Pages:
Author

Topic: MtGox - too many connections (Read 14126 times)

legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1490
November 17, 2021, 09:42:10 AM
Just update the thread, I'll leave it here.

The Tokyo District Court approved a plan for the civil rehabilitation of the bankrupt bitcoin exchange Mt.Gox. This was announced by the trustee Nobuyaki Kobayashi.
The trustee submitted a proposal to reimburse users in December 2020.
https://www.mtgox.com/img/pdf/20211116_announcement_en.pdf


hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 566
fractally
May 25, 2011, 10:53:29 AM
Everything was resolved with Mt. Gox with very helpful support.
eof
full member
Activity: 156
Merit: 100
May 25, 2011, 10:46:56 AM
I have a transfer with 12 confirmations that has not yet posted to Mt.Gox account.  In the past it took less than 6 confirmations.   I really wish Mt. Gox would show all of the "pending" transactions so that you can feel good that you did not enter the wrong BTC amount for the address he gave. 

you should certainly email them or get on #bitcoin-otc and ask MagicalTux what is going on with that transaction.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 566
fractally
May 24, 2011, 11:39:15 PM
I have a transfer with 12 confirmations that has not yet posted to Mt.Gox account.  In the past it took less than 6 confirmations.   I really wish Mt. Gox would show all of the "pending" transactions so that you can feel good that you did not enter the wrong BTC amount for the address he gave. 
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1014
Strength in numbers
May 24, 2011, 05:24:02 AM
I sent BTC from my main wallet to my MT. GOX account does it normaly take up to 24hrs to see the btc in the account?
or they have issues? thanks


Does the tx have confirmations? If it does then you should have your funds by now.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
May 23, 2011, 08:02:29 PM
I sent BTC from my main wallet to my MT. GOX account does it normaly take up to 24hrs to see the btc in the account?
or they have issues? thanks
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 252
May 11, 2011, 01:30:45 PM
Either way...   He is OBVIOUSLY a liar and cannot be trusted.
LZ
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1072
P2P Cryptocurrency
May 03, 2011, 05:44:36 PM
He should start his own thread in the Russian forum and have someone with a good command of English translate for him.  Because we can debate about his vague English posts as long as we want.
I hope that I have not lost the original meaning.

I added that link to the first message. It is clear that bitcoinex wanted greater decentralization.
However, he should not threaten the DDoS attack. It is at least unfair competition. Undecided

I did not threaten. Enough interpret me wrong. It was just bad joke on support the DDoS attack because I liked that idea. There is nothing wrong here. Moreover, it would have happened in the future. It simply couldn't not happen as bitcoins couldn't not appear.

And I was attacked verbally by those who bought bitcoins and are now afraid not for the idea, but because of their money invested in currency, which is dependent on a single rickety site. And it just means that the exchange rate depends only on what was told by a few people on the forum and which buttons does few merchants click on Mt.Gox.
member
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
May 03, 2011, 04:41:35 PM
Your interpretation:
"I'm sorry, but I am actually serious.  It's worth it because I'm/you/someone is losing money because of Mt. Gox.  I might even feel sorry, but this is what happens with autoregulation in anarchy.  Say goodbye (to Mt. Gox) in advance 'just in case'."

Original quote:
Quote
I'm sorry but I'm afraid so is serious. It would cost less than to be owed +$100 every day.
Maybe I even feel sorry about it. But we want anarchy and autoregulation? This is it is.
Just in case, say goodbye in advance. With you it was good, bitcoiners is a great community!

I guess he means that the focus on Mt Gox is serious problem. And he points out to the low costs of such an possible attack.

But I'm really tired of definding him -.-
He should make an own thread and clearly state the things as they are.


He should start his own thread in the Russian forum and have someone with a good command of English translate for him.  Because we can debate about his vague English posts as long as we want.

LOL, I can handle the translations.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
May 03, 2011, 04:19:38 PM
#99
Your interpretation:
"I'm sorry, but I am actually serious.  It's worth it because I'm/you/someone is losing money because of Mt. Gox.  I might even feel sorry, but this is what happens with autoregulation in anarchy.  Say goodbye (to Mt. Gox) in advance 'just in case'."

Original quote:
Quote
I'm sorry but I'm afraid so is serious. It would cost less than to be owed +$100 every day.
Maybe I even feel sorry about it. But we want anarchy and autoregulation? This is it is.
Just in case, say goodbye in advance. With you it was good, bitcoiners is a great community!

I guess he means that the focus on Mt Gox is serious problem. And he points out to the low costs of such an possible attack.

But I'm really tired of definding him -.-
He should make an own thread and clearly state the things as they are.


He should start his own thread in the Russian forum and have someone with a good command of English translate for him.  Because we can debate about his vague English posts as long as we want.
legendary
Activity: 860
Merit: 1021
May 03, 2011, 04:16:48 AM
#98
Your interpretation:
"I'm sorry, but I am actually serious.  It's worth it because I'm/you/someone is losing money because of Mt. Gox.  I might even feel sorry, but this is what happens with autoregulation in anarchy.  Say goodbye (to Mt. Gox) in advance 'just in case'."

