re: coinflow,
I'm not able to explain how barrysty1e's protection worked, because I'm not an expert.
I told many times, I'm an investor. I'm not even a miner (you are a miner).
1) Vassilis was invited, he made a review on barrysty1e's protection
2) barrysty1e can explain by himself
3) mebagger is a crypto expert, he reviewed the code
4) independent devs, invited by Discord community investigated the code
There have been several outside developers who have done direct comparisons of the old MOON GitHub and the new
GitHub and have discovered that, besides the bit of work done on the desktop wallet, nothing else has yet been accomplished.
5) a dev, recommended by cointopay.com (Trev), now reviews the code,
what do you need more?
I will remind that you personally actively helped Vassilis work on a new release and fix issues with txs:
I just fixed today the pool mining section and the transaction issues..
we passed "key" block #1180751 with 73(?!?!?!!??!) transactions! Few more tests and tomorrow i will inform all the pools to make an update!
I must thank public @mebagger, @coinflow, @GBLASS and @Laidback!
you guys spent your time with me and your resources!
Thank you for your contribution to the Mooncoin community!
You may want to explain us how it happened that coins were moved as you better know the tech side and even helped Vassilis work on coding in December, 2017.
I tried to help people with less technical understanding all the time, as you know. But I get less involved more and more, as I see people not really want to solve problems, but only are focused on how the price can be driven up.
I have already explained, how the attacker managed to move the coins and there was more than enough time now to submit another explanation. But obviously Vassilis isn't available anymore and barrysty1e wastes his time with doing explanations on how someone knows something about crypto or not. If James knows that much about crypto (remember: "knowledge" about crypto is not the ability to code, just as Jeff Bezos would not necessarily know to code himself to know how selling goods in the web really works ...), then at let him explain how the movement happened, so that anybody interested in Mooncoin can make educated decisions on how to proceed. If he isn't interested in this, why would he post anyway? I don't need entertainment. I have also already explained, that serious investors need confidence to invest.
As I have already explained, it was a 51%-attack: the attacker possessed the private keys of the "blocked" Mooncoins to be moved and managed to move them, when he was in control of more than 50% of the hashrate in the moment he moved them. That is, why the network accepted the confirmations, despite of other wallets normally would block the transaction based on their code. These wallets carried on when the attacker left, after he had managed to move the coins. It was effectively a temporary hardfork done by the attacker to move the coins. As long as barrysty1e or someone else does not post a better explanation, which we can discuss, this is what happened. Maybe barry should first invest his time to explain why the Mooncoins in moonrush.org are gone without people having the chance to access them anymore (which was asked here sometimes and barry being silent), before he tries to explain, who knows about crypto and who not.