Can we get a summary please of what exactly you are alleging. It's a lot to go through.
Thanks
When there are so many character attacks, and a lack of a clear and substantive outline and/or argument, one surely must wonder whether there is any validity to the claims...
Here is a clear and substantive outline:
yantis' (interesting and effective) re-post in this thread is (partly) a direct response to this list.
A thorough background check
I did some checking and there is little (if any) doubt that Brock Pierce:
1) Repeatedly starts (and helps to start) companies that lose many millions of investor funds.
2) Allegedly cheated a partner for a huge sum in a stock deal.
3a) Left the country when he knew some "wild parties" had gone way too far.
3b) Was sued for child rape by more than one (alleged) victim.
I think the above is reasonably accurate, the sources are (relatively) easy to find on google and in current threads here.
To be fair, in a recent video Brock Pierce seemed like a great spokesperson for Bitcoin.
If the world is ready to completely forgive "thieves and (alleged) pedos", then he's the perfect man to help lead BTC into the future.
I would add that the concept of "innocent until proven guilty" applies to court cases.
My interest in this story spiked when I read Brock left the country with his "sex crime" partners.
I viewed "fleeing" the country as a strong sign of guilt.
If that is wrong, then I am very sorry.
If the guy is NOT worthy to be involved in a potential GOX rehabilitation, then the Japanese court should be presented with that information or if the plan to save GOX is NOT legitimate and genuine, then the Japanese court should be presented with that, as well, in order that those matters can be taken into account. To me, it seems that some plan to rehabilitate GOX, whether it involves Brock, or some other rehabilitation plan, would likely be much better for GOX account holders and bitcoin as a whole, rather than liquidation, yet certainly, I have NOT seen all of the evidence presented to the bankrupcy court.