Topic: Missing BTC (Read 3768 times)
such a stupid idea to post missing BTC here.
I think those coins are off in never to regain unless ya happen to stumble upon that priv key as that addy has not been used in a year.... doubt the owner even has key for it any more.... good luck though,
AFAIK, there is little chance for you to get it back,
but good luck.
I have asked coinbase, but their support is painfully slow.
And you thought posting on bitcointalk would make it faster???LOL.. If I received your coin, I will keep it. Or maybe give you half but mostly keep it. Ive done that already before, sending my coins to other address and yes they kept it. Ive made postings to return it too. The fact that the owner of the address is unknown, you got a lesser chance of getting it back.
damn dude, thats not cool. just imagine it happens to you. it s important to also be able to trust the community
and not only the technical aspect of BTC.
i would def. return them to the source if i receive an unexpected transaction. and i hope that the majority of the BTC
users do the same.
to the OP: send a micro-tx to the addy and provide your e-mail addy or URL of this thread (tx-comment). maybe that helps..
This year old thread seems related https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=327767.0all
The address OP said appears there. Some big transactions are occuring there, 900 BTC
The address OP said appears there. Some big transactions are occuring there, 900 BTC
This is his own fault for a such big amount i double and triple check if the wallet is the right one
Did OP ever got the coins back?
No. There are no transactions from 1MA7CK... and to 18xQoD... afterhttps://blockchain.info/tx/338f1dec43bcd2c6fbfa4b6d8e0e41b6e8798abc29a4df0e60bebab1e5fec2e1
Possible the private key for 1MA7CK... is lost or owner is unknown/not answering
Did OP ever got the coins back?
This is an elaborate troll. Right?
Seems likely.
This is an elaborate troll. Right?
This is fun!
Quote
Please explain to me what you think the purpose of the bitcointalk.org feedback system is?
Do not know. Is it something like "centarlisation" in bitcoin network? The person who has more "hashing power" is able to dictate his principles
Quote
If we don't agree on the purpose for such a system, then we won't be able to have a constructive conversation here.
Thank you. I can say that you are right and I am wrong. I do not want to take part in this "religius war". Anyway, bitcoin is the system where we should trust in math and should not trust to individuals.
Please explain to me what you think the purpose of the bitcointalk.org feedback system is?
If we don't agree on the purpose for such a system, then we won't be able to have a constructive conversation here.
You are here in the middle of the day? Do you have a Job? Come on dude.. your paid to wash the plates!
Yeah Danny Hamilton answering my questions just makes you gayer.
I'm not sure what sexual orientation has to do with responding to you?
I will be your shadow from now on. 
Cool. I always wanted a pet. You don't mind if I simply ignore you, right?
Well Hellooooo, you are still answering my sentences. That is not ignoring Great Danny The Gayman Gaymilton!
Given me a feedback?
Why do I know you? Did we have a transaction before?
Hmmmmm.. Americans doesnt do anything like this. Im guessing you are from China, Singapore, or Hong Kong, Anywhere from Asia?
Do you have a girlfriend? Or you just ordered a play doll from hometown Japan?
Why do I know you? Did we have a transaction before?
Hmmmmm.. Americans doesnt do anything like this. Im guessing you are from China, Singapore, or Hong Kong, Anywhere from Asia?
Do you have a girlfriend? Or you just ordered a play doll from hometown Japan?
Anyway, bitcoin is the system where we should trust in math and should not trust to individuals.
Please explain to me what you think the purpose of the bitcointalk.org feedback system is?
If we don't agree on the purpose for such a system, then we won't be able to have a constructive conversation here.
Yeah Danny Hamilton answering my questions just makes you gayer.
I'm not sure what sexual orientation has to do with responding to you?
I will be your shadow from now on.
Cool. I always wanted a pet. You don't mind if I simply ignore you, right?
Quote
There's a BIG difference between what is technically true, and what is morally and ethically true.
1) This is "Technical Support" forum. This is not a church, court or elementary school.
2) I am not sure that all 7 billion people on planet have the same moral and ethic as you and me. So, I do not speak ( about moral and ethic ) for all.
Given me a negative trust because of certain thing I just wrote? Whaaaat? Yeah you are the GOD. lol. Mom and Dad must be very proud they have you as a child. Niiiice, another douche in the world.
ISIS wants you in their vid. Quote
You are wandering away from the topic that is being discussed here.
I am very sorry. English is not my native language, it is difficult to catch nuances.Quote
Informing others about the potential risk of transacting with someone is what the feedback system is for, isn't it?
I do not see any additional risk here.May be, contrary, I will trust the person who says his point of view. (OK, I do not like his words too. But he has a right to speach.)
Anyway, bitcoin is the system where we should trust in math and should not trust to individuals.
Yeah Danny Hamilton answering my questions just makes you gayer.
I will be your shadow from now on.
I will be your shadow from now on.
Quote
There's a BIG difference between what is technically true, and what is morally and ethically true.
1) This is "Technical Support" forum. This is not a church, court or elementary school.
Agreed. The original post:
"I accidentally send 1.85 BTC to this wallet address 1MA7CKbWMyKdPkmsbnwmfeLh1hYy5A3gy8 Please return them. I thank you."
probably does not belong in "Technical Support". Do you want to contact the moderator and let them know that they should move it to a more appropriate forum? Or shall I?
2) I am not sure that all 7 billion people on planet have the same moral and ethic as you and me. So, I do not speak for all.
Certainly, but if someone claims that they would not return something that was accidentally sent to them, then I am going to personally consider that person to be untrustworthy and will leave them feedback indicating such.
Informing others about the potential risk of transacting with someone is what the feedback system is for, isn't it?
In the same way that your watch belongs to the person that is wearing it on their wrist. And your wallet belongs to the person that has it in their pocket.
I do not know the legislation in the country where you live.In my country owning a watch and a wallet written in some kind of country laws.
Owning of bitcoins is not defined in laws. Nobody would care who is bitcoin owner.
So, there is not "same way".
You are wandering away from the topic that is being discussed here.
We are not talking about "laws" or how to define "ownership".
We are talking about the bitcointalk.org feedback system, its purpose, and whether or not a person that demonstrates themselves to be untrustworthy should receive negative feedback.
Please try to focus on the topic at hand to avoid meaningless debate about unrelated topics.
Jump to: