It says
Quote
I was forced to stop.
So it is not offline, think it just stopped for some reason?
Maybe Frais can explain how and what?
Strange?!?!?!
No PM's possible. So something is very wrong here I suppose...
Topic: NA - page 309. (Read 893613 times)
It says
So it is not offline, think it just stopped for some reason?
Maybe Frais can explain how and what?
Strange?!?!?!
No PM's possible. So something is very wrong here I suppose...
http://guldencoin.network offline?
Bitsms: Cryptocurrency via text message (SMS)
Bitsms is a texting platform for cryptocurrency launched late August 2014. You can send regular text messages to anyone’s mobile phone (or to 100 people in one go if you prefer) and pay for it with Bitcoin, Darkcoin, Guldencoin or Sterlingcoin. But you can also send the aforementioned cryptocurrencies as a gift via sms to anyone’s smartphone along with a personal message.
The price was lowered from €0,21 (+- $0,26) to €0,15 (+- $0,19) per sms. As we were able to negotiate a better deal with our provider which allowed us to lower the price per text for the third time in 3 months.
Now these improvements have been implemented we’re going to expand the check-out system and we are building an API for further use by third-parties such as Bitcoin ATM’s, (online) wallets, pools and many other uses. We’re always trying to add new features, so stay tuned for our upcoming ones!
Feel free to send suggestions and stay in touch through Twitter by following @bitsmscom.
Bitsms is a texting platform for cryptocurrency launched late August 2014. You can send regular text messages to anyone’s mobile phone (or to 100 people in one go if you prefer) and pay for it with Bitcoin, Darkcoin, Guldencoin or Sterlingcoin. But you can also send the aforementioned cryptocurrencies as a gift via sms to anyone’s smartphone along with a personal message.
The price was lowered from €0,21 (+- $0,26) to €0,15 (+- $0,19) per sms. As we were able to negotiate a better deal with our provider which allowed us to lower the price per text for the third time in 3 months.
Now these improvements have been implemented we’re going to expand the check-out system and we are building an API for further use by third-parties such as Bitcoin ATM’s, (online) wallets, pools and many other uses. We’re always trying to add new features, so stay tuned for our upcoming ones!
Feel free to send suggestions and stay in touch through Twitter by following @bitsmscom.
This is so sexy, good to have sterlingcoin on here too. Love the guldencoin community!
The topsection looks great.
The free bitcoin banner is a bit of a disturbing factor? I know perfecting a look of a website takes a lot of time in trials, but its getting better and better, Bram! Compliments!thanks for the compliment http://www.guldencoinlinks.nl/betalen.html
Bitsms: Cryptocurrency via text message (SMS)
Bitsms is a texting platform for cryptocurrency launched late August 2014. You can send regular text messages to anyone’s mobile phone (or to 100 people in one go if you prefer) and pay for it with Bitcoin, Darkcoin, Guldencoin or Sterlingcoin. But you can also send the aforementioned cryptocurrencies as a gift via sms to anyone’s smartphone along with a personal message.
The price was lowered from €0,21 (+- $0,26) to €0,15 (+- $0,19) per sms. As we were able to negotiate a better deal with our provider which allowed us to lower the price per text for the third time in 3 months.
Now these improvements have been implemented we’re going to expand the check-out system and we are building an API for further use by third-parties such as Bitcoin ATM’s, (online) wallets, pools and many other uses. We’re always trying to add new features, so stay tuned for our upcoming ones!
Feel free to send suggestions and stay in touch through Twitter by following @bitsmscom.
Bitsms is a texting platform for cryptocurrency launched late August 2014. You can send regular text messages to anyone’s mobile phone (or to 100 people in one go if you prefer) and pay for it with Bitcoin, Darkcoin, Guldencoin or Sterlingcoin. But you can also send the aforementioned cryptocurrencies as a gift via sms to anyone’s smartphone along with a personal message.
The price was lowered from €0,21 (+- $0,26) to €0,15 (+- $0,19) per sms. As we were able to negotiate a better deal with our provider which allowed us to lower the price per text for the third time in 3 months.
Now these improvements have been implemented we’re going to expand the check-out system and we are building an API for further use by third-parties such as Bitcoin ATM’s, (online) wallets, pools and many other uses. We’re always trying to add new features, so stay tuned for our upcoming ones!
Feel free to send suggestions and stay in touch through Twitter by following @bitsmscom.
The topsection looks great.
The free bitcoin banner is a bit of a disturbing factor? I know perfecting a look of a website takes a lot of time in trials, but its getting better and better, Bram! Compliments! /GJ, you said the large-wave and DIGI functions of the simulator would be about a day's work. Have you been able complete it yet? Not rushing, just haven't seen an update. If not, my offer is still on the table- I'll contact the DIGI devs and ask them to write the custom DIGI code for NLG. Let me know if you want to go that route.
I made great progress on the sim, I have added export to csv (excel) and am working on the simulations (large wave, jump pool).
Great progress, GJ. Almost there I think.
- reducing the block time to 75sec cuts transaction times by greater than 50%, speeding up transactions
- reducing the block reward to 500NLG maintains the current number of NLG minted per 24hrs
- increases the number of diff increments by 100% per 24hrs, from 576 to 1152
- reduces the number of blocks a high-hash-rate attacking miner/multipool can mint by 80%
- these changes support the community vision of NLG becoming a daily use currency
- the only down side of this proposal is that the block chain storage requirement would double, but still be less than most alt-coins
2) DGW3 with adjusted parameters.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9278554
Let the analysing be a fun part of this process, although it takes some time. When the best solution is there it will be highly rewarding.[/list]
Most algorithms that are widely used are subject to multipools.
I would suggest a chain fork onto a less widely used algorithm, take for instance Momentum, or Onecoin version of scrypt-jane. These are great algorithms and if put together with a reasonable difficulty adjustment system can prove pretty great and resilient. Also use of these algos, promotes solo-mining which is the essence of decentralization.
I would suggest a chain fork onto a less widely used algorithm, take for instance Momentum, or Onecoin version of scrypt-jane. These are great algorithms and if put together with a reasonable difficulty adjustment system can prove pretty great and resilient. Also use of these algos, promotes solo-mining which is the essence of decentralization.
/GJ, you said the large-wave and DIGI functions of the simulator would be about a day's work. Have you been able complete it yet? Not rushing, just haven't seen an update. If not, my offer is still on the table- I'll contact the DIGI devs and ask them to write the custom DIGI code for NLG. Let me know if you want to go that route.
I made great progress on the sim, I have added export to csv (excel) and am working on the simulations (large wave, jump pool).
Implementing Digi in NLG isn't even that much work, no need to ask the Digi dev's to do that for us.
What IS a lot of work is proving that Digi will actually protect us from a jumping pool, that's why we need to run these simulations. We need prove that the algorithm adjusts properly, and we must be able to explain HOW and WHY the algorithm is adjusting properly.
Good work, GJ. Might I ask again about Nite's DGW? What would be the problem with that algo? I don't remember if this was looked into or not, just a few posts of discussion. When I was mining UFO coin before the switch from scrypt to neoscrypt, it worked great.
Fuse, maybe you could run a week long sim on that algo for haha's?
Even the miners there are questioning what is happening with CM. Missing payouts, Terk being absent, etc. I don't understand how anyone could run a pool like that and continue to gain miners.
CM has a single point of failure (Terk went missing)? Oh, yes, please. Let CM drop from the planet.
That would be a nice new year's gift!
Even the miners there are questioning what is happening with CM. Missing payouts, Terk being absent, etc. I don't understand how anyone could run a pool like that and continue to gain miners.
CM has a single point of failure (Terk went missing)? Oh, yes, please. Let CM drop from the planet.
I really wonder: GAW's Clever Hashlet......... Is GAW behind this too?
Even the miners there are questioning what is happening with CM. Missing payouts, Terk being absent, etc. I don't understand how anyone could run a pool like that and continue to gain miners.
CM has a single point of failure (Terk went missing)? Oh, yes, please. Let CM drop from the planet.
/GJ, you said the large-wave and DIGI functions of the simulator would be about a day's work. Have you been able complete it yet? Not rushing, just haven't seen an update. If not, my offer is still on the table- I'll contact the DIGI devs and ask them to write the custom DIGI code for NLG. Let me know if you want to go that route.
I made great progress on the sim, I have added export to csv (excel) and am working on the simulations (large wave, jump pool).
Implementing Digi in NLG isn't even that much work, no need to ask the Digi dev's to do that for us.
What IS a lot of work is proving that Digi will actually protect us from a jumping pool, that's why we need to run these simulations. We need prove that the algorithm adjusts properly, and we must be able to explain HOW and WHY the algorithm is adjusting properly.
Sounds good.
I just want to note though, that while the code I provided wasn't 100% correct, the graphs I provided were 100% typical of a DIGI implementation. You will always return to a "baseline" difficulty, rather than a false low caused by the averaging equation. The removal of the false lows are enough to mitigate around 70-80% of CM's influence.
How DIGI works isn't difficult to understand. If nActualTimespan(actual block time) goes over nTargetTimespan(150 seconds in our case), the difficulty goes down proportionately. If nActualTimespan is less than nTargetTimespan, difficulty goes up proportionately. The key difference between DIGI and DGW3, besides the removal of false lows caused by a moving average, is the the immediate retarget instead of a delayed retarget caused by the averaging. I'm sure you know why and how it adjusts properly though... you had it a better understanding of the code in the 20 minutes we chatted than I will probably ever have.
How much data are you looking to collect before you move forward? Also, when will the DIGI port and large-wave code be posted to github for community testing?
-Fuse
/GJ, you said the large-wave and DIGI functions of the simulator would be about a day's work. Have you been able complete it yet? Not rushing, just haven't seen an update. If not, my offer is still on the table- I'll contact the DIGI devs and ask them to write the custom DIGI code for NLG. Let me know if you want to go that route.
I made great progress on the sim, I have added export to csv (excel) and am working on the simulations (large wave, jump pool).
Implementing Digi in NLG isn't even that much work, no need to ask the Digi dev's to do that for us.
What IS a lot of work is proving that Digi will actually protect us from a jumping pool, that's why we need to run these simulations. We need prove that the algorithm adjusts properly, and we must be able to explain HOW and WHY the algorithm is adjusting properly.
Clever is hitting us hard again
Have they ever stopped?
CM is a cancer. Take a look at the last month or so of their forum thread(https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annauto-switch-profit-switch-auto-exchange-pool-cleverminingcom-448649). Even the miners there are questioning what is happening with CM. Missing payouts, Terk being absent, etc. I don't understand how anyone could run a pool like that and continue to gain miners.
/GJ, you said the large-wave and DIGI functions of the simulator would be about a day's work. Have you been able complete it yet? Not rushing, just haven't seen an update. If not, my offer is still on the table- I'll contact the DIGI devs and ask them to write the custom DIGI code for NLG. Let me know if you want to go that route.
-Fuse
Jump to: