miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX - page 37.

fr4nkthetank

legendary

Activity: 2294

Merit: 1182

Now the money is free, and so the people will be

Thanks for the update, looking forward to more stable connections

Although as people have said before a :start // goto start in the .bat file works wonders

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Hi everyone,
Thank you for your feedback!

You can find miniZ v1.5q6 here.
We made improvements to address some of the issues you have reported.

In brief:
* Performance improvement for 192,7. (Up to 4% on RTX)
* Added --jobtimeout, --retries, --retrydelay for (re)connection customization.
* Added --cleanjobs for miner to only accept clean jobs.
* Better connection handling.
* Bug fixes.

For additional information check our Usage or FAQ pages.
Let us know how it goes!

Happy mining!

ARTRN

newbie

Activity: 63

Merit: 0

Quote from: miniZ on September 06, 2019, 09:17:00 AM

Quote from: ARTRN on September 04, 2019, 07:56:28 AM

Just an FYI, v1.5q5 still lost connection 'can't connect to any pool'. I lost 45 mins mining time.

Hi ARTRN,
we have been checking all connection errors.
It seems that you lost connection to all your pools.
Could you let us know which coin are you mining and to which pool?
This can help us to further check if there can be any issue.
Thanks!
Cheers

Sorry I wasn't clear enough. It was on BEAM @sunpool, v1.5q5 cuda10 windows 10.
Thx.

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: V_I_T_A_L_Y on September 06, 2019, 03:58:12 AM

Hello! please tell me I'm your miner can dig beam on the pool solo-beam.2miners.com? And then yesterday switched to your miner Mini-Z with gminer and still have not found a single block, maybe just bad luck but decided better to ask you. Not all miners are suitable for solo mining

Hi V_I_T_A_L_Y,
miniZ should be able to mine solo on 2miners. We know it can find blocks on other pools.
Also, 2miners accepts all our shares when mining solo.

Quote from: V_I_T_A_L_Y on September 06, 2019, 05:14:52 AM

Found the unit and the rejected, coincidence?

Do you mean you get rejected shares? In this case could you let us know which miniZ version are you using?
Or do you mean that a block was found and rejected. Unfortunately this can happen in case of orphan block.
Maybe this can help to understand it better?

Thanks.
Cheers

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: BigHarryArmsi on September 04, 2019, 09:02:24 AM

More speed!

Thanks again, miniZ

update... I must say the 1066s are very responsive to power increase. Increasing power from 65% to 75% gained 10% in hash rate!
up-update... invalids have dropped to near non-existent!

Hi BigHarryArmsi,
good to know the invalid shares issue is fixed.
Yes, raising power a little has large effect on performance.
It is good to adjust to have better efficiency, min power but high hashrate.

We always work for speed improvements, but we are also focused on issues people have been reporting.

Thanks for the feedback. Keep us posted with your results.
Cheers

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: darkneorus on September 04, 2019, 08:09:32 AM

found this at your website:

Quote

Some of you were unable to run miniZ with the NVIDIA mining series cards, on Windows. These cards require an older driver (≥382.53, depending on card and brand) that is not compatible with cuda 9.2 (see Table 1).

my P106 and P104 are running with 4xx drivers and CUDA 10 without any issues. maybe you have some hacks/workarounds in your code to support CUDA 8 for them, and they are related to, or are the cause of low performance?

thank you

Hi darkneorus,
that information is outdated. We have removed it.
Thank you for the suggestion, but it does not seem to be related to it.
As we said before, since we do not have P104/6 it is hard to optimise the performance for those GPUs.
We'll keep doing our best.
Cheers

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: ARTRN on September 04, 2019, 07:56:28 AM

Just an FYI, v1.5q5 still lost connection 'can't connect to any pool'. I lost 45 mins mining time.

Hi ARTRN,
we have been checking all connection errors.
It seems that you lost connection to all your pools.
Could you let us know which coin are you mining and to which pool?
This can help us to further check if there can be any issue.
Thanks!
Cheers

darkneorus

jr. member

Activity: 238

Merit: 3

Quote from: V_I_T_A_L_Y on September 06, 2019, 05:14:52 AM

Found the unit and the rejected, coincidence?

V_I_T_A_L_Y

newbie

Activity: 47

Merit: 0

Found the unit and the rejected, coincidence?

V_I_T_A_L_Y

newbie

Activity: 47

Merit: 0

Hello! please tell me I'm your miner can dig beam on the pool solo-beam.2miners.com? And then yesterday switched to your miner Mini-Z with gminer and still have not found a single block, maybe just bad luck but decided better to ask you. Not all miners are suitable for solo mining

BigHarryArmsi

newbie

Activity: 137

Merit: 0

Thanks for the update miniZ!
All green! The sea of red has gone away, thank you.
Hash rate is still low, though. 1066s ~22, 1080 ~42
Power at 65% clocks at 150 and 450 across the board, temps are down a bit, all ~55 or lower.
1080Ti rig running all green also. Kinda slow, though. 80% power, 150 and 500 clocks generating ~57 hashes.

More speed!

Thanks again, miniZ

update... I must say the 1066s are very responsive to power increase. Increasing power from 65% to 75% gained 10% in hash rate!
up-update... invalids have dropped to near non-existent!

darkneorus

jr. member

Activity: 238

Merit: 3

Quote from: miniZ on September 03, 2019, 09:17:07 PM

Hi darkneorus,
thank you for all the information on the P104-100 GPU, with 150,5,3.
At the moment it is likely that v1.5q5 doesn't show a significant improvement.
We will keep working on this.
Cheers

found this at your website:

Quote

Some of you were unable to run miniZ with the NVIDIA mining series cards, on Windows. These cards require an older driver (≥382.53, depending on card and brand) that is not compatible with cuda 9.2 (see Table 1).
We made available a version compiled with cuda 8.0 for Windows for you to use with these GPUs.
Both Linux and Windows miniZ cuda 8.0 versions should run fine with the P106-100 and P104-100 GPUs across different brands.

my P106 and P104 are running with 4xx drivers and CUDA 10 without any issues. maybe you have some hacks/workarounds in your code to support CUDA 8 for them, and they are related to, or are the cause of low performance?

thank you

ARTRN

newbie

Activity: 63

Merit: 0

Just an FYI, v1.5q5 still lost connection 'can't connect to any pool'. I lost 45 mins mining time.

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: darkneorus on September 03, 2019, 02:43:22 PM

Quote from: miniZ on August 29, 2019, 02:56:33 PM

Quote from: darkneorus on August 25, 2019, 01:46:35 PM

Quote from: miniZ on August 25, 2019, 01:39:54 PM

Could you just confirm that mode 3 was selected? Should appear something like this in the beginning of output:
miniZ<150,5,3>[3:1:00:3933]: Selecting GPU#0[0] P104-100

yup
GPU Bus load, reported by GPU-Z, also varies from 7 to 16%, with worst performing GPUs using less bus bandwidth.

Hi darkneorus,
we just released a v1.5q3 beta version.
Could you check if there is any improvement for the P104?
Thanks.
Cheers

there is some improvement but performance is still far behind GMiner.

Hi darkneorus,
thank you for all the information on the P104-100 GPU, with 150,5,3.
At the moment it is likely that v1.5q5 doesn't show a significant improvement.
We will keep working on this.
Cheers

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: Divinity666 on September 02, 2019, 02:37:46 AM

Quote from: miniZ on September 01, 2019, 08:52:14 PM

Hi Divinity666,
losing connection to pool is not uncommon, even for other miners.
Reasons, can be on user side like newtork instability, even if momentaneous (or not).
It can also depend on the pool. The pool may disconnect if it does not receive any shares for some time. The pool may disconnect or reset the connection for some other reason.

We made available a beta version v1.5q4 that should be more efficient in reconnecting to pool.
Let us know how it goes. Thanks a lot for your feedback and patience.
Cheers

In v1.5q4 issue still persists. I got 2 minutes of idle after 20 minutes of running a miner(and 3 minutes after submitting last share)

ps Well gminer doesn't lose connection thats a fact, I've tested for a 24+hours...

pps upd. ok, now its 1 minute of idle, I was wrong, it actually went down from 2 minutes. Still would like miner not to stop mining in the first place. Other miners I've tried don't have that issue, so its not pool error or something like that.

ppps upd2. turns out idle time varies, sometimes its 1 minute and sometimes its over 2 even(like 140 seconds or so)

Hi Divinity666,
we have been unable to reproduce such high idle time periods. Very ocasionally we get a few seconds down, not minutes.
It is possible that the latest fix v1.5q5 is dealing better with this issue.
We continue checking this.
Thanks for all the updates!
Cheers

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: sharmanov on September 02, 2019, 10:04:09 AM

any way you could add exchangecoin EXCC its 144,5 algo? Please

Hi sharmanov
we'll have a look.
We will see if this is possible for the next release.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Cheers

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: BigHarryArmsi on September 02, 2019, 12:54:48 AM

Thanks, miniZ
Lay it on me! Your miner is running steady as usual but these cards are not happy as there are too many invalids and low hash rate,

Quote from: sharmanov on September 03, 2019, 02:32:44 PM

Something terribly wrong with the latest test-release 1.5q4 only half the accepted shares are being accounted for on the poolside. for BeamHash II

Hi BigHarryArmsi, sharmanov,
thanks for the feedback!
We think that this issue is fixed in the latest v1.5q5 fix.
Could you try it out and let us know how it goes?
Cheers

darkneorus

jr. member

Activity: 238

Merit: 3

Quote from: miniZ on August 29, 2019, 02:56:33 PM

Quote from: darkneorus on August 25, 2019, 01:46:35 PM

Quote from: miniZ on August 25, 2019, 01:39:54 PM

Could you just confirm that mode 3 was selected? Should appear something like this in the beginning of output:
miniZ<150,5,3>[3:1:00:3933]: Selecting GPU#0[0] P104-100

yup
GPU Bus load, reported by GPU-Z, also varies from 7 to 16%, with worst performing GPUs using less bus bandwidth.

Hi darkneorus,
we just released a v1.5q3 beta version.
Could you check if there is any improvement for the P104?
Thanks.
Cheers

there is some improvement but performance is still far behind GMiner.

GMiner

Quote

00:58:31 Speed: GPU0 41.1 Sol/s GPU1 27.9 Sol/s GPU2 26.8 Sol/s GPU3 39.8 Sol/s GPU4 41.4 Sol/s GPU5 40.7 Sol/s GPU6 41.2 Sol/s GPU7 41.2 Sol/s GPU8 40.8 Sol/s

without --oc

Quote

[ 0d 0h 4m52s|00:42:45 04/09/2019] S:173/0 234(233.9)Sol/s 1153(1163.0)W [beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com]- 83ms (91.8%) (8.2%)
0>P104-100 ` 100% [54°C/83%] 15.88 I/s 32.0(31.9)Sol/s 165(169.9)W clk=1809MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.19 1.999 Sol/I
1>P106-100 ` 100% [46°C/125%] 7.82 I/s 15.9(15.8)Sol/s 65( 77.5)W clk=1949MHz mclk=4303MHz Sol/W=0.20 2.019 Sol/I
2>P106-100 ` 100% [49°C/88%] 7.64 I/s 15.1(15.0)Sol/s 100( 86.6)W clk=1923MHz mclk=4303MHz Sol/W=0.17 1.949 Sol/I
3>P104-100 ` 100% [52°C/57%] 14.29 I/s 28.6(28.6)Sol/s 121(132.8)W clk=1847MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.22 1.982 Sol/I
4>P104-100 ` 100% [56°C/83%] 14.51 I/s 29.6(29.6)Sol/s 143(141.4)W clk=1873MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.21 2.029 Sol/I
5>P104-100 ` 100% [51°C/89%] 14.20 I/s 28.0(28.1)Sol/s 143(140.3)W clk=1847MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.20 1.968 Sol/I
6>P104-100 ` 100% [57°C/84%] 14.27 I/s 28.4(28.4)Sol/s 134(137.4)W clk=1835MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.21 1.992 Sol/I
7>P104-100 ` 100% [52°C/82%] 14.41 I/s 28.6(28.7)Sol/s 143(139.5)W clk=1898MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.21 1.997 Sol/I
8>P104-100 ` 100% [50°C/85%] 14.45 I/s 28.1(28.2)Sol/s 139(137.7)W clk=1898MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.20 1.959 Sol/I

