miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX - page 28.

Kringel

jr. member

Activity: 151

Merit: 7

Quote from: miniZ on June 16, 2020, 12:01:33 PM

Quote from: rgsnedds on June 16, 2020, 11:18:54 AM

Quote from: Kringel on June 16, 2020, 05:25:46 AM

With 1070s, the new version is painfully slow on beamv2 (~1.7 times slower than the previous one) and all found shares are rejected by the Nicehash pool.

must be the pool you choose to mine on giving you the problems, i'm mining Beam directly and the new version is pretty much no different to the previous.

Hi Kringel, rgsnedds,

Thank you for your messages.

We haven't change anything significantly, on Beam.

Kringel, you say that with t3 it works fine and with the new version you have rejected shares and performance drops, with the same command line?
Could you maybe paste here the start of your log?

We are investigating this.

Cheers

Yes, the command line is the same, I upgraded-downgraded miniZ one more time and can confirm the problem with the new version(s).
The u2 didn't change much, it just stopped saying that OC2 kernel is not available for 1070 (the switch is there just in case you implement it sometime; I tried to remove it, nothing changes).

Start of the output (the test rig is a miniPC with two 1070s, one of them is limited to 70% TDP):

Code:

************ miniZ v1.5u2 ************
Algo: EQ[150,5]
Pool#0: user[...] server[beamv2.eu.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[auto]
Pool#1: user[...] server[beamv2.usa.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[auto]
Pool#2: user[...] server[beamv2.hk.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[auto]
Pool#3: user[...] server[beamv2.jp.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[auto]
Pool#4: user[...] server[beamv2.in.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[auto]
Pool#5: user[...] server[beamv2.br.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[auto]
Pool#6: user[...] server[beamv2.eu.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[auto]
Telemetry: [http://localhost:4002]
Optimisation: oc1[0] oc2[1]
Temp. limit: [90°C]
miniZ<150,5>[8:0:00:6787]: Selecting GPU#0[0] GeForce GTX 1070
miniZ<150,5>[1:0:00:6787]: Selecting GPU#1[1] GeForce GTX 1070
[ 0d 0h 0m10s] 38(37.8)Sol/s 253(253.2)W
0>GTX 1070 ` 100% [60°C/38%] 9.66 I/s 17.8(17.8)Sol/s 106(105.8)W clk=1316MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.17
1>GTX 1070 ` 100% [60°C/38%] 10.74 I/s 20.0(20.0)Sol/s 147(147.4)W clk=1670MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.14
[ 0d 0h 0m20s] 41(40.8)Sol/s 255(254.6)W
0>GTX 1070 `0.00% [61°C/42%]*10.05 I/s 19.4(19.4)Sol/s 106(105.9)W clk=1215MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.18
1>GTX 1070 ` 100% [61°C/42%] 11.24 I/s 20.7(20.7)Sol/s 149(148.6)W clk=1670MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.14
[ 0d 0h 0m30s] 42(42.3)Sol/s 248(247.7)W
0>GTX 1070 `0.00% [62°C/42%] 10.12 I/s 20.4(20.4)Sol/s 103(102.9)W clk=1290MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.20
1>GTX 1070 ` 100% [61°C/42%] 11.35 I/s 21.7(21.7)Sol/s 145(144.9)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.15
[ 0d 0h 0m40s] 41(41.4)Sol/s 251(250.6)W
0>GTX 1070 `0.00% [62°C/44%] 10.14 I/s 19.9(19.9)Sol/s 105(104.6)W clk=1303MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.19
1>GTX 1070 `0.00% [62°C/44%]*11.39 I/s 21.4(21.4)Sol/s 146(146.1)W clk=1670MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.15
[ 0d 0h 0m50s] 42(41.9)Sol/s 250(250.0)W
0>GTX 1070 `0.00% [63°C/46%] 10.12 I/s 20.0(20.0)Sol/s 105(104.9)W clk=1177MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.19
1>GTX 1070 `0.00% [63°C/46%] 11.38 I/s 22.0(22.0)Sol/s 145(145.1)W clk=1670MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.15
[ 0d 0h 1m00s] 41(41.2)Sol/s 250(249.7)W
0>GTX 1070 `0.00% [63°C/46%] 10.15 I/s 19.5(19.5)Sol/s 103(103.6)W clk=1303MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.19
1>GTX 1070 `0.00% [64°C/46%] 11.38 I/s 21.8(21.8)Sol/s 147(146.1)W clk=1670MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.15

A healthy output with t3 and the same settings:

Code:

************ miniZ v1.5t3 ************
Algo: EQ[150,5]
Pool#0: user[...] server[beamv2.eu.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[Beam-PoW]
Pool#1: user[...] server[beamv2.usa.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[Beam-PoW]
Pool#2: user[...] server[beamv2.hk.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[Beam-PoW]
Pool#3: user[...] server[beamv2.jp.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[Beam-PoW]
Pool#4: user[...] server[beamv2.in.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[Beam-PoW]
miniZ<150,5,3>[09:0:00:6788]: Selecting GPU#0[0] GeForce GTX 1070
Pool#5: user[...] server[beamv2.br.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[Beam-PoW]
Pool#6: user[...] server[beamv2.eu.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[Beam-PoW]
Telemetry: [http://localhost:4003]
Optimisation: oc1[0] oc2[1]
Temp. limit: [90°C]
[WARNING] GPU[1]: GeForce GTX 1070 does not have oc2 for this algo.
miniZ<150,5,3>[04:0:00:6788]: Selecting GPU#1[1] GeForce GTX 1070
[ 0d 0h 0m10s] 64(63.7)Sol/s 257(257.3)W
0>GTX 1070 ` 100% [61°C/41%] 15.67 I/s 27.4(27.4)Sol/s 105(104.8)W clk=1493MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.26
1>GTX 1070 ` 100% [60°C/39%] 17.75 I/s 33.7(33.7)Sol/s 153(152.5)W clk=1733MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.22
[ 0d 0h 0m20s] 66(65.9)Sol/s 254(254.1)W
0>GTX 1070 ` 100% [61°C/42%]*16.32 I/s 30.4(30.4)Sol/s 105(105.1)W clk=1480MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.29
1>GTX 1070 ` 100% [61°C/41%]*18.50 I/s 34.5(34.5)Sol/s 149(149.0)W clk=1746MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 0m30s] 70(69.8)Sol/s 257(256.6)W
0>GTX 1070 ` 100% [62°C/44%] 16.44 I/s 33.1(33.1)Sol/s 106(106.4)W clk=1518MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.31
1>GTX 1070 ` 100% [62°C/42%] 18.64 I/s 36.2(36.2)Sol/s 150(150.2)W clk=1721MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.24
[ 0d 0h 0m40s] 70(70.5)Sol/s 253(253.2)W
0>GTX 1070 ` 100% [63°C/46%] 16.48 I/s 33.8(33.8)Sol/s 106(106.0)W clk=1493MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.32
1>GTX 1070 ` 100% [63°C/44%] 18.69 I/s 36.1(36.1)Sol/s 147(147.2)W clk=1721MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 0m50s] 70(69.9)Sol/s 251(251.9)W
0>GTX 1070 ` 100% [63°C/46%] 16.51 I/s 33.7(33.7)Sol/s 107(106.4)W clk=1493MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.32
1>GTX 1070 ` 100% [63°C/46%] 18.70 I/s 36.4(36.4)Sol/s 145(145.5)W clk=1721MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 1m00s] 70(69.9)Sol/s 251(251.9)W
0>GTX 1070 ` 100% [64°C/48%] 16.51 I/s 33.0(33.0)Sol/s 107(106.5)W clk=1493MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.31
1>GTX 1070 ` 100% [64°C/48%] 18.69 I/s 36.6(36.6)Sol/s 145(145.4)W clk=1708MHz mclk=4252MHz Sol/W=0.25

The driver version is 442.92.

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Hi everyone,

A new version miniZ v1.5u2 is out with a fix for an issue that on ZEL mining was not submitting shares on some pools.

We also had the opportunity to adjust kernels for the 1070. It should start with the best kernel now, on stock settings.

We will keep working to make miniZ better.

Download miniZ v1.5u2 here.

Changelog:

* Fixed bug that on ZEL mining was not submitting shares on some pools ex: 2miners.
* Adjusted default kernels for GTX1070, on stock settings, for all algorithms.

Let us know how it goes!

Thank you all for your feedback!

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: somaton on June 16, 2020, 12:22:43 PM

Question: does it mean that Miniz is mining devfee when --show-pers not showing what coin is mined?

Hi somaton,
yes, it should be like that. You can use --extra option for more information on when the miner mines to you/fee.
Cheers

somaton

jr. member

Activity: 212

Merit: 6

Question: does it mean that Miniz is mining devfee when --show-pers not showing what coin is mined?

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: rgsnedds on June 16, 2020, 11:18:54 AM

Quote from: Kringel on June 16, 2020, 05:25:46 AM

With 1070s, the new version is painfully slow on beamv2 (~1.7 times slower than the previous one) and all found shares are rejected by the Nicehash pool.

must be the pool you choose to mine on giving you the problems, i'm mining Beam directly and the new version is pretty much no different to the previous.

Hi Kringel, rgsnedds,

Thank you for your messages.

We haven't change anything significantly, on Beam.

Kringel, you say that with t3 it works fine and with the new version you have rejected shares and performance drops, with the same command line?
Could you maybe paste here the start of your log?

We are investigating this.

Cheers

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: Ziv1 on June 16, 2020, 02:36:19 AM

W7 vd 430.86

In an hour and 20 minutes, non-transferred shares to the pool
When you contact the GPUZ immediately crash.

Hi Ziv1,
Thanks a lot for letting us know. Sorry about this.

Possibly, this is only happening with 2miners. We spotted the issue (we had a control verification that was messing up with high difficulty pools).
We are currently testing it. A fix should be out very soon.

It is good to see that miniZ works again on your GPU on Windows

(apart from this new thing...).

Maybe next time you do not need to run ocX again, since you have confirmed that mode 0 is the best for yout GPU.

Cheers

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: cryptoyes on June 15, 2020, 06:19:46 PM

1070. no 1070ti.

Re: stock - if you read my message (in full) you'll notice I said I already tried stock. It's not o/c related.

Hi cryptoyes,
Thank you for your message and for pointing out that on stock it is also not working well.
We will try to improve the kernel calls like you suggested.

Cheers

rgsnedds

member

Activity: 952

Merit: 17

raskul

Quote from: Kringel on June 16, 2020, 05:25:46 AM

With 1070s, the new version is painfully slow on beamv2 (~1.7 times slower than the previous one) and all found shares are rejected by the Nicehash pool.

must be the pool you choose to mine on giving you the problems, i'm mining Beam directly and the new version is pretty much no different to the previous.

Kringel

jr. member

Activity: 151

Merit: 7

With 1070s, the new version is painfully slow on beamv2 (~1.7 times slower than the previous one) and all found shares are rejected by the Nicehash pool.

Ziv1

newbie

Activity: 25

Merit: 1

W7 vd 430.86

************ miniZ v1.5u ************
Number of CUDA[10.0] devices found: 2
Algo:      EQ[125,4]
Pool#0:    user[t1QVyHMCUztsdHWSyrpwNs4KLSJ8o8HroHg.rigr]
      server[zel.2miners.com] port[9090] ssl[no] pers[ZelProof]
Logging::    file[miniZ.log] period[10] delay[0]
Optimisation:   ocX[0 1]
Temp. limit:   [75шC]
miniZ<125,4>[00:0:00:2906]: Selecting GPU#1[1] GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
miniZ<125,4>[00:0:00:2906]: Selecting GPU#0[0] GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
[ 0d 0h 0m10s|08:44:37 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 39(39.0)Sol/s 156(155.7)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [53шC/37%] 9.69 I/s 22.3(22.3)Sol/s 80( 80.2)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.28
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/46%] 9.20 I/s 17.4(17.4)Sol/s 76( 75.5)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 0m20s|08:44:46 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 40(40.0)Sol/s 155(155.2)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [54шC/41%] 10.38 I/s 21.5(21.5)Sol/s 80( 80.2)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [58шC/48%] 9.75 I/s 18.4(18.4)Sol/s 75( 75.0)W clk=1531MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[TRACE ] GPU[1]: Optimisation started mode[00]
[TRACE ] GPU[0]: Optimisation started mode[00]
[ 0d 0h 0m30s|08:44:56 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 42(41.7)Sol/s 155(154.5)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [54шC/41%] 10.54 I/s 21.3(21.3)Sol/s 78( 78.1)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [58шC/49%] 9.88 I/s 20.5(20.5)Sol/s 76( 76.4)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.27
[ 0d 0h 0m40s|08:45:06 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 42(42.1)Sol/s 157(156.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [55шC/42%] 10.60 I/s 21.7(21.7)Sol/s 79( 79.1)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [58шC/49%] 9.92 I/s 20.3(20.3)Sol/s 78( 77.9)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 0m50s|08:45:16 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 41(41.3)Sol/s 157(157.4)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [55шC/43%] 10.64 I/s 21.6(21.6)Sol/s 79( 79.4)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [59шC/49%] 9.96 I/s 19.7(19.7)Sol/s 78( 78.1)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 1m00s|08:45:26 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 42(42.1)Sol/s 157(157.3)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/44%] 10.65 I/s 22.3(22.3)Sol/s 81( 80.0)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.28
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [59шC/52%] 9.97 I/s 19.9(19.9)Sol/s 77( 77.3)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 1m10s|08:45:36 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 42(42.4)Sol/s 157(157.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/45%] 10.65 I/s 22.8(22.8)Sol/s 81( 80.6)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.28
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [59шC/52%] 9.97 I/s 19.8(19.8)Sol/s 76( 76.6)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 1m20s|08:45:46 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 43(42.5)Sol/s 157(157.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/45%] 10.65 I/s 22.6(22.6)Sol/s 81( 80.7)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.28
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [59шC/52%] 9.97 I/s 19.9(19.9)Sol/s 76( 76.3)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 1m30s|08:45:56 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 42(42.0)Sol/s 155(156.4)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/45%] 10.65 I/s 22.5(22.5)Sol/s 78( 79.7)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.28
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [59шC/52%] 9.97 I/s 19.5(19.5)Sol/s 77( 76.7)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 1m40s|08:46:06 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 41(41.3)Sol/s 154(155.8)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/45%] 10.65 I/s 21.8(21.8)Sol/s 77( 79.1)W clk=1632MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.28
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [59шC/52%] 9.98 I/s 19.4(19.4)Sol/s 77( 76.7)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 1m50s|08:46:16 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 41(40.8)Sol/s 157(156.4)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/45%] 10.65 I/s 21.7(21.7)Sol/s 79( 79.3)W clk=1632MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [59шC/52%] 9.98 I/s 19.2(19.2)Sol/s 78( 77.1)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 2m00s|08:46:26 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 40(40.5)Sol/s 157(156.7)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/45%] 10.65 I/s 21.5(21.5)Sol/s 79( 79.5)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [59шC/52%] 9.98 I/s 19.1(19.1)Sol/s 78( 77.2)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 2m10s|08:46:36 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 40(40.5)Sol/s 159(157.3)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/46%] 10.65 I/s 21.7(21.7)Sol/s 81( 79.9)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/52%] 9.98 I/s 18.9(18.9)Sol/s 78( 77.4)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.24
[ 0d 0h 2m20s|08:46:46 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 41(40.7)Sol/s 159(157.5)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/46%] 10.65 I/s 21.6(21.6)Sol/s 82( 80.3)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [59шC/52%] 9.98 I/s 19.2(19.2)Sol/s 77( 77.2)W clk=1506MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 2m30s|08:46:56 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 41(40.6)Sol/s 158(157.2)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/45%] 10.64 I/s 21.5(21.5)Sol/s 81( 80.2)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/52%] 9.98 I/s 19.1(19.1)Sol/s 77( 77.1)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 2m40s|08:47:06 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 41(40.7)Sol/s 157(157.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/46%] 10.64 I/s 21.6(21.6)Sol/s 79( 80.0)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [59шC/53%] 9.98 I/s 19.1(19.1)Sol/s 78( 77.2)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 2m50s|08:47:16 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 41(40.9)Sol/s 160(157.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/45%] 10.64 I/s 21.5(21.5)Sol/s 83( 80.8)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.98 I/s 19.5(19.5)Sol/s 77( 77.0)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 3m00s|08:47:26 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 41(41.2)Sol/s 160(157.