Author

Topic: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 move to a new thread - page 253. (Read 317746 times)

full member
Activity: 233
Merit: 102
https://genesis.re
I've just tweeted about you: https://twitter.com/stefek99/status/872252444436299776

I promised myself not to trade but these days it's working like a drug...

To the $MOON Smiley
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
Yes.

A few years back I had found an article that described a survey they took regarding the names of all these alt coins.  The name "Moon" came out on top.  A link to the article is already posted on Mooncoin's webpage.
https://web.archive.org/web/20141210082000/http://altcoinpress.com/2014/11/a-name-matters-cryptocurrency-names-and-ratings/


Excellent!

The MOON is rising!
full member
Activity: 287
Merit: 159

I have found this to be one of the key selling points.  I have described mooncoin to fellow coders, and some marketers.  One of the points they like is the fact that they can have many mooncoins.  ...  Most will not be impressed to say they just bought 0.002 bitcoins, but most will be happy to say they just bought a thousand mooncoins, or a million coins.

I realize its just a perception thing, but a lot of products are bought based on emotions.

I think that's correct.

I also think different coins will be popular, to some degree, simply for what each represents.

For example, Purina might want to offer incentives to cat owners to buy Purina Cat Food, and could offer 100,000 KittenCoins (Symbol: MEOW) to buy their products or visit their website.

The Elephant Coin (ELP) could be popular to promote zoos.

The Krugercoin (KGC) could be given away by gold and silver bullion dealers, to attract new customers.

Mooncoin could be very popular to different people who consider the moon to have cultural or spiritual significance.

The point is - apart from any technological advantage of the coin, the symbolism of the coin itself may have it's own appeal and value.

Yes.

A few years back I had found an article that described a survey they took regarding the names of all these alt coins.  The name "Moon" came out on top.  A link to the article is already posted on Mooncoin's webpage.
https://web.archive.org/web/20141210082000/http://altcoinpress.com/2014/11/a-name-matters-cryptocurrency-names-and-ratings/
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0

I have found this to be one of the key selling points.  I have described mooncoin to fellow coders, and some marketers.  One of the points they like is the fact that they can have many mooncoins.  ...  Most will not be impressed to say they just bought 0.002 bitcoins, but most will be happy to say they just bought a thousand mooncoins, or a million coins.

I realize its just a perception thing, but a lot of products are bought based on emotions.

I think that's correct.

I also think different coins will be popular, to some degree, simply for what each represents.

For example, Purina might want to offer incentives to cat owners to buy Purina Cat Food, and could offer 100,000 KittenCoins (Symbol: MEOW) to buy their products or visit their website.

The Elephant Coin (ELP) could be popular to promote zoos.

The Krugercoin (KGC) could be given away by gold and silver bullion dealers, to attract new customers.

Mooncoin could be very popular to different people who consider the moon to have cultural or spiritual significance.

The point is - apart from any technological advantage of the coin, the symbolism of the coin itself may have it's own appeal and value.


full member
Activity: 287
Merit: 159

What would a logical target be for MOON ?

MOON is beyond any logic.

Theoretically it's designed to be better than BTC and LTC as a payment solution used on a daily basis by common people.
Also MOON has less inflation than DOGE, BTC, LTC and a lot of other coins.
DOGE is fun, MOON is serious and it's good for money.
LTC, BTC are not great for micropayments and tipping, MOON is great for that and there is enough coins for everyone.
If a price of goods and services is denominated in MOON, it will never look like 0.00000000001 MOON.

I have found this to be one of the key selling points.  I have described mooncoin to fellow coders, and some marketers.  One of the points they like is the fact that they can have many mooncoins.  ...  Most will not be impressed to say they just bought 0.002 bitcoins, but most will be happy to say they just bought a thousand mooncoins, or a million coins.

I realize its just a perception thing, but a lot of products are bought based on emotions.
full member
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
Crypto Enthusiast
I can help with the site, keeping it updated.

Bittrex or Poloniex would only list this coin only if they see potential, potential equals big trading volumes like yesterday or today. If every day we can keep at least 500k $ trading volumes almost for certain they will list it, at least bittrex.

As somebody here said, Bleutrade had yesterday and today a volume they never seen it before (at least as I know). People are moving their btc to the altcoin they want to invest in.

Today was a very good day for trading, almost double up my coins, still need to work until i have 10 mil Smiley

Cheers
member
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
Where do you guys keep your mooncoins? What's the safest place?
newbie
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
If the Devs can update the Reddit page, their website and provide a bit of news thru their social sites, this coin will blow. Just saying. If they need help with this, PM me.
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
I am a complete noob to this cryptoverse. So don't take my word for granted.
But my theory is as follows;
The total marketcap is growing everyday between 3 and 4 bil usd,
that is all new money, everyday between 3 and 4 bil usd.

MOON will go up for sure, especially if it stands for what it predicts.

See how much happend in a couple of weeks.
Its a matter of little patience.

 
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 550
Mooncoin at Bitcointalk
mooncoin will be in bittrex sometime soon?

In 2015 Bittrex promised to agswinner to list MOON if it's traded at BTC markets (MOON was below 1 Satoshi in 2015),
and Bittrex had BTC markets only.

Barrysty1e told he already had completed an enhanced verification at Bittrex as a Mooncoin dev.

Now it only depends on whether Bittrex keeps his word (we believe they do, they are trustable),
other than that we cannot make them list MOON, they don't list coins for money (paid voting etc.)
only ask for "community demand".
legendary
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
Don't forget that some top addresses with a lot of coins belong to 5 exchanges where MOON is listed currently (C-cex, Bleutrade, Nova, Coingather, Coinexchange),
top 2 addresses are unspendable, also 2 other smaller addresses with stolen coins,
if you hear rumours that any other address is unspendable, don't believe them, you can ask any independent expert who is able to read a Mooncoin code.

re: agswinner,
private keys are safe if they were generated in a safe way and if you keep them in a safe place and don't disclosure to anyone.
That's the fundamental thing behind crypto at all.
No matter how many coins someone sends to any of addresses.

Only for the readers education to get the full picture, not to necessarily speak against you:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Address_reuse

agswinner, could you elaborate on your theory? barrysty1e?

One of those addresses where stolen coins went, is the one mentioned here:



If you do some little research, you'll see there is no activity
except someone sent 2450 Mooncoins to each of top addresses,
that's why now in the Rich list all top addresses (even with coins which were not touched since 2014) indicate that last activity was today.

And because it is monitored, every activity, even only sending micro-amounts to it, should be closely watched and investigated, that's why agswinner's previous post is interesting. Maybe a hint to something ...?
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 550
Mooncoin at Bitcointalk

What would a logical target be for MOON ?

MOON is beyond any logic.

Theoretically it's designed to be better than BTC and LTC as a payment solution used on a daily basis by common people.
Also MOON has less inflation than DOGE, BTC, LTC and a lot of other coins.
DOGE is fun, MOON is serious and it's good for money.
LTC, BTC are not great for micropayments and tipping, MOON is great for that and there is enough coins for everyone.
If a price of goods and services is denominated in MOON, it will never look like 0.00000000001 MOON.

The long term potential of MOON definitely exists, but you need some patience.
Better keep some MOON (even small quantities) over long term than try to make a quick buck with it.
Some people tried to play with MOON before and it looks like they just sold their coins low,
they are off now and don't participate in this move. No one can predict that, you risk.
But the risk/reward ratio is not bad with MOON and it looks like liquidity risks now are disappearing.
People who were buying MOON in 2016 or in 2017 for 1 Sat, were accepting liquidity risks also, these people are rewarded now, they risked and won,
no one can predict your own story though.

If large exchanges (Bittrex and Polo first of all) list MOON, a big rise can happen immediately,
anyway we see that it's not an exchange which makes MOON successful, it's MOON that can make even a small exchange successful (the recent story of Bleutrade, small, but good innovative startup, launched in 2014, they generated yesterday almost the $1 million volume with MOON and received good fees from trading, and that's great).

legendary
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
Mooncoin is an open source project, exchange read the code, analyze the source before listing MOON just like any coin to use it with no worry.
So even a dev who codes a wallet doesn't control decentralized things.
It's a community that decides. With no consensus, there is no network.

Make sure you understand the nature of decentralized open source projects before posting.

In a ponzi scheme the price is only rising, while newcomers pay to founders.

In a decentralized Mooncoin project a founder probably has less coins than you.
There was no premine and no crowdsale.

People have equal opportunities, but the market price varies, like a Bitcoin or Dogecoin, or a Digibyte price.
Someone who bought at 1 Sat sells at 5 Sat, someone who sold at 2 Sat, rebuys at 5 Sat (fomo as coinflow said),
someone sold at 6 Sat hoping to rebuy at 4-5 etc etc etc.

With a free market the price is a balance of supply and demand and there are lots of players currently at the Mooncoin market. The $1 million volume yesterday indicated that very well. The price can be very volatile, MOON is still an emerging market and no one is able to predict it, a price can go to 1 Sat and then to 30, or to 30 Sat and then to 1 Sat, or to 30 Sat and then to 50 Sat, now the price varies between 4 and 7.

What is MOON's dev target per coin?

Since you mentioned Digibyte, i know they have a target of $1-$10 , anything above that is bonus.

What would a logical target be for MOON ?

I look Dogecoin
Dogecoin comunity said this http://www.muchdogenews.com/not-being-a-marketer-but-mooncoin-is-like-what-dogecoin-was-3-years-back-can-someone-take-a-look-at-this-coin-and-tell-if-its-worth-it/


MOON 5 sat vs Dogecoin 128 sat  Roll Eyes


Plenty of room for growth.  Smiley
Just see RDD. Was 1-3 satoshi. Now over 100 satoshi.
full member
Activity: 149
Merit: 100
There's been good movements with this coin lately.
legendary
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000

Quote
Of course, the new difficulty readjustment algo is priority, it goes without saying.
As said, then it should have been added already. I have mentioned this for years already, as you know. As nice as web-wallet and the such are, I'll repeat: the heart of any crypto is its algo and it needs to work flawlessly as advertised (in case of Mooncoin: 90 sec. block-time). But as also said, good, that James has now set it on top of his list.


You did suggest DigiShield as a new algo in the past and it was implemented by barrysty1e in the current wallet and works since March, 2017.
However, the idea was not great. Current pauses between blocks happen due to DigiShield.
We definitely need another algo, you will agree with it. But it's not so easy to change the algo each time, because it requires a fork and a mandatory update of wallet.

Anyway it's true that it's better to do a mandatory update than to leave a current algo which doesn't match a 90 sec block time.

Only to make everything clearer for the gentle reader:
Long ago I suggested using DigiShield, because the original dev deaconboogie talked about it, when he realized that the newly implemented KGW did not work well under all conditions. Back then DigiShield (invented by DigiByte-devs, btw., for those who don't know it, see https://www.reddit.com/r/Digibyte/comments/1yn6t1/digibyte_v_20_code_name_digishield/) seemed to be a better solution, but it is only to a small extent, as we all know now.

With PoS surfacing more and more (RDD etc.) I suggested to switch over to it several times and we had serious discussions about that, as you know (which most probably led to the text about PoS vs. PoW in the first posting of this thread). Now - literally years later - we have the outdated DigiShield and we realize again, that PoS is most probably the better solution, because it is much easier to get a decentralized critical mass of users together, than with mining. It has drawbacks, for sure, but so has PoW, as we all can see. And we could also develop an improved PoS-algorithm, as I said before.

Why would one try to explain how to mine over and over again? It is not that easy to set up a miner correctly, as one could think, especially if you are a newbie. Moreover mining a Scrypt-coin like Mooncoin without specialized ASIC will most probably never get you a coin, except you are extremely lucky, at least it is extremely unprofitable to waste GPU- or even CPU-energy on that, whereas with PoS everybody and their neighbor can contribute to the network stability easily, and you don't pull that much energy which always comes along with the pollution of the environment, if the electricity isn't produced from renewables). If coins like Stratis and RDD exist well with PoS (and for Ethereum PoS is planned too, after the Ice Age, let's see what happens, it's all a big experiment), then Moon could also do very well with it.

Quote
We definitely need another algo, you will agree with it. But it's not so easy to change the algo each time, because it requires a fork and a mandatory update of wallet.
That's why it would have been good to have PoS implemented already, instead of dealing with DigiShield when developing an updated wallet not in 2014, but in 2016. Times change and if there are better options, then one can use those, too. DigiShield was a better thing back in the days and deaconboogie thought about implementing it, but the time moved on.
legendary
Activity: 1375
Merit: 1010
Mooncoin is an open source project, exchanges read the code, analyze the source before listing MOON just like any coin to use it with no worry.
So even a dev who codes a wallet doesn't control decentralized things.
It's a community that decides. With no consensus, there is no network.

Make sure you understand the nature of decentralized open source projects before posting.

In a ponzi scheme the price is only rising, while newcomers pay to founders.

In a decentralized Mooncoin project a founder probably has less coins than you.
There was no premine and no crowdsale.

People have equal opportunities, but the market price varies, like a Bitcoin or Dogecoin, or a Digibyte price.
Someone who bought at 1 Sat sells at 5 Sat, someone who sold at 2 Sat, rebuys at 5 Sat (fomo as coinflow said),
someone sold at 6 Sat hoping to rebuy at 4-5 etc etc etc.

With a free market the price is a balance of supply and demand and there are lots of players currently at the Mooncoin market. The $1 million volume yesterday indicated that very well. The price can be very volatile, MOON is still an emerging market and no one is able to predict it, a price can go to 1 Sat and then to 30, or to 30 Sat and then to 1 Sat, or to 30 Sat and then to 50 Sat, now the price varies between 4 and 7.

And the depth at bleutrade now is 5,3 billions in bid vs 3,5 in ask price  Roll Eyes






Mooncoin is an open source project, exchange read the code, analyze the source before listing MOON just like any coin to use it with no worry.
So even a dev who codes a wallet doesn't control decentralized things.
It's a community that decides. With no consensus, there is no network.

Make sure you understand the nature of decentralized open source projects before posting.

In a ponzi scheme the price is only rising, while newcomers pay to founders.

In a decentralized Mooncoin project a founder probably has less coins than you.
There was no premine and no crowdsale.

People have equal opportunities, but the market price varies, like a Bitcoin or Dogecoin, or a Digibyte price.
Someone who bought at 1 Sat sells at 5 Sat, someone who sold at 2 Sat, rebuys at 5 Sat (fomo as coinflow said),
someone sold at 6 Sat hoping to rebuy at 4-5 etc etc etc.

With a free market the price is a balance of supply and demand and there are lots of players currently at the Mooncoin market. The $1 million volume yesterday indicated that very well. The price can be very volatile, MOON is still an emerging market and no one is able to predict it, a price can go to 1 Sat and then to 30, or to 30 Sat and then to 1 Sat, or to 30 Sat and then to 50 Sat, now the price varies between 4 and 7.

What is MOON's dev target per coin?

Since you mentioned Digibyte, i know they have a target of $1-$10 , anything above that is bonus.

What would a logical target be for MOON ?

I look Dogecoin
Dogecoin comunity said this http://www.muchdogenews.com/not-being-a-marketer-but-mooncoin-is-like-what-dogecoin-was-3-years-back-can-someone-take-a-look-at-this-coin-and-tell-if-its-worth-it/


MOON 5 sat vs Dogecoin 128 sat  Roll Eyes
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
Mooncoin is an open source project, exchange read the code, analyze the source before listing MOON just like any coin to use it with no worry.
So even a dev who codes a wallet doesn't control decentralized things.
It's a community that decides. With no consensus, there is no network.

Make sure you understand the nature of decentralized open source projects before posting.

In a ponzi scheme the price is only rising, while newcomers pay to founders.

In a decentralized Mooncoin project a founder probably has less coins than you.
There was no premine and no crowdsale.

People have equal opportunities, but the market price varies, like a Bitcoin or Dogecoin, or a Digibyte price.
Someone who bought at 1 Sat sells at 5 Sat, someone who sold at 2 Sat, rebuys at 5 Sat (fomo as coinflow said),
someone sold at 6 Sat hoping to rebuy at 4-5 etc etc etc.

With a free market the price is a balance of supply and demand and there are lots of players currently at the Mooncoin market. The $1 million volume yesterday indicated that very well. The price can be very volatile, MOON is still an emerging market and no one is able to predict it, a price can go to 1 Sat and then to 30, or to 30 Sat and then to 1 Sat, or to 30 Sat and then to 50 Sat, now the price varies between 4 and 7.

What is MOON's dev target per coin?

Since you mentioned Digibyte, i know they have a target of $1-$10 , anything above that is bonus.

What would a logical target be for MOON ?
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 550
Mooncoin at Bitcointalk
Mooncoin is an open source project, exchanges read the code, analyze the source before listing MOON just like before listing any coin to use it with no worry.
So even a dev who codes a wallet doesn't control decentralized things.
It's a community that decides. With no consensus, there is no network.

Make sure you understand the nature of decentralized open source projects before posting.

In a ponzi scheme the price is only rising, while newcomers pay to founders.

In a decentralized Mooncoin project a founder probably has less coins than you.
There was no premine and no crowdsale.

People have equal opportunities, but the market price varies, like a Bitcoin/Dogecoin/Digibyte price.
Someone who bought at 1 Sat sells at 5 Sat, someone who sold at 2 Sat, rebuys at 5 Sat (fomo as coinflow said),
someone sold at 6 Sat hoping to rebuy at 4-5 etc etc etc.

With a free market the price is a balance of supply and demand and there are lots of players currently at the Mooncoin market. The $1 million volume yesterday indicated that very well. The price can be very volatile, MOON is still an emerging market and no one is able to predict it, a price can go to 1 Sat and then to 30, or to 30 Sat and then to 1 Sat, or to 30 Sat and then to 50 Sat, now the price varies between 4 and 7.
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
about to jump on the moon train at 5 satoshis

good call?
I'm still buying but who am i

ok man is goed
member
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
about to jump on the moon train at 5 satoshis

good call?
I'm still buying but who am i
Jump to: