You are probably talking about such a thing as the stability of the chosen strategy. Indeed, often in the game there is a temptation to break the strategy at a specific moment in the game and the thought comes to mind that this will be correct and will bring good luck. However, in most cases the opposite is true.
Simply because the first violation of the strategy will be followed by a literal avalanche of violations; because you decided to violate the strategy once, psychologically you can easily break the next time. And all this will lead to a chaotic and emotional game and a greater likelihood of you losing.
The interesting question here is how long you can play without violating your original strategy.
Some players, I think, never even violate the strategy they initially chose.
That's reality in which the gambler itself violated his own intend strategy, that mindset which push you to change your style while in the middle of the game, thinking that you might win decently if you change the way you play the game, but eventually, it's the outcome is the opposite and only regret will remain after that sessions.
[/quote
I will also add that probably many experienced players become experienced because they once went through a stage in their practice when the idea came to their minds to change the strategy during the game and they did just that. And then their own experience showed them that it was wrong that they did this.
Several similar games, as a rule, lead to loss, and the player begins to understand that the option of changing the strategy during the game is a crucial moment; if you change the strategy, then only to a more verified one, which the player has in stock.
And if there is no such reserve, then a chaotic game begins, which will lead in most cases to loss. And at least to a bad mood after such a game.]