Topic: 🌟🎲🌟 MoneyPot.com - page 123. (Read 119056 times)
I do know there were 14 Bitcoin in withdrawals shortly after we announced we were in maintenance mode. That may or may not have accounted for the difference seen. Nonetheless, we'll get it fixed up
^ I'll pass that along to the team.
To my recollection, it was affected by the maintenance we've been conducting in the past few days. I don't believe it's been outdated for any longer than that, but I may be wrong.
We're continuously working on getting all the small things fixed up and are working towards updating the site to stages listed in the original post.
Thank you for bringing this to our attention.
Sounds good. I think it is longer then a few days since right now the bankroll is 131,185,650 bits and the proof of liabilities shows 158,057,332.82 bits and the bankroll hasn't dropped that much for the last week and a bit more. It might be before the big win on plinkopot bringing the profit to a negative.To my recollection, it was affected by the maintenance we've been conducting in the past few days. I don't believe it's been outdated for any longer than that, but I may be wrong.
We're continuously working on getting all the small things fixed up and are working towards updating the site to stages listed in the original post.
Thank you for bringing this to our attention.
I do know there were 14 Bitcoin in withdrawals shortly after we announced we were in maintenance mode. That may or may not have accounted for the difference seen. Nonetheless, we'll get it fixed up
Yeah, that would probably be why. Forgot that the proof of liabilities includes user balances, not just invested bitcoin.
It seems your Proof of Liabilities has not been updated for a bit (not sure how long).
It says on your site that it's updated every 24 hours
My account has ~71k bits and has had around that for 2-3 days, yet it isn't included there.
You should either change the text claiming it's updated every 24 hours or just get rid of it (or keep updating it like it says) since right now it is misleading.
https://www.moneypot.com/proof-of-liabilities.txt shows Proof of 158,057,332.82 bits of liabilities at the top, and the current bankroll is ~130,000,000 bits so it seems it hasn't been updated for a few weeks.
It says on your site that it's updated every 24 hours
My account has ~71k bits and has had around that for 2-3 days, yet it isn't included there.
You should either change the text claiming it's updated every 24 hours or just get rid of it (or keep updating it like it says) since right now it is misleading.
https://www.moneypot.com/proof-of-liabilities.txt shows Proof of 158,057,332.82 bits of liabilities at the top, and the current bankroll is ~130,000,000 bits so it seems it hasn't been updated for a few weeks.
Thanks for getting things back up and running! The changes look like they will be nice can't wait to add new coins to our site!
Currently undergoing technical maintenance.
Please be patient.
Please be patient.
We are done with maintenance now. Please generate a new deposit address before depositing. Sorry for the delays!
New site design should be up sometime next week
New site design should be up sometime next week
Glad to hear, you are back on track. I have one question though, all the older deposits adresses are workable, or?. I have some possible transactions coming in olders adresses.
Cheers
Old addresses should still work, but in the future we suggest using a new deposit address.
We are done with maintenance now. Please generate a new deposit address before depositing. Sorry for the delays!
New site design should be up sometime next week
New site design should be up sometime next week
Glad to hear, you are back on track. I have one question though, all the older deposits adresses are workable, or?. I have some possible transactions coming in olders adresses.
Cheers
We are done with maintenance now. Please generate a new deposit address before depositing. Sorry for the delays!
New site design should be up sometime next week
New site design should be up sometime next week
@ New MoneyPot Team:
I have a little suggestion for you, since you're already offering a casino API with MoneyPot,
why not turn MoneyPot into an actual GAMING API, so you can allow users to make more than
just casinos.. There could be network-wide premium currency (or bits itself) which players could
use to either transact within the game, to pay to PLAY the game, and MoneyPot could maybe take
fees from App Developer's users for using the API, instead of the App Developer..
Just my 2 bits.
If you can't work on this, I'd like to maybe experiment, learn a bit more and work on it myself
I have a little suggestion for you, since you're already offering a casino API with MoneyPot,
why not turn MoneyPot into an actual GAMING API, so you can allow users to make more than
just casinos.. There could be network-wide premium currency (or bits itself) which players could
use to either transact within the game, to pay to PLAY the game, and MoneyPot could maybe take
fees from App Developer's users for using the API, instead of the App Developer..
Just my 2 bits.
If you can't work on this, I'd like to maybe experiment, learn a bit more and work on it myself
This is a very interesting idea I like the idea of flexibility if it's feasible for cost development.
If Moneypot doesn't work on this I definitely will.
I'll find a way to make it feasible, the legitimate e-gaming market
is untapped, and cryptocurrency IMO should've been the way to do so
Ok please keep us posted if you do work on this and get to the testing point we may be able to help, great ideas!
Thanks Doge! good to know all its fine agin ^^
good to know all its fine agin ^^ @ New MoneyPot Team:
I have a little suggestion for you, since you're already offering a casino API with MoneyPot,
why not turn MoneyPot into an actual GAMING API, so you can allow users to make more than
just casinos.. There could be network-wide premium currency (or bits itself) which players could
use to either transact within the game, to pay to PLAY the game, and MoneyPot could maybe take
fees from App Developer's users for using the API, instead of the App Developer..
Just my 2 bits.
If you can't work on this, I'd like to maybe experiment, learn a bit more and work on it myself
I have a little suggestion for you, since you're already offering a casino API with MoneyPot,
why not turn MoneyPot into an actual GAMING API, so you can allow users to make more than
just casinos.. There could be network-wide premium currency (or bits itself) which players could
use to either transact within the game, to pay to PLAY the game, and MoneyPot could maybe take
fees from App Developer's users for using the API, instead of the App Developer..
Just my 2 bits.
If you can't work on this, I'd like to maybe experiment, learn a bit more and work on it myself
very good idea!
@ New MoneyPot Team:
I have a little suggestion for you, since you're already offering a casino API with MoneyPot,
why not turn MoneyPot into an actual GAMING API, so you can allow users to make more than
just casinos.. There could be network-wide premium currency (or bits itself) which players could
use to either transact within the game, to pay to PLAY the game, and MoneyPot could maybe take
fees from App Developer's users for using the API, instead of the App Developer..
Just my 2 bits.
If you can't work on this, I'd like to maybe experiment, learn a bit more and work on it myself
I have a little suggestion for you, since you're already offering a casino API with MoneyPot,
why not turn MoneyPot into an actual GAMING API, so you can allow users to make more than
just casinos.. There could be network-wide premium currency (or bits itself) which players could
use to either transact within the game, to pay to PLAY the game, and MoneyPot could maybe take
fees from App Developer's users for using the API, instead of the App Developer..
Just my 2 bits.
If you can't work on this, I'd like to maybe experiment, learn a bit more and work on it myself
This is a very interesting idea I like the idea of flexibility if it's feasible for cost development.
If Moneypot doesn't work on this I definitely will.
I'll find a way to make it feasible, the legitimate e-gaming market
is untapped, and cryptocurrency IMO should've been the way to do so
@ New MoneyPot Team:
I have a little suggestion for you, since you're already offering a casino API with MoneyPot,
why not turn MoneyPot into an actual GAMING API, so you can allow users to make more than
just casinos.. There could be network-wide premium currency (or bits itself) which players could
use to either transact within the game, to pay to PLAY the game, and MoneyPot could maybe take
fees from App Developer's users for using the API, instead of the App Developer..
Just my 2 bits.
If you can't work on this, I'd like to maybe experiment, learn a bit more and work on it myself
I have a little suggestion for you, since you're already offering a casino API with MoneyPot,
why not turn MoneyPot into an actual GAMING API, so you can allow users to make more than
just casinos.. There could be network-wide premium currency (or bits itself) which players could
use to either transact within the game, to pay to PLAY the game, and MoneyPot could maybe take
fees from App Developer's users for using the API, instead of the App Developer..
Just my 2 bits.
If you can't work on this, I'd like to maybe experiment, learn a bit more and work on it myself
This is a very interesting idea I like the idea of flexibility if it's feasible for cost development.
@ New MoneyPot Team:
I have a little suggestion for you, since you're already offering a casino API with MoneyPot,
why not turn MoneyPot into an actual GAMING API, so you can allow users to make more than
just casinos.. There could be network-wide premium currency (or bits itself) which players could
use to either transact within the game, to pay to PLAY the game, and MoneyPot could maybe take
fees from App Developer's users for using the API, instead of the App Developer..
Just my 2 bits.
If you can't work on this, I'd like to maybe experiment, learn a bit more and work on it myself
I have a little suggestion for you, since you're already offering a casino API with MoneyPot,
why not turn MoneyPot into an actual GAMING API, so you can allow users to make more than
just casinos.. There could be network-wide premium currency (or bits itself) which players could
use to either transact within the game, to pay to PLAY the game, and MoneyPot could maybe take
fees from App Developer's users for using the API, instead of the App Developer..
Just my 2 bits.
If you can't work on this, I'd like to maybe experiment, learn a bit more and work on it myself
Quote
That is correct, we did not purchase the S.L.R., e will be removing the license from the footer shortly. Also, there is no such thing as a Costa Rican gaming license, Costa Rica does not offer gaming licenses but they also do not prohibit gaming.
What are you implying / what do you mean exactly? I know that the license exists and is correct, as I've seen it myself. Just trying to get miscommunication out of the way here.EDIT: Rewrote my post as it was a bit to much.
Not implying anything, Emerge is spot on on what he said, Costa Rica does not require e-gaming companies to have a special license.
This service definitely looks good, spot on to be honest. I love the design but I'll probably wait a little while until it's been open a bit so I don't experience any bugs or issues.
We have already been open for a few months (and before we took over it was ran for 7 months), we are glad you like the design!
I don't want to on public record and state something that may not be the final decision.
We are still crunching the numbers and are debating the best way to approach it.
Moneypot will be fully responsible for all of the funds and won't use outside funds to cover or makeup any losses and therefore must be structured in a way that partially controls the volatility and allows us to always remain in the black with our other revenue streams to satisfy all parties.
Once we come closer to implementation and reach a satisfying conclusion, we will explain it here in detail.
We are still crunching the numbers and are debating the best way to approach it.
Moneypot will be fully responsible for all of the funds and won't use outside funds to cover or makeup any losses and therefore must be structured in a way that partially controls the volatility and allows us to always remain in the black with our other revenue streams to satisfy all parties.
Once we come closer to implementation and reach a satisfying conclusion, we will explain it here in detail.
This service definitely looks good, spot on to be honest. I love the design but I'll probably wait a little while until it's been open a bit so I don't experience any bugs or issues.
Hi all, we are conducting maintenance and are pushing an update to our API server, this means that bets will not be able to be placed for the short term. We expect the maintenance to be completed within the next few hours. Thank you for your patience
As to some of the questions above:
Moneypot will be fully responsible for all of the funds and won't use outside funds to cover or makeup any losses
interesting! you are not accepting investor money as it was before?
We will still be accepting money as before, just an additional option will be added. More information on this will be released within the next couple weeks.
Right now we are just planning on adding Rubies, however we are considering other large cap coins.
That is correct, we did not purchase the S.L.R., e will be removing the license from the footer shortly. Also, there is no such thing as a Costa Rican gaming license, Costa Rica does not offer gaming licenses but they also do not prohibit gaming.
As to some of the questions above:
Moneypot will be fully responsible for all of the funds and won't use outside funds to cover or makeup any losses
interesting! you are not accepting investor money as it was before?
We will still be accepting money as before, just an additional option will be added. More information on this will be released within the next couple weeks.
I am curios to know about list of altcoins which coins are into the list which will be available there in upcoming update, anyway that is good news for bag holders of altcoins.
Right now we are just planning on adding Rubies, however we are considering other large cap coins.
Quote
MoneyPot S.L.R. is a fully incorporated Costa Rican gaming company (License No. 3-102-700828)
I see that the footer hasn't changed yet. Does this still hold true? And if so, did you buy the company from RHavar as well? If not, please remove it as it is misleading.That is correct, we did not purchase the S.L.R., e will be removing the license from the footer shortly. Also, there is no such thing as a Costa Rican gaming license, Costa Rica does not offer gaming licenses but they also do not prohibit gaming.
Quote
That is correct, we did not purchase the S.L.R., e will be removing the license from the footer shortly. Also, there is no such thing as a Costa Rican gaming license, Costa Rica does not offer gaming licenses but they also do not prohibit gaming.
What are you implying / what do you mean exactly? I know that the license exists and is correct, as I've seen it myself. Just trying to get miscommunication out of the way here.EDIT: Rewrote my post as it was a bit to much.
To clear things up, all they had to do was to purchase a business license in Costa Rica as they don't have any regulations regarding E-Gaming and Money.
There is in fact a gaming license though, as in for operating an online gaming application business but that's not what we're talking about here.
@everybitbit @deathangel We're already up and running and are close to processing 100 Bitcoin a day in wagered amounts. 
. The product is undergoing ongoing improvements and changes however and one of the reasons for the original post.
. The product is undergoing ongoing improvements and changes however and one of the reasons for the original post. 
Quote
That is correct, we did not purchase the S.L.R., e will be removing the license from the footer shortly. Also, there is no such thing as a Costa Rican gaming license, Costa Rica does not offer gaming licenses but they also do not prohibit gaming.
What are you implying / what do you mean exactly? I know that the license exists and is correct, as I've seen it myself. Just trying to get miscommunication out of the way here.EDIT: Rewrote my post as it was a bit to much.
Jump to: