Topic: My campaign journey has ended due to this - page 2. (Read 702 times)

Again sir, I didn't wore the signature of 1xbit. Maybe JollyGood tagged/suspected me for not deleting my application. The tagged says " participating in the 1xbit campaign" Which on my part, technically I did not.

---

Yes, I didn't participate, just a mere application that I wasn't able to deleted due to my inactiveness. I've try to reach out but JollyGood already made up his mind. Would be thankful if he sees it and reconsider.


I did not open this thread to complain, I was just sharing coz I remember it how I got my neg trust coz I always see this 1xbit campaign all the time.


Yeah just a mere application. I guess from the point that I wasn't able to delete it makes his suspicion obvious on his POV.

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

Since you claim that its not about the money at all, why even opening thread complaining about not being able to join any campaign?


Just to check if I understood you correctly, you never wore 1xbit signature, you just applied and for that you got negative feedback?

Usually, i don't feel pity for those who are in the 1xbit scam campaign but your case attracts my attention as you were never selected in the 1xbit campaign (as per my understanding), so maybe the negative could be changed to neutral maybe?

Did you try to reach out to jollygood on this and what was his response on this? Also let's wait and see if JollyGood replies on this thread to see his point of view.

In my previous comment, I said that I didn't think the red tag was fair, but seeing that you were given enough time and that you call being lazy to continue to carry the signature of a scam site when it would take seconds to remove it, I think you deserve the tag.

Long before I applied to 1xbit I wasn't really that active but trying to be if ever accepted, wasn't for the money at all, I just wanna make a value on my participation besides, I'm an active reader here which I've learned a lot of things. It's just my carelessness had to be this more dramatic haha.

It wasn't my fault for participating in art contest and if it has a prize. I even remember starting my way up here, a sr. member, takes so much effort and engaging to the forum. Participating in campaign is advertising, using my account and I doubt anyone would do it if it's free.

Yeah maybe this is right, it does prove something. But sometimes being a lazy one will also make you to not remove it til the next one.

Pretty bad for me I didn't noticed how rug the 1xbit is. In all honesty it just got to my point of awareness when I see the neg trust but I did not wear their signature just a mere careless application.

I don't see this to just magically be gone, and I'm almost over it since it is nearly a year, I appealed to @JollyGood and didn't given another chance.

Yeah he reconsider others after complying to him, but in my case I was inactive for over a week, as I have said I didn't bother myself to check if it was accepted or not.

Didn't post this to ask anything, you can see it from my post I didn't please anyone. It is just that I remember how I got tagged after applying to that scam campaign. Sorry but this sounded like I'm asking for everyone's attention and help to get it removed.

Again I didn't post this to hate nor to ask for your sympathy. I just shared what happened to me and how it changed me. My inactivity to the forum had a purpose, I'm grateful for what I've learned and earned here. It will not stop right here.

 Thank you all for sharing your opinions and sentiments!

Unfortunately sympathy can not earn you positive trust even with thread. The process will ask for the reason behind it, so it does not come cheap. Positive trust tag can appease your negative trust position but u might need be more than 2 to look it.

I think i have seen JollyGood change feedback before, but you have also done nothing much to show you deserve a second chance except lamenting how you are going to miss future signature camapigns.


How is it free advertising if the word "1xbit" shows up with the word "scam" in most sentences. By the time someone looks up the site in the forum and even fails to read through what the threads have to say about the scam, and they end up getting scammed, then they are to blame.

At this point, I’m sure if the keywords 1xbit is searched on bitcointalk forum, the company has been mentioned more than a million times good and bad, mostly bad reviews associated with the company and its signature campaign. But talking about it everyday is free advertising imo. They probably have more people clicking their websites through bitcointalk because they are everywhere. OP wants his feedback removed, I suggest he contact the person who gave the feedback and give convincing reasons why it should be removed.

I don't know how long you were a part of 1xbit campaign but it was big risk joining and everyone was well aware they could receive negative feedback.
There is still a chance he could remove that feedback, but instead you should concentrate to improve your posts and get some positive feedback for your services and trades.
If you want to provide some design and other art related services you can always create brand new account, and you don't have to publicly say that is your alt account.

You are wrong if you think that removing or banning 1xbit will somehow magically remove your negative feedback and make everything clean again.
Bitcointalk forum is giving enough free speech to everyone, including scammers and shady gambling websites like 1xbit, and I think this is not bad.

If this is true than I think JollyGood should consider removing negative feedback he gave him, or at least change it to Neutral.

If I am not wrong this action taken by JollyGood after multiple warnings to the campaign participants but they never cared so he made a list of people who are wearing the 1xbit signatures and getting financial benefits from the scammers. If you didn't get that financial benefits but still you got negged may look harsh but its your responsibility to choose what you're promoting because literally you're helping the scammers and being one if the reason for people to lose their money.

Interestingly, I didn't find your name in the list which actually have 124 names.

The way he wrote it was like he immediately got negative feedback after he applied for 1xbit signature campaign, but this is a completely different thing. He was given more than 2 weeks time to remove that sig and if that wasn't enough, then even 2 months probably wouldn't be enough for him.

I agree with what has been said:

The -1 is not that big a deal if you want to provide a service just use a reliable escrow and if you do enough good deals over time it really will not matter.

As for joining signature campaigns, that really is up to the individual manager.

But still wearing the sig for a service that has gone away and itself is tagged is not a good thing.

-Dave

I get the idea but I think they are wrong. If you are not in a signature campaign I think it is better to post without carrying any signature, because this way you show that it is not only economic interest that brings you to this forum.

I think that some do keep the old signature for proving some sort of "status", i.e. that they were accepted to campaigns.
Or some may keep signature in order to "fool" people that they are any good, by showing that they're somewhat trusted by the campaign manager (I don't know how to explain it well), without realizing that one can do quality posts even if he's not member of any campaign.

Maybe I didn't explain well, but the point is that it can also be seen not as carelessness, instead as somehow trying to pretend he's more than he is.

It seems that the OP is not a careful person at all. Out of curiosity, I checked if there is a signature campaign in the thread:

Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns [Last update: 30-April-22]

And there is no signature campaign of that service (obviously). Surely he joined in the past and he has not removed the signature.

Reminds me of everyone who continued to carry Lightlord's  777coin and Bitvest.io signatures long after they stopped running in the forum. I still saw one the other day.

I'm not sure if he wore a 1xbit signature during that time, but I think JG gave him plenty of time to change his mind before tagging his account. He applied for the 1xbit campaign on June 15 and received negative trust on July 1. Then, after realizing he wasn't going to be accepted into their campaign, he deleted his application and started complaining.

Given how inactive he has been for the past year, I doubt this is his only account on the forum.

You should have seen all the warnings about 1xbit before you decided to apply for their signature campaign.

How did you miss seeing
1. Red trust and flags on all 1xbit's profiles amd campaign manager's profile.
2. Warnings in the campaign thread by so many members that anyone would risk getting tagged if they applied for the campaign.
3. Multiple scam accusations and reputation posts complaining about 1xbit at that time.


The fact that you are so careless is evident even today.

Blender wallet, a service that you are advertising on your signature has been off for several weeks now.

Before even going off, they claim the "noncustodial" wallet was hacked and funds for users were withdrawn.

How do you not know this and continue advertising such a service on your signature after all that long?

Judging by his registration, he could only apply for participation but did not participate in this company.
The post with the registration has been deleted, and also I did not find it in the spreadsheet. Therefore, we can conclude that he did not participate and receive payments.
Subsequently, there were also applications for other subscription companies, in which the OP, apparently, was not accepted.

https://ninjastic.space/addresses?address=bc1qme0j0hxrxyghzgxfrdd7sat5eehuyatugak2th
https://ninjastic.space/post/57235692



OP, Sometimes choosing the company you're going to advertise with carefully will help you maintain your reputation....

I think that's what happened, and JollyGood has been known to be quite harsh with the negative feedback--that's why I took him off my trust list.  OP's trust actually doesn't show up red on my end because of that, but if he's still on DT2 or even DT1 then yeah, it's going to be a problem for OP getting into anything other than a bounty that doesn't care about feedback.

Personally, I think JollyGood ought to rethink some of his feedbacks but I suspect he's not going to.  There have been threads just like this one before, and he's not inclined to reverse any of the ones he's given.  Tagging applicants to a campaign is stepping over the line IMO, but we've all got differing opinions on that. 

While you're right with "IDK why it is still here on the forum", you're wrong with blaming them for what has happened to you. Look closer and you'll see that it was your own fault to not read all the red warnings around that campaign.
Yes, I know, you can tell that I expect too much from a Sr. Member. But you're here since 2017, or at least the account is. You had to learn the proper ways at some point...