Pages:
Author

Topic: MPOE-PR Perma-Banned after warning, Temp Ban more appropriate? - page 4. (Read 8507 times)

legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2156
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
1) I've deleted many of MPOE-PR's posts in the past, throughout many threads.
See that, SaltySpitoon?

2) MPOE-PR has an orange ignore button.
Labcoin got me a yellow one.

Yeah, nice work. Congratulations, you're a scammer.

If you call everything a scam, and get some things right once in a while, that doesn't give you immunity to troll. If there is a thread accusing someone of being a scammer that is 15 pages long, and someone comes along and starts posting a "legit warning" but it is in the form of something that should be deleted. Its not silencing the accusation, its shutting one person up. The other 15 pages should be adequet.

Message to take away I guess is just because you call out scammers doesn't give you a free pass to break the rest of the rules. Thank you and congrats on calling them out, to both you and MPOE, your posts can still be deleted.
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1015
2) MPOE-PR has an orange ignore button.
Labcoin got me a yellow one.
Again, none of those factors alone can result in a ban.

Yeah, nice work. Congratulations, you're a scammer.
You're very welcome. I live to please.

But seriously, I deleted about as many of the supporter's posts as I did of the detractor's.
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1015
Old members shouldn't get preferential treatment if they break the rules. No one would be complaining if a new member got banned for swearing at a moderator. Sometimes people need to be made an example of in order to keep others in check.

You don't get banned for swearing at a moderator. MPOE-PR was asked to stop spamming/trolling by Maged, and rather than stopping, she swore at him. The act of insulting Maged itself didn't get her banned, it was the warning, and then lack of acknowledgement of the warning that got the ban.
Oh, the warning was acknowledged, all right. She specifically quoted my warning in her "fuck you" reply. That reply was off-topic and was extremely likely to result in additional off-topic posts from other users. Had she posted that message in the correct location, she would have been fine. This is also why TAT wasn't banned: you can insult us and complain all you want in Meta, since doing so is often on-topic.

Beyond the reasons you mentioned for the ban, there are some more:
1) I've deleted many of MPOE-PR's posts in the past, throughout many threads.
2) MPOE-PR has an orange ignore button.

Alone, none of these things would result in a ban. You can only get banned if you put them all together.

And yet Inaba can slander and defame people up and down the forums for years and nothing is done? Funny.
Slandering and defaming people in a thread about a company of which you are an employee is often on-topic because it reveals the true character of the company. If we removed those posts, there would be a much better argument for claiming that we support scammers.
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2156
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
Hey, do you own homework yourself, and learn how to write properly.
This is about mods removing and banning criticism of scams.

Seeing as its the forum's official policy not to touch scam accusations, I find that hard to believe. When people come to me asking to have a scam accusation against them taken down, even if I can tell its complete BS, I just tell them to provide a response that makes the accuser lose all credibility. We don't touch scam accusations, ever. Besides moving them to the scam accusation section that is.

If you see someone violate that, report it. They will be gone immediately if not sooner.

hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 509
As for the mods supposed "scam-loving", Do your own homework, if you get scammed it is your own fault, do not blame the mods for that. 
Hey, do you own homework yourself, and learn how to write properly.
This is about mods removing and banning criticism of scams.

There is a fine line between critisism and trolling.

MPOE-PR had stepped miles across that line.
member
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
The only tragedy is that TAT was not banned after asking the mod to ban him. Teach children that throwing temper tantrums do not work.

As for the mods supposed "scam-loving", Do your own homework, if you get scammed it is your own fault, do not blame the mods for that. 

Finally, It is only one website, being banned or whatever is not a big deal. There is almost always drama about this sort of thing, never understood why.
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
You can pretty much assume that mod = scamlover.
There are an awful lot of mods, and that's an awfully unfair generalisation.
Given that an awful lot of them act anonymously, I can't say. Maybe some of them are honest. Why do they stay, though? Especially after theymos' repeated failures.
Because this is still the prime (and only meaningful) communication forum for bitcoin and those of us who believe in bitcoin try to keep it as useful as possible.
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
You can pretty much assume that mod = scamlover.
There are an awful lot of mods, and that's an awfully unfair generalisation.
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
I've been banned twice for something similar. This was a while back though lol
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 509
And yet Inaba can slander and defame people up and down the forums for years and nothing is done? Funny.
Nothing surprising. The forum is rotten at its core, many mods and admins deeply involved in scams (and what a joke is DefaultTrust?); as far as I'm concerned, their actions make them scammers too.

You can pretty much assume that mod = scamlover.

Almost as rotten as the cult of mpex and bitcoin-assets
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 509
Quote
This will be the last month of MPOE-PR salary. The Bitcointalk forum moderators finally took exception to her public naming and shaming of their favourite scams, and banned her. I suppose in a sense this is best for all those involved.

Source: Trilema

Wow so mpoe-pr was literally paid to do nothing but spam these forums. I thought there was more to the job than that.

Well in the end she earned a cool few hundred btc for trolling. Something many do for free.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
Quote
This will be the last month of MPOE-PR salary. The Bitcointalk forum moderators finally took exception to her public naming and shaming of their favourite scams, and banned her. I suppose in a sense this is best for all those involved.

Source: Trilema
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
Lux e tenebris
Is this the queue for abuse?
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2156
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
Sorry for my sensationalist title - now edited - and my fudging of Maged's reasons for permabanning her.

I was annoyed, but it's no excuse.

Long-standing members do need a little more leniency when they're being tw@s.

Hehe, I didn't mean you had to literally change it. You also don't need to suck up to me, feel free to throw a few f bombs my way, I don't care. I was just voicing my opinion on the matter.
member
Activity: 231
Merit: 43
Sorry for my sensationalist title - now edited - and my fudging of Maged's reasons for permabanning her.

I was annoyed, but it's no excuse.

Long-standing members do need a little more leniency when they're being tw@s.
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
Lets be honest MPOE-PR gets on everyone's nerves, she is annoying and while maybe 2 out of 10 post are good, she isn't a staple of this forum that bought any high level discussion.
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2156
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
I dont know all of the details either, so I'm not sure if a perma ban was warranted based off of what I do know, but some sort of action was reasonable. Swearing at the mods wont win you any brownie points, but most don't really care. Although old accounts shouldn't be given preferential treatment, how long someone has been here definately is a consideration. If you are a newbie with 30 posts, and 27 of them are banworthy, well, bye. But if your account is two years old with 2,000 posts and you have a slip up or a bad day, you tend to have a little bit more leniency given. That is not to say that you are untouchable if you have an old account, that is to say you are more likely to get a temporary ban first, or perhaps a second warning.

If anything, the title of this thread should be, MPOE-PR Perma Banned after warning, Temp Ban more appropriate?
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1001
https://keybase.io/masterp FREE Escrow Service
Old members shouldn't get preferential treatment if they break the rules. No one would be complaining if a new member got banned for swearing at a moderator. Sometimes people need to be made an example of in order to keep others in check.

You don't get banned for swearing at a moderator. MPOE-PR was asked to stop spamming/trolling by Maged, and rather than stopping, she swore at him. The act of insulting Maged itself didn't get her banned, it was the warning, and then lack of acknowledgement of the warning that got the ban.

I was going by what the OP posted. It's witty how people usually leave out important details when they bash the mods.
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2156
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
Old members shouldn't get preferential treatment if they break the rules. No one would be complaining if a new member got banned for swearing at a moderator. Sometimes people need to be made an example of in order to keep others in check.

You don't get banned for swearing at a moderator. MPOE-PR was asked to stop spamming/trolling by Maged, and rather than stopping, she swore at him. The act of insulting Maged itself didn't get her banned, it was the warning, and then lack of acknowledgement of the warning that got the ban.
 
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1001
https://keybase.io/masterp FREE Escrow Service
Old members shouldn't get preferential treatment if they break the rules. No one would be complaining if a new member got banned for swearing at a moderator. Sometimes people need to be made an example of in order to keep others in check.
Pages:
Jump to: