Let's use this thread for its intended purpose folks. This is my blacklist thread so unless you want to be included in said list, please stop posting here about the bs accusation against me. Use the other guys thread which i'll be responding in 1 last time shortly.
Topic: My Sig Spammers list and banned from Campaigns list - page 2. (Read 21376 times)
Quote from: DarkStar_alt link=topic=1661654.msg21931524#msg21931524
I'm assuming that's sarcasm right? Someone PMed me asking if it was true so I'd just like to be sure.
Sarcasm 
You've never been late with payment for the past 15 weeks 
I am talking about how "actmyname" is trying to claim that yahoo's negative trust is fair due to FJ claiming that yahoo stole funds. Indeed, this is serious as yahoo clearly gave the feedback about spreading FUD long before any claim about stealing funds was made. Something deeper must be going on here as no one can be that stupid, as you say.
Stop! Wait a minute. Check the date on some of the quotes I showed during my libel post.Of my opinion, yahoo is the worst campaign manger, who always late with payment
This quote is literally false.maybe he is always getting druñk, how dare he steal money for 24 hour of some people to get drunk insstead to pay the campaign member?
Taken from FJ's thread, this is pretty much libel.Both these comments happened before the negative trust. Here's some more examples.
I do some research and saw yahoo he is always getting druñk, how dare he steal money for 24 hour of some people to get drunk insstead to pay the campaign member?
Unfounded. 'always' implies every time. This is one time.He love alcohol too much (he is alcoholic) and do not care about company he manages.
Again unfounded.Then this one from his original thread:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2184366.msg21913155#msg21913155
Quote
I do some research and saw yahoo opening lots of scam thread against some company in some alternate account. He used the fake profiles, he have over 40 i thinking, and he used those fake profile to trick everyone of the forum.
It is very sad. He try to ruin the reputation of some company here if they did not acept him to be the campaign manager!
If you don't consider any of it libel then you should reevaluate your sense of the law. It is very sad. He try to ruin the reputation of some company here if they did not acept him to be the campaign manager!
What's with the huge amount of people getting mad because someone actually went out and enjoyed life, other than sitting home every day.
Agreed. You shouldn't rely on signature campaign payments for anything important anyway, and it's not unreasonable to mess up once in a while.
Oh no Darkstar didn't pay out chip mixer campaigns, I better sue him and find where he lives.
I'm assuming that's sarcasm right? Someone PMed me asking if it was true so I'd just like to be sure.
What's with the huge amount of people getting mad because someone actually went out and enjoyed life, other than sitting home every day.
I don't understand you people. You guys are pissed off because someone delayed your HUGE payment of 50 dollars by not even 2 hours. Mate that's 50... An average job pays that in 2-3 hours, and you guys are sweating your asses off because yahoo paid out late? At least he showed the courtesy telling you guys payment would be delayed and also explaining it.
Oh no Darkstar didn't pay out chip mixer campaigns, I better sue him and find where he lives.
But seriously, this is yahoo's SMAS blacklisted thread, stop spamming it, make a new one or just go away.
There are more issues we should address than someone sending your 50 bucks 2 hours late.
I don't understand you people. You guys are pissed off because someone delayed your HUGE payment of 50 dollars by not even 2 hours. Mate that's 50... An average job pays that in 2-3 hours, and you guys are sweating your asses off because yahoo paid out late? At least he showed the courtesy telling you guys payment would be delayed and also explaining it.
Oh no Darkstar didn't pay out chip mixer campaigns, I better sue him and find where he lives.
But seriously, this is yahoo's SMAS blacklisted thread, stop spamming it, make a new one or just go away.
I wonder what happens when NOTARY finds out? Surely they will. Most likely he will get fired like Nexchange did to me. 
I think NOTARY wouldn't mind, why would a trusted campaign manager, who has had basically no issues in the past, managed heaps of campaigns get fired over having a day out? Doesn't make sense. There are more issues we should address than someone sending your 50 bucks 2 hours late.
Dang, yahoo messed up bad. I tried to warn him.
Sigh.I wonder what happens when NOTARY finds out? Surely they will. Most likely he will get fired like Nexchange did to me.
Fired for possibly delaying the payment for a small amount of time (though I'm still not sure the exact timing as there are different claims)? What kind of bullshit is that? There are *horrible* managers out there and *horrible campaigns* managed by nobody, and you think we should focus on someone for delaying the payment for a bit? 
Wth? That's messed up. I will never join a signature campaign managed by yahoo.
Dang, yahoo messed up bad. I tried to warn him.
I wonder what happens when NOTARY finds out? Surely they will. Most likely he will get fired like Nexchange did to me.
Sorry, I am new here... what is the SMAS blacklist?
A list of spammers such as yourself.I was just responding to the guy who seems to only care about himself.
You have no idea who Yahoo is, nor what he is like. You are in no position to judge him. Go away.Half my posts are in Bitcoin Discussion. The site is called "Bitcoin Talk". 
You're a classic shitposter. OP, I recommend adding both to your SMAS list (as I've done with mine).
Wth? That's messed up. I will never join a signature campaign managed by yahoo.
1) Random shit project: Check.2) One liner spam: Check.
3) Genuine concern: Error 404.
Stay away from sections where the people responding all not all illiterate spammers, will ya now?
Welcome to the SMAS blacklist. Until someone posts something worth responding to,
Cat out.
Cat out.
Wth? That's messed up. I will never join a signature campaign managed by yahoo.
1) Random shit project: Check.2) One liner spam: Check.
3) Genuine concern: Error 404.
Stay away from sections where the people responding all not all illiterate spammers, will ya now?
Welcome to the SMAS blacklist. * Lauda takes a look at your post history.
* Lauda realizes that it is being bullshitted by a one-line signature spammer.
* Lauda looks for the campaign manager of Solar DAO.
* Lauda realizes that there is no such manager; the owners of that bullshit projects are managing it: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-solar-dao-signature-avatar-campaign-frozen-2049677.
* Lauda adds Kaller to its own SMAS blacklist.
Until someone posts something worth responding to,
Cat out.
That is fine, but we never got a clear answer about yahoo. Just a one-line halfhearted comment. Are you going to condemn his delaying of payments by 26 hours and giving false negative feedback?
* Lauda takes a look at your post history.
* Lauda realizes that it is being bullshitted by a one-line signature spammer.
* Lauda looks for the campaign manager of Solar DAO.
* Lauda realizes that there is no such manager; the owners of that bullshit projects are managing it: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-solar-dao-signature-avatar-campaign-frozen-2049677.
* Lauda adds Kaller to its own SMAS blacklist.
Until someone posts something worth responding to,
Cat out.
You obviously did not read my entire post. I said your tag is 100% warranted, as it is not known if yahoo has stolen campaign funds.
You've explicitly said no such thing.Although FJ might be wrong about the stolen funds (and deserve to get tagged by you), they certainly do not deserve negative feedback simply for reporting misbehavior. Again, that is the whole point of a feedback system to begin with.
You are wrong.
Why no warnings to yahoo? All you have said thus far is a short one-line comment halfheartedly condemning the behavior. It is clear in the screenshot provided in my previous post the feedback is solely an act of retaliation based on absolutely nothing but the fact he got caught (by his own-self) delaying 100 members from receiving their payment. Is this something you would do?
Edit: It seems yahoo has edited his original feedback after realizing he got caught. What the heck is going on here?
You obviously did not read my entire post. I said your tag is 100% warranted, as it is not known if yahoo has stolen campaign funds.
You've explicitly said no such thing.However, it is not acceptable for a DT member to give negative feedback solely in retaliation, which is what yahoo did. See here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21916402
Which is not what he did. The user has been tagged for libel, at least from my perspective. Have I missed something here?Now you are proven wrong.
I was proven wrong? Certainly not by someone like yourself.It would be nice to see a mod like you stand up for what is right around here for once and gain some credibility. As far as I know you ran Bitmixer's campaign perfectly, or almost at least... why do you defend such irresponsible behavior and false feedback from yahoo?
1) The feedback is not false, the user did commit libel.2) I am not defending the behavior:
Getting 'trashed' every once in a while is fine, albeit I'd avoid doing that around the payment dates.
Maybe you should start reading entire posts.
However, yahoo clearly gave the feedback about spreading FUD long before any claim about stealing funds was made.
Are you sure? I can't see the timestamp of the rating, and it was modified and re-applied thus I can't say which happened.Lauda, even you must admit delaying payments by 26 hours due to being drunk and hungover is asking to get negative feedback.
No? That would be incompetence and bad priorities. Now, if I were to start going after signature campaign managers for their incompetence then we'd see >90% of them taken down by my ratings. Are you sure we want to be going there? Although FJ might be wrong about the stolen funds, they certainly do not deserve negative feedback simply for reporting misbehavior. Again, that is the whole point of a feedback system to begin with.
He deserves feedback for libel. You can't go around smearing someone's name as you please, especially not without any actual evidence. You obviously did not read my entire post. I said your tag is 100% warranted, as it is not known if yahoo has stolen campaign funds.
However, it is not acceptable for a DT member to give negative feedback solely in retaliation, which is what yahoo did. See here. Long before any accusation.
Now you are proven wrong. It would be nice to see a mod like you stand up for what is right around here for once and gain some credibility. As far as I know you ran Bitmixer's campaign very well... why do you defend such irresponsible behavior and false feedback from yahoo?
Hello,
I just noticed my name is included here, I think that's because I had some huge gaps in post history in 2015-2016. The only sign campaign I can remember I was banned for being inactive was bitmixer.io, and that was when I abruptly become inactive for some months for very important personal reasons.
I am a correct person and i never was considered a spammer or scammed anyone.
Please reconsider your choice, seeing me included in this list is disturbing.
I just noticed my name is included here, I think that's because I had some huge gaps in post history in 2015-2016. The only sign campaign I can remember I was banned for being inactive was bitmixer.io, and that was when I abruptly become inactive for some months for very important personal reasons.
I am a correct person and i never was considered a spammer or scammed anyone.
Please reconsider your choice, seeing me included in this list is disturbing.
However, yahoo clearly gave the feedback about spreading FUD long before any claim about stealing funds was made.
Are you sure? I can't see the timestamp of the rating, and it was modified and re-applied thus I can't say which happened.Lauda, even you must admit delaying payments by 26 hours due to being drunk and hungover is asking to get negative feedback.
No? That would be incompetence and bad priorities. Now, if I were to start going after signature campaign managers for their incompetence then we'd see >90% of them taken down by my ratings. Are you sure we want to be going there? Although FJ might be wrong about the stolen funds, they certainly do not deserve negative feedback simply for reporting misbehavior. Again, that is the whole point of a feedback system to begin with.
He deserves feedback for libel. You can't go around smearing someone's name as you please, especially not without any actual evidence. 
Yahoo take our monies to get druñk.
Is it possible Yahoo has other monies? (Just playing the devil's advocate here lol)
Why you take $5,000 of payment after 24 hour?
No need to start screaming though... He's just a troll... Just forget about him
Regards,
Trump
I should have been clearer.
I am talking about how "actmyname" is trying to claim that yahoo's negative trust is fair due to FJ claiming that yahoo stole funds. Indeed, this is serious as yahoo clearly gave the feedback about spreading FUD long before any claim about stealing funds was made. Something deeper must be going on here as no one can be that stupid, as you say.
The only reason is retaliation for the 100% deserved negative feedback he got. Lauda, even you must admit delaying payments by 26 hours due to being drunk and hungover is asking to get negative feedback. Things like this are the reason feedback exists in the first place. Although FJ might be wrong about the stolen funds (and deserve to get tagged by you), they certainly do not deserve negative feedback simply for reporting misbehavior. Again, that is the whole point of a feedback system to begin with.
so many butthurt people to yahoo lmao. I'm sure people who complain here bcos his main acc in banned list.
Jump to: