Pages:
Author

Topic: Monkeys: Don't do trend analysis! (with poll) (Read 355 times)

legendary
Activity: 3094
Merit: 1127
September 04, 2020, 12:26:55 PM
#29
The result:
Quote
Yes   - 9 (56.3%)
No   - 6 (37.5%)
I don't know   - 1 (6.3%)
Total Voters: 16

The question is, from those nine analysts, how many of you correctly predict that the price will be dump to the $10k level?

I would like to know as well on how they do consider it out on having such precision on using up analysis.I cant deny nor disagree that they dont work but we know that each decision we do made
just really have that 50% chance of succeeding neither it would go up or down as we do able to enter the market.Im sure that 99% didnt really anticipate that we would be heading down on 10k
again yet most of peoples perception or feeling is already on talking in levels of 13k as we break that 12k barrier but it seems this isnt still the right time for such price.I do make use of technicals
but im not really that relying when it comes to precision yet market is always been unpredictable and even to those so-called expert or pros then they are just typical speculators also.
copper member
Activity: 2324
Merit: 2142
Slots Enthusiast & Expert
September 04, 2020, 12:03:31 PM
#28
The result:
Quote
Yes   - 9 (56.3%)
No   - 6 (37.5%)
I don't know   - 1 (6.3%)
Total Voters: 16

The question is, from those nine analysts, how many of you correctly predict that the price will be dump to the $10k level?
member
Activity: 505
Merit: 35
Yes we can predict price.

 Can we do it with any degree of accuracy? 

Yes but only about 1 second in advance.
Only few person can predict it with accuracy. However, there is no consistent prediction to a person because anytime bitcoin fluctuates. This is the reason why most of the signal or technical analyst said a price with boundaries. Buying from a boundary and selling to a target price seems to be the accurate prediction we can take right now.

Many people have already know that bitcoin may fluctuate higher at the end of this year or next year. But we can't imagine yet where it will place. Does bitcoin reach ATH? WHO KNOWS.
hero member
Activity: 2814
Merit: 734
Bitcoin is GOD
I would not trust the random walk theory with my money, nor with a risky investment like Bitcoin (you need to know when it's good time to invest). I'd give a good example, the pattern Bitcoin price usual takes after a halving is a prediction with a premise somewhat, a shrewd investor will rather follow that path, accumulating before the halving and waiting for the next 6-12 months to see if the pattern repeats itself, it very well could/could not, but what I know is it's an Investment that's based on a pattern that has been experienced before, chances are higher of it pulling through.
This is called seasonal trading and it is a very effective way to trade, just to give another example everyone knows that during the winter companies need more oil and a standard movement by those that trade that asset is to begin to buy it during autumn and then sell it when most companies are close to fulfilling their needs for oil, and we can see many examples of this during our everyday lives, for example we can see Halloween pumpkins in October in the supermarket and not in any other month because as we know the demand for those kind of pumpkins skyrockets during that time of the year.

And obviously bitcoin also follows seasonal trading because we know in advance when the halving will happen and smart investors will buy bitcoin months before the event hoping that it goes up in value after the halving takes place.
legendary
Activity: 3710
Merit: 1170
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
You can talk about any method you want but bitcoin doesn't apply to any of them at all, the other things like gold or stocks or even forex could use those things because there are regulations and overseeing branches of governments and even LOGIC we do not have.

However in crypto things are too wild, we could have bitcoin 30k in a week or 5k and both could be equally possible, do not get me wrong if we are 5k in a week people would be super bummed about it and would be sad and upset but nobody could say that it is impossible, same goes with 30k, that wouldn't be impossible neither that will happen too and people would believe it as well and would be super happy about it. I doubt that people could say the same thing about all other investment stuff.
sr. member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 278
If you've watched a chart for long enough you'll know where it's going next. TA for Hull and bear flags and repeat patterns also make it possible to have a pretty clear idea.

Also depending on how they traded is going to change things. If it was equities, while in a bull market, most are going to follow the trend.. If you just keep longing at 3x leverage for example, even in crashes you won't lose anything...
But given this market is lacking consistency, making a prediction will not be a help. It is one's freedom to share his thoughts and speculations but I just cannot see the essence of doing so because the market is inconsistent, a pattern may be formed but that doesn't give assurance of what could happen next. We should expect the unexpected because that is how this market behave. A market price could go up continuously but could also fall down in an instant. Same thing when the market price is falling, the other way around could take place.
copper member
Activity: 2324
Merit: 2142
Slots Enthusiast & Expert
^Thanks for mention the Brownian motion (not about the software thingy lul). Trend analysis lovers might want to learn about the stochastic process, doesn't have to be deep since it's mainly mathematics.

Nevertheless, even with Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM) plus Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS), the results still fall within probabilities.

The horror is that perhaps the analysts who were beaten by the random darts already use the stochastic process, not just a mere trend analysis.
legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1441
Why does this thing happen? Well, there is a theory called "Random Walk Theory."



Post 2008 financial crisis, there was an attempt made at forensics to distinguish primary causes of the meltdown. One of the observations made during this time was industry standard financial software emulating brownian motion in physics to randomize the future behavior of consumers and markets.

The projected future behavior of consumers and markets being randomized created a type of observational blind spot where some consumers would be projected to buy while others sold. But never in a timeframe where they all bought or sold simultaneously, which would precipitate large market rises or crashes. This led to software utilized in the financial industry being unable to predict the subprime mortgage crash. So it was claimed anyway.

Everything said about random walk theory and related content would appear to be new age ideology of MMT - modern monetary theory.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1860
Okay, the above examples are for stocks, but it should be somewhat applicable to the cryptocurrency market. What do you think?

While I am not really a fan of technical analyses as I am not really convinced of their accuracy, I don't think that a random dart throw is more or less the same.

If you want to try out this random dart throwing in the wide crypto market, say, which coin is worth investing in the following week, or which price range is better for buy or selling, or whether it is buying or selling time right now, the tendency is that you are going to end up losing.

hero member
Activity: 2702
Merit: 672
I don't request loans~
Random theories are just more or less lucky guesses, I'd rather be researching into an asset I want to invest in, be it stocks or cryptocurrency, to get an understanding of the market and even if not for the immediate profits, but so I'll be productive in that field in the long term. That being said, true random guesses could give you profits some time, but if you learn all there is about an investment market, you can always make profits for a lifetime.
What makes you different than professional analysts whose beaten by darts?
Isn't that what makes random theories lucky guesses? Since even if it was an educated guess or just a plain ol' lucky guess, you both still have a 50/50 chance of hitting a jackpot and losing. I say educated since the guess is backed up with data that you think is relevant, and might just be relevant, but can also be not, but this really just increases your confidence of choosing the correct asset to invest in, not the chances of you actually successfully profiting off of an asset. Again, chances are ALWAYS 50/50, research and studies are just stuff that boosts your confidence in an asset, making you think that it's the correct asset to invest to.

TA's are great and all, lots of complicated stuff that I don't really understand, and might not bother even understanding them, but they're all in the end just predictions. This is why some people just throw away thinking and just go in. Predictions don't guarantee success, nor do they increase chances of success, so why bother thinking right?
full member
Activity: 1442
Merit: 153
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
I would say that if you see some sort of analysis and if you do not know what you are looking at, there is really nothing you can do about it, people will fool you because you do not know what you are looking at so they could make something up that doesn't exist at all and show you a chart that makes absolutely zero sense and you will believe them because you do not know what you are doing.

However if you do know what you are looking at, that means you will be capable of actually understanding what he is talking about, that way you would be also understanding if the person that is doing the analysis is actually doing a good job (doesn't mean he has to be right, just be correct about what he is talking about) and by that time you would be capable of doing some analysis yourself as well.
What if you think you know what you are looking at, but actually you do not know what you are looking at. You think you make a useful chart, analysis, etc., but actually it does not matter.
Now that will depend on how you percept things, how you understand such thing to actually know it. There are times that you really feel that you are doing right coz you follow all the right thing in your mind, but with the market like this that contains a high volatility there are more chances of you losing than actually winning. Say in a price prediction, there is only 2 direction which is up or down you guess where the price is going based on your matters that you understand from chart, influence, etc.

copper member
Activity: 2324
Merit: 2142
Slots Enthusiast & Expert
I would say that if you see some sort of analysis and if you do not know what you are looking at, there is really nothing you can do about it, people will fool you because you do not know what you are looking at so they could make something up that doesn't exist at all and show you a chart that makes absolutely zero sense and you will believe them because you do not know what you are doing.

However if you do know what you are looking at, that means you will be capable of actually understanding what he is talking about, that way you would be also understanding if the person that is doing the analysis is actually doing a good job (doesn't mean he has to be right, just be correct about what he is talking about) and by that time you would be capable of doing some analysis yourself as well.
What if you think you know what you are looking at, but actually you do not know what you are looking at. You think you make a useful chart, analysis, etc., but actually it does not matter.

By the time you realize this situation, you would believe the monkeys lul.
sr. member
Activity: 2030
Merit: 323
I would say that if you see some sort of analysis and if you do not know what you are looking at, there is really nothing you can do about it, people will fool you because you do not know what you are looking at so they could make something up that doesn't exist at all and show you a chart that makes absolutely zero sense and you will believe them because you do not know what you are doing.

However if you do know what you are looking at, that means you will be capable of actually understanding what he is talking about, that way you would be also understanding if the person that is doing the analysis is actually doing a good job (doesn't mean he has to be right, just be correct about what he is talking about) and by that time you would be capable of doing some analysis yourself as well.
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1293
There is trouble abrewing
that is why i never liked technical analysis. there are too many errors in the result of this so called "analysis" that makes it very unreliable. that is also why traders who use TA aren't all rich!
but at the same time i think it is not as bad as being random. there is still some good conclusions to be made from it. combining that with fundamental analysis and years of experience is the only way one can succeed in trading.

Okay, the above examples are for stocks, but it should be somewhat applicable to the cryptocurrency market. What do you think?
Bonus, notable argument by a skeptic:
no, never.
the problem with cryptocurrency market is the high level of manipulation. this goes as far as some coins being complete pump and dumps which means there is never any way of predicting their price unless you are the one pump and dumping it and even then it is hard to predict it with 100% accuracy because someone else may dump while you pump or vice versa.
legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 2406
Playgram - The Telegram Casino
But how about if we do random in top-100 crypto, assumed the top-100 is more legit than the rest?
Market capitalization is not a reliable metric with which to verify the legitimacy of a currency. The top 100 is just one of many indicators of which has a reliable project, and it's a very broad list which could contain fake/shilled projects. More cherry picking would need to be done to come up with an ideal list from which to select randomly from.
There are also stable coins on that list, and they do not pass as an ideal investment option.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1277
If there are some people basing their decisions on careful analysis, and other basing theirs on random picks, then this would arguably result in a situation where many of those using analysis end up reaching similar conclusions and making similar picks. I would say that if you are capable of making the analysis, then you could use this information to your advantage. Knowledge of how people think the market will move is extremely valuable - and this is especially true if we are considering some of the smaller crypto markets.

Regardless, I would suggest that giving darts to monkeys is a bad idea.
copper member
Activity: 2324
Merit: 2142
Slots Enthusiast & Expert
I do strongly oppose animal experimentation.
You think they like throwing darts?
What makes you think the monkeys hate the experiment if they earn sweet bananas?

The process of creating a stock and a cryptocurrency are quite different, so even if this thesis works in stocks, it may not in cryptocurrency. Stocks are created from existing businesses which wants to raise funds by inviting shareholders (private or public), there are legal processes and they need to have a working product. Cryptocurrencies can be created by literally anyone with coding skills, without any product behind it or legal barrier to ensure it's not a scam. If you were to randomly pick out a cryptocurrency from a tracking website, you would more times than not select one with no utility; losing out in the long run.
Great argument!
It's true that stocks market != crypto market because of this thing. In crypto, the ticker can range from blatant, obvious scams or useless tokens to legit cryptocurrencies. By a simple logic (without empirical studies), doing random darts in crypto will rekt the investor.

But how about if we do random in top-100 crypto, assumed the top-100 is more legit than the rest?

I'm hoping that you don't belittle the importance of analysis in the market because that will be your basis on what action you are going to do with your investments. Just always observe the charts and make your own conclusion about what is going to happen next so that you can make it profitable for you.
It's not me who belittle the analysis, but the monkeys Tongue
full member
Activity: 1540
Merit: 219
If you've watched a chart for long enough you'll know where it's going next. TA for Hull and bear flags and repeat patterns also make it possible to have a pretty clear idea.

Also depending on how they traded is going to change things. If it was equities, while in a bull market, most are going to follow the trend.. If you just keep longing at 3x leverage for example, even in crashes you won't lose anything...

Technical analysis is really helpful and this is what you need in order for you to have some ideas about the next price movement.

Being aware in the market is essential as it will guide you towards success in your investment.

I'm hoping that you don't belittle the importance of analysis in the market because that will be your basis on what action you are going to do with your investments. Just always observe the charts and make your own conclusion about what is going to happen next so that you can make it profitable for you.
legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 2406
Playgram - The Telegram Casino
Okay, the above examples are for stocks, but it should be somewhat applicable to the cryptocurrency market. What do you think?
The process of creating a stock and a cryptocurrency are quite different, so even if this thesis works in stocks, it may not in cryptocurrency. Stocks are created from existing businesses which wants to raise funds by inviting shareholders (private or public), there are legal processes and they need to have a working product. Cryptocurrencies can be created by literally anyone with coding skills, without any product behind it or legal barrier to ensure it's not a scam. If you were to randomly pick out a cryptocurrency from a tracking website, you would more times than not select one with no utility; losing out in the long run.
hero member
Activity: 1890
Merit: 831
Yes but only about 1 second in advance.
Why one second?

Random theories are just more or less lucky guesses, I'd rather be researching into an asset I want to invest in, be it stocks or cryptocurrency, to get an understanding of the market and even if not for the immediate profits, but so I'll be productive in that field in the long term. That being said, true random guesses could give you profits some time, but if you learn all there is about an investment market, you can always make profits for a lifetime.
What makes you different than professional analysts whose beaten by darts?

it says you cannot predict it using past data and two things are different. It says one cannot outperform the market without assuming "additional risk" this risk is called un systematic often referred to as Beta. Trader doesn't only predicts the direction of the market but along with that ascertains the risk of that trade and reward which he is willing to take.
And how do we calculate individual stock's beta?

Bur here the theory that you have suggested is something that i have serious doubts on, since this is very weird and twisted
...
One experiment showing results opposite to the one the theory can kill the theory instantly , even if it has years of backing up and data.
Lol weird and twisted?! Read this paper's conclusion mate Grin

Thank you for the suggestion , now let us analyze what the main conclusion is:

Quote
We examine the value of investment advice given monthly by investment analysts in the “Investment Dartboard
Column” of the Wall Street Journal. The portfolio thus formed is compared with another portfolio which consists of
stocks selected at random. The results indicate that the pros portfolio generates significant positive abnormal return on the
day of publication in the WSJ. However, upon comparison of this portfolio with the dart portfolio, the pros portfolio
outperforms the dart portfolio only when the holding period is one week or less. For holding periods longer than a week,
the pros portfolio does not perform better than the portfolio of random picks. The pros portfolio, in fact, generates significant negative abnormal returns over the longer holding period intervals. Therefore, a profitable opportunity can be
realized by going short on the buy recommendation and/or long on the sell recommendation over the six-month
investment horizon.
This leads us to believe that the publicity effect, is potent only in the short-term which then lends support to a moral
hazard problem encountered by investment professionals. In other words, the effect of the recommendation in the long-
run is transitory.

I do strongly oppose animal experimentation.
You think they like throwing darts?

Secondly conclusion is like : A wannabe scientist , not being able to express what he did and what he intends to use it for.

Very easily he could have used random generator since the whole point was putting values up and selecting randomly.

Even if its true (which is absurd) its not for us long time holders.
Pages:
Jump to: