Pages:
Author

Topic: MY BITCOIN BUY INDICATORS (Read 369 times)

newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 6
December 23, 2022, 12:45:59 AM
#30
Don't use the Fear&Greed index and RSI only, because you're ignoring the price direction factor. You might be buying when the price is about to head *down* (sharply).

Make sure you are using Bollinger Bands and they are *not* wide, because that usually means (more often than not) some fuckup is going to happen to the market, and it's usually something coming from the outside, not from investors or speculators (eg. Luna crash, Celcius crash, FTX crunch).


I use +30 indicators
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 6660
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
December 23, 2022, 12:00:00 AM
#29
Don't use the Fear&Greed index and RSI only, because you're ignoring the price direction factor. You might be buying when the price is about to head *down* (sharply).

Make sure you are using Bollinger Bands and they are *not* wide, because that usually means (more often than not) some fuckup is going to happen to the market, and it's usually something coming from the outside, not from investors or speculators (eg. Luna crash, Celcius crash, FTX crunch).
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 6
December 22, 2022, 01:21:15 PM
#28
My final presentation.

1) I have already presented you the DCA model for the bitcoin price, which includes a potential recession – sugest to DCA 56% at price $16,6k. I give this model an index of 0.2

2) The next DCA model I built, measures the popularity of bitcoin on social media. I cannot present this model in graphic form in correlation with the price. This model currently suggests me a DCA to bitcoin of 23.42%. With this model, it may be that it will suggest a higher DCA at a higher BTC price. For example, on Twitter, people are still too interested in the topic around Bitcoin. I give this model an index of 0.2

3) All indicators point to a likely recession in 2023 or even 2024. As I observe, the bottom of the stock market is very much related to GDP and unemployment (I won't go into details). If the recession move into 2024 (which is less likely) I allow for the possibility that 2023 will be bullish for bitcoin like 2019. I give this model an index of 0.5. This indicator give 0% chance that we are at the bottom.

4) Additional indicators that I follow tell me that the bottom of bitcoin is close, but the bottom is not yet confirmed. These indicators tend to confirm a bottom when the bottom is already several weeks behind us. I give this factor an index of 0.1

Therefore, the whole matter together suggests that my DCA is 15.6%, at a price of $16,600 per btc.
_______________________________________________________________________________ _______

If it weren't for the threat of a recession, I would have followed my normal DCA model for BITCOIN much more. This model says that at a price of $15,500 per bitcoin, I should already be 96% loaded with bitcoin

Anyway, I'm not buying ETH right now because the stats say so. I wouldn't "touch" Altcoins right now, even with a stick.

There are many signals that real bitcoin sellers are gone. The problem that can arise in a recession is the following. Tesla, which is highly dependent on low interest rates, may be forced to sell its bitcoins during a recession. This news can bring the price of bitcoin down a lot. As a result, the price may fall so low that Saylor will then have to sell .. and so on. So then everyone who is in bitcoin on leverage/credit can literally fall out of the game.
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 6
December 14, 2022, 07:50:55 AM
#27
- My BTC price model advise me to DCA 42% of capital  into BTC at today price ($17,7k)

The same model adviced to me to to push  63% of capital into BTC at BTC $15,5k



- Based on previose BTC cycles (no potential recession included in calculations), at today price my DCA would be 74%
At price $15,5k my DCA would be 96%

-My  social-internet risk model  says that people still need to lose a social-internet interest into BITCOIN. This model sugest to push till now 15% of capital into BTC. This model may sugest more DCA at bigger BTC prices

It looks like inflation will normalize soon. Last time we had high monthly inflation was June 2022. If because of this we will only have a milder and shorter recession, then it is also possible that the price of 15k-16k per btc  was the bottom.
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 6
November 30, 2022, 07:38:38 AM
#26
4 Real BITCOIN dominance is closer to the bottom of this cycle (60%). Top dominance was 85% in 2019( after 2016). I dont expect we hit 85% again, but we are much more away from this levels..
Where people look for the real dominance of bitcoin? Coinmarketcap shows 38.5% while Coingecko shows 37%. So, right now, it's likely ranging from 37% to 38% for the bitcoin dominance.

I'm not expecting as well to see that much dominance for the next bull run. AFAIK, last bull run the highest that I've seen for btc dominance was like around 70%.

real bitcoin dominance include only  :

Bitcoin (BTC)
Litecoin (LTC)
Ethereum (ETH)
Bsv (BSV)
Bcash (BCH)
Monero (XMR)
DASH (DASH)
Zcash (ZEC)
Bitcoin Gold(BTG)
Ethereum Classic (ETC)
Dogecoin (DOGE)
Decred (DCR)

But if you look at coinmarkecap than i would say realistic is that BTC dominance will get up to 50%-60% dominance.

The pick of bitcoin dominance will be probably, when bitcoin price will be again around $69k
Yeah, that can be achieved again when the price of bitcoin goes up. And as it increases, the dominance of it in the market will be seen.

Why is that the real bitcoin dominance is only circulating into those altcoins and limits that to that number? Isn't it that it covers majority of the market's pair and altcoins and that's why it has gotten the percentage share for the entire market?

I prefer to look at Real Bitcoin dominance chart, becouse it exclude stablecoins

But I also chack coinmarketcap bitcoin dominance for the reference.
hero member
Activity: 3150
Merit: 636
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
November 23, 2022, 06:57:46 PM
#25
4 Real BITCOIN dominance is closer to the bottom of this cycle (60%). Top dominance was 85% in 2019( after 2016). I dont expect we hit 85% again, but we are much more away from this levels..
Where people look for the real dominance of bitcoin? Coinmarketcap shows 38.5% while Coingecko shows 37%. So, right now, it's likely ranging from 37% to 38% for the bitcoin dominance.

I'm not expecting as well to see that much dominance for the next bull run. AFAIK, last bull run the highest that I've seen for btc dominance was like around 70%.

real bitcoin dominance include only  :

Bitcoin (BTC)
Litecoin (LTC)
Ethereum (ETH)
Bsv (BSV)
Bcash (BCH)
Monero (XMR)
DASH (DASH)
Zcash (ZEC)
Bitcoin Gold(BTG)
Ethereum Classic (ETC)
Dogecoin (DOGE)
Decred (DCR)

But if you look at coinmarkecap than i would say realistic is that BTC dominance will get up to 50%-60% dominance.

The pick of bitcoin dominance will be probably, when bitcoin price will be again around $69k
Yeah, that can be achieved again when the price of bitcoin goes up. And as it increases, the dominance of it in the market will be seen.

Why is that the real bitcoin dominance is only circulating into those altcoins and limits that to that number? Isn't it that it covers majority of the market's pair and altcoins and that's why it has gotten the percentage share for the entire market?
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 6
November 22, 2022, 02:42:39 PM
#24
Did you test this indicator for the past how it would outperform?

yep
after lessons learned mentioned already and below.. if i now trace it the bottom line cost stays below the market at all times

you also notice things more, like why 2016 started at ~$450 and ended up near $900 (halving event caused)

you notice when new gen asics became popular as the main miner. like when the S9 dominated the mining pools the prices went up
as did the s19

take things like
2011 when GPU pool mining took majority over solo GPU mining
or when asics first jumped into pools in 2013

there are many things you can learn by factoring mining variables
EG
2010 first price discovery. 1 year later ATH
2012 first halving. 1 year later ATH
2016 second halving. 1 year later ATH
2020 third halving. 1 year later ATH

you start to see events that effect mining costs booster the confidence in the bottom line value. which then sends market price speculation up

..
its worth noting
in 2018 i did make the mistake of "daily" value checking where value did go up to $5.6k by summer of 2018
however by not staying with periodic value and staying an a low of the start of the period. i raced ahead . where by in autumn 2018 the hashrate declined and so the value declined. which allowed the market to decline
i should have stuck to the start of year value number not the daily number

as i in hindesight now and learned my lesson that its best to stick to cycles(4 year) with periodic checks inbetween
such as6month-2year.

to have the base line number of value that sits below price speculation

so take this lesson with you. dont get ahead of yourself basing underlying support bottom line based on the short term daily/monthly changes of hashrate when calculating mining cost. stretch it out over 6months or more to get the better average.. because thats what the most efficient miners do when they pay their bills 6-24 months at a time.. and not daily

I put a lot of importance to HALVING. Halving day is the last day that  I would DCA into BITCOIN

you wrote an interesting theory about how miners affect the price.
However, I have this question:

If the price would drop drastically below $15k, than hashrate would drop drastically. Many miners should turn off their computers. As a result, you would have less competition for mining in the market and the strongest miners will remain. In times of crisis such as recession, the market destroys many companies. So many miners maybe will need to sell under this prices to exit out of this buisnes with positive 0.
So why shouldn't some of the larger miners banropt in coming recesion and sell to us undervalued BITCOINS?




Thank you for the detailed explanation. It makes more sense now.

real bitcoin dominance include only  :
Bitcoin (BTC)
Litecoin (LTC)
Ethereum (ETH)
Bsv (BSV)
Bcash (BCH)
Monero (XMR)
DASH (DASH)
Zcash (ZEC)
Bitcoin Gold(BTG)
Ethereum Classic (ETC)
Dogecoin (DOGE)
Decred (DCR)

I think that this list is wrong,

Not important at all, if you look at real dominance or at coinmarketcap dominance ( i look at bouth). Conclusions are the same

coimn market cap is meaningles as ezplained a few posts about of making an alt with 1trill premine for 1cent

here is something you should look into
if a altcoin has any real community behind it. a niche service/feature only that altcoin has where there are a dominant userbase using it. then they would be setting their own sentiments about the utility which convert to individual trading patter of unique pricing compared to bitcoin.. in short the market price wiggles wont be wiggling in same pattern as another coin

however
ethereum is tracing bitcoin prices. which shows that there is not much unique trading happening in ethereum and instead if just bitcoin traders arbitraging that is holding ethereums market inline..

yep if there was another dominant coin it would be trading in its own unique spikes and dips of the market chart

enjoy

https://i.imgur.com/B6HErEj.png
1) there is an altcoin season, and there is a bitcoin season
2) From halving to halving, from the top of the cycle to the next top of a new cycle, and from the bottom to the next bottom,.. it is very difficult to get an altcoin that would outperform bitcoin. So if you're betting blind, it's best to buy bitcoin
3) Statistically, bitcoin dominance is highest when bitcoin reach new ATH in  the next halving. So altcoins will be worth buying blindly when bitcoin hits $69k.
There are too many altcoins to study them all. And the fact is that 99% of altcoins are scams
4) It is therefore wise to hold Altcoins for a few months max on 4 year cycle
5) look at ada, look at XRP. These are alts that do not outperform bitcoin in the long term and have a lot of believers.
6) then shiba or doge, which have no fundamentals and grow more than other altcoins that have some fundaments
That's why I will change 10% of bitcoin to altcoins during the bitcoin mania phase.
But when it is necessary to sell altcoins, that is a completely different topic.
Ant when to buy ETH is also topic for a new topic



So you will claim that it wasn't any under-20k price good for starting DCA? Interesting...
And how often you suggest buying while doing this DCA? Daily? Weekly? Or?

$16K, $18K, it doesn't make a difference.
While people are getting spooked out of Bitcoin (bad Halloween joke), they are wasting their money on Cyber Monday (!) discounts that could've been spent to buy Bitcoin at these very discount prices.

I mean admit it, we have pretty much the best discount on the entire internet right now. 80% off from $69K FTW!

Don't get me wrong, people are going to wish that they bought this dip in 2025. Mark my words. Feel free to link back to this post then. Smiley

Its totaly same buying BITCOIN at 16k or 18k.

But its not same to buy BTC at 30k or at 8k.

DCA is not so easy task. I needed a lot of study and discipline to start DCA under $21k.
Today i added additional 1% to BTC with price under $16k  per BTC.

For now i DCA 11% of my total bankroll into BTC


Price in range 15k- $16k are very atractive to me. Becouse many BITCOIN indicators scream botom is very close



So you will claim that it wasn't any under-20k price good for starting DCA? Interesting...
And how often you suggest buying while doing this DCA? Daily? Weekly? Or?

$16K, $18K, it doesn't make a difference.
While people are getting spooked out of Bitcoin (bad Halloween joke), they are wasting their money on Cyber Monday (!) discounts that could've been spent to buy Bitcoin at these very discount prices.

I mean admit it, we have pretty much the best discount on the entire internet right now. 80% off from $69K FTW!

Don't get me wrong, people are going to wish that they bought this dip in 2025. Mark my words. Feel free to link back to this post then. Smiley

I completely agree (and see, you are being quoted now too). But my point was not about the exact price, it was more about the "abrupt call for DCA" the OP has made. He cleared up later on that he was DCA-ing since under 21k, so we're good.
And yes, Bitcoin is certainly at Black Friday discount (and pretty much only those who bought in the previous market cycles - and didn't sell - could argue this).

Black friday is here yes  Grin

But we also discus how big this disount will be.

No doubt that this price in 2024-26 will be a price that everyone wish to buy at. But those who will wish to buy at this prices, are now  claiming BITCOIN will go to 0

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
legendary
Activity: 4410
Merit: 4788
November 22, 2022, 01:56:38 PM
#23

Thank you for the detailed explanation. It makes more sense now.

real bitcoin dominance include only  :
Bitcoin (BTC)
Litecoin (LTC)
Ethereum (ETH)
Bsv (BSV)
Bcash (BCH)
Monero (XMR)
DASH (DASH)
Zcash (ZEC)
Bitcoin Gold(BTG)
Ethereum Classic (ETC)
Dogecoin (DOGE)
Decred (DCR)

I think that this list is wrong,

Not important at all, if you look at real dominance or at coinmarketcap dominance ( i look at bouth). Conclusions are the same

coin market cap is meaningless as explained a few posts about of making an alt with 1trill premine for 1cent

here is something you should look into
if a altcoin has any real community behind it. a niche service/feature only that altcoin has where there are a dominant userbase using it. then they would be setting their own sentiments about the utility which convert to individual trading patter of unique pricing compared to bitcoin.. in short the market price wiggles wont be wiggling in same pattern as another coin

however
ethereum is tracing bitcoin prices. which shows that there is not much unique trading happening in ethereum and instead if just bitcoin traders arbitraging that is holding ethereums market inline..

yep if there was another dominant coin it would be trading in its own unique spikes and dips of the market chart

enjoy

legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 6382
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
November 22, 2022, 01:27:29 PM
#22
So you will claim that it wasn't any under-20k price good for starting DCA? Interesting...
And how often you suggest buying while doing this DCA? Daily? Weekly? Or?

$16K, $18K, it doesn't make a difference.
While people are getting spooked out of Bitcoin (bad Halloween joke), they are wasting their money on Cyber Monday (!) discounts that could've been spent to buy Bitcoin at these very discount prices.

I mean admit it, we have pretty much the best discount on the entire internet right now. 80% off from $69K FTW!

Don't get me wrong, people are going to wish that they bought this dip in 2025. Mark my words. Feel free to link back to this post then. Smiley

I completely agree (and see, you are being quoted now too). But my point was not about the exact price, it was more about the "abrupt call for DCA" the OP has made. He cleared up later on that he was DCA-ing since under 21k, so we're good.
And yes, Bitcoin is certainly at Black Friday discount (and pretty much only those who bought in the previous market cycles - and didn't sell - could argue this).
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 6660
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
November 22, 2022, 12:17:15 PM
#21
So you will claim that it wasn't any under-20k price good for starting DCA? Interesting...
And how often you suggest buying while doing this DCA? Daily? Weekly? Or?

$16K, $18K, it doesn't make a difference.
While people are getting spooked out of Bitcoin (bad Halloween joke), they are wasting their money on Cyber Monday (!) discounts that could've been spent to buy Bitcoin at these very discount prices.

I mean admit it, we have pretty much the best discount on the entire internet right now. 80% off from $69K FTW!

Don't get me wrong, people are going to wish that they bought this dip in 2025. Mark my words. Feel free to link back to this post then. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 4410
Merit: 4788
November 22, 2022, 10:46:34 AM
#20
Did you test this indicator for the past how it would outperform?

yep
after lessons learned mentioned already and below.. if i now trace it the bottom line cost stays below the market at all times

you also notice things more, like why 2016 started at ~$450 and ended up near $900 (halving event caused)

you notice when new gen asics became popular as the main miner. like when the S9 dominated the mining pools the prices went up
as did the s19

take things like
2011 when GPU pool mining took majority over solo GPU mining
or when asics first jumped into pools in 2013

there are many things you can learn by factoring mining variables
EG
2010 first price discovery. 1 year later ATH
2012 first halving. 1 year later ATH
2016 second halving. 1 year later ATH
2020 third halving. 1 year later ATH

you start to see events that effect mining costs booster the confidence in the bottom line value. which then sends market price speculation up

..
its worth noting
in 2018 i did make the mistake of "daily" value checking where value did go up to $5.6k by summer of 2018
however by not staying with periodic value and staying an a low of the start of the period. i raced ahead . where by in autumn 2018 the hashrate declined and so the value declined. which allowed the market to decline
i should have stuck to the start of year value number not the daily number

as i in hindesight now and learned my lesson that its best to stick to cycles(4 year) with periodic checks inbetween
such as6month-2year.

to have the base line number of value that sits below price speculation

so take this lesson with you. dont get ahead of yourself basing underlying support bottom line based on the short term daily/monthly changes of hashrate when calculating mining cost. stretch it out over 6months or more to get the better average.. because thats what the most efficient miners do when they pay their bills 6-24 months at a time.. and not daily
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 6
November 22, 2022, 03:46:35 AM
#19

Thank you for the detailed explanation. It makes more sense now.

real bitcoin dominance include only  :

I think that this list is wrong, from the very start. Half of those "coins" don't deserve to be there and a few others could be there.
But it doesn't actually matter. The whole metric of Bitcoin dominance is pointless (and as said, based on wrong premises).

Not important at all, if you look at real dominance or at coinmarketcap dominance ( i look at bouth). Conclusions are the same
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 6382
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
November 22, 2022, 03:33:31 AM
#18

Thank you for the detailed explanation. It makes more sense now.

real bitcoin dominance include only  :

I think that this list is wrong, from the very start. Half of those "coins" don't deserve to be there and a few others could be there.
But it doesn't actually matter. The whole metric of Bitcoin dominance is pointless (and as said, based on wrong premises).
legendary
Activity: 4410
Merit: 4788
November 21, 2022, 05:58:42 PM
#17
market cap and dominance is MEANINGLESS

dont give it any second thought

market cap is not a valuation based on billions of dollars held somewhere backing a market cap of any coin

its just a empty math calculation of multiplication

anyone can create an altcoin with 1trillion premised coins.. sell just 0.00005 coins for 1cent
yep just 1 cent need to be paid

they can create a whole coin price of $200
meaning creating a market cap of 200 trillion dollars.. yep making bitcoin 0.25% dominance.. all for the low low price of 1cent
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 6
November 21, 2022, 05:49:25 PM
#16
4 Real BITCOIN dominance is closer to the bottom of this cycle (60%). Top dominance was 85% in 2019( after 2016). I dont expect we hit 85% again, but we are much more away from this levels..
Where people look for the real dominance of bitcoin? Coinmarketcap shows 38.5% while Coingecko shows 37%. So, right now, it's likely ranging from 37% to 38% for the bitcoin dominance.

I'm not expecting as well to see that much dominance for the next bull run. AFAIK, last bull run the highest that I've seen for btc dominance was like around 70%.

So I see more potential to buy BITCOIN now than altcoins
True to that and we're in a bear market, cheap bitcoins are there and they're on the sale.

real bitcoin dominance include only  :

Bitcoin (BTC)
Litecoin (LTC)
Ethereum (ETH)
Bsv (BSV)
Bcash (BCH)
Monero (XMR)
DASH (DASH)
Zcash (ZEC)
Bitcoin Gold(BTG)
Ethereum Classic (ETC)
Dogecoin (DOGE)
Decred (DCR)

But if you look at coinmarkecap than i would say realistic is that BTC dominance will get up to 50%-60% dominance.

The pick of bitcoin dominance will be probably, when bitcoin price will be again around $69k
legendary
Activity: 4410
Merit: 4788
November 21, 2022, 05:40:33 PM
#15
If a mining facility works on solar power and got its ROI for both the panels (and related hardware) and miners, the costs would be insignificant.
Still, they will not sell under the price of electricity they could sell to the grid, I guess. So what's the minimum by your math? 0? Or the equivalent of 5 cents/kWh?
I don't think that they'll be willing to sell this low, no matter what.

So I see a contradiction/discrepancy between

if you simply calculate the mining costs of the cheapest mining on the planet. you find this base number

and

if no one can or wants to sell below a certain level on the entire planet. then thats the base/bottom.

solar is not free..
solars ROI is not based on months. its based on years.

i never said to calculate a electric cost alone. its the hardware+electric
even if you are not paying "the grid" you still buying the solar panels which if you divide down the solar panel via how long a solar panel lasts gives you the end cost per KW/h

which still is inline with the planets cheapest realistic cost to mine via grid based electric of cheap grid electric cost

some places where its really really cheap grid electirc are also the highest climate temperatures meaning more electric needed for cooling so again this needs to be factored into the cost.. which again become aligned to a certain level
there is no such thing as free electric

bitcoins 2022 underlying cost has been $15k/coin which is where the markets have been trying their damned hardest to get below $16k but have not really been able to budge down to $15k . this is because no on on the planet can acquire coin below $15k so no one wants to sell for less this year

the markets ares testing the lows. the support where people just stop seling below thus refusing to let the price fall below.. testing these levels is a good thing as it then becomes support/confidence that it becomes the new non-zero bottom number everyone wont go below. thus then traders then start using that as the bottom and then confidence increases compared to previous lows of previous years. and then start using the bottom to then grow up from and trade upwards from..

over the decade those that did accumulate for less, that have weak emotions have sold already. where the new buyer has bought in at the sell price of the past higher than previous holder, they too sell at their min and each time the minimum level raises of the coins bought decades ago and sold and bought and sold over the years. where again no one wants to sell below X amount in 2022

...
i personally did do a math mistake at the start of the year.
i put lowest cost at about $30k when the market was at $50. my miscalculation was the the retail electric grid change of price due to inflation where prices jumped up..
however i did not factor in that many of the most efficient mining farms had 2 year contracts with the grid and or had solar with 5-10 ROI thus
real prices were still based on 2021 electric rates. but my early calculations were on 2022 rates i initially mad the mistake of valuing the bottom as $30j by not considering all factors..

and i bought in when the market price came down to $30k. i personally did not care/worry. as i know next year when the grid contracts expire of the 2021 prices and they have to start paying 2023 prices that min cost will raise up from the true $15k number i was not accounting for
but for the last 6 months i have gone by the truer 15k bases. and so far the markets are trying hard to test that line. and unable to bust it

unless before contracts renew. people get bulk order asics at a lower cost to run/special deal discount at delivery. we should not see any large fall in the underlying bottom of costs on the planet to get coin. unless there is no large long term drop in hashrate that lasts a couple seasons-annually. we should not see large break down in underlying value base number.
hero member
Activity: 3150
Merit: 636
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
November 21, 2022, 04:41:59 PM
#14
4 Real BITCOIN dominance is closer to the bottom of this cycle (60%). Top dominance was 85% in 2019( after 2016). I dont expect we hit 85% again, but we are much more away from this levels..
Where people look for the real dominance of bitcoin? Coinmarketcap shows 38.5% while Coingecko shows 37%. So, right now, it's likely ranging from 37% to 38% for the bitcoin dominance.

I'm not expecting as well to see that much dominance for the next bull run. AFAIK, last bull run the highest that I've seen for btc dominance was like around 70%.

So I see more potential to buy BITCOIN now than altcoins
True to that and we're in a bear market, cheap bitcoins are there and they're on the sale.
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 6
November 21, 2022, 08:17:30 AM
#13
finding the bottom is actually simpler than you think

forget the market
below the market. there are people able to acquire bitcoin CHEAPER.. they are the miners of the most efficient mining on the planet.
they are the BASE. the "no one on the planet can get below"

some less knowledgeable think bitcoins base/bottom could be $3k. but thats their opinion from market wiggle watching of a few years agos low.

it means nothing in regards to todays base.

if no one can or wants to sell below a certain level on the entire planet. then thats the base/bottom.

this base/bottom support is not something that wiggles volitally day by day. its a stable rate mainly due to miners electric contracts being allotments of MW over a 1-2 year period. averaging out the variability of their daily-monthly costs.
their hardware they run for a couple years before upgrading. again averaging out their variability.
the only variability is the hashrate competition itself which determines how much of a miners hashrate compared to the network hashrate a miner is going to get on average of coins.

but they do not play to the whims of the daily changes of mining coin rewards issued due to hashrate changes. they instead just plod along mining, and just take their coins they accumulate in a 6-24month time period and evaluate the coins of 6-24month vs their 6-24 month costs of electric/hardware

if you simply calculate the mining costs of the cheapest mining on the planet. you find this base number




Very good points!!


This data i got online: Most of the leading mining companies can breakeven at price of $7,000 to $9,000


Many of indicator i follow say that worst scenario is from $9k - $13k.


Only one indicator I folow says we can go under $9k, and that we can hit $4,4k.

I dont treat this indicator which predict $4,4k as a potential bottom a serios option. Realisticly this indicator claim that the bottom is around $16,5k





Thanks for your insights! I appreciate all indicators you have stated within your post. I have come across another great indicator that can maybe help identify clear DCA-zones, mixed DCA and cashstacking zones, and clear cashstacking zones in which one should not buy BTC from a risk-to-return perspective.

https://www.coinglass.com/pro/i/ahr999

Check out AHR999-Index.

This indicator calculates the 200 day costs for BTC in relation to its current value. The following zones can be adapted for a monthly rate one is aiming to buy BTC with:

<0.45 = all in (below red line, red zone)
0.46 - 0.7 = 75% BTC, 25% Cash
0.71 - 1.0 = 50% BTC, 50% Cash
1.01-1.2 = 25% BTC, 75% Cash
>1.2 = 100% Cash (above fixed investment zone aka the green line)

With this strategy, one can invest rationally and give up emotional investing. One has a clear strategy of when to buy into BTC and when to start building cash. A great side effect of this strategy is a passive cash building strategy. When the market is then tanking again, there is enough cash on the sidelines to buy heavily into BTC. In the past, I sometimes had problems to discipline myself not to buy into too high prices. Since I found AHR999, I have been really consistent, strict, and disciplined with myself. Maybe this will help you too.

--------
IN GOD WE TRUST, IN CODE WE TRUST!
Long live Satoshi
EAST GREAT FALLS

I see you like to DCA more frequently. Not so bad strategy , if you wish to stay discipleted



Modern History Facts:
1) The S&P500 has bottomed every time during a recession. The exception is the dot com bubble. The present time, however, is nothing like the dot com bubble. A recession has not yet been officially declared
2) In the past, a recession was declared when two consecutive quarters of GDP were negative. This time it was not like that in 2022
3) The bottom of the S&P500 was always reached immediately or a little later (a few months later) when the Fed pivot
4) Every indicator I know indicates that a recession will most likely occur in 2023
5) Unemployment is in good shape, this is probably the main factor why a recession was not declared in 2022
6) The Fed is likely to reduce rate hikes from 75bps to 50bps in December. This is not a PIVOT
7) If the FED PIVOT too quickly the 70s where we had a yoyo market could be repeated. Inflation must remain stable and low in the long term, otherwise we cannot have the next big bull market

The Fed should stick with tough policy until quite a few zombie companies fail, and hoping not to many people lose jobs fast

IF the high interest rate persists, it will have a negative impact on the economy. Tech. companies in particular are sensitive to the level of interest rates. Therefore, it is possible to expect another crash in the crypto world similar to FTX.

Many crypto indicators that I follow say that BITCOIN is at the bottom or very close to the bottom. If there was no threat of recession ahead, I would dare to say with some certainty that this is the bottom of BITCOIN.

If large companies get into financial trouble, they will also be forced to sell large amounts of BITCOIN, like Saylor.

The FTX news will slowly cool down, and BITCOIN may soon go above $23k. For example, if the inflation data in December are better than expected, we can expect milder rhetoric from the FED in December. Such scenarios could push BITCOIN up.

This stock bear market has been average so far. Therefore, it may happen that we will experience the bottom of the S&P500 in the summer of 2023. This bottom may be just a little lower than the current bottom - 3.577.

This is a sign that even then BITCOIN will reach the bottom at that time, which could be approximately where we are now.

In any case, the year 2023 should not be the year where BITCOIN will make a big upward movement

ETH dominance is sky high for me right now, so I'm only buying BTC right now. ETH has a much better chance of making a new low than BITCOIN

Could a major stablecoin collapse happen? This is what could finally drive many cryptocurrencies to their real value of $0, and bitcoin would finaly find his bottom.

We also should know that FTX news impact at this time on BTC price stronger than FED policy



Its my first image that i try to add. After someone will quote picture should work


This bitcoin indicator is still not at his bottom. But only smaller additional drop need to ocure



I don't see the war as something that would drastically affect the price of bitcoin. War is just the Fed's excuse that war is to blame for inflation. Inflation was high even before the war

Inflation and unemployment gets people selling their coins instead of buying.
The energy war (don't forget that too) makes some miners get in difficulty because of the prices.
Recession can make also businesses sell (some or all of) their investments.

if you simply calculate the mining costs of the cheapest mining on the planet. you find this base number

If a mining facility works on solar power and got its ROI for both the panels (and related hardware) and miners, the costs would be insignificant.
Still, they will not sell under the price of electricity they could sell to the grid, I guess. So what's the minimum by your math? 0? Or the equivalent of 5 cents/kWh?
I don't think that they'll be willing to sell this low, no matter what.

So I see a contradiction/discrepancy between

if you simply calculate the mining costs of the cheapest mining on the planet. you find this base number

and

if no one can or wants to sell below a certain level on the entire planet. then thats the base/bottom.

Bigger money starts going into the system when the news are at the bottom. When the economy starts to recover, the financial markets are already quite a few percent above the bottom.
For example, when the financial markets see that unemployment is already too high, they simply assume that the FED will start lowering the interest rate. And if the Fed only give a hint that it will go in this direction, we have probably already hit the bottom...



[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 2226
Signature space for rent
November 21, 2022, 08:04:15 AM
#12
Since we all have different tests, we will not all use the same strategy to accumulate Bitcoin. The concern is that we never know when Bitcoin going to reach the bottom. It's bottom for you, but it won't be for me. When there is a sudden dump that is lower than expected, I try to accumulate. And we know that a pump occurs after every dump, whether big or small. So I take advantage of it infrequently, but not always. Because it's quite risky, and I only do it when I feel less risky.
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 6382
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
November 21, 2022, 07:53:26 AM
#11
I don't see the war as something that would drastically affect the price of bitcoin. War is just the Fed's excuse that war is to blame for inflation. Inflation was high even before the war

Inflation and unemployment gets people selling their coins instead of buying.
The energy war (don't forget that too) makes some miners get in difficulty because of the prices.
Recession can make also businesses sell (some or all of) their investments.

if you simply calculate the mining costs of the cheapest mining on the planet. you find this base number

If a mining facility works on solar power and got its ROI for both the panels (and related hardware) and miners, the costs would be insignificant.
Still, they will not sell under the price of electricity they could sell to the grid, I guess. So what's the minimum by your math? 0? Or the equivalent of 5 cents/kWh?
I don't think that they'll be willing to sell this low, no matter what.

So I see a contradiction/discrepancy between

if you simply calculate the mining costs of the cheapest mining on the planet. you find this base number

and

if no one can or wants to sell below a certain level on the entire planet. then thats the base/bottom.
Pages:
Jump to: