I think the whole principle of heritage should be removed.
It would equal the chances of everybody.
Topic: Money and people - page 2. (Read 4783 times)
I believe that people who work as hard as they do should receive a higher money unlike people who are not taking serious work or lesser work should be paid less in money, even they are instances that rates may follow due to education gained by the person. Knowledge and skills by the person is also a plus factor for the person to paid higher in money..
yeah, I agree. the harder people work, the higher they should get salary. sometimes there are people out there who work very hard, but they get so small salary, and I think it's not fair.
Guy's,lets just be serious.
If the government had all the money,probably 80% of people will never know what happiness means,because the people in goverment
like politics etc.only think about themselves,not about the poor people in their country that need help.
yaa just like the scenario of the hunger games without the match though hahahaha !!!! People should realize that's it's not money that we want. It is the freedom and independent feeling that we want. So, money is just the tool that helps us achieve our freedom and happiness. If the government had all the money,probably 80% of people will never know what happiness means,because the people in goverment
like politics etc.only think about themselves,not about the poor people in their country that need help.
The idea that our salary should depended from work we do is seems good and useful even now. But by this idea the most of money will stay at government in any case, cause they imagine themselves as the top of all professions and specializations.
That is why 90% of people even getting normal payout could not get payed their salary paid in bitcoin,because they could notrisk it until take can convert it fiat:If they have families,believe me converting btc-fiat every day/week/month could be dangerous for their financial status.
In my opinion the money should be divided by the more someone work the more he/she get. I think that way because I think if the government will give everybody the same amount then it would not be fair for those who work more. The 2nd option "a person decides how much he/she needs and takes it" isn't good either since if people will take how much he/she needs and takes it, It would just cause laziness because everyone can just take money they need and if they can decide how much he/she needs and takes it well some people can take a very big sum then it wouldn't be fair for those who will pick last and the one who will benefit are the early pickers. Well for me the third option the more you work the more you get because you have to do work before obtaining money and it will be productive that way.
Guy's,lets just be serious.
If the government had all the money,probably 80% of people will never know what happiness means,because the people in goverment
like politics etc.only think about themselves,not about the poor people in their country that need help.
If the government had all the money,probably 80% of people will never know what happiness means,because the people in goverment
like politics etc.only think about themselves,not about the poor people in their country that need help.
None of those 3 are right. but i voted for the last one because it was closer to the "Truth"
You can't give everyone the same amount of money because it won't be fair for someone who has a harder job or does his job better .
The second one can not be done because simply no one would be honest with their self and they would ask for exaggerated amount of money.
Third of all just as someone else stated What if someone is being more productive in the 2 hours of work while the other person who is working for 8 hours is maybe just doing nothing at all? So yeah none of them are right
Do you even understand the third choice?You can't give everyone the same amount of money because it won't be fair for someone who has a harder job or does his job better .
The second one can not be done because simply no one would be honest with their self and they would ask for exaggerated amount of money.
Third of all just as someone else stated What if someone is being more productive in the 2 hours of work while the other person who is working for 8 hours is maybe just doing nothing at all? So yeah none of them are right
It says the "more work", doing nothing at all is not a work. Your statement is clearly wrong there and misunderstood what is more work, more profit mean. The one who did nothing in 8 hours should not be having more profit than the one that is productive for 2 hours.
None of those 3 are right. but i voted for the last one because it was closer to the "Truth"
You can't give everyone the same amount of money because it won't be fair for someone who has a harder job or does his job better .
The second one can not be done because simply no one would be honest with their self and they would ask for exaggerated amount of money.
Third of all just as someone else stated What if someone is being more productive in the 2 hours of work while the other person who is working for 8 hours is maybe just doing nothing at all? So yeah none of them are right
You can't give everyone the same amount of money because it won't be fair for someone who has a harder job or does his job better .
The second one can not be done because simply no one would be honest with their self and they would ask for exaggerated amount of money.
Third of all just as someone else stated What if someone is being more productive in the 2 hours of work while the other person who is working for 8 hours is maybe just doing nothing at all? So yeah none of them are right
The idea that our salary should depended from work we do is seems good and useful even now. But by this idea the most of money will stay at government in any case, cause they imagine themselves as the top of all professions and specializations.
agree with your statement, the salary of each people is depending about how hard he work, sometimes how high his school also can give some plus salary /
The idea that our salary should depended from work we do is seems good and useful even now. But by this idea the most of money will stay at government in any case, cause they imagine themselves as the top of all professions and specializations.
agree with your statement, the salary of each people is depending about how hard he work, sometimes how high his school also can give some plus salary /
Work and earning money is what keeps the world going, without this, the world would have crashed a long time ago.
Lol, you're so innocent in the world we are living. Don't you know the economy is made out of humans ideas. If ever working and earning money for a living don't exist, you're more likely seeing us hunting on the wild while and doing what Charles Darwin said, survival of the fittest.But i agree with you,money is something what drives people from many many years,and you can't just erase it from across the world.
The idea that our salary should depended from work we do is seems good and useful even now. But by this idea the most of money will stay at government in any case, cause they imagine themselves as the top of all professions and specializations.
agree with your statement, the salary of each people is depending about how hard he work, sometimes how high his school also can give some plus salary /
Work and earning money is what keeps the world going, without this, the world would have crashed a long time ago.
Lol, you're so innocent in the world we are living. Don't you know the economy is made out of humans ideas. If ever working and earning money for a living don't exist, you're more likely seeing us hunting on the wild while and doing what Charles Darwin said, survival of the fittest.
The idea that our salary should depended from work we do is seems good and useful even now. But by this idea the most of money will stay at government in any case, cause they imagine themselves as the top of all professions and specializations.
This website will get you thinking, of how it could be in the future
https://www.thevenusproject.com/
And if you have some spare time, watch this video, or bookmark for later
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yb5ivvcTvRQ
From the website
https://www.thevenusproject.com/
And if you have some spare time, watch this video, or bookmark for later
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yb5ivvcTvRQ
From the website
Quote
In a Resource Based Economy all goods and services are available to all people without the need for means of exchange such as money, credits, barter or any other means. For this to be achieved all resources must be declared as the common heritage of all Earth’s inhabitants. Equipped with the latest scientific and technological marvels mankind could reach extremely high productivity levels and create abundance of resources.
Resource Based Economy concerns itself with three main factors, namely Environmental, Technological and Human. We invite you to investigate further into these factors and discover more about The Venus Project and Resource Based Economy.
Resource Based Economy concerns itself with three main factors, namely Environmental, Technological and Human. We invite you to investigate further into these factors and discover more about The Venus Project and Resource Based Economy.
Well, i think money is a good motivation for people to get skilled or exploit their talents.
So work gotta be paid...
So work gotta be paid...
Let's imagine the world, where government has all the money at the beginning and we need to decide how this money can be shared with people. Do we all need to be equal? Or should our salary depend on the work we do?
I would say the second thing.If you let's say work in NASA you cant really have the same salary as the guy who digs holes at the countryside right? it wouldnt be fair at all,one can think that the second guy does the harder job but well... i dont think so actually.
Strange topic,but interesting indeed.
Work and earning money is what keeps the world going, without this, the world would have crashed a long time ago.
Lol, you're so innocent in the world we are living. Don't you know the economy is made out of humans ideas. If ever working and earning money for a living don't exist, you're more likely seeing us hunting on the wild while and doing what Charles Darwin said, survival of the fittest.
i think it would be base on what service you can give. men and women can be seen differently.
three's nothing to be equal, people are unique in every aspects, intellectual differences you may see, the future is here, if you work hard you pay less, but if you work wise, you pay more than to your expectation, don't work hard just work wise.
Jump to: