Users have already told you it is the managers right to choose whom he wants to add in the campaign.
Obviously the more active a user is, the better he would be for a campaign and a company. Hiring inactive users is generally not a great idea at all. I won't speculate that that means it is his alts or anything. I would just advise all managers to look at user activity and post quality when choosing participants.
If you have proof he is enrolling alts, that would be a different story altogether. Without proof you probably shouldn't post speculation, defamation isn't really fair to the manager.
Topic: Murat the worst campaign manager? - page 2. (Read 947 times)
Why not Yahoo or Hhampuz these are the most reasonable campaign manager on this forum to handle this kind of campaign, it's good that this issue is brought so, in the future, developers will know who qualifies and who is not, for me he is a worst because he is not picking the right candidate well it is his prerogative but this thread is a reference for the kind of character he is.
I'm not jealous of not being accepted, I just posted this because, it's a very unfair situation and a not professional act by a Campaign manager.
Thanks for pointing these, these users are removed from the campaign. I will fill these spots next week.
This is his latest post, see how unprofessional he is? if no one pointed that out he will not remove those shitposter/inactive user.
You guys saying that it's fair because, it's normal user VS campaign manager. But if someone famous user pointed this is out you will be in favor on them.
It's done so I think I will lock this topic. Opening it and welcoming other member's thoughts
Just an advise manager cause you have the final say but ever since I'm on this forum no campaign manager has ever accepted an account that is inactive for more than 7days, 4weeks which shows they only contribute to the forum because of the signature campaigns not to even mention not having the require 5merit.
This is injustice to the genuine user of this forum.
Henmark
perfect999
stepwilli
Emitdama
starkovblue
Shallow
SirLancelot
funchiestz
This is injustice to the genuine user of this forum.
Henmark
perfect999
stepwilli
Emitdama
starkovblue
Shallow
SirLancelot
funchiestz
Thanks for pointing these, these users are removed from the campaign. I will fill these spots next week.
This is his latest post, see how unprofessional he is? if no one pointed that out he will not remove those shitposter/inactive user.
You guys saying that it's fair because, it's normal user VS campaign manager. But if someone famous user pointed this is out you will be in favor on them.
DAVID CHAUM's XX Coin Signature Campaign prioritize shit poster and inactive participants over quality poster and active forum members.
There are song lyrics that read."Just let him choose between you and me".
OP, for me it's the right of managers who manage sig campaigns, they have full rights to accept good and bad members.
There is a risk, if you think the member received at sig is a spamer or Alt.
The important thing is, no, fraudulently accepting multi-account participants, not promoting fraudulent sites.
Despite all that, I think it's safe.
You are jealous of times, not accepted there, with the highest paid, joking.
Murat is the worst campaign manager! Maybe those accounts is his alts?
I think you accuse too quickly, without evidence. It's dangerous if it's not proven.http://archive.is/wip/OeNmt
I checked the first three on the list and their posts weren't that bad as you claim. I'm not sure how others would see it though. Perhaps you could also tell us your real account for comparison. There is no denying that they were inactive for a month but that's probably not a very long time in the eyes of some managers.
If you are going to question the campaign manager's reputation, you should at least provide more evidence that he is the worst or that he's doing something wrong like accepting his relatives/friends/alts into the campaign. Take a good look at the case of CryptoMania Slots.
If you're not willing to do the above, you should just move on and wait for another opening. Maybe in another campaign by Murat
If you are going to question the campaign manager's reputation, you should at least provide more evidence that he is the worst or that he's doing something wrong like accepting his relatives/friends/alts into the campaign. Take a good look at the case of CryptoMania Slots.
If you're not willing to do the above, you should just move on and wait for another opening. Maybe in another campaign by Murat
First, I will not evaluate the criteria that a manager will choose someone. Next, there is no injustice here, managers have the right to choose those that they feel good.
In this case, we should discuss why those members are accepted, definitely, there is shady here.
There are a total of 11 pages of applications in the campaign
He can choose anyone better, who is always active. And now he accepts people who have been inactive for a long time. I wonder if there is any relationship between him and the people mentioned above? 
Or they are his alt accounts I think this should be investigated clearly, or at least he needs to explain 
I think it's clearly his alts. some of them apply on a lot of campaign and being accepted there even though their post history is filled with application.In this case, we should discuss why those members are accepted, definitely, there is shady here.
There are a total of 11 pages of applications in the campaign
He can choose anyone better, who is always active. And now he accepts people who have been inactive for a long time. I wonder if there is any relationship between him and the people mentioned above? Or they are his alt accounts I think this should be investigated clearly, or at least he needs to explain You are right about the manager are free to choose what they feel is qualifying. So his preference is shitposter and inactive participants? This is so wrong for me, I see a lot of good poster there that is obviously more qualifying than those clowns.
it is his prerogative to choose whatever suits his standards. however, in doing so, it will build what kind of reputation he is as bounty manager. as he mentioned on his thread, you can pm him for any questions. so maybe, you can ask explanation from his side.
indeed, there are better and active posters that applied on that campaign but it is his campaign so he has the privilege to choose.
and if someone wants to investigate those users that got accepted, they are free to do so. anyway, this forum is open for those investigations.
just remember, in time, you will know what kind of bounty manager a user is and they will earn such respect from the community if they are being good about it!
First, I will not evaluate the criteria that a manager will choose someone. Next, there is no injustice here, managers have the right to choose those that they feel good.
In this case, we should discuss why those members are accepted, definitely, there is shady here.
There are a total of 11 pages of applications in the campaign He can choose anyone better, who is always active. And now he accepts people who have been inactive for a long time. I wonder if there is any relationship between him and the people mentioned above? Or they are his alt accounts I think this should be investigated clearly, or at least he needs to explain
I think it's clearly his alts. some of them apply on a lot of campaign and being accepted there even though their post history is filled with application.In this case, we should discuss why those members are accepted, definitely, there is shady here.
There are a total of 11 pages of applications in the campaign
He can choose anyone better, who is always active. And now he accepts people who have been inactive for a long time. I wonder if there is any relationship between him and the people mentioned above? Or they are his alt accounts I think this should be investigated clearly, or at least he needs to explain You are right about the manager are free to choose what they feel is qualifying. So his preference is shitposter and inactive participants? This is so wrong for me, I see a lot of good poster there that is obviously more qualifying than those clowns.
What the hell you expect when you get involved with shitcoins except of losing money and time?
Edit: why the hell you'd spam your name so much, that thing has no future and it looks for me he is promoting a shitcoin.
Edit: why the hell you'd spam your name so much, that thing has no future and it looks for me he is promoting a shitcoin.
First, I will not evaluate the criteria that a manager will choose someone. Next, there is no injustice here, managers have the right to choose those that they feel good.
In this case, we should discuss why those members are accepted, definitely, there is shady here.
There are a total of 11 pages of applications in the campaign He can choose anyone better, who is always active. And now he accepts people who have been inactive for a long time. I wonder if there is any relationship between him and the people mentioned above? Or they are his alt accounts I think this should be investigated clearly, or at least he needs to explain
In this case, we should discuss why those members are accepted, definitely, there is shady here.
There are a total of 11 pages of applications in the campaign
He can choose anyone better, who is always active. And now he accepts people who have been inactive for a long time. I wonder if there is any relationship between him and the people mentioned above? Or they are his alt accounts I think this should be investigated clearly, or at least he needs to explain
DAVID CHAUM's XX Coin Signature Campaign prioritize shit poster and inactive participants over quality poster and active forum members.
see the spreadsheet yourself: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qniilytsO0r3383giue6XIw51V9S1zzSCKwJBefS_1g/edit#gid=0
This is injustice to the genuine user of this forum.
Henmark
perfect999
stepwilli
Emitdama
starkovblue
Shallow
SirLancelot
funchiestz
I make a newbie account because I am not a fan of this kind of act. but, this is very unfair to all of the forum user.
Your thoughts about this kind of manager?
see the spreadsheet yourself: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qniilytsO0r3383giue6XIw51V9S1zzSCKwJBefS_1g/edit#gid=0
Update -
* Campaign is closed for the new participants, Please check the spreadsheet.
* Please update your signature.
* Any questions or issues, please pm me.
Just an advise manager cause you have the final say but ever since I'm on this forum no campaign manager has ever accepted an account that is inactive for more than 7days, 4weeks which shows they only contribute to the forum because of the signature campaigns not to even mention not having the require 5merit.* Campaign is closed for the new participants, Please check the spreadsheet.
* Please update your signature.
* Any questions or issues, please pm me.
This is injustice to the genuine user of this forum.
Henmark
perfect999
stepwilli
Emitdama
starkovblue
Shallow
SirLancelot
funchiestz
I make a newbie account because I am not a fan of this kind of act. but, this is very unfair to all of the forum user.
Your thoughts about this kind of manager?
Jump to: