Pages:
Author

Topic: Murat Scammed 62k Metropoly token - page 2. (Read 851 times)

hero member
Activity: 2436
Merit: 877
October 12, 2023, 03:39:32 PM
#43
And yeah, I wish bounty hunters would all vanish immediately and all at once.  I find it hard to feel true pity when they don't get paid for their spamming.  On the other hand, what's fair is fair no matter my feelings toward their line of 'work'.  If Murat was supposed to pay them, then that's what he ought to do.
That thread is mostly filled with newbies applying to join the bounty campaign. It would a complete guess in trying to work out how many were farmed accounts but you stated an important aspect: the bounty manager should have paid in time he participants expected to receive.


Well, we can't make this excuse that since there were all newbies in that campiagn , doing the spamming, therefore they should not be paid the token or paid less than what was promised to them earlier. Also, this excuse may not work that most of the newbies might be alts of each other and hence do not deserve the tokens.

The right way to treat them was to exclude those whom they think are the alts of each other and never let them participate in the campiagn. If it was difficult to detect the alts, they should have made a rule of not accpeting the newbies in the campiagns at the start.  Similiary if the posts done were spamming, why not excluded those particiapnts initially from the campiaign.

Get all the social meida activities and promotions and then making these spamming / alts excues, is just not right and shows the project does not want to pay for work.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
October 12, 2023, 03:20:13 PM
#42
And yeah, I wish bounty hunters would all vanish immediately and all at once.  I find it hard to feel true pity when they don't get paid for their spamming.  On the other hand, what's fair is fair no matter my feelings toward their line of 'work'.  If Murat was supposed to pay them, then that's what he ought to do.
That thread is mostly filled with newbies applying to join the bounty campaign. It would a complete guess in trying to work out how many were farmed accounts but you stated an important aspect: the bounty manager should have paid in time he participants expected to receive.

If the fees to send bounties made it a loss making transaction then he really should have thought of some alternative to present to participants or better still he should have let them know from before they signed up what he would do to compensate them if the fees became too much while their bounties were too small to make it a viable payment.
legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 7005
Top Crypto Casino
October 12, 2023, 02:29:23 PM
#41
I think Murat should explain how this situation be resolved now that the tokens have lost value and what has he learned from this experience? Lack of clarity will only add to more questions.
Man, I knew Murat's name rang a bell but I haven't seen a post from him in a long time; I did a deal with him a few years ago, which is reflected on his trust page (a neutral one).

I wasn't familiar with this situation at all, but the questions you asked that I snipped out of the post I took the above from are valid ones.  Murat doesn't seem too eager to do much explaining, though.  I read through most of the first page of this thread, about gas fees for the tokens in question and so forth being prohibitively high, but I'm going to go back and see why they weren't sent way before now.

Looking at all the posts that the OP has made, I am going with they have been tagged and kicked out of several bounties and are now just looking to cause trouble for everyone they can.
Yep, that's the impression I get as well.  Maybe he can aim his sights at me with his bilious sniper rifle, though I don't think I've done anything to him that he'd have enough ammunition to do anything but get the community rolling their collective eyes and me greatly amused.

And yeah, I wish bounty hunters would all vanish immediately and all at once.  I find it hard to feel true pity when they don't get paid for their spamming.  On the other hand, what's fair is fair no matter my feelings toward their line of 'work'.  If Murat was supposed to pay them, then that's what he ought to do.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
October 12, 2023, 12:55:32 PM
#40
Why would the bounty manager state escrow at the beginning and then change it later. Originally when the thread was created it was showing escrowed:
I was about to ask Stalker22 where he saw that part about bounty been escrowed as I couldn't find any traces of it in the bounty thread. Is it possible to see when exactly he changed the title? It is one thing if it was changed right after bounty campaign started and another if it was changed months later.
That will be difficult to know with certainty. Murat posted on 24th December 2022 with [Bounty] Metropoly.io Social Media Campaign [$100k Tokens] [ESCROWED] but the next post in that thread was a different member on 11th May 2023 with [Bounty] Metropoly.io Social Media Campaign [$100k Tokens]

I think Murat should explain how this situation be resolved now that the tokens have lost value and what has he learned from this experience? Lack of clarity will only add to more questions.
He already explained it. He is basically waiting for market to pick up and tokens incerase in value so he sends them. Unfortunately for him and bounty hunters, chances that these tokens will have any worth in the future are slim to none.

1. It's not worth it to send $2 to each person.

2. I plan to sell the tokens at a reasonable price and distribute everyone.
I read his post but he did not mention anything about what would happen if the tokens remained worthless over a particular period of time. For example, how long will he wait for the tokens to have some sort of value before he gives up and if that (as expected) happens, does he have a plan to compensate bounty participants? Also, it would be good to read from him if he has learned anything from this experience which will help to ensure a repeat does not occur in future.

What he has not explained is plan B if what happens is those tokens continue to fall, which would not be unusual. I guess we have to assume that the participants will be left with nothing
You are right and that was the reason I asked Murat to clarify what he intends to do now that the tokens are wasted. He should learn from this and ensure bounty participants in future do not suffer the same failure.
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1462
Yes, I'm an asshole
October 12, 2023, 12:28:32 PM
#39
Why would the bounty manager state escrow at the beginning and then change it later. Originally when the thread was created it was showing escrowed:
I was about to ask Stalker22 where he saw that part about bounty been escrowed as I couldn't find any traces of it in the bounty thread. Is it possible to see when exactly he changed the title? It is one thing if it was changed right after bounty campaign started and another if it was changed months later.

Ninjastic archived the original title, and it does indeed contain the "[escrowed]" part. As for when it changed, though I can't be sure with the exact time, it should be around after the bounty ended, given up to the announcement of the end of the bounty he made, the title still had it.

legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1565
The first decentralized crypto betting platform
October 12, 2023, 11:59:00 AM
#38
I think Murat should explain how this situation be resolved now that the tokens have lost value and what has he learned from this experience? Lack of clarity will only add to more questions.
He already explained it. He is basically waiting for market to pick up and tokens incerase in value so he sends them. Unfortunately for him and bounty hunters, chances that these tokens will have any worth in the future are slim to none.

1. It's not worth it to send $2 to each person.

2. I plan to sell the tokens at a reasonable price and distribute everyone.

What he has not explained is plan B if what happens is those tokens continue to fall, which would not be unusual. I guess we have to assume that the participants will be left with nothing, and as you said in your previous post, the tokens were worth more before, so distributing them at that time would have made more sense.

I don't know shitcoins and tokens very well, and I understand that he may have been at a difficult crossroads and made a decision about it, but if as is likely the tokens keep going down we're going to have quite a few justified complaints about it.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 5937
October 12, 2023, 10:36:26 AM
#37
Why would the bounty manager state escrow at the beginning and then change it later. Originally when the thread was created it was showing escrowed:
I was about to ask Stalker22 where he saw that part about bounty been escrowed as I couldn't find any traces of it in the bounty thread. Is it possible to see when exactly he changed the title? It is one thing if it was changed right after bounty campaign started and another if it was changed months later.


I think Murat should explain how this situation be resolved now that the tokens have lost value and what has he learned from this experience? Lack of clarity will only add to more questions.
He already explained it. He is basically waiting for market to pick up and tokens incerase in value so he sends them. Unfortunately for him and bounty hunters, chances that these tokens will have any worth in the future are slim to none.

1. It's not worth it to send $2 to each person.

2. I plan to sell the tokens at a reasonable price and distribute everyone.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
October 12, 2023, 06:44:00 AM
#36
Why would the bounty manager state escrow at the beginning and then change it later. Originally when the thread was created it was showing escrowed:

[Bounty] Metropoly.io Social Media Campaign [$100k Tokens] [ESCROWED]
[Bounty] Metropoly.io Social Media Campaign [$100k Tokens]

I think Murat should explain how this situation be resolved now that the tokens have lost value and what has he learned from this experience? Lack of clarity will only add to more questions.

campaign ended, calculation is ongoing.

What was the token value after the campaign ended? Why not distribute the tokens then?

Who do you plan to sell them to now that they hold no value? And is that really your decision to make?

And why did you lie in the bounty campaign that the funds were escrowed ($100k)?
hero member
Activity: 2212
Merit: 670
Signature designer - start @$10 - PM me!
October 11, 2023, 10:56:14 AM
#35
In the end, this is not the fault of the manager, but the fault of the project team who have not or did not send the entire payment for the bounty hunters at once.
Sorry I meant, I wasn't referring to the manager's bounty. I saw OP's post history which always blamed DT members who didn't comply with his requests.
Not all DTs are interested in being involved in tagging this shit, especially someone who seems to be fighting for something hard but he has never been involved in anything with it.
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1083
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
October 11, 2023, 02:25:36 AM
#34
I just saw someone get too let down by some damn project in this thread, then hide into one account to say his PoV because he still had a shred of hope that the payoff would be worth it someday.
I think it's time for you to forget about your activities as a bounty hunter rather than blaming people who have nothing to do with it. I don't remember when, but bounties have disappointed many of their hunters for a long time.
You are right, like myself, I was once a bounty hunter, and if there is one thing very common in bounty hunting on this forum, its disappointment. Every bounty hunter should really get used to being disappointed once in a while, or even regularly as the case may be.

From my personal experience, most non payments to hunters after their work is most of the time not the fault of the bounty manager. Like in this case  of the op, the project team only sent 60k tokens to Murat, instead of 250k, Murat cant just distribute the 60k whereas the team have promised they will send the balance, distribution cost fees and some times, bounty managers are the ones who bear that fees, so i personally believe that Murat does have a justified reason why he has not distributed the 60kk token in his possession, Op is probably just being impatient.

In the end, this is not the fault of the manager, but the fault of the project team who have not or did not send the entire payment for the bounty hunters at once.
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 800
October 10, 2023, 05:47:04 PM
#33
I  a few times in the past.

1. It's not worth it to send $2 to each person.

2. I plan to sell the tokens at a reasonable price and distribute everyone.

There is no other option because the team is not responding after raising a good chunk of money.

Thanks @Little Mouse

Where did you answer? I did not see any updates in the bounty thread. Your last post:

campaign ended, calculation is ongoing.

What was the token value after the campaign ended? Why not distribute the tokens then?

Who do you plan to sell them to now that they hold no value? And is that really your decision to make?

And why did you lie in the bounty campaign that the funds were escrowed ($100k)?


Actually is not right to say bounty funds are escrowed while they aren't and this shows dishonesty to the bounty hunters and untrustworthy. This is a sign of fowl play in the campaign and as a bounty manager who has lots of followers and they rely on him due to his capacity to be able to get payment from join his campaign managed by him to get paid at the last but most times bounty managers in their own decisions always takes in-law into their hands without seeking to secure the interest of bounty hunters rather only on their side which they thinks about.
But from my little understanding any funds that are being escrowed most managers do post the address visible for everyone to look and scan through the address to see the funds as it's stored inside. And the holders holds it till the end of the bounty campaign to send it back to the manager and he distributes to the hunters.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1359
October 10, 2023, 02:59:03 PM
#32
I  a few times in the past.

1. It's not worth it to send $2 to each person.

2. I plan to sell the tokens at a reasonable price and distribute everyone.

There is no other option because the team is not responding after raising a good chunk of money.

Thanks @Little Mouse

Where did you answer? I did not see any updates in the bounty thread. Your last post:

campaign ended, calculation is ongoing.

What was the token value after the campaign ended? Why not distribute the tokens then?

Who do you plan to sell them to now that they hold no value? And is that really your decision to make?

And why did you lie in the bounty campaign that the funds were escrowed ($100k)?
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 5937
October 10, 2023, 11:01:58 AM
#31
Btw am wondering why the team has equally only sent out 24.8% (62k) of the bounty allocation and not everything owed in one transaction ??
They actually sent 62.5k which is 25%. My guess is that they weren't satisfied with the results which I am not surprised at all. Planned bounty pool was $100k worth of tokens and when they saw that overall ~300 participants did some job, they decided to cut it. I thought that's pretty much standard thing in bounty campaigns, team adjusting pool after they see the results.


I answered a few times in the past.
What about money for fees, did you get that from the team?


1. It's not worth it to send $2 to each person.
Well now tokens are worthless, while at one point they were worth $10k, which when you divide by ~300 participants is not nothing.


2. I plan to sell the tokens at a reasonable price and distribute everyone.
Is that your standard practice, to sell bounty tokens and then distribute ETH/whatever else? And do you really believe that tokens will be worth anything ever again, after they mananged to have no volume whatsoever? I am sory to say but you became a bagholder.
legendary
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1261
October 10, 2023, 10:49:19 AM
#30
IMO, seeing the other manager getting the same situation while the team project did not send any fee-tx + cutting the pools. If, I manager asked the same things by BH & called being a scammer while really caring about their reward only 2$ + have a problem sending the fee.
- I will make a decision to just make a pool voting on telegram channel and sell these token
- The reward being sent using internal-transaction example using (Binance ID) to them
- Move on from these problem, and live peace as bounty manager

Because the project-team being a j*rk by not send the reward fully & BH also doing the same things asking (when, when + called BM scammer). Feel bad for @Murat, not every BH understand the situation.
hero member
Activity: 2156
Merit: 711
Telegram @tokensfund
October 10, 2023, 10:25:04 AM
#29
I answered a few times in the past.

1. It's not worth it to send $2 to each person.

2. I plan to sell the tokens at a reasonable price and distribute everyone.

There is no other option because the team is not responding after raising a good chunk of money.

Thanks @Little Mouse

hero member
Activity: 2212
Merit: 670
Signature designer - start @$10 - PM me!
October 10, 2023, 10:15:54 AM
#28
I just saw someone get too let down by some damn project in this thread, then hide into one account to say his PoV because he still had a shred of hope that the payoff would be worth it someday.
I think it's time for you to forget about your activities as a bounty hunter rather than blaming people who have nothing to do with it. I don't remember when, but bounties have disappointed many of their hunters for a long time.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 2100
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
October 10, 2023, 10:06:43 AM
#27
My best guess is nobody sent him a message regarding this thread time.
I sent a PM yesterday through telegram and asked to respond in the thread in reputation. Don't know how I forgot to share the thread link lol. Just sent him the link.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 482
October 10, 2023, 09:53:58 AM
#26
I'm not saying that he is wrong, but Murat should really think about laying out his side of things here.  Not saying anything doesn't do anyone any favors, and it usually just leads to more guessing and people making up stuff that aint true.  Even if Metropoly screwed up and didn't hold up their end of the bargain, no reason for the manager to not speak out about it publicly.

My best guess is nobody sent him a message regarding this thread time. But I have checked the old thread where Holydarkness had a conversation with Murat regarding this matter. So, If he do not use notification bots for the mentions (as like me, I do not use it as well), he is unlikely to know about this situation. It will be better if someone reputed knock and let him know about this thread.

If sending these $760 worth of tokens is too expensive, I don't know what he should do then. I guess this is why he is holding it without taking any action like selling it or distributing it. Let's see if someone knocks him and if he replies here.

legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1225
October 10, 2023, 09:20:40 AM
#25
<...>
I will neutral tag him with a direction to this thread. That should get his attention, seeing as how he never responded here on forum on the issue.
Fair enough, but seeing the conversation from the other thread, the writing is on the wall that Metropoly project is being the dishonest party not honouring their part of the deal.

I'm not saying that he is wrong, but Murat should really think about laying out his side of things here.  Not saying anything doesn't do anyone any favors, and it usually just leads to more guessing and people making up stuff that aint true.  Even if Metropoly screwed up and didn't hold up their end of the bargain, no reason for the manager to not speak out about it publicly.

So far the speculation favors Murat, it's the metropoly's team who are not doing their part, but I agree since it is posted here he should drop a line not only on his telegram group, there's no need to defend himself because the real picture points to Metropoly, We just want him to confirm or deny what's posted here.
I'm sure Murat wants these things over, in only a few months, the campaign will be one year from the end.
hero member
Activity: 1456
Merit: 940
🇺🇦 Glory to Ukraine!
October 10, 2023, 06:29:25 AM
#24
<...>
I will neutral tag him with a direction to this thread. That should get his attention, seeing as how he never responded here on forum on the issue.
Fair enough, but seeing the conversation from the other thread, the writing is on the wall that Metropoly project is being the dishonest party not honouring their part of the deal.

I'm not saying that he is wrong, but Murat should really think about laying out his side of things here.  Not saying anything doesn't do anyone any favors, and it usually just leads to more guessing and people making up stuff that aint true.  Even if Metropoly screwed up and didn't hold up their end of the bargain, no reason for the manager to not speak out about it publicly.
Pages:
Jump to: