I also insisted that they tell me who put the red flag in my account and by what reason, question Mark has been avoiding and is not answering.
To me Mtgox is game over.
To bad Tradehill had to close business.
Any reliable exchange someone could recommend me.
Please forgive for not taking sides on this issue, sergio, but feel that I need to state the following on your thread. I'm about to invest more money and time in this Bitcoin thingy, and the last thing I want the business owners I approach is to see threads like this one. I'm in no way dissing Mt Gox, but do feel that this issue should not have gone on this long if what sergio is stating is true. By sergio expressing his fustrations on a public forum, it does not bode well for Bitcoin in general, and we all lose. I truly hope that this issue gets resolved quickly.
~Bruno~
I cannot agree with you on this one. Essentially, you are trying to pressure other bitcoin users to keep quiet about fishy business practises they encounter with bitcoin companies (in this case, MtGox). Now, while I would love to live in a world where I can say to my customers that bitcoin is zero-risk, the current situation is that someone adopting bitcoin is normally well aware that he is adopting a relatively new technology which is yet in the process of becoming mature. Still, it is a highly promising technology, so there is growth in the user base. But if you were successful in your attempts to shut down the open discussion about problems with certain companies, in the end bitcoin would become much more risky for new adopters because they would all risk to run into problems like those with MtGox without being warned.
If the people at MtGox are smart, they will learn from these incidents and create a new policy which allows more people to trust them. Yes, they are in a position where they can be approached by law enforcement when there is a problem, but it is still their own business decision how to handle these situations. I saw similar problems with internet access providers when governments started to approach them in order to get information about relations between IP addresses and the people behind the addresses. Some access providers were happy because they saw this as a great excuse to collect more data about their users than before. Yet others acted more diplomatically and only gave out the information for which they were clearly obligated to do so. And guess what? The latter made great business because people do care about privacy. Ideally, be it an internet access provider, a bitcoin exchange, or something else, a company in that position should act as a thin layer between customers and inquiries about customers. And more importantly, the rights of both sides should be honoured equally. There may be valid reasons for someone outside to ask for information about customers' identity or activity on a platform, maybe because there was some crime involved which needs to be prosecuted and where the customer may have some relation to. But crime accusations can also be wrong, and the customer should have the equally effective opportunity to file a lawsuit against someone who wrongly accused him of misbehaviour. Hopefully, MtGox will learn from what happened. But if not, it will not hurt the bitcoin community for long because other exchanges will do, and provide a better service.
It would hurt the bitcoin community much more if we lose bitcointalk.org as a platform where problems are freely discussed and where people have the opportunity to decide by themselves about which risks they are willing to take. Myself, I provide development services to companies doing BTC-USD-EUR day trading, so it is important for me to keep track of what happens on the exchange company market. I wouldn't like to see a bitcoin community where information about bitcoin exchange trustworthiness is kept secret.