A couple of weeks ago, I posted
here my theory that the virus was released intentionally by China and the Western elites to effect a reset of the global financial system. It was quite a lively discussion!
We have one more important piece of evidence now.
It appears that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a truly effective treatment for early patients, that can potentially be a game changer in the fight against covid-19. See reports
here,
here and
here.
I know the controversial US President Trump is a big supporter of this treatment, but this is a time to put politics aside and look at the science.
In the US, two high-profile reports have just been published against using the treatment, and have generated much coverage in the mainstream media, with predictable results. (One comes from the US Veterans' Health Administration, and the other is published by The Lancet. I won't provide the links because they're everywhere!)
Chris Martenson of PeakProsperity.com has argued that both studies are flawed, because the key to effective treatment is starting treatment early, plus the inclusion of zinc, and neither of these studies consider those factors. French doctor Didier Raoult, an advocate of HCQ, also finds major problems with the studies. (He has written an
open letter to The Lancet in protest.) In addition, Martenson has looked at the design of 3 major future US-based studies on HCQ and found them 'designed to fail' by not accounting for early treatment and zinc.
One has to ask the question, why, oh why?
If HCQ is indeed an unfairly maligned, highly promising treatment, it does look as if the entire US establishment, not just the anti-Trump politicians and media, and not just big pharma (who stand to profit from much more expensive future vaccines and treatments, whereas HCQ is a generic) is against HCQ, and are desperate to make sure patients
don't get cured. This would be consistent with my theory that the Coronavirus was released in order to effect a controlled, gradual reset of the financial system.
I have not seen a rebuttal of the arguments by Martenson and Raoult. Raoult also complains that raw data was withheld from public review in the case of the Lancet report, against tradition.
Again, one has to ask, who has (have) this kind of power and ambition, to destroy what appears to be the biggest hope for the biggest problem facing the world?
Some things that I would like to mention here :-
1. Hydroxychloroquine is not an effective treatment against the Corona Virus . Remember that it is mostly used in the tropical countries to combat Malaria. The malarial parasite " Plasmodium " is not a VIRUS . The only reason it is effective in some cases is because it is being carefully administered by the doctors to the patients , it is not exactly killing the Virus . * It cannot *, it's just preventing further complications in case of only a small number of patients.
Reports are different everywhere therefore we should be cautious with it . Everyday they are giving a new statement. Hydroxychloroquine can be effective in some cases but the percentage is not that big . Plus it won't work if you take it at home ! You need to be administered the drug by a certified medical professional that too when you do get the virus unfortunately.Experts won't suggest you to take this drug at home!! Overdose and underdose can easily harm your body .
2. Drug For HIV is working in some patients ! Only if treatment is started early . Therefore it is a better option for us .
Unfortunately the president is a little out of the line here , I saw him telling people to take it as a preventive measure . You should not do that , I don't know why people are taking advice from anyone now a days .
________________________________________________________
The synthesis of this drug along with the HIV drug is located at certain developing countries where one of them is engaging in a war with China . Trump have good relationships with India therefore I do think that they can politically somehow make sure the drug reaches the US on time if needed.
In contrast to Trump asking drug from India , he have actually said he is going to help mediate between China and India if needed.
Everything is with a reason here .
I am not against the treatment with the antimalarial drug , but am against people who are taking advice from a non medical professional.
________________________________________________________
It's not just economic reset . It is the reset of the whole world , the government , the factories. It's going to change everything real fast. The countries who won't be able to change will suffer for a long long time .
Plus until and unless we don't have a big scale clinical trial with respect to the drug we need to remember that it is not a good idea .