--oc1

Quote

[ 0d 0h 3m51s|00:33:07 04/09/2019] S:115/0 217(217.2)Sol/s 1059(1076.2)W [fee.server]- 72ms (93.5%) (6.5%)
0>P104-100 ` 100% [52°C/85%] 15.08 I/s 29.7(29.7)Sol/s 166(161.6)W clk=1835MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.18 1.968 Sol/I
1>P106-100 ` 100% [42°C/138%] 6.57 I/s 13.1(13.1)Sol/s 66( 70.4)W clk=1949MHz mclk=4303MHz Sol/W=0.19 1.984 Sol/I
2>P106-100 ` 100% [47°C/84%] 6.53 I/s 13.2(13.3)Sol/s 63( 65.3)W clk=1923MHz mclk=4303MHz Sol/W=0.20 2.049 Sol/I
3>P104-100 ` 100% [49°C/114%] 13.44 I/s 26.1(26.1)Sol/s 118(122.2)W clk=1847MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.21 1.947 Sol/I
4>P104-100 ` 100% [52°C/82%] 13.61 I/s 27.5(27.5)Sol/s 133(132.5)W clk=1885MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.21 2.013 Sol/I
5>P104-100 ` 100% [49°C/84%] 13.42 I/s 26.8(26.8)Sol/s 123(126.9)W clk=1847MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.21 2.006 Sol/I
6>P104-100 ` 100% [54°C/85%] 13.41 I/s 26.0(26.1)Sol/s 133(132.0)W clk=1835MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.20 1.967 Sol/I
7>P104-100 ` 100% [49°C/82%] 13.56 I/s 27.3(27.2)Sol/s 129(132.8)W clk=1911MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.20 1.988 Sol/I
8>P104-100 ` 100% [46°C/85%]*13.59 I/s 27.0(27.0)Sol/s 128(132.6)W clk=1898MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.20 1.994 Sol/I

--oc2

Quote

[ 0d 0h 3m12s|00:37:03 04/09/2019] S:178/0 234(234.0)Sol/s 1163(1178.2)W [beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com]- 168ms (100.0%) (0.0%)
0>P104-100 ` 100% [54°C/83%] 15.89 I/s 31.1(31.1)Sol/s 174(178.1)W clk=1847MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.17 1.957 Sol/I
1>P106-100 ` 100% [46°C/143%] 7.82 I/s 15.8(15.8)Sol/s 64( 79.3)W clk=1949MHz mclk=4303MHz Sol/W=0.20 2.024 Sol/I
2>P106-100 ` 100% [49°C/87%]* 7.56 I/s 14.9(14.9)Sol/s 92( 91.4)W clk=1923MHz mclk=4303MHz Sol/W=0.16 1.984 Sol/I
3>P104-100 ` 100% [52°C/114%] 14.30 I/s 28.5(28.5)Sol/s 130(131.3)W clk=1847MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.22 2.004 Sol/I
4>P104-100 ` 100% [55°C/83%] 14.39 I/s 28.9(28.9)Sol/s 144(138.8)W clk=1873MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.21 2.019 Sol/I
5>P104-100 ` 100% [51°C/89%] 14.18 I/s 28.8(28.8)Sol/s 125(133.6)W clk=1847MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.22 2.001 Sol/I
6>P104-100 ` 100% [56°C/84%] 14.13 I/s 28.1(28.1)Sol/s 139(140.9)W clk=1835MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.20 1.954 Sol/I
7>P104-100 ` 100% [52°C/84%] 14.42 I/s 29.4(29.4)Sol/s 152(144.9)W clk=1898MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.20 2.056 Sol/I
8>P104-100 ` 100% [50°C/84%] 14.49 I/s 28.8(28.8)Sol/s 141(139.9)W clk=1898MHz mclk=5005MHz Sol/W=0.21 1.994 Sol/I

sharmanov

newbie

Activity: 54

Merit: 0

Something terribly wrong with the latest test-release 1.5q4 only half the accepted shares are being accounted for on the poolside. for BeamHash II

sharmanov

newbie

Activity: 54

Merit: 0

any way you could add exchangecoin EXCC its 144,5 algo? Please

Topic: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX - page 37. (Read 60004 times)