guess everything should be fine JPR , looking at what monsterbyte is doing it seems that they are taking the business really seriously and most likely they will solve all of the old issues
their aim for the new exchange should be to compete with other small exchanges , and most likely they will figure this out to protect their business
It's probably a matter of opinion, but in my experience when someone is taking a business "seriously", the first thing they do is pay back debtors. It seems like that hasn't happened yet despite the partnership being over 6 months old.
Even if you put aside the fact that it's the right thing to do, it's just a matter of optics. How can you trust Company B when they still owe a bunch of money to people from when they were Company A? How do you know that they won't repeat their mistakes if they have never atoned for them?
What debtors are you referring to? All the investors with an available balance that have divested and requested a cashout have been processed.
The investor compensations are also not debt. The losses they incurred from investing were at their own risk and responsibility. We had no obligation to credit these users, but chose to compensate them over time from profits as was originally stated.
There is only an unfounded claim that is being settled by the proper channels.
I believe you are misunderstanding the situation which may be a cause of inaccurate statements put forth by other members.
From my understanding, you owe "MaidenVoyage" a large sum of money that you are currently being taken to court over. Your new owner accidentally admitted your culpability in a post a week or two ago.
In addition to that, you owe the promised "investor compensations", which you chose to call "debt tokens" if I'm not mistaken. You can see why something called "debt tokens" would be seen as...you know...debt. Because it's in the name.
BUT what I actually said is that you owe people money. And, if you say to investors "I'm going to pay you money", that's owing people money. You can dress it up in whatever semantics you'd like, but if you promise people money and you haven't paid it to them yet, you owe them that money. You can say that that money that you owe is due to you being charitable and not because of any liability (and I can't speak to the validity of that claim), but you can't say that you don't owe the money.