Topic: More trust abuse by marlboroza - page 4. (Read 3477 times)

Yes he probably did get paid and he probably wrote the text for him to post here. Did we really think or expect anything else?



My oh my.... look who crawled out of the woodwork and still is refusing to answer your question with a mountain of evidence in front of his eyes.

Mr "pay me and I will bump your ICO thread with fake information" is deliberately avoiding answering your questions. His attention seeking buddies with all their alt-accounts are continuously trying to deflect in that thread but it will not go away.

And to think this totally inept example of a member was even on DT rank recently before unceremoniously being removed.

Did TECSHARE wrote this for ya, Bump?

It's your own interpretation of me being at very high risk and harmful to the forum, whatever pentun hunting your doing and calling it as "investigation" is an total witch hunt, same proves an pattern which you and your friends follow to harass the user's and abuse the system to stop real criticism against you. Your cherry picking of comments is an very bad and cheap tactics to hide your ways of attacking users here. I even think many of my legimate attempts of my defense are drilled by many of your buddies.

You want to discuss, but you don't want to post anything new for the sake of discussion? You are playing this "retribution for criticizing your buddies..." card all the way long.

You don't have anything else to say except "exposing fraud[1] business is retribution for calling someone out". Lets see keywords you use in your posts over and over again(from last post):


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53507689 :

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53931684:


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54177501:


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54183563:


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54190412:


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54195999:


Anything about topic and fraudulent business?

---

[1]I just figured what I wrote. Silly me, you didn't say a word about "fraud", so "striketrough". Anyway, scare quotes.

You know what is great about dingleberries like you? You think you are smart, but in your strain to use circular logic to push your lies, you patronize everyone reading. I am sure you really believe that your strategy of accusing me of everything that is being perpetrated against me will work, but all it will serve to do is put your rep in a dumpster.

People around here might be too chicken shit to speak out about things like this, but they do read them, and they aren't stupid. They can see exactly what you are doing. No one believes marlboroza is a victim here. You know why that is? Because this thread documents clearly his repeated attempts to abuse the trust system against me in an attempt to silence my criticism of him and his red nosed buddies.



Yeah who ever heard of people abusing systems of justice to protect themselves and their friends from criticism? I might as well believe the Earth is flat right? What a conspiracy! Yes marlboroza, this thread was created as a result of you abusing the trust system against me because you want me to stop criticizing you and your buddies.

Unfortunately for you that is not what that system is for, and your repeated hamfisted attempts to justify it in the past paint a very clear picture of your motivations. If you gave a fuck about people losing money, you wouldn't be abusing the system designed to protect them from it as your own personal plaything to attack people who say things you don't like. Or you know, continue with your strategy of accusations of secondary guilt via association. What could go wrong allowing people to use the trust system to punish people for objecting to the use of the trust system? I am sure that won't have any negative consequences.

Marlboroza has now decided that when challenged to publicly debate points that i am making about him (which are true)
That rather than meet me in public to debunk my points ( which he can not)

He will claim that telling the truth about his non achievements and clear undeniable double standards is worthy of red.

The challenge to debunk my points is still there malboroza chicken shit scammer supporter and trust abuser.

These people run crying to red trust when they dare not answer or debate your undeniable points that you make about them.

Debunk the points that i have made in the post you referenced as justification for red malboroza

Or just keep hiding away.

Time for another meta thread. Referencing a post that is full of truths as reason to give red trust?
I'll  give you some time to debunk the points made in that post first. Then if you don't attempt to there must be a discussion on such trust abuse.

You can not give red trust to those making posts about you that are entirely true nothing burger malboroza.
I can't see one thing you have achieved that really made a difference here in the context of real legends. You look like a nasty little peasant beggar that got greedy and now is sig spamming and avatar spamming milking the forum whilst supporting scammers and punishing those that wish to speak out against them

Horrible little pleb.

It was created because I tagged tecshare and placed "troll" on his trust page.

OP is paranoid cunt who see conspiracy theory everywhere and majority of information he post is not true.

---

@TECSHARE

Please update topic with new tag, it doesn't say "troll" any more, now you have:


And please update it with my argument:


Thank you, shill!

Most active and is net negative.

Marlboroza is a nothing burger.  Bring me his largest achievements here.  Where is he singlehandedly  forcing huge scams to offer 2 000 000 000 usd compensation offers to this forum? How many projects had he supported here over the years?  Where are the people all thanking him for making the millionaires? Like real contributors here??

Actually just any major achievement that made a real difference?  

Marlboroza is a scammer supporter. This is undeniable. Unless he wishes to prove me wong?

Jollygood is also another fake scam hunter who only wants to play detective with tiny little scams but is willing to let his friends enable and work with the same scams he tries to bust because he is a terrified little bitch. Even when people point it out to him he seems to try to run away and ignore it.

Both are a net negative and pushing clear double standards.

Marlboroza is a trust abuser. Selectively punishing members for lesser crimes than his friends commit who he protects and supports is clearly abuse.

He is too afraid to debate this with me. Why? Because he knows i will clearly demonstrate publicly that this is true.

I can not find evidence marlboroza is a scammer directly himself. Using double standards to shield scammers or punish the critics of scammers must be stopped.  I suggest malboroza redeems himself quickly else will find himself a pariah once we get all the corrupt and scammy members out of DT.

scammer supporters using trust abuse are as bad as scammers I beleive.

I will challenge marlboroza to debunk anything i have said here in our own dedicated thread.

I just see yet another member been here through 2 huge bull runs and is still milking this forum in sig spamming with even a paid avatar
Greedy non achieving scum.

Hope that cleared that up for ya.

Double standards trust abusing sig spamming scammer supporting nothing burger.
Change your ways marlboroza or you must be classed as bad as proven scammers here.

Jollygood the same goes for you. Although you have achieved even less that marlboroza as unbelievable as that may seem.
Respect your elders and clearly betters. I am noticing deliberate avoidance of tackling scam enablers and facilitators. Now supporting double standards and trust abuse.

By giving a 8yr old rather famous account with impeccable trade history a red tag you are devaluing the warning system and again placing honest members in danger.

Red tags are becoming dangerous in many ways to this forum. The worst is the crushing of free and open speech.

Why on earth was this thread created?

Was it really created just for some low-level titillation for the OP?

Seriously, all the hullaballoo within the thread consisting of hot air and nothing of substance just for the sake of some personal revenge against marlboroza who is one of the most active contributors to this forum?

Surely this sort of unethical conduct should not be allowed.

A well thought out and rational argument marlboroza, as usual.