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/45%] 10.64 I/s 21.4(21.4)Sol/s 82( 80.8)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.97 I/s 19.8(19.8)Sol/s 77( 77.1)W clk=1506MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 3m10s|08:47:36 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 41(41.3)Sol/s 158(157.6)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/47%] 10.64 I/s 21.6(21.6)Sol/s 81( 80.7)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.97 I/s 19.8(19.8)Sol/s 77( 77.0)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 3m20s|08:47:46 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 41(41.2)Sol/s 157(157.6)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/46%] 10.64 I/s 21.3(21.3)Sol/s 79( 80.3)W clk=1632MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.97 I/s 19.8(19.8)Sol/s 78( 77.2)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 3m30s|08:47:56 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 41(41.0)Sol/s 156(157.3)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/45%] 10.64 I/s 21.4(21.4)Sol/s 78( 80.0)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.97 I/s 19.7(19.7)Sol/s 79( 77.4)W clk=1569MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 3m40s|08:48:06 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 41(41.1)Sol/s 157(157.5)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/47%] 10.64 I/s 21.4(21.4)Sol/s 79( 80.1)W clk=1632MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.97 I/s 19.7(19.7)Sol/s 78( 77.4)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 3m50s|08:48:16 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 41(41.1)Sol/s 157(157.3)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/47%] 10.64 I/s 21.2(21.3)Sol/s 79( 80.0)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.97 I/s 19.8(19.8)Sol/s 77( 77.3)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 4m00s|08:48:26 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 41(41.0)Sol/s 156(157.2)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/45%] 10.64 I/s 21.3(21.3)Sol/s 80( 80.1)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.97 I/s 19.7(19.7)Sol/s 76( 77.1)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 4m10s|08:48:36 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 41(40.9)Sol/s 158(157.3)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/45%] 10.64 I/s 21.3(21.3)Sol/s 81( 80.2)W clk=1683MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.97 I/s 19.6(19.6)Sol/s 77( 77.1)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 4m20s|08:48:46 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 41(41.0)Sol/s 155(156.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/45%] 10.64 I/s 21.3(21.3)Sol/s 79( 80.0)W clk=1683MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.97 I/s 19.6(19.6)Sol/s 76( 76.9)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[TRACE ] GPU[1]: switch mode 0 -> mode 10, speed=9.97-0.05% max:9.972[00]
[ 0d 0h 4m30s|08:48:56 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 41(40.9)Sol/s 151(156.4)W [fee.server] (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/45%] 10.64 I/s 21.1(21.2)Sol/s 80( 80.1)W clk=1632MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.97 I/s 19.6(19.6)Sol/s 71( 76.3)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 4m40s|08:49:06 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 41(40.8)Sol/s 151(156.0)W [fee.server] (96.4%) (3.6%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/46%] 10.64 I/s 21.3(21.3)Sol/s 76( 79.6)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.96 I/s 19.4(19.5)Sol/s 75( 76.4)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 0h 4m50s|08:49:16 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 40(40.5)Sol/s 155(156.2)W [fee.server] (93.1%) (6.9%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/47%] 10.64 I/s 21.2(21.2)Sol/s 78( 79.6)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.93 I/s 19.0(19.2)Sol/s 77( 76.6)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 5m00s|08:49:26 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 40(40.3)Sol/s 157(156.4)W [fee.server] (90.0%) (10.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/45%] 10.63 I/s 21.2(21.3)Sol/s 79( 79.7)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.92 I/s 18.8(19.1)Sol/s 78( 76.7)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 5m10s|08:49:36 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 40(40.3)Sol/s 156(156.3)W [fee.server] (87.1%) (12.9%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/45%] 10.63 I/s 21.2(21.2)Sol/s 79( 79.6)W clk=1632MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/52%] 9.91 I/s 18.7(19.0)Sol/s 77( 76.7)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 5m20s|08:49:46 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 40(40.1)Sol/s 155(156.1)W [fee.server] (84.3%) (15.7%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/47%] 10.63 I/s 21.2(21.2)Sol/s 80( 79.7)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/52%] 9.90 I/s 18.5(18.9)Sol/s 75( 76.4)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.25
[ 0d 0h 5m30s|08:49:56 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 39(39.8)Sol/s 153(155.8)W [fee.server] (81.8%) (18.2%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/46%] 10.63 I/s 21.3(21.3)Sol/s 79( 79.6)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.89 I/s 18.0(18.6)Sol/s 73( 76.2)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.24
[ 0d 0h 5m40s|08:50:06 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 39(39.9)Sol/s 154(155.8)W [fee.server] (79.4%) (20.6%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/46%] 10.63 I/s 21.4(21.3)Sol/s 80( 79.6)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.87 I/s 17.9(18.5)Sol/s 75( 76.1)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.24
[ 0d 0h 5m50s|08:50:16 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 39(39.7)Sol/s 153(155.5)W [fee.server] (77.1%) (22.9%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/47%] 10.63 I/s 21.6(21.4)Sol/s 79( 79.6)W clk=1632MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [59шC/53%] 9.86 I/s 17.7(18.4)Sol/s 74( 75.9)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.24
[ 0d 0h 6m00s|08:50:26 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 39(39.7)Sol/s 154(155.6)W [fee.server] (74.9%) (25.1%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/46%] 10.63 I/s 21.8(21.6)Sol/s 78( 79.4)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [59шC/53%] 9.85 I/s 17.7(18.3)Sol/s 76( 76.1)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.24
[ 0d 0h 6m10s|08:50:36 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 40(39.9)Sol/s 156(155.7)W [fee.server] (72.9%) (27.1%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/45%] 10.63 I/s 22.0(21.7)Sol/s 80( 79.5)W clk=1632MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [59шC/53%] 9.85 I/s 17.6(18.2)Sol/s 76( 76.1)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.24
[ 0d 0h 6m20s|08:50:46 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 39(39.7)Sol/s 155(155.6)W [fee.server] (71.0%) (29.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/45%] 10.63 I/s 21.8(21.6)Sol/s 80( 79.6)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.84 I/s 17.6(18.2)Sol/s 75( 76.0)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.24
[TRACE ] GPU[0]: switch mode 0 -> mode 10, speed=10.63-0.03% max:10.633[00]
[ 0d 0h 6m30s|08:50:56 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 39(39.6)Sol/s 159(155.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (69.2%) (30.8%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/47%] 10.63 I/s 21.9(21.7)Sol/s 83( 80.0)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [59шC/53%] 9.83 I/s 17.1(17.9)Sol/s 76( 76.0)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.24
[ 0d 0h 6m40s|08:51:06 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 39(39.4)Sol/s 161(156.2)W [zel.2miners.com] (69.9%) (30.1%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/47%] 10.62 I/s 21.4(21.4)Sol/s 83( 80.1)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [59шC/52%] 9.83 I/s 17.1(17.9)Sol/s 78( 76.2)W clk=1582MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 6m50s|08:51:16 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 38(39.2)Sol/s 161(156.5)W [zel.2miners.com] (70.7%) (29.3%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/45%] 10.62 I/s 21.2(21.3)Sol/s 83( 80.2)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.27
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.82 I/s 17.0(17.8)Sol/s 78( 76.3)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 7m00s|08:51:26 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 38(38.9)Sol/s 157(156.4)W [zel.2miners.com] (71.4%) (28.6%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/45%] 10.61 I/s 20.9(21.2)Sol/s 80( 80.1)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.82 I/s 17.0(17.8)Sol/s 77( 76.3)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 7m10s|08:51:36 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 38(38.8)Sol/s 156(156.3)W [zel.2miners.com] (72.0%) (28.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/45%] 10.60 I/s 20.4(20.9)Sol/s 80( 80.1)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.81 I/s 17.2(17.8)Sol/s 76( 76.2)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 7m20s|08:51:46 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 37(38.6)Sol/s 156(156.3)W [zel.2miners.com] (72.7%) (27.3%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/46%] 10.59 I/s 20.1(20.8)Sol/s 79( 80.0)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [59шC/53%] 9.81 I/s 17.1(17.7)Sol/s 76( 76.3)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 7m30s|08:51:56 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 37(38.6)Sol/s 154(156.0)W [zel.2miners.com] (73.3%) (26.7%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/45%] 10.59 I/s 20.2(20.8)Sol/s 78( 79.9)W clk=1683MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [59шC/53%] 9.81 I/s 17.2(17.8)Sol/s 75( 76.2)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 7m40s|08:52:06 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 37(38.5)Sol/s 156(156.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (73.9%) (26.1%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/46%] 10.58 I/s 20.3(20.9)Sol/s 78( 79.8)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/52%] 9.81 I/s 17.2(17.7)Sol/s 78( 76.3)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 7m50s|08:52:16 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 37(38.3)Sol/s 156(156.0)W [zel.2miners.com] (74.4%) (25.6%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/46%] 10.58 I/s 19.9(20.6)Sol/s 77( 79.6)W clk=1670MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [59шC/52%] 9.80 I/s 17.1(17.7)Sol/s 79( 76.5)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 8m00s|08:52:26 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 37(38.1)Sol/s 155(156.0)W [zel.2miners.com] (74.9%) (25.1%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/46%] 10.57 I/s 19.5(20.5)Sol/s 77( 79.5)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/52%] 9.80 I/s 17.1(17.6)Sol/s 78( 76.5)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 8m10s|08:52:36 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 36(38.0)Sol/s 155(155.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (75.4%) (24.6%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/46%] 10.57 I/s 19.4(20.4)Sol/s 77( 79.4)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.80 I/s 17.0(17.6)Sol/s 77( 76.5)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 8m20s|08:52:46 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 36(37.8)Sol/s 157(156.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (75.9%) (24.1%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/45%] 10.57 I/s 19.2(20.3)Sol/s 79( 79.5)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.79 I/s 17.0(17.6)Sol/s 78( 76.6)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 8m30s|08:52:56 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 36(37.6)Sol/s 155(155.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (76.4%) (23.6%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/45%] 10.56 I/s 18.9(20.2)Sol/s 78( 79.4)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.25
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.79 I/s 17.2(17.6)Sol/s 77( 76.5)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 8m40s|08:53:06 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 36(37.6)Sol/s 156(156.0)W [zel.2miners.com] (76.8%) (23.2%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/45%] 10.56 I/s 18.7(20.0)Sol/s 78( 79.4)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.25
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [59шC/53%] 9.79 I/s 17.0(17.5)Sol/s 78( 76.6)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 8m50s|08:53:16 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 36(37.5)Sol/s 160(156.3)W [zel.2miners.com] (77.3%) (22.7%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/47%] 10.56 I/s 18.7(20.0)Sol/s 82( 79.6)W clk=1708MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.25
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/52%] 9.79 I/s 17.1(17.5)Sol/s 77( 76.7)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 9m00s|08:53:26 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 36(37.5)Sol/s 157(156.2)W [zel.2miners.com] (77.7%) (22.3%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/45%] 10.56 I/s 18.6(19.9)Sol/s 82( 79.7)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.25
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.79 I/s 17.1(17.5)Sol/s 75( 76.6)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 9m10s|08:53:36 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 35(37.2)Sol/s 159(156.4)W [zel.2miners.com] (78.1%) (21.9%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/45%] 10.56 I/s 18.3(19.7)Sol/s 82( 79.7)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.25
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.79 I/s 17.1(17.5)Sol/s 77( 76.6)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 9m20s|08:53:46 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 35(37.1)Sol/s 152(156.0)W [zel.2miners.com] (78.5%) (21.5%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/46%] 10.55 I/s 18.0(19.6)Sol/s 78( 79.5)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.25
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.79 I/s 17.0(17.5)Sol/s 74( 76.5)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 9m30s|08:53:56 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 35(36.9)Sol/s 155(156.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (78.9%) (21.1%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/45%] 10.55 I/s 17.7(19.4)Sol/s 79( 79.5)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.78 I/s 16.8(17.4)Sol/s 77( 76.6)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 9m40s|08:54:06 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 35(36.8)Sol/s 154(156.0)W [zel.2miners.com] (79.2%) (20.8%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/45%] 10.55 I/s 18.0(19.5)Sol/s 78( 79.5)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.25
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.78 I/s 16.7(17.4)Sol/s 76( 76.5)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h 9m50s|08:54:16 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 35(36.7)Sol/s 154(155.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (79.6%) (20.4%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/45%] 10.55 I/s 17.9(19.4)Sol/s 78( 79.4)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.78 I/s 16.7(17.3)Sol/s 75( 76.5)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h10m00s|08:54:26 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 34(36.6)Sol/s 155(155.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (79.9%) (20.1%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/45%] 10.55 I/s 17.8(19.3)Sol/s 80( 79.5)W clk=1683MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.78 I/s 16.7(17.3)Sol/s 75( 76.4)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h10m10s|08:54:36 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 35(36.6)Sol/s 158(156.0)W [zel.2miners.com] (80.3%) (19.7%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/47%] 10.54 I/s 17.9(19.3)Sol/s 80( 79.5)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.78 I/s 16.6(17.3)Sol/s 77( 76.5)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h10m20s|08:54:46 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 35(36.5)Sol/s 155(155.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (80.6%) (19.4%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/45%] 10.54 I/s 18.2(19.3)Sol/s 79( 79.5)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.78 I/s 16.8(17.3)Sol/s 76( 76.4)W clk=1569MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h10m30s|08:54:57 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 35(36.5)Sol/s 156(155.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (80.9%) (19.1%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/45%] 10.54 I/s 18.0(19.2)Sol/s 80( 79.6)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.78 I/s 16.9(17.3)Sol/s 75( 76.3)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h10m40s|08:55:06 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 35(36.4)Sol/s 157(156.0)W [zel.2miners.com] (81.2%) (18.8%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/45%] 10.54 I/s 18.0(19.2)Sol/s 79( 79.5)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.78 I/s 16.8(17.3)Sol/s 78( 76.4)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[TRACE ] GPU[1]: switch mode 10 -> mode 14, speed=9.78-0.04% max:9.972[00]
[ 0d 0h10m50s|08:55:16 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 35(36.4)Sol/s 156(155.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (81.5%) (18.5%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/46%] 10.54 I/s 17.9(19.1)Sol/s 79( 79.5)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/52%] 9.76 I/s 16.9(17.3)Sol/s 77( 76.4)W clk=1518MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h11m00s|08:55:26 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 35(36.5)Sol/s 158(156.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (81.8%) (18.2%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/47%] 10.54 I/s 17.9(19.1)Sol/s 81( 79.6)W clk=1670MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.75 I/s 17.1(17.3)Sol/s 77( 76.5)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h11m10s|08:55:36 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 35(36.3)Sol/s 155(155.9)W [zel.2miners.com] (82.0%) (18.0%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/45%] 10.54 I/s 17.7(19.0)Sol/s 79( 79.5)W clk=1632MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/52%] 9.73 I/s 17.3(17.4)Sol/s 76( 76.4)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h11m20s|08:55:46 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 35(36.3)Sol/s 159(156.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (82.3%) (17.7%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/45%] 10.54 I/s 17.5(18.9)Sol/s 80( 79.5)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.72 I/s 17.3(17.4)Sol/s 79( 76.6)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h11m30s|08:55:56 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 35(36.3)Sol/s 162(156.3)W [zel.2miners.com] (82.6%) (17.4%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/47%] 10.54 I/s 17.2(18.8)Sol/s 83( 79.7)W clk=1708MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.71 I/s 17.7(17.5)Sol/s 79( 76.6)W clk=1556MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[TRACE ] GPU[1]: Tune finished: mode=0 speed=9.97
[TRACE ] GPU[0]: switch mode 10 -> mode 14, speed=10.54-0.05% max:10.633[00]
[ 0d 0h11m40s|08:56:06 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 35(36.2)Sol/s 160(156.4)W [zel.2miners.com] (82.8%) (17.2%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/45%] 10.53 I/s 17.1(18.7)Sol/s 82( 79.7)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.23
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/52%] 9.70 I/s 17.5(17.4)Sol/s 78( 76.6)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.23
[ 0d 0h11m50s|08:56:17 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 35(36.2)Sol/s 156(156.2)W [zel.2miners.com] (83.1%) (16.9%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [56шC/45%] 10.53 I/s 17.4(18.8)Sol/s 78( 79.5)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.24
.................................................
[ 0d 1h18m30s|10:02:57 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 42(40.8)Sol/s 159(159.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (97.4%) (2.6%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/47%] 10.62 I/s 21.7(21.1)Sol/s 81( 81.6)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.95 I/s 19.8(19.7)Sol/s 78( 77.1)W clk=1569MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 1h18m40s|10:03:07 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 41(40.7)Sol/s 157(159.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (97.5%) (2.5%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/49%] 10.62 I/s 21.4(21.1)Sol/s 80( 81.6)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.95 I/s 19.6(19.7)Sol/s 77( 77.1)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 1h18m50s|10:03:17 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 41(40.7)Sol/s 157(159.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (97.5%) (2.5%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/47%] 10.62 I/s 21.3(21.0)Sol/s 80( 81.6)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.95 I/s 19.8(19.7)Sol/s 77( 77.1)W clk=1531MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 1h19m00s|10:03:27 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 41(40.7)Sol/s 161(159.1)W [zel.2miners.com] (97.5%) (2.5%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/49%] 10.62 I/s 21.2(21.0)Sol/s 82( 81.6)W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [60шC/53%] 9.95 I/s 20.0(19.7)Sol/s 79( 77.1)W clk=1544MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
[ 0d 1h19m10s|10:03:37 16/06/2020] S: 0/0 40(40.7)Sol/s 137(158.3)W [zel.2miners.com] (97.5%) (2.5%)
0>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [57шC/48%] 10.61 I/s 21.2(21.0)Sol/s 78( 81.5)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.26
1>GTX 1060 3GB 100% [59шC/52%] 9.95 I/s 19.5(19.7)Sol/s 59( 76.9)W clk=1898MHz mclk=3802MHz Sol/W=0.26
In an hour and 20 minutes, non-transferred shares to the pool
When you contact the GPUZ immediately crash.

[FATAL ] GPU[1]: CUDA error 6 'the launch timed out and was terminated' in line 1356
[FATAL ] GPU[0]: CUDA error 6 'the launch timed out and was terminated' in line 1356
[INFO ] Disconnecting from zel.2miners.com
[INFO ] Miner monitor exited.
[INFO ] Exited main loop

cryptoyes

member

Activity: 297

Merit: 10

Quote from: miniZ on June 15, 2020, 12:41:05 PM

Quote from: cryptoyes on June 14, 2020, 07:08:11 PM

Only the 1080ti work better as I could increase the PL. The 1070s are still hanging everything and they are at max PL -- I already tried stock settings. Gminer is definitely doing something better than miniZ given the problem doesn't exist and it also hashes faster. I met this problem on quite a few miners (even Gminer at first, he fixed it in the meantime) ... it's always because of inefficient use of CUDA calls which end up hogging the driver unnecessarily, being amplified by the number of GPUs.

At 5 GPUs you're mostly going to be ok. 7+ and you need to be increasingly careful.

I only used miniZ on 150,5 because Gminer's devfee pools choked and killed mining (so in that regard you've already beaten Gminer Tongue

)

Hi cryptoyes,

thank you for the feedback. This information might be usefull (you mean 1070 and perhaps 1070 Ti? both models?).

We will keep looking at/for this

Btw, have you tried in stock settings? With no increase/decrease in PL, core, and memory clocks?

Cheers

1070. no 1070ti.

Re: stock - if you read my message (in full) you'll notice I said I already tried stock. It's not o/c related.

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Hi everyone,

A new version miniZ v1.5u is out with major improvements for 144,5 - ZHash - and minor for 125,4 - ZelHash.

We have updated 144,5 and 125,4 performance tables (stock, eco, eco70, and max power oc) @ 144,5 and 125,4 algorithm performance pages, respectively.

Download miniZ v1.5u here.

Changelog:

* 144,5 (BTG, XSG, BTCZ, BTH, BZE,...): major improvements for various GPUs. Up to 6.5% depending on GPU.
* 125,4 (ZEL): minor improvements. Up to 1% depending on GPU.
* Fixed connection latency issues.
* Added --ocX option for automatic tunning of the best kernel for your GPU and OC settings, for all algos.
* Added --show-mode option to show the miniZ kernel each GPU is using.
* Reduced memory utilization on 144,5 for all GPUs.
* Reduced memory usage on 3GB GPUs for 125,4, on Windows 10 (work still in progress).

Few notes:

* When adjusting your GPUs settings do not forget to check if your GPU supports oc1/oc2. If so it may boost your performance a little. --oc1/oc2 changed for some GPUs and algos in the new version.
You can also use an option for automatic tunning of the best kernel for your GPU and OC settings --ocX - available in all algorithms. For updated information read the specific topic on FAQ page.
* In this version we have stopped Cuda 8 support. On Download page you can find Cuda 10 version (Linux and Windows).

We wish you a fast and friendly mining experience!

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: cryptoyes on June 14, 2020, 07:08:11 PM

Only the 1080ti work better as I could increase the PL. The 1070s are still hanging everything and they are at max PL -- I already tried stock settings. Gminer is definitely doing something better than miniZ given the problem doesn't exist and it also hashes faster. I met this problem on quite a few miners (even Gminer at first, he fixed it in the meantime) ... it's always because of inefficient use of CUDA calls which end up hogging the driver unnecessarily, being amplified by the number of GPUs.

At 5 GPUs you're mostly going to be ok. 7+ and you need to be increasingly careful.

I only used miniZ on 150,5 because Gminer's devfee pools choked and killed mining (so in that regard you've already beaten Gminer Tongue

)

Hi cryptoyes,

thank you for the feedback. This information might be usefull (you mean 1070 and perhaps 1070 Ti? both models?).

We will keep looking at/for this

Btw, have you tried in stock settings? With no increase/decrease in PL, core, and memory clocks?

Cheers

cryptoyes

member

Activity: 297

Merit: 10

Quote from: miniZ on June 13, 2020, 03:57:50 PM

Hi cryptoyes,

sorry, the driver version is 440.64.

miniZ Cuda 10.0, Linux kernel 5.4.0-37-generic and cpu Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G4560 @ 3.50GHz. We can only test up to 5 GPUs so it is hard to fully test with higher GPU load.

However, from what you described it really looks like that it could be the oc settings causing the driver to misbehave. Also, each miner may require different OCs settings since the kernels are different and exploit the GPU in different ways.

Have you had the chance to observe the same problem with miniZ on other algos?

Having said this, we will keep looking into it and we will do our best to replicate/fix/understand all the issues that everyone reports, the one you described is obviously something we'll keep an eye on. Even now that you said you managed to get it to work by increasing PL.

Thanks a lot for your feedback!

Cheers

Only the 1080ti work better as I could increase the PL. The 1070s are still hanging everything and they are at max PL -- I already tried stock settings. Gminer is definitely doing something better than miniZ given the problem doesn't exist and it also hashes faster. I met this problem on quite a few miners (even Gminer at first, he fixed it in the meantime) ... it's always because of inefficient use of CUDA calls which end up hogging the driver unnecessarily, being amplified by the number of GPUs.

At 5 GPUs you're mostly going to be ok. 7+ and you need to be increasingly careful.

I only used miniZ on 150,5 because Gminer's devfee pools choked and killed mining (so in that regard you've already beaten Gminer Tongue

)

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: somaton on June 14, 2020, 11:16:25 AM

Is it possible to do something with this behaviour: i have 2 gpus and running them separately in two miniz windows. The problem is - in both miniz windows gpu number shown as 0. Any way to see real gpu number? That way like it is now it is just useless.

Hi somaton,

You can use --pci-order, this will display the GPU pci bus numbers.

Feel free to let us know if you are running two instances because you experience issues with miniZ.

Cheers

somaton

jr. member

Activity: 212

Merit: 6

Is it possible to do something with this behaviour: i have 2 gpus and running them separately in two miniz windows. The problem is - in both miniz windows gpu number shown as 0. Any way to see real gpu number? That way like it is now it is just useless.

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: cryptoyes on June 13, 2020, 11:48:14 AM

Care to give a link to that driver for Linux? I only found 440.82.

Also, what CUDA version, kernel version, CPu and number of GPUs are you using?

CPU utilization is not from the miniz executable itself, but from the drivers. If the executable doesn't efficient CUDA calls then the nvidia driver gets hogged and kworkers end up killing the CPU. This is amplified by the number of GPUs. If you only use a few GPUs then you'll never see a problem.

There is nothing wrong with my setup, proof being that Gminer has no issues whatsoever on the exact same algo. The issue is from miniz.

Hi cryptoyes,

sorry, the driver version is 440.64.

miniZ Cuda 10.0, Linux kernel 5.4.0-37-generic and cpu Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G4560 @ 3.50GHz. We can only test up to 5 GPUs so it is hard to fully test with higher GPU load.

However, from what you described it really looks like that it could be the oc settings causing the driver to misbehave. Also, each miner may require different OCs settings since the kernels are different and exploit the GPU in different ways.

Have you had the chance to observe the same problem with miniZ on other algos?

Having said this, we will keep looking into it and we will do our best to replicate/fix/understand all the issues that everyone reports, the one you described is obviously something we'll keep an eye on. Even now that you said you managed to get it to work by increasing PL.

Thanks a lot for your feedback!

Cheers

cryptoyes

member

Activity: 297

Merit: 10

Quote

The driver we use at the moment with the 1080Ti is 440.94 and it works well

Care to give a link to that driver for Linux? I only found 440.82.

Also, what CUDA version, kernel version, CPu and number of GPUs are you using?

CPU utilization is not from the miniz executable itself, but from the drivers. If the executable doesn't efficient CUDA calls then the nvidia driver gets hogged and kworkers end up killing the CPU. This is amplified by the number of GPUs. If you only use a few GPUs then you'll never see a problem.

There is nothing wrong with my setup, proof being that Gminer has no issues whatsoever on the exact same algo. The issue is from miniz.

rgsnedds

member

Activity: 952

Merit: 17

raskul

Quote from: miniZ on June 13, 2020, 08:53:05 AM

Quote from: rgsnedds on June 11, 2020, 05:58:36 PM

testnet pool for BeamhashIII - http://testnet.raskul.com:8010/
mainnet pool with stratum-ready for BeamHashIII - https://pool.raskul.com/

feel free to use my pool for your devfee - we have designed a rewards system which benefits blockfinder with a (variable) bonus.

please see https://medium.com/@rgsnedds/beam-open-source-pool-e68bae4ca06f for more info

Hi rgsnedds,

Thank you for the testnet. We were about to inquire about it. This is very useful!

We already tested a bit, and both miniZ and your pool appear to be working fine. We expect to use it a lot until the algo change

Cheers

my pleasure. i have forced to stop the pool temporarily but it will be back up soon.
good luck in making the most optimised miner for BH3!

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: cryptoyes on June 11, 2020, 01:37:51 PM

miniZ still humps the drivers too much (at least on Linux) ... the hashrate is fine for the first few minutes, then drops. Driver becomes unresponsive while miniZ is running, e.g. nvidia-smi doesn't respond. I reported this problem in the past. On my G4400 one core ends up used at a constant 100% while the other is practically idle (something's not right, it's as if the app ends in single-threaded mode). Shame this issue wasn't fixed.

I tried miniZ again because Gminer made a boobo and blocked all 150,5 mining because all devfee pools are unavailable and shuts down the miner.

miniZ hashes slower than Gminer to begin with (but not by a lot), but then drops by 10-25% ... on Grimm: it drops from 300 H/s to 270 H/s (9 GPUs), and on the other node it drops from 270 H/s to 210 H/s.

Gminer has no such issues. Hashes at constant rate.

ubuntu 16.04, cuda10.0, nvidia 415.28, G4400, 16GB ram, 9 GPUs on one node (mix of 1080ti and 1070) and 7 GPUs on another node (1080ti). GPUs are overclocked, but not a lot (+100 core, +800 mem). I tried without o/c as well. Hashrate still drops.

I tried all combinations of --oc1/2. --oc2 isn't supported, --oc1 lowers my hashrate directly by 20-30%. I also tried --nonvml. I also tried --intensity=99 or lower (it's unusable, even at 99 the gpu core utilization is 60% and hashrate is less than half).

p.s. I have no idea what --f11 is or does and it's not really explained. Doesn't seem to help anyway.

Quote from: cryptoyes on June 11, 2020, 06:31:02 PM

Pushing the power up from 200W to 235W on 1080ti seems to have made a huge difference and the hashrate is not dropping any more. Do you recommend any specific driver version and cuda version for Linux for Nvidia?

Hi cryptoyes,

thank you for sharing your issue in the forum and for letting us know that you managed to resolve the it. We had observed something similar, and adjusting OCs (beside PL) helps. We never experienced problems in stock settings. Usually it is good to test in stock settings just to clarify if it can be a OCs/PL problem.

Regarding the cpu usage, possibly nvidia driver crashes and cpu goes up. miniZ does not use the CPU for any significant work. The usage should be very low. If it is using too much CPU there is something wrong, either with miniZ or with your setup.

The driver we use at the moment with the 1080Ti is ~~440.94~~ 440.64^* and it works well. Also, we haven't tested it with all GPU models. Maybe someone might post here their experience with other versions.

f11 was to be used with 144,5 only, but it will be deprecated.

In the next version you will be able to use --ocX in 150,5 mining, for miniZ to find the best kernel for your OCs. However, reasonable OCs must still apply.

Cheers

^*edited

Topic: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX - page 28. (Read 59781 times)