Staff/mods can't merge threads.
You may not be able to merge threads, but could we lock one thread after posting a link to the other thread?
Topic: Moderator is doing a bad job (Read 3097 times)
You may not be able to merge threads, but could we lock one thread after posting a link to the other thread?
Here is a new one a person has posted the same copy and past thead in 4 spots. I reported to move 3 of the 4 threads and I am ignored........ it belongs in 1 spot Why? its been 2 days since I started reporting it.
Staff/mods can't merge threads.
I didn't censor anything, I split the topic and moved your off topic posts to the appropriate section and deleted the few other off topic posts that you kept posting in the initial thread only because I couldn't split those and merge with the split thread as I've explained myself here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1267686
and here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1268026
Just to say, I think I've seen people merge threads on other boards using this software so there may be a way.
Oh? I need to check into that! Thanks.
I didn't censor anything, I split the topic and moved your off topic posts to the appropriate section and deleted the few other off topic posts that you kept posting in the initial thread only because I couldn't split those and merge with the split thread as I've explained myself here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1267686
and here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1268026
Just to say, I think I've seen people merge threads on other boards using this software so there may be a way.
my gaud man, its so refreshing to have someone posting reasonable shit here. i've never ventured into these part of the woods until i got banished here and man is it depressing.
yeah, i feel like i'm on Mars or somethin'. oops, better get back "on topic" bashing hazek or else i might get my comments "split off" and moved to somewhere i can't find myself. 
You sound quite pathetic and your English writing skill is terrible.
(This is not an "ad hominem". I am not trying to undermine any argument... You have none.)
this is an example of your tunnel vision apologist attitude. you can't even recognize when someone resorts to slang.
let me make one other point. what you see at the beginning of the thread is everything i said. i only had to repost one comment and its clear which one that was. so what you're seeing now is a complete picture of everything. just how bad is it? i'd say except for the "shitty" comment, not too bad at all. what you see is what was banished here to Meta solely b/c hazek can't take the slightest bit of criticism.
It is very bad. You do not have appropriate arguments to support your endless ranting. E.g., since you have this crave for attention, you have to spam useless posts in another thread:
you are insulting. what does this have to do with getting attention? hazek has been caught red handed deleting/censoring posts on two occasions; once directly to me and the other to stan.distortion. read thru the posts from the beginning here. as i said, the only comment that could be construed as "bad" is the "shitty" comment but that was in reaction to an insult hurled at me by hazek. it seems you're just as sensitive as he. if this is your definition of bad you'd better stay away from the Internet otherwise i will continue to hurt your fragile feelings.
I now see I made a big mistake and should have never assumed it is either alright or fair to retroactively set local rules after posts have already been made and apply those rules to those posts.
I apologize to everyone affected by my actions.
I apologize to everyone affected by my actions.
WTF? i just found this thread. and you two guys have the temerity to justify your actions of censoring my posts with the ad hominem of "off topic"?
You fail to comprehend why moderation is necessary and you do not know the meaning of "ad hominem":
i do understand why moderation is necessary but i don't think it applies to what i said. btw, here's someone who agrees with my original complaint just so ppl don't think i'm exaggerating when it comes to what Atlas did. this was in a pm to me:
my gaud man, its so refreshing to have someone posting reasonable shit here. i've never ventured into these part of the woods until i got banished here and man is it depressing.
yeah, i feel like i'm on Mars or somethin'. oops, better get back "on topic" bashing hazek or else i might get my comments "split off" and moved to somewhere i can't find myself.
Quote
You sound quite pathetic and your English writing skill is terrible.
Quote
(This is not an "ad hominem". I am not trying to undermine any argument... You have none.)
now you're resorting to lame criticism? who's pathetic? you, i'd say, by bragging about your little VIP and colored coins.
i think that definition is spot on the way i'm using it. if English writing skills are so important to you, how's this?: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1269864
now go criticize him. you're just a little apologist.
let me make one other point. what you see at the beginning of the thread is everything i said. i only had to repost one comment and its clear which one that was. so what you're seeing now is a complete picture of everything. just how bad is it? i'd say except for the "shitty" comment, not too bad at all. what you see is what was banished here to Meta solely b/c hazek can't take the slightest bit of criticism.
It is very bad. You do not have appropriate arguments to support your endless ranting. E.g., since you have this crave for attention, you have to spam useless posts in another thread:
I now see I made a big mistake and should have never assumed it is either alright or fair to retroactively set local rules after posts have already been made and apply those rules to those posts.
I apologize to everyone affected by my actions.
I apologize to everyone affected by my actions.
WTF? i just found this thread. and you two guys have the temerity to justify your actions of censoring my posts with the ad hominem of "off topic"?
You fail to comprehend why moderation is necessary and you do not know the meaning of "ad hominem":
http://plover.net/~bonds/adhominem.html
my gaud man, its so refreshing to have someone posting reasonable shit here. i've never ventured into these part of the woods until i got banished here and man is it depressing.
yeah, i feel like i'm on Mars or somethin'. oops, better get back "on topic" bashing hazek or else i might get my comments "split off" and moved to somewhere i can't find myself.
You sound quite pathetic and your English writing skill is terrible.
(This is not an "ad hominem". I am not trying to undermine any argument... You have none.)
The thing is the threads weren't all the same.
Could you at least put similar topics in the same thread? I know there is a rule against posting off-topic to the thread at hand, but there is some leniency. Plus, most of your posts are about four words long (you got a whole 9 words in that last post), it is a total waste of a thread to have such a short post taking up the OP.
Here is a great idea: Start a new thread, name it "Topics of interest to Atlas" and post all your one line musings there so they do not crowd the forum.
my gaud man, its so refreshing to have someone posting reasonable shit here. i've never ventured into these part of the woods until i got banished here and man is it depressing.
You got banished to Meta? Whoa, that's deep.
yeah, i feel like i'm on Mars or somethin'. oops, better get back "on topic" bashing hazek or else i might get my comments "split off" and moved to somewhere i can't find myself.
The thing is the threads weren't all the same.
Could you at least put similar topics in the same thread? I know there is a rule against posting off-topic to the thread at hand, but there is some leniency. Plus, most of your posts are about four words long (you got a whole 9 words in that last post), it is a total waste of a thread to have such a short post taking up the OP.
Here is a great idea: Start a new thread, name it "Topics of interest to Atlas" and post all your one line musings there so they do not crowd the forum.
my gaud man, its so refreshing to have someone posting reasonable shit here. i've never ventured into these part of the woods until i got banished here and man is it depressing.
You got banished to Meta? Whoa, that's deep.
Is it possible to merge threads? When Atlas starts up a bunch of threads, or when something big happens and ten people all start identical threads, could the moderators merge the threads? That way there would not be any censorship, just organization.
The thing is the threads weren't all the same.
Could you at least put similar topics in the same thread? I know there is a rule against posting off-topic to the thread at hand, but there is some leniency. Plus, most of your posts are about four words long (you got a whole 9 words in that last post), it is a total waste of a thread to have such a short post taking up the OP.
Here is a great idea: Start a new thread, name it "Topics of interest to Atlas" and post all your one line musings there so they do not crowd the forum.
my gaud man, its so refreshing to have someone posting reasonable shit here. i've never ventured into these part of the woods until i got banished here and man is it depressing.
Is it possible to merge threads? When Atlas starts up a bunch of threads, or when something big happens and ten people all start identical threads, could the moderators merge the threads? That way there would not be any censorship, just organization.
The thing is the threads weren't all the same.
Could you at least put similar topics in the same thread? I know there is a rule against posting off-topic to the thread at hand, but there is some leniency. Plus, most of your posts are about four words long (you got a whole 9 words in that last post), it is a total waste of a thread to have such a short post taking up the OP.
Here is a great idea: Start a new thread, name it "Topics of interest to Atlas" and post all your one line musings there so they do not crowd the forum.
i'm sorry. but it is very clear to me now that hazek is bad news: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/hazeks-opportune-pruning-118273
allowing 5-6 threads on the same topic simultaneously, by a guy like Atlas, bashing the devs and BF is inappropriate. that's my opinion.
I disagree that bashing the devs and/or BF is inappropriate. What is this, the catholic church? 5-6 threads on the matter may be out of line though.
Is it possible to merge threads? When Atlas starts up a bunch of threads, or when something big happens and ten people all start identical threads, could the moderators merge the threads? That way there would not be any censorship, just organization.
The thing is the threads weren't all the same.
allowing 5-6 threads on the same topic simultaneously, by a guy like Atlas, bashing the devs and BF is inappropriate. that's my opinion.
I disagree that bashing the devs and/or BF is inappropriate. What is this, the catholic church? 5-6 threads on the matter may be out of line though.
Is it possible to merge threads? When Atlas starts up a bunch of threads, or when something big happens and ten people all start identical threads, could the moderators merge the threads? That way there would not be any censorship, just organization.
Cypherdoc, why does it matter so much?
b/c i've never had comments here censored initially, then "moved" only after i complained about the censorship, and then had those actions defended with an ad hominem argument about being off topic. what this is about is no one wants the moderators criticized even mildly.
you'll recall on the day you made those 5-6 troll threads i made only one critical comment in one of your threads about the # of troll threads and you didn't even refute my argument. you simply responded that your threads weren't being taken down b/c hazek agreed with you philosophically. i didn't like that answer at the time but i let it go.
Cypherdoc, why does it matter so much?
let me make one other point. what you see at the beginning of the thread is everything i said. i only had to repost one comment and its clear which one that was. so what you're seeing now is a complete picture of everything. just how bad is it? i'd say except for the "shitty" comment, not too bad at all. what you see is what was banished here to Meta solely b/c hazek can't take the slightest bit of criticism.
so if all you guys and hazek insist that my posts were moved/deleted/censored solely b/c they were off topic, then you wouldn't mind me starting a thread in the Discussion Forum titled: Moderator Bad? 
is the fact that you used the stupid "off topic" excuse to censor/delete my critical comments within seconds of posting to avoid embarassment also not reality?
No, because if your posts were really critical for the forum discussion, they would not stand out to the attention of the moderators. Moreover, you seem to ignore what censorship really means:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship
continuing to use the "off topic" excuse as a reason to banish my comments over here to the Meta forum is not helping your case but in fact illuminating your hypocrisy.
It appears you are making a special pleading. This indicates that your true concern is where the posts are and by who they are being read. If is that so, I suggest you become a donator or VIP member. The colourful coins below the user name offers what you are demanding: special attention for your posts.
Jump to: