If the universe is made out of the same stuff everywhere and nature hates to waste energy to build new stuff, could the humanoid shape be the most logical path for an intelligent life form ready for space exploration?
NO. Because as we all know, our big brains stem from the fact we have opposing thumbs and fingers.
That is, unless you choose to be a Denier of these established scientific factoids. Just as the grand planet Pluto is now only a Plutoid, by virtue of a consensus of scientific opinion, you must bow down to factoids such as the thumb and finger oppositional premise of the big brain theory, and ignore contrary evidence such as the infinite number of gradations of stupidity. Those only confirm the hypothesis, as creatures which were more stupid would have fewer possible levels of stupidity. Thus in the case of Hillary, it's "Bill or No Bill?" asked from one side of the bed to Huma, on the other side.
Now, if the oppositional thumb merits discussion, we have to acknowledge that beings, creatures or slimeballs with a plethora of said oppositional apparatus would be greater in intelligence as follows.
n = number of oppositional thumb/finger pairs
t = time
c = clusterfuck factor
bb = degree to which brain is high or low density in bricklike nature
F = unknown factor, plugged into make the results agree with pre determined intent
Smartness = n^(t*(-c + -bb + F)
Obviously...
LOL, everytime I read one of your post I discover a new way to see things in an absurd and far too simplified way.
So you don't agree on the fact that Pluto is not a planet? Tell us how you know things better than all scientists. After proving how you're better than any meteorologist and climatologists I bet you're ready to show us how good of an astronaum you are xD
Spendulus, the great scientist!
Ah.....
I SHOULD HAVE EXPECTED...
A strong defense of the decision that Pluto is only a "PLutoid object," since the IAU, which has the sole authority to name planets in it's own mind, is based in Paris, France, and you....
Fuck no I don't agree with this BS. Hey, Pluto earned it's right to be a planet. It's your French buddies who think they have the right to name things who are Plutoids.
Besides, "Plutoid" is dumber than a sack of bricks.
Well I didn't know it was based in Paris but it doesn't matter it's an international consortium. The decision to declassify it was made after an international consortium precised the definition of the word planet.
A planet: Astronomers of the International Astronomical Union (IAU) voted on and passed the first scientific definition of a planet in August 2006. According to this new definition, an object must meet three criteria in order to be classified as a planet. First, it must orbit the Sun. Second, it must be big enough for gravity to squash it into a round ball. And third, it must have cleared other objects out of the way in its orbital neighborhood.
It is not the case of Pluto
You want Pluto to be classified as a planet? As you wish, but then you would have not nine but around 51 planets. Because any object orbiting the sun and massive enough would be called a planet.
And by the way, it's not a Plutoid, it's a dwarf planet.