Original quote:
Quote
I'm sorry but I'm afraid so is serious. It would cost less than to be owed +$100 every day.
Maybe I even feel sorry about it. But we want anarchy and autoregulation? This is it is.
Just in case, say goodbye in advance. With you it was good, bitcoiners is a great community!

I guess he means that the focus on Mt Gox is serious problem. And he points out to the low costs of such an possible attack.

But I'm really tired of definding him -.-
He should make an own thread and clearly state the things as they are.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
May 02, 2011, 10:57:53 PM
#97
The Script,

Yes, I know that the on west a "professionals" hide the truth, lie at the same time smiling and looking straight into your eyes. Sorry, but I do not like this behaviour, I came to the community to participate in creating a better currency and not to deceive mistaken people.

Centralization of the exchange, the complexity of the withdrawal of money and accelerating inflation of the bubble - for understandable reasons what happens. I'm surprised that the attackers did not think to do it sooner. And I am glad that it did not happen the week after, when bitcoiny would cost $10 - I think that if I lived in the U.S. I am would have been killed in these circumstances. while the haters would give a damn about what I do not have relation with the attack.


Ha ha, excellent.  Thanks for posting, I missed this one.  So in the west professionals lie and deceive but he is not like them.  He only lies about committing DDoS attacks on Mt. Gox and later retracts that statement when he feels too much pressure.  I suppose we'll never know now, whether he really is responsible, but either way he is a liar. 
full member
Activity: 193
Merit: 100
May 02, 2011, 09:30:40 PM
#96
Can someone explain me in one sentence how LOIC is different to other (d)dos tools existing in decades? Why "ddos for the masses"? Is it using some ultra simple gui maybe to allow every lowbob to use it?

Yes

You can also give control of your bandwidth to a remote operator. Hassle free voluntary botnet.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
May 02, 2011, 08:50:02 PM
#95
Can someone explain me in one sentence how LOIC is different to other (d)dos tools existing in decades? Why "ddos for the masses"? Is it using some ultra simple gui maybe to allow every lowbob to use it?

Yes
hero member
Activity: 527
Merit: 500
May 02, 2011, 08:48:08 PM
#94
Can someone explain me in one sentence how LOIC is different to other (d)dos tools existing in for decades? Why "ddos for the masses"? Is it using some ultra simple gui maybe to allow every lowbob to use it?
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1000
May 02, 2011, 08:21:34 PM
#93
I was wondering if hanging the author of LOIC would count for aggression within the Anarchist handbook...  Roll Eyes

WTF. Yes, of course.

Ah, damn! Since that junk came out now you get DDoS all around for any reason and no reason, now every lame in the planet can be "a h4x0r", even if he doesn't even know what that thing does indeed... "DDoS for the masses"  Tongue
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
May 02, 2011, 08:16:29 PM
#92
I was wondering if hanging the author of LOIC would count for aggression within the Anarchist handbook...  Roll Eyes

WTF. Yes, of course.
sr. member
Activity: 410
Merit: 250
Proof-of-Skill - protoblock.com
May 02, 2011, 08:11:16 PM
#91
can someone tell e what his grip is with mtgox? maybe the DOS is warranted?

whats the deal?

p.s. i just wired 2k to mtgox today, hope I can get it back.

full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
May 02, 2011, 08:09:16 PM
#90
The Script,

Yes, I know that the on west a "professionals" hide the truth, lie at the same time smiling and looking straight into your eyes. Sorry, but I do not like this behaviour, I came to the community to participate in creating a better currency and not to deceive mistaken people.

Centralization of the exchange, the complexity of the withdrawal of money and accelerating inflation of the bubble - for understandable reasons what happens. I'm surprised that the attackers did not think to do it sooner. And I am glad that it did not happen the week after, when bitcoiny would cost $10 - I think that if I lived in the U.S. I am would have been killed in these circumstances. while the haters would give a damn about what I do not have relation with the attack.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
May 02, 2011, 08:05:47 PM
#89
SmokeTooMuch and Mewantbitcoins,

If this is a "joke" why did he say "this is not a joke".  And if he didn't do it, why doesn't he come out and say "I didn't do it, I was just mad"?  Did you read his posts?  He said "Let's attack Mt. Gox!  Here is a bitcoin address to donate to."  Someone replied "This is bad joke if it is one.  You are making me lose confidence in your business."  Bitcoinex then said:  "I'm sorry, but I am actually serious.  It's worth it because I'm/you/someone is losing money because of Mt. Gox.  I might even feel sorry, but this is what happens with autoregulation in anarchy.  Say goodbye (to Mt. Gox) in advance 'just in case'."  Then later he said something about quitting his DDoS attack which I seem to remember was about the time I was able to briefly access my Mt. Gox account again.  Perhaps he's just an angry person trying to capitalize on someone else's attack and these are just a string of coincidences.  But until there is proof otherwise, I'm going with the current facts and believing what he said.  Either way I don't want to associate with him, because either he's attacking Mt. Gox, or pretending to and lying about it.  Either way he's going to lose major respect.
Pages:
Jump to: