These are a few quotes from you. I just didn't feel the need to post whole quotes. But here you go.
But from a compliance perspective
You would be flagged for money laundering immediately
Why would a genuine honest person who purchase 13BTC legally, who can provide proof of funds want to mix and hid the trail of BTC? Nobody legal would.
At best you are wanting to avoid tax, but a mixer would not be required for that.
You are a criminal, possibly a darknet vendor, scammer or hacker. A criminal who takes payment in BTC, the wallet address your BTC is held, is flagged as a dodgy address.
You cannot send it to a legitimate exchange as chain analysis will flag your wallet immediately and alert the compliance department.
My guess is the mixer you used also use chain analysis and saw your a dodgy wallet guy linked to crime.
The criminal had his money confiscated, and nothing you can do.
Live by the sword, die by the sword.
Can we get Mr 13BTC sourced from crime wallet address please? I would like to see
Why would anyone send US$1 x N of Bitcoin to some mixer on internet? Increment N: where's your threshold?
If I have half a million, for example, and I want to spend it... I sure wouldn't want my recipient knowing I have half a million dollars unless the transaction required a majority of the funds.
Exactly. Since the blockchain publicises wallet transaction history, I did not feel comfortable sending smaller transactions to people from the same wallet ID that the coins. Everyone I would send coins to would be able to see my "account balance," if they wanted. That is why privacy is key and I was attracted to the idea of a mixer.
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
Oh, calling Loyce a moron, and we're off to a fantastic start.
For all you know the funds were held by Satoshi Nakamoto.
pre-10 minute edit: What it looks like to me is that somebody wants these coins bad. But what lengths are they willing to go to steal them? Maybe they are already stolen but whoever owns the address is frustrated at the attention they are receiving.
Should I care who Loyce is? Another non complaint privacy advocate who does not adopt AML regulations and apply them to Cryptoassest related businesses? Another person offering services for criminals to launder money? Great one Loyce, I will bow down to you oh holy one, profiting from criminals.
I guess this Mr 13BTC should've washed his 13BTC with, you would have profited from him using your money laundering services, and as you clearly have no systems and controls in place he would have gone undetected with this $600k transaction. You are aware you are a vehicle for money laundering, don't you?
Where is your company registered? Under what regulating body is your country or state regulated by?
Or do you just offer rogue services for criminals?
If I am wrong and darknet vendors, hackers, paedophiles, scammers etc do not use your service. What legitimate person would? And of what reason? Avoid tax at best? Anyone who is avoiding tax does not need a bitcoin mixer.
Just another cog in the wheel of a global crime network, I do not even see your company registration number. So you are no different from those BTC brokers who exchange cash to BTC for criminal gangs taking zero KYC, and complying with any local or international AML guidelines.
Sorry Loyce these noobs who are still stuck in 2014 might look at you as a god on here, but I just see you as a vehicle criminals use to launder money. You are no better than they are, profoting off of their crimes.
Crypto privacy lol, that's horse shit. Anyone who wants privacy has something to hide, and its a public ledger, and with exchanges all becoming compliant, wallets can easily be linked using block chain analysis, score chain etc.
Its people like Mr 13BTC sourced from scams hacking or other crimes need to wash their dirty BTC, so they can put it on an exchange and cash out without trace.
Yeah. That's hardly any accusation.
I am out of here. Don't wanna waste any more brain cells here. Your sockpuppetery isn't helping MrCryptoMixer's case here, let me tell you that.