Btw, have you tried in stock settings? With no increase/decrease in PL, core, and memory clocks?

Cheers
cryptoyes
member
Activity: 297
Merit: 10
Re: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
June 14, 2020, 07:08:11 PM
#969
Quote from: miniZ on June 13, 2020, 03:57:50 PM
Hi cryptoyes,

sorry, the driver version is 440.64.

miniZ Cuda 10.0, Linux kernel 5.4.0-37-generic and cpu Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G4560 @ 3.50GHz. We can only test up to 5 GPUs so it is hard to fully test with higher GPU load.

However, from what you described it really looks like that it could be the oc settings causing the driver to misbehave. Also, each miner may require different OCs settings since the kernels are different and exploit the GPU in different ways.

Have you had the chance to observe the same problem with miniZ on other algos?

Having said this, we will keep looking into it and we will do our best to replicate/fix/understand all the issues that everyone reports, the one you described is obviously something we'll keep an eye on. Even now that you said you managed to get it to work by increasing PL. Smiley

Thanks a lot for your feedback!

Cheers

Only the 1080ti work better as I could increase the PL. The 1070s are still hanging everything and they are at max PL -- I already tried stock settings. Gminer is definitely doing something better than miniZ given the problem doesn't exist and it also hashes faster. I met this problem on quite a few miners (even Gminer at first, he fixed it in the meantime) ... it's always because of inefficient use of CUDA calls which end up hogging the driver unnecessarily, being amplified by the number of GPUs.

At 5 GPUs you're mostly going to be ok. 7+ and you need to be increasingly careful.

I only used miniZ on 150,5 because Gminer's devfee pools choked and killed mining (so in that regard you've already beaten Gminer Tongue)
Pages:
Bitcoin Forum>Alternate cryptocurrencies>Mining (Altcoins)
Jump to: