I am thinking of the Bounty Section to be fully moderate to the extent that scam ICO will not be posted there. As we all know that there are many many many scam ICOs nowadays. Bounty hunters are stressing out on how to choose those legit ICOs. I know bounty hunters will agree am I right? Is this even possible?
I think it is hard to implement because you need evidence to prove that they are scammers. Moderators are also not an employee, they are just volunteer and their numbers are not enough to solve this issue. It is also the responsibility of investors and bounty hunters to be diligent when joining the campaign or investment. 
Topic: Moderating Bounty Posts (Read 466 times)
It's a awesome idea, but very hard to do. There are many and many ICOs every day, if there any bounty section, how can moderators know which ICO is legit or not?
It is impossible, so you can only choose the right bounty campaign yourself. Good luck
Thanks for the opinion but There's something we can do to lessen the scam ICO at least. It is impossible, so you can only choose the right bounty campaign yourself. Good luck
It's a awesome idea, but very hard to do. There are many and many ICOs every day, if there any bounty section, how can moderators know which ICO is legit or not?
It is impossible, so you can only choose the right bounty campaign yourself. Good luck
It is impossible, so you can only choose the right bounty campaign yourself. Good luck
Yes. I agree, a lot of bounty scam. it's hard to know which one is really legitimate. Despite studying their whitepaper, and researching the board. but it's still hard to know which one will work out its ICO.
I wonder how you are going to figure out which ico is a scam and which is not? if there were any obvious features of scam, then people would have stayed away from them and never lose their money:)
I think that a lot depends on the moderator himself, because not everything is responsible for his work. I know a couple of simply unbearable moderators, but there are really very responsible.
I think that in the first place you need to try and find the best ICO and select it yourself, because in the crypt you can not be completely sure of anything.
I am thinking of the Bounty Section to be fully moderate to the extent that scam ICO will not be posted there. As we all know that there are many many many scam ICOs nowadays. Bounty hunters are stressing out on how to choose those legit ICOs. I know bounty hunters will agree am I right? Is this even possible?
I am fully agree about that but I think it takes a big team and will be more effective if there is representative for each country.I think it will take a lot of effort to verify every ICO project.
Moderators usually have so much work to do and to monitor each participant's posts is simply not realistic, especially if a big campaign.
I think that in the first time it will be very difficult to distinguish a well-scaled scam project from the real one. I think that this is one of the most important problems of the crypt.
It was a good idea, not just bounty maybe bitcointalk or community should also regulating or moderating the ICO it self, so many of investor and bounty hunter can focus growing cryptocurrency community from legit ICO.
Sir its our responsibilities (bounty hunters/investor) to choose the right project. Its very difficult task for moderators to do this thing with a lot of new ICO everyday. Thats why we need our own research before joining in the ICO or bounty. The moderators didnt also know if the project will turn to scam in the last phase. So the blame is in ourself if we choose the wrong one.
I am thinking of the Bounty Section to be fully moderate to the extent that scam ICO will not be posted there. As we all know that there are many many many scam ICOs nowadays. Bounty hunters are stressing out on how to choose those legit ICOs. I know bounty hunters will agree am I right? Is this even possible?
The thing is you can only do some research especially about the team, that is the only way you may be able to identify scam project. However, you can not tell the project that will scam people. Although some project did not intend to scam people, what happen is they could not succeed in their plans or maybe their plans where not good enough to attract investors.
It will be tedious work and I don't think is quite important. ICO listing sites and other monitors are already doing that. The best thing any serious bounty participants can do is to visit these listing sites and do a thoroughly review and research on them before joining them.
that's the thing they should always consider as a member of this organization to thoroughly review everything before posting because with that they would able to know the exact detail of the project.
This would be a good step in the right direction but it would be really hard for moderators to be able to differentiate between good icos and bad icos as well. Many icos started well and ended badly. Many other started badly and ended well. So, its up to the bounty hunter to do his or her own due diligence
Of course this is so good, everyone hope for this, but that just a joke.
So much have to select everyday, try to imagine, is it easy for the moderator? Of course not.
So let's help the moderator to tell if there's any ico that smelling like scam.
But if it easy for you, please try to explain how it can be easy.
It's not that easy actually. Moderators could have require to present legal papers, ICO bench rating and proof of funds. And of course the identities of those behind the ICO So much have to select everyday, try to imagine, is it easy for the moderator? Of course not.
So let's help the moderator to tell if there's any ico that smelling like scam.
But if it easy for you, please try to explain how it can be easy.
Some bounty campaigns are moderating the participant's post to qualify for their rewards but some member disregard it that's why the bounty managers does not count the works of applicants in a specific week. Every bounties have their own rules to qualify their campaign and we must take note or obey it in order for us to receive rewards.
We're talking about Scams here dude. Scam ICOs don't give reawards at all or their coins will be zero in value. There's something that moderators could do to filter the legit ICOs 
Of course this is so good, everyone hope for this, but that just a joke.
So much have to select everyday, try to imagine, is it easy for the moderator? Of course not.
So let's help the moderator to tell if there's any ico that smelling like scam.
But if it easy for you, please try to explain how it can be easy.
So much have to select everyday, try to imagine, is it easy for the moderator? Of course not.
So let's help the moderator to tell if there's any ico that smelling like scam.
But if it easy for you, please try to explain how it can be easy.
What criteria would you use on what ICOs to allow and what not to? Seems like a slippery slope. Maybe have a minimum ICO Bench score?
Some bounty campaigns are moderating the participant's post to qualify for their rewards but some member disregard it that's why the bounty managers does not count the works of applicants in a specific week. Every bounties have their own rules to qualify their campaign and we must take note or obey it in order for us to receive rewards.
Jump